- Lead
- 20,323
- Total
- 163,163
- vs nation
- R+11.0
- Turnout
- 59.5%
Allen County, IN
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 59.5% of 278,785 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 18,894
- Total
- 169,082
- vs nation
- R+15.6
- Turnout
- 65.0%
- Lead
- 28,579
- Total
- 148,343
- vs nation
- R+21.4
- Turnout
- 58.8%
- Lead
- 24,577
- Total
- 147,246
- vs nation
- R+20.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,530
- Total
- 150,324
- vs nation
- R+11.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 35,303
- Total
- 129,609
- vs nation
- R+24.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 28,790
- Total
- 114,320
- vs nation
- R+25.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 17,805
- Total
- 110,645
- vs nation
- R+24.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+12.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 392,3782024 5-year
- Population density
- 597 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 657 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $70,7372024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 69.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 10.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 9.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+28.2 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+39.1 in 1956MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Sedgwick County, KS · twin score 87.1
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 59.5%165,941 participants ÷ 278,785 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +27.2 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- +2.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 32.3%–46.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 165,941 | 278,785 ± 1,403 | 59.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 103,730 | 274,419 ± 1,204 | 37.8% | Audited | A/A |
| 173,707 | 267,051 ± 1,179 | 65.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 156,134 | 262,800 ± 1,050 | 59.4% | Audited | A/A |
| 151,792 | 258,252 ± 1,050 | 58.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 147,246 | 249,708 | 59.0% | Derived | — | |
| 150,324 | 245,196 | 61.3% | Derived | — | |
| 129,609 | 240,684 extrapolated | 53.9% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Allen County only. The complete district District 3 result is shown below for comparison.
Allen County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
District District 3 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 277 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
277 precincts · 163,650 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -WASHINGTON FWASHINGTON F | 693 | 893 | 30 | 1,616 | 42.9% | 55.3% | R+12.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -NH 2ANH 2A | 485 | 934 | 21 | 1,440 | 33.7% | 64.9% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -PERRY LPERRY L | 560 | 825 | 29 | 1,414 | 39.6% | 58.3% | R+18.7 |
| Precinct -ABOITE JABOITE J | 547 | 803 | 25 | 1,375 | 39.8% | 58.4% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -HUNTERTOWN FHUNTERTOWN F | 537 | 778 | 29 | 1,344 | 40.0% | 57.9% | R+17.9 |
| Precinct -LAFAYETTE ALAFAYETTE A | 480 | 770 | 27 | 1,277 | 37.6% | 60.3% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -MILANMILAN | 233 | 1,001 | 21 | 1,255 | 18.6% | 79.8% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -ST JOE GST JOE G | 392 | 826 | 12 | 1,230 | 31.9% | 67.2% | R+35.3 |
| Precinct -LEO-CEDARVILLE ALEO-CEDARVILLE A | 324 | 874 | 18 | 1,216 | 26.6% | 71.9% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -HUNTERTOWN DHUNTERTOWN D | 378 | 814 | 23 | 1,215 | 31.1% | 67.0% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct -370370 | 528 | 643 | 30 | 1,201 | 44.0% | 53.5% | R+9.6 |
