How did Wichita-Hutchinson Plus vote in the 2024 presidential election?

Wichita-Hutchinson Plus voted Republican in 2024 with a margin of R+33.4. Kamala D Harris received 164,089 votes and Donald Trump received 333,286 out of 506,175 total votes cast, a 1.1-point shift toward Republicans from 2020.

What is Wichita-Hutchinson Plus's political history?

Wichita-Hutchinson Plus has 40 presidential elections on record, spanning 1868 to 2024. It has voted Republican in every presidential election since 1968. The largest single-election swing was 60.4 points in 1932.

What are the demographics of Wichita-Hutchinson Plus?

Wichita-Hutchinson Plus has a population of 4,756,608 according to the 2020 Census. The racial composition is 76.9% non-Hispanic white, 13.0% Hispanic, 4.6% Black. About 25% of residents hold a bachelor's degree or higher. Median household income is $51,000.

Which places are most similar to Wichita-Hutchinson Plus?

Based on demographic and electoral similarity analysis, the three most similar media markets to Wichita-Hutchinson Plus are Lincoln & Hastings-Kearney, Amarillo, Sioux Falls(Mitchell). Similarity is computed using a vector embedding of demographic, economic, and electoral characteristics.

Live · Media market

Wichita-Hutchinson Plus

South-central Kansas's dominant media market, anchored by a mid-sized industrial city

Wichita's aerospace manufacturing base shapes a blue-collar electorate that leans heavily Republican in federal races while occasionally splitting tickets for statewide offices, making margin size rather than outcome the key variable to watch.

Presidential margin · 2024

Data unavailable for this race.

Race data unavailable

Geography

Race data unavailable

No current race for this office.

2024FIPS 678

Population4.8M

Median ageU.S. 38.9y

36.8y▼ 2.1

Bachelor's+U.S. 35%

24.6%▼ 10.4

White76.9%
Hispanic13.0%
Two or more4.9%
Black4.6%
Other4.1%
Asian2.2%
Native0.8%

Trajectory · 2008–2024

Wichita-Hutchinson PlusBaseline

Cycle2024

Open in Cartographer

Constituent Counties

Open in Cartographer

Similarity Explorer

Similar media markets

Reads like Lincoln & Hastings-Kearney, Amarillo, and Sioux Falls(Mitchell).

8 visible matches

Lincoln & Hastings-Kearney

Small-town rural republican 3

Sioux Falls(Mitchell)

Small-town rural republican 3

R+30.4

Similarity score84%

Wichita Falls & Lawton

Small-town rural republican

Small-town rural republican 3

R+31.9

Similarity score82%

Constituent Geography

Counties in Wichita-Hutchinson Plus

2024 presidential results across the counties that make up this geography.

Sort:

