State capital meets flagship university in a mid-Michigan corridor
Ingham County anchors a metro where state-government employment and a large student population at Michigan State University consistently push turnout patterns and partisan margins apart from surrounding rural counties.
| County | Pop. | Margin | Dem | Rep | Total | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ingham | 285K | D+29.7 | 94,542 | 50,564 | 148,101 | 14.1% |
| Ingham | 284K | D+29.7 | 94,542 | 50,564 | 148,101 | 14.1% |
| Ingham | 279K | D+29.7 | 94,542 | 50,564 | 148,101 | 14.1% |
| Ingham | 279K | D+29.7 | 94,542 | 50,564 | 148,101 | 14.1% |
| Eaton | 109K | R+3.1 | 31,056 | 33,102 | 65,208 | 6.2% |
| Eaton | 109K | R+3.1 | 31,056 | 33,102 | 65,208 | 6.2% |
| Eaton | 107K | R+3.1 | 31,056 | 33,102 | 65,208 | 6.2% |
| Eaton | 104K | R+3.1 | 31,056 | 33,102 | 65,208 | 6.2% |
| Clinton | 80K | R+8.6 | 22,450 | 26,751 | 49,986 | 4.7% |
| Clinton | 77K | R+8.6 | 22,450 | 26,751 | 49,986 | 4.7% |
| Clinton | 70K | R+8.6 | 22,450 | 26,751 | 49,986 | 4.7% |
| Clinton | 65K | R+8.6 | 22,450 | 26,751 | 49,986 | 4.7% |
| Group | Local | National |
|---|---|---|
▶White (Non-Hispanic)(13) | 78.3% | 57.4% |
▶Black / African American(12) | 8.4% | 12.2% |
▶Hispanic / Latino(19) | 6.0% | 19.3% |
▶Asian(6) | 3.6% | 6.0% |
Multiracial / Other | 3.3% | 4.0% |
▶Middle Eastern / North African(11) | 1.2% | 0.9% |
▶Native American / Alaska Native(4) | 0.4% | 0.9% |
Catholic-Evangelical edge: -12.5pp (vs national 4.5pp). A strongly Evangelical-leaning religious profile, which nationally correlates with Republican-leaning rural and exurban communities.
| Tradition | % Pop | % Adherents | US Pop | US Adherents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.3% | 39.9% | — | — | |
| 11.4% | 31.8% | — | — | |
| 4.7% | 13.1% | — | — | |
| 3.9% | 10.8% | — | — | |
| 1.3% | 3.7% | — | — | |
LDS (Mormon) | 0.7% | 2.0% | — | — |
| 0.2% | 0.7% | — | — | |
Non-religiousPopulation | 64.1% | — | — | — |
Who lives in the Lansing-East Lansing, MI metro area? 1,845,977 residents across 12 counties.
Scale, voting-age share, and this geography's footprint inside the national electorate.
Income, attainment, and ownership indicators that often shape coalition structure and turnout behavior.
Age structure, language use, and nativity signals that explain how this geography differs from state and nation.
| Offices | Margin A | Margin B | Split |
|---|---|---|---|
| President vs Senate | D+14.3 | D+16.5 | 2.2pp |