| Precinct -170170 | 541 | 594 | 30 | 1,165 | 46.4% | 51.0% | R+4.5 |
| Precinct -EEL RIVER BEEL RIVER B | 261 | 879 | 23 | 1,163 | 22.4% | 75.6% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -ABOITE OABOITE O | 502 | 629 | 19 | 1,150 | 43.7% | 54.7% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY DPERRY D | 400 | 721 | 22 | 1,143 | 35.0% | 63.1% | R+28.1 |
| Precinct -ABOITE TABOITE T | 463 | 638 | 28 | 1,129 | 41.0% | 56.5% | R+15.5 |
| Precinct -180180 | 423 | 672 | 29 | 1,124 | 37.6% | 59.8% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -PERRY SPERRY S | 420 | 680 | 23 | 1,123 | 37.4% | 60.6% | R+23.2 |
| Precinct -ABOITE UABOITE U | 437 | 676 | 8 | 1,121 | 39.0% | 60.3% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -CEDAR CREEK DCEDAR CREEK D | 304 | 798 | 17 | 1,119 | 27.2% | 71.3% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -322322 | 437 | 651 | 21 | 1,109 | 39.4% | 58.7% | R+19.3 |
| Precinct -474474 | 465 | 614 | 23 | 1,102 | 42.2% | 55.7% | R+13.5 |
| Precinct -452452 | 510 | 574 | 15 | 1,099 | 46.4% | 52.2% | R+5.8 |
| Precinct -285285 | 389 | 691 | 15 | 1,095 | 35.5% | 63.1% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -487487 | 462 | 602 | 31 | 1,095 | 42.2% | 55.0% | R+12.8 |
| Precinct -CEDAR CREEK ACEDAR CREEK A | 242 | 824 | 11 | 1,077 | 22.5% | 76.5% | R+54.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY NPERRY N | 375 | 679 | 18 | 1,072 | 35.0% | 63.3% | R+28.4 |
| Precinct -ABOITE BABOITE B | 385 | 647 | 24 | 1,056 | 36.5% | 61.3% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct -PERRY BPERRY B | 320 | 674 | 23 | 1,017 | 31.5% | 66.3% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -HUNTERTOWN GHUNTERTOWN G | 303 | 687 | 12 | 1,002 | 30.2% | 68.6% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -LAKE BLAKE B | 319 | 662 | 18 | 999 | 31.9% | 66.3% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -CEDAR CREEK ECEDAR CREEK E | 277 | 690 | 25 | 992 | 27.9% | 69.6% | R+41.6 |
| Precinct -163163 | 382 | 566 | 18 | 966 | 39.5% | 58.6% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -289289 | 399 | 537 | 21 | 957 | 41.7% | 56.1% | R+14.4 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONJEFFERSON | 173 | 768 | 15 | 956 | 18.1% | 80.3% | R+62.2 |
| Precinct -190190 | 397 | 544 | 11 | 952 | 41.7% | 57.1% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -ABOITE CABOITE C | 350 | 570 | 26 | 946 | 37.0% | 60.3% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -177177 | 445 | 478 | 19 | 942 | 47.2% | 50.7% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -PERRY HPERRY H | 277 | 629 | 16 | 922 | 30.0% | 68.2% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -260260 | 479 | 419 | 17 | 915 | 52.3% | 45.8% | D+6.6 |
| Precinct -516516 | 663 | 236 | 13 | 912 | 72.7% | 25.9% | D+46.8 |
| Precinct -205205 | 492 | 384 | 33 | 909 | 54.1% | 42.2% | D+11.9 |
| Precinct -486486 | 380 | 506 | 19 | 905 | 42.0% | 55.9% | R+13.9 |
| Precinct -MADISONMADISON | 161 | 726 | 13 | 900 | 17.9% | 80.7% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -257257 | 377 | 498 | 15 | 890 | 42.4% | 56.0% | R+13.6 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON EWASHINGTON E | 333 | 535 | 19 | 887 | 37.5% | 60.3% | R+22.8 |
| Precinct -LEO CEDARVILLE BLEO CEDARVILLE B | 177 | 665 | 31 | 873 | 20.3% | 76.2% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -186186 | 314 | 538 | 19 | 871 | 36.1% | 61.8% | R+25.7 |
| Precinct -371371 | 331 | 518 | 21 | 870 | 38.0% | 59.5% | R+21.5 |
| Precinct -CEDAR CREEK BCEDAR CREEK B | 142 | 689 | 29 | 860 | 16.5% | 80.1% | R+63.6 |