County	Pop.	Margin	Dem	Rep	Total	Share
Sedgwick	528K	R+13.8	90,506	120,118	214,152	10.6%
Sedgwick	508K	R+13.8	90,506	120,118	214,152	10.6%
Sedgwick	476K	R+13.8	90,506	120,118	214,152	10.6%
Sedgwick	453K	R+13.8	90,506	120,118	214,152	10.6%
Butler	68K	R+41.2	9,150	22,426	32,236	1.6%
Butler	66K	R+41.2	9,150	22,426	32,236	1.6%
Reno	65K	R+34.5	8,554	17,847	26,940	1.3%
Reno	64K	R+34.5	8,554	17,847	26,940	1.3%
Reno	63K	R+34.5	8,554	17,847	26,940	1.3%
Butler	63K	R+41.2	9,150	22,426	32,236	1.6%
Reno	62K	R+34.5	8,554	17,847	26,940	1.3%
Butler	59K	R+41.2	9,150	22,426	32,236	1.6%
Saline	56K	R+32.1	7,827	15,425	23,685	1.2%
Saline	54K	R+32.1	7,827	15,425	23,685	1.2%
Saline	54K	R+32.1	7,827	15,425	23,685	1.2%
Saline	54K	R+32.1	7,827	15,425	23,685	1.2%
Finney	41K	R+34.7	3,425	7,166	10,782	0.5%
Finney	41K	R+34.7	3,425	7,166	10,782	0.5%
Finney	38K	R+34.7	3,425	7,166	10,782	0.5%
Finney	37K	R+34.7	3,425	7,166	10,782	0.5%
Cowley	36K	R+40.3	3,919	9,360	13,505	0.7%
Cowley	36K	R+40.3	3,919	9,360	13,505	0.7%
Harvey	35K	R+21.1	6,202	9,591	16,086	0.8%
Ford	34K	R+38.4	2,461	5,616	8,224	0.4%
Cowley	34K	R+40.3	3,919	9,360	13,505	0.7%
Ford	34K	R+38.4	2,461	5,616	8,224	0.4%
Cowley	34K	R+40.3	3,919	9,360	13,505	0.7%
Harvey	34K	R+21.1	6,202	9,591	16,086	0.8%
Harvey	34K	R+21.1	6,202	9,591	16,086	0.8%
Harvey	33K	R+21.1	6,202	9,591	16,086	0.8%
Ford	33K	R+38.4	2,461	5,616	8,224	0.4%
Ford	32K	R+38.4	2,461	5,616	8,224	0.4%
McPherson	30K	R+41.1	4,021	9,816	14,104	0.7%
McPherson	30K	R+41.1	4,021	9,816	14,104	0.7%
McPherson	29K	R+41.1	4,021	9,816	14,104	0.7%
Ellis	29K	R+46.1	3,511	9,743	13,511	0.7%
McPherson	29K	R+41.1	4,021	9,816	14,104	0.7%
Ellis	29K	R+46.1	3,511	9,743	13,511	0.7%
Barton	28K	R+56.8	2,207	8,205	10,570	0.5%
Barton	28K	R+56.8	2,207	8,205	10,570	0.5%
Ellis	28K	R+46.1	3,511	9,743	13,511	0.7%
Ellis	27K	R+46.1	3,511	9,743	13,511	0.7%
Barton	27K	R+56.8	2,207	8,205	10,570	0.5%
Sumner	26K	R+50.1	2,527	7,810	10,549	0.5%
Barton	25K	R+56.8	2,207	8,205	10,570	0.5%
Sumner	24K	R+50.1	2,527	7,810	10,549	0.5%
Sumner	24K	R+50.1	2,527	7,810	10,549	0.5%
Seward	23K	R+39.0	1,354	3,133	4,565	0.2%
Seward	23K	R+39.0	1,354	3,133	4,565	0.2%
Seward	23K	R+39.0	1,354	3,133	4,565	0.2%
Sumner	22K	R+50.1	2,527	7,810	10,549	0.5%
Seward	21K	R+39.0	1,354	3,133	4,565	0.2%
Dickinson	19K	R+55.0	1,989	7,014	9,144	0.5%
Dickinson	19K	R+55.0	1,989	7,014	9,144	0.5%
Dickinson	19K	R+55.0	1,989	7,014	9,144	0.5%
Dickinson	18K	R+55.0	1,989	7,014	9,144	0.5%
Marion	13K	R+49.1	1,429	4,312	5,870	0.3%
Marion	12K	R+49.1	1,429	4,312	5,870	0.3%