| Precinct -457457 | 391 | 450 | 15 | 856 | 45.7% | 52.6% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -PERRY OPERRY O | 249 | 578 | 21 | 848 | 29.4% | 68.2% | R+38.8 |
| Precinct -194194 | 349 | 466 | 15 | 830 | 42.0% | 56.1% | R+14.1 |
| Precinct -NH 3BNH 3B | 250 | 560 | 13 | 823 | 30.4% | 68.0% | R+37.7 |
| Precinct -473473 | 357 | 446 | 16 | 819 | 43.6% | 54.5% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -HUNTERTOWN BHUNTERTOWN B | 248 | 558 | 12 | 818 | 30.3% | 68.2% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct -306306 | 338 | 459 | 20 | 817 | 41.4% | 56.2% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct -ST JOE BST JOE B | 318 | 468 | 18 | 804 | 39.6% | 58.2% | R+18.7 |
| Precinct -189189 | 284 | 511 | 8 | 803 | 35.4% | 63.6% | R+28.3 |
| Precinct -NH 1NH 1 | 256 | 513 | 19 | 788 | 32.5% | 65.1% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -207207 | 433 | 333 | 20 | 786 | 55.1% | 42.4% | D+12.7 |
| Precinct -454454 | 312 | 464 | 9 | 785 | 39.7% | 59.1% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -NH 4ANH 4A | 275 | 497 | 13 | 785 | 35.0% | 63.3% | R+28.3 |
| Precinct -ABOITE NABOITE N | 304 | 462 | 16 | 782 | 38.9% | 59.1% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -554554 | 507 | 246 | 24 | 777 | 65.3% | 31.7% | D+33.6 |
| Precinct -303303 | 317 | 441 | 15 | 773 | 41.0% | 57.1% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -204204 | 378 | 365 | 23 | 766 | 49.3% | 47.7% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -185185 | 334 | 418 | 12 | 764 | 43.7% | 54.7% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -482482 | 389 | 355 | 9 | 753 | 51.7% | 47.1% | D+4.5 |
| Precinct -360360 | 292 | 440 | 19 | 751 | 38.9% | 58.6% | R+19.7 |
| Precinct -179179 | 308 | 428 | 11 | 747 | 41.2% | 57.3% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -HUNTERTOWN ERHUNTERTOWN ER | 290 | 444 | 11 | 745 | 38.9% | 59.6% | R+20.7 |
| Precinct -477477 | 342 | 373 | 21 | 736 | 46.5% | 50.7% | R+4.2 |
| Precinct -188188 | 236 | 483 | 15 | 734 | 32.2% | 65.8% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct -166166 | 314 | 400 | 16 | 730 | 43.0% | 54.8% | R+11.8 |
| Precinct -316316 | 291 | 425 | 12 | 728 | 40.0% | 58.4% | R+18.4 |
| Precinct -320320 | 277 | 434 | 16 | 727 | 38.1% | 59.7% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -287287 | 221 | 489 | 16 | 726 | 30.4% | 67.4% | R+36.9 |
| Precinct -485485 | 322 | 392 | 11 | 725 | 44.4% | 54.1% | R+9.7 |
| Precinct -EEL RIVER AEEL RIVER A | 156 | 552 | 15 | 723 | 21.6% | 76.3% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct -399399 | 231 | 466 | 18 | 715 | 32.3% | 65.2% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -309309 | 296 | 393 | 21 | 710 | 41.7% | 55.4% | R+13.7 |
| Precinct -SPRINGFIELD BSPRINGFIELD B | 140 | 554 | 13 | 707 | 19.8% | 78.4% | R+58.6 |
| Precinct -HUNTERTOWN AHUNTERTOWN A | 244 | 448 | 14 | 706 | 34.6% | 63.5% | R+28.9 |
| Precinct -MARION CMARION C | 197 | 492 | 17 | 706 | 27.9% | 69.7% | R+41.8 |
| Precinct -NH 3ANH 3A | 227 | 467 | 12 | 706 | 32.2% | 66.1% | R+34.0 |
| Precinct -172172 | 321 | 367 | 14 | 702 | 45.7% | 52.3% | R+6.6 |
| Precinct -178178 | 306 | 379 | 15 | 700 | 43.7% | 54.1% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -195195 | 301 | 386 | 13 | 700 | 43.0% | 55.1% | R+12.1 |
| Precinct -ST JOE AST JOE A | 215 | 460 | 17 | 692 | 31.1% | 66.5% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -288288 | 233 | 432 | 17 | 682 | 34.2% | 63.3% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -PERRY KPERRY K | 265 | 399 | 16 | 680 | 39.0% | 58.7% | R+19.7 |
| Precinct -MARION BMARION B | 148 | 520 | 11 | 679 | 21.8% | 76.6% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct -323323 | 309 | 357 | 12 | 678 | 45.6% | 52.7% | R+7.1 |