Marion	12K	R+49.1	1,429	4,312	5,870	0.3%
Marion	12K	R+49.1	1,429	4,312	5,870	0.3%
Rice	11K	R+56.7	825	3,073	3,966	0.2%
Rice	10K	R+56.7	825	3,073	3,966	0.2%
Rice	10K	R+56.7	825	3,073	3,966	0.2%
Pratt	10K	R+51.5	954	3,054	4,082	0.2%
Pratt	10K	R+51.5	954	3,054	4,082	0.2%
Pratt	9K	R+51.5	954	3,054	4,082	0.2%
Rice	9K	R+56.7	825	3,073	3,966	0.2%
Pratt	9K	R+51.5	954	3,054	4,082	0.2%
Kingman	9K	R+59.9	753	3,119	3,947	0.2%
Thomas	8K	R+65.8	597	3,007	3,664	0.2%
Thomas	8K	R+65.8	597	3,007	3,664	0.2%
Grant	8K	R+63.0	395	1,793	2,220	0.1%
Thomas	8K	R+65.8	597	3,007	3,664	0.2%
Kingman	8K	R+59.9	753	3,119	3,947	0.2%
Grant	8K	R+63.0	395	1,793	2,220	0.1%
Kingman	8K	R+59.9	753	3,119	3,947	0.2%
Greenwood	8K	R+61.0	541	2,299	2,884	0.1%
Thomas	7K	R+65.8	597	3,007	3,664	0.2%
Grant	7K	R+63.0	395	1,793	2,220	0.1%
Russell	7K	R+61.3	608	2,632	3,301	0.2%
Pawnee	7K	R+51.5	625	2,003	2,675	0.1%
Grant	7K	R+63.0	395	1,793	2,220	0.1%
Kingman	7K	R+59.9	753	3,119	3,947	0.2%
Russell	7K	R+61.3	608	2,632	3,301	0.2%
Mitchell	7K	R+65.6	528	2,608	3,172	0.2%
Greenwood	7K	R+61.0	541	2,299	2,884	0.1%
Pawnee	7K	R+51.5	625	2,003	2,675	0.1%
Sherman	7K	R+68.7	379	2,161	2,593	0.1%
Russell	7K	R+61.3	608	2,632	3,301	0.2%
Russell	7K	R+61.3	608	2,632	3,301	0.2%
Harper	7K	R+64.0	437	2,072	2,555	0.1%
Ellsworth	7K	R+52.3	636	2,078	2,758	0.1%
Pawnee	6K	R+51.5	625	2,003	2,675	0.1%
Ellsworth	6K	R+52.3	636	2,078	2,758	0.1%
Ellsworth	6K	R+52.3	636	2,078	2,758	0.1%
Mitchell	6K	R+65.6	528	2,608	3,172	0.2%
Greenwood	6K	R+61.0	541	2,299	2,884	0.1%
Mitchell	6K	R+65.6	528	2,608	3,172	0.2%
Ellsworth	6K	R+52.3	636	2,078	2,758	0.1%
Ottawa	6K	R+66.6	476	2,475	3,003	0.1%
Pawnee	6K	R+51.5	625	2,003	2,675	0.1%
Sherman	6K	R+68.7	379	2,161	2,593	0.1%
Gray	6K	R+69.0	324	1,837	2,193	0.1%
Ottawa	6K	R+66.6	476	2,475	3,003	0.1%
Ottawa	6K	R+66.6	476	2,475	3,003	0.1%
Norton	6K	R+67.7	346	1,882	2,270	0.1%
Greenwood	6K	R+61.0	541	2,299	2,884	0.1%
Sherman	6K	R+68.7	379	2,161	2,593	0.1%
Gray	6K	R+69.0	324	1,837	2,193	0.1%
Gray	6K	R+69.0	324	1,837	2,193	0.1%
Sherman	6K	R+68.7	379	2,161	2,593	0.1%
Ottawa	6K	R+66.6	476	2,475	3,003	0.1%
Harper	6K	R+64.0	437	2,072	2,555	0.1%
Harper	6K	R+64.0	437	2,072	2,555	0.1%
Mitchell	6K	R+65.6	528	2,608	3,172	0.2%
Stevens	6K	R+75.5	210	1,595	1,835	0.1%
Gray	6K	R+69.0	324	1,837	2,193	0.1%
Rooks	6K	R+71.2	349	2,153	2,534	0.1%
Norton	6K	R+67.7	346	1,882	2,270	0.1%
Stevens	5K	R+75.5	210	1,595	1,835	0.1%
Norton	5K	R+67.7	346	1,882	2,270	0.1%
Harper	5K	R+64.0	437	2,072	2,555	0.1%
Norton	5K	R+67.7	346	1,882	2,270	0.1%
Barber	5K	R+72.2	288	1,854	2,170	0.1%
Stevens	5K	R+75.5	210	1,595	1,835	0.1%
Rooks	5K	R+71.2	349	2,153	2,534	0.1%
Stevens	5K	R+75.5	210	1,595	1,835	0.1%
Rooks	5K	R+71.2	349	2,153	2,534	0.1%
Scott	5K	R+74.7	248	1,843	2,135	0.1%
Scott	5K	R+74.7	248	1,843	2,135	0.1%
Scott	5K	R+74.7	248	1,843	2,135	0.1%
Barber	5K	R+72.2	288	1,854	2,170	0.1%
Rooks	5K	R+71.2	349	2,153	2,534	0.1%
Stafford	5K	R+64.0	326	1,548	1,909	0.1%
Barber	5K	R+72.2	288	1,854	2,170	0.1%
Scott	5K	R+74.7	248	1,843	2,135	0.1%
Meade	5K	R+69.6	247	1,427	1,695	0.1%
Kearny	5K	R+68.4	192	1,082	1,301	0.1%
Osborne	4K	R+68.5	261	1,477	1,774	0.1%
Meade	4K	R+69.6	247	1,427	1,695	0.1%
Stafford	4K	R+64.0	326	1,548	1,909	0.1%
Meade	4K	R+69.6	247	1,427	1,695	0.1%
Haskell	4K	R+64.5	221	1,045	1,278	0.1%
Stafford	4K	R+64.0	326	1,548	1,909	0.1%
Kearny	4K	R+68.4	192	1,082	1,301	0.1%
Haskell	4K	R+64.5	221	1,045	1,278	0.1%
Barber	4K	R+72.2	288	1,854	2,170	0.1%
Haskell	4K	R+64.5	221	1,045	1,278	0.1%
Stafford	4K	R+64.0	326	1,548	1,909	0.1%
Kearny	4K	R+68.4	192	1,082	1,301	0.1%
Meade	4K	R+69.6	247	1,427	1,695	0.1%
Osborne	4K	R+68.5	261	1,477	1,774	0.1%
Kearny	4K	R+68.4	192	1,082	1,301	0.1%
Osborne	4K	R+68.5	261	1,477	1,774	0.1%
Haskell	4K	R+64.5	221	1,045	1,278	0.1%
Lincoln	4K	R+65.2	250	1,233	1,507	0.1%
Rush	4K	R+65.4	264	1,315	1,606	0.1%
Morton	3K	R+73.4	131	909	1,060	0.1%
Decatur	3K	R+69.0	215	1,217	1,452	0.1%
Ness	3K	R+78.9	129	1,205	1,363	0.1%
Osborne	3K	R+68.5	261	1,477	1,774	0.1%
Edwards	3K	R+65.3	213	1,042	1,269	0.1%
Trego	3K	R+71.0	216	1,343	1,587	0.1%
Kiowa	3K	R+71.4	151	941	1,107	0.1%
Elk	3K	R+69.7	191	1,123	1,338	0.1%
Lincoln	3K	R+65.2	250	1,233	1,507	0.1%
Rush	3K	R+65.4	264	1,315	1,606	0.1%
Cheyenne	3K	R+68.8	206	1,185	1,422	0.1%
Rush	3K	R+65.4	264	1,315	1,606	0.1%
Lincoln	3K	R+65.2	250	1,233	1,507	0.1%
Edwards	3K	R+65.3	213	1,042	1,269	0.1%
Morton	3K	R+73.4	131	909	1,060	0.1%
Gove	3K	R+77.2	150	1,227	1,396	0.1%
Ness	3K	R+78.9	129	1,205	1,363	0.1%
Logan	3K	R+71.6	183	1,186	1,400	0.1%
Morton	3K	R+73.4	131	909	1,060	0.1%
Chase	3K	R+50.8	348	1,090	1,462	0.1%
Elk	3K	R+69.7	191	1,123	1,338	0.1%
Edwards	3K	R+65.3	213	1,042	1,269	0.1%
Rawlins	3K	R+72.6	176	1,194	1,403	0.1%
Decatur	3K	R+69.0	215	1,217	1,452	0.1%
Trego	3K	R+71.0	216	1,343	1,587	0.1%
Ness	3K	R+78.9	129	1,205	1,363	0.1%
Rush	3K	R+65.4	264	1,315	1,606	0.1%
Graham	3K	R+65.7	210	1,055	1,287	0.1%
Trego	3K	R+71.0	216	1,343	1,587	0.1%
Lincoln	3K	R+65.2	250	1,233	1,507	0.1%
Decatur	3K	R+69.0	215	1,217	1,452	0.1%
Chase	3K	R+50.8	348	1,090	1,462	0.1%
Sheridan	3K	R+80.3	126	1,229	1,373	0.1%
Logan	3K	R+71.6	183	1,186	1,400	0.1%
Gove	3K	R+77.2	150	1,227	1,396	0.1%
Edwards	3K	R+65.3	213	1,042	1,269	0.1%
Trego	3K	R+71.0	216	1,343	1,587	0.1%
Cheyenne	3K	R+68.8	206	1,185	1,422	0.1%
Decatur	3K	R+69.0	215	1,217	1,452	0.1%
Logan	3K	R+71.6	183	1,186	1,400	0.1%
Chase	3K	R+50.8	348	1,090	1,462	0.1%
Gove	3K	R+77.2	150	1,227	1,396	0.1%
Cheyenne	3K	R+68.8	206	1,185	1,422	0.1%
Hamilton	3K	R+66.3	131	671	815	0.0%
Ness	3K	R+78.9	129	1,205	1,363	0.1%
Kiowa	3K	R+71.4	151	941	1,107	0.1%
Logan	3K	R+71.6	183	1,186	1,400	0.1%
Elk	3K	R+69.7	191	1,123	1,338	0.1%
Cheyenne	3K	R+68.8	206	1,185	1,422	0.1%
Morton	3K	R+73.4	131	909	1,060	0.1%
Gove	3K	R+77.2	150	1,227	1,396	0.1%
Hamilton	3K	R+66.3	131	671	815	0.0%
Graham	3K	R+65.7	210	1,055	1,287	0.1%
Hamilton	3K	R+66.3	131	671	815	0.0%
Graham	3K	R+65.7	210	1,055	1,287	0.1%
Chase	3K	R+50.8	348	1,090	1,462	0.1%
Rawlins	3K	R+72.6	176	1,194	1,403	0.1%
Wichita	3K	R+73.6	107	740	860	0.0%
Sheridan	3K	R+80.3	126	1,229	1,373	0.1%
Kiowa	3K	R+71.4	151	941	1,107	0.1%
Rawlins	3K	R+72.6	176	1,194	1,403	0.1%
Rawlins	3K	R+72.6	176	1,194	1,403	0.1%
Sheridan	2K	R+80.3	126	1,229	1,373	0.1%
Hamilton	2K	R+66.3	131	671	815	0.0%
Elk	2K	R+69.7	191	1,123	1,338	0.1%
Sheridan	2K	R+80.3	126	1,229	1,373	0.1%
Kiowa	2K	R+71.4	151	941	1,107	0.1%
Stanton	2K	R+63.5	115	537	664	0.0%
Clark	2K	R+72.8	129	867	1,014	0.1%
Graham	2K	R+65.7	210	1,055	1,287	0.1%
Dundy	2K	R+78.9	96	829	929	0.0%
Wichita	2K	R+73.6	107	740	860	0.0%
Wichita	2K	R+73.6	107	740	860	0.0%
Lane	2K	R+70.9	111	709	843	0.0%
Stanton	2K	R+63.5	115	537	664	0.0%
Clark	2K	R+72.8	129	867	1,014	0.1%
Clark	2K	R+72.8	129	867	1,014	0.1%
Stanton	2K	R+63.5	115	537	664	0.0%
Wichita	2K	R+73.6	107	740	860	0.0%
Hodgeman	2K	R+70.5	136	817	966	0.0%
Stanton	2K	R+63.5	115	537	664	0.0%
Clark	2K	R+72.8	129	867	1,014	0.1%
Comanche	2K	R+68.3	130	727	874	0.0%
Hodgeman	2K	R+70.5	136	817	966	0.0%
Dundy	2K	R+78.9	96	829	929	0.0%
Hodgeman	2K	R+70.5	136	817	966	0.0%
Comanche	2K	R+68.3	130	727	874	0.0%
Comanche	2K	R+68.3	130	727	874	0.0%
Dundy	2K	R+78.9	96	829	929	0.0%
Wallace	2K	R+84.8	52	686	748	0.0%
Dundy	2K	R+78.9	96	829	929	0.0%
Comanche	2K	R+68.3	130	727	874	0.0%
Lane	2K	R+70.9	111	709	843	0.0%
Lane	2K	R+70.9	111	709	843	0.0%
Hodgeman	2K	R+70.5	136	817	966	0.0%
Wallace	2K	R+84.8	52	686	748	0.0%
Wallace	2K	R+84.8	52	686	748	0.0%
Greeley	2K	R+73.4	75	510	593	0.0%
Lane	1K	R+70.9	111	709	843	0.0%
Wallace	1K	R+84.8	52	686	748	0.0%
Greeley	1K	R+73.4	75	510	593	0.0%
Greeley	1K	R+73.4	75	510	593	0.0%
Greeley	1K	R+73.4	75	510	593	0.0%

260 countiesTotal votes: 2,024,700

Historian Query

Ask the Historian

Explore Wichita-Hutchinson Plus's political evolution with the Historian

“How has the Wichita-Hutchinson Plus media market voted in presidential elections?”

Race & Ancestry

Who Lives Here

A race-first Census view with ancestry expansion where source coverage is strong enough to support detail.

Wichita-Hutchinson PlusCensus ACS 2024Ancestry detail available

Census race profile

Major Census race and ethnicity groups shown as a share of total population.

Expand rows for ancestry detail

White (Non-Hispanic) 76.9%Hispanic 13.0%Black 4.6%Multiracial 2.4%Asian 2.2%Native American 0.8%

Group	Local	National
▶White (Non-Hispanic)(13)	76.9%	57.4%
▶Hispanic / Latino(19)	13.0%	19.3%
▶Black / African American(11)	4.6%	12.2%
Multiracial / Other	2.4%	4.0%
▶Asian(6)	2.2%	6.0%
▶Native American / Alaska Native(6)	0.8%	0.9%
▶Middle Eastern / North African(10)	0.4%	0.9%

Method notes

Census treats race and Hispanic/Latino origin as separate questions. Race categories other than Hispanic reflect total populations (small Hispanic overlap in Black, Asian, AIAN, NHPI). “Multiracial / Other” is derived as a non-overlapping remainder.

Click rows to expand ancestry detail. Ancestry from ACS B04006, B03001, B02020, B02016. Totals may differ from race — individuals can report multiple ancestries.

Black / African American (estimated remainder) is derived as Black population share minus reported Sub-Saharan African and West Indian ancestry. It is shown as an estimated ancestry detail, not a standalone Census ancestry category.

MENA estimated from ancestry reporting — Census does not have a separate MENA race category. Not shown in bar (overlaps with other race groups).

Religious Adherents

Population that are religious adherents:

48.7%(587.9K people)

U.S. Religion Census 2020

Browse all religions

Catholic-Evangelical edge: -14.0pp (vs national 4.5pp). A strongly Evangelical-leaning religious profile, which nationally correlates with Republican-leaning rural and exurban communities.

Ecological pattern — how to read this

Reflects patterns in counties where this religious tradition concentrates — not a claim about individual voters.

Values are derived by joining Religion Census 2020 (U.S. Religion Data Archive) with certified election results at the county level. That means we know what counties with more or fewer of this group did — not how any individual voted.

This is known as ecological inference. It is a valid way to surface geographic correlation but must not be read as a personal-vote claim about anyone in the group.

Tradition	% Pop	% Adherents	US Pop	US Adherents
Evangelical Protestant	19.5%	40.0%	—	—
Catholic	14.9%	30.5%	—	—
Mainline Protestant	10.1%	20.8%	—	—
Other	2.4%	5.0%	—	—
Black Protestant	1.7%	3.4%	—	—
LDS (Mormon)	1.2%	2.4%	—	—
Orthodox Christian	0.1%	0.2%	—	—
Non-religiousPopulation	51.3%	—	—	—

Click the chevron to expand denominations. Tradition and denomination rows label both share of total population and share of all religious adherents. Non-religious is shown as a share of total population only.

Explore Evangelical Protestant adherence nationally

Who lives in the Wichita-Hutchinson Plus media market? 4,756,608 residents across 260 counties.

Demographic Comparison

Demographics

Read this geography's profile in three layers: local, state (where available), and national baseline.

Export CSVPro

Wichita-Hutchinson Plus vs National4.8M residents

25% of adults hold a bachelor's degree — 8pp below the national average. Places with similar education levels vote R+9 on average nationally.

Population & electorate

Scale, voting-age share, and this geography's footprint inside the national electorate.

Total population

Local vs state vs U.S.

4.8M

local

4.8MNational 334.9M

Share of U.S. population

Local vs state vs U.S.

1.42%

local

1.42%National 100%

Voting-age population

Local vs state vs U.S.

36.8%

local

36.8%National 75.7%

Economic profile

Income, attainment, and ownership indicators that often shape coalition structure and turnout behavior.

Median household income

Local vs state vs U.S.

$51,000

local

$51,000National $83,960

Poverty rate

Local vs state vs U.S.

12.2%

local

12.2%National 12.5%

College degree

Local vs state vs U.S.

24.6%

local

24.6%National 35.6%

Homeownership

Local vs state vs U.S.

69.0%

local

69.0%National 65.2%

Community profile

Age structure, language use, and nativity signals that explain how this geography differs from state and nation.

Median age

Local vs state vs U.S.

36.8 yrs

local

36.8 yrsNational 39.1 yrs

Age 18–29

Local vs state vs U.S.

12.0%

local

12.0%National 15.7%

Age 65+

Local vs state vs U.S.

11.7%

local

11.7%National 17.0%

Foreign born

Local vs state vs U.S.

6.9%

local

6.9%National 14.1%

Non-English at home

Local vs state vs U.S.

12.4%

local

12.4%National 22.2%

English only

Local vs state vs U.S.

87.6%

local

87.6%National 77.8%

Voter Turnout

Turnout in Wichita-Hutchinson Plus

Turnout % = votes cast ÷ citizen voting-age population (CVAP). Source: CVAP Special Tab 2020-2024.

2024 Turnout

58.7%

vs Previous

-0.9pp

Eligible Non-Voters

357K · 41.3%

Citizen VAP

862,727

History

1988–2024

Ticket-Splitting

Do voters in Wichita-Hutchinson Plus split their tickets?

Divergence between offices in the same election reveals persuadable voters.

ConsistencyHeavy splitting (0/100)

2024 Office Comparisons

Offices	Margin A	Margin B	Split
President vs Senate	R+33.4	R+82.7	49.3pp

Average divergence across office pairs: 29.1pp

Containing Geography

Located In

Wichita-Hutchinson Plus sits inside these higher-level geographies.

Kansas(State)Nebraska(State)

Upgrade Path

Unlock Media Market Analytics

Advance from the public dossier into precinct-level, insight-rich district intelligence.

Target plan Pro$33/mo

Precinct data, Smart Insights, full history, and export controls tailored to place pages.

Precinct-Level Data

See results for every neighborhood and voting precinct

Smart Insights

Automated highlights from recent election patterns

Full Historical Access

165 years of election data at every level of geography

CSV Exports

Download any table or chart as a CSV file

Upgrade to Pro$33/mo