| Precinct -472472 | 314 | 351 | 12 | 677 | 46.4% | 51.8% | R+5.5 |
| Precinct -490490 | 317 | 336 | 24 | 677 | 46.8% | 49.6% | R+2.8 |
| Precinct -319319 | 294 | 373 | 9 | 676 | 43.5% | 55.2% | R+11.7 |
| Precinct -480480 | 280 | 376 | 18 | 674 | 41.5% | 55.8% | R+14.2 |
| Precinct -583583 | 489 | 154 | 25 | 668 | 73.2% | 23.1% | D+50.1 |
| Precinct -553553 | 456 | 196 | 15 | 667 | 68.4% | 29.4% | D+39.0 |
| Precinct -153153 | 304 | 340 | 19 | 663 | 45.9% | 51.3% | R+5.4 |
| Precinct -470470 | 268 | 377 | 10 | 655 | 40.9% | 57.6% | R+16.6 |
| Precinct -WOODBURNWOODBURN | 140 | 504 | 11 | 655 | 21.4% | 76.9% | R+55.6 |
| Precinct -218218 | 233 | 408 | 13 | 654 | 35.6% | 62.4% | R+26.8 |
| Precinct -679679 | 467 | 169 | 15 | 651 | 71.7% | 26.0% | D+45.8 |
| Precinct -168168 | 264 | 367 | 19 | 650 | 40.6% | 56.5% | R+15.8 |
| Precinct -590590 | 323 | 298 | 26 | 647 | 49.9% | 46.1% | D+3.9 |
| Precinct -203203 | 361 | 260 | 20 | 641 | 56.3% | 40.6% | D+15.8 |
| Precinct -NH 1SJNH 1SJ | 241 | 386 | 13 | 640 | 37.7% | 60.3% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -468468 | 247 | 374 | 17 | 638 | 38.7% | 58.6% | R+19.9 |
| Precinct -293293 | 297 | 318 | 21 | 636 | 46.7% | 50.0% | R+3.3 |
| Precinct -481481 | 263 | 359 | 10 | 632 | 41.6% | 56.8% | R+15.2 |
| Precinct -410410 | 350 | 270 | 8 | 628 | 55.7% | 43.0% | D+12.7 |
| Precinct -ST JOE FST JOE F | 241 | 373 | 12 | 626 | 38.5% | 59.6% | R+21.1 |
| Precinct -479479 | 274 | 340 | 6 | 620 | 44.2% | 54.8% | R+10.6 |
| Precinct -368368 | 292 | 313 | 13 | 618 | 47.2% | 50.6% | R+3.4 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT CPLEASANT C | 153 | 454 | 10 | 617 | 24.8% | 73.6% | R+48.8 |
| Precinct -312312 | 288 | 310 | 17 | 615 | 46.8% | 50.4% | R+3.6 |
| Precinct -SPRINGFIELD ASPRINGFIELD A | 105 | 504 | 6 | 615 | 17.1% | 82.0% | R+64.9 |
| Precinct -318318 | 255 | 346 | 11 | 612 | 41.7% | 56.5% | R+14.9 |
| Precinct -314314 | 307 | 290 | 14 | 611 | 50.2% | 47.5% | D+2.8 |
| Precinct -156156 | 272 | 325 | 13 | 610 | 44.6% | 53.3% | R+8.7 |
| Precinct -HUNTERTOWN CHUNTERTOWN C | 156 | 445 | 9 | 610 | 25.6% | 73.0% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -183183 | 268 | 325 | 14 | 607 | 44.2% | 53.5% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct -ABOITE KABOITE K | 203 | 391 | 11 | 605 | 33.6% | 64.6% | R+31.1 |
| Precinct -LAFAYETTE BLAFAYETTE B | 161 | 435 | 7 | 603 | 26.7% | 72.1% | R+45.4 |
| Precinct -488488 | 276 | 305 | 15 | 596 | 46.3% | 51.2% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -255255 | 255 | 329 | 11 | 595 | 42.9% | 55.3% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -176176 | 213 | 369 | 12 | 594 | 35.9% | 62.1% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -256256 | 231 | 347 | 13 | 591 | 39.1% | 58.7% | R+19.6 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT BPLEASANT B | 268 | 302 | 18 | 588 | 45.6% | 51.4% | R+5.8 |
| Precinct -582582 | 372 | 185 | 27 | 584 | 63.7% | 31.7% | D+32.0 |
| Precinct -192192 | 218 | 340 | 14 | 572 | 38.1% | 59.4% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -310310 | 240 | 320 | 11 | 571 | 42.0% | 56.0% | R+14.0 |
| Precinct -653653 | 436 | 127 | 7 | 570 | 76.5% | 22.3% | D+54.2 |
| Precinct -483483 | 257 | 293 | 14 | 564 | 45.6% | 52.0% | R+6.4 |
| Precinct -484484 | 243 | 302 | 15 | 560 | 43.4% | 53.9% | R+10.5 |
| Precinct -592592 | 321 | 224 | 15 | 560 | 57.3% | 40.0% | D+17.3 |
| Precinct -210210 | 326 | 223 | 10 | 559 | 58.3% | 39.9% | D+18.4 |
| Precinct -MARION AMARION A | 147 | 392 | 19 | 558 | 26.3% | 70.3% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -311311 | 261 | 285 | 10 | 556 | 46.9% | 51.3% | R+4.3 |
| Precinct -585585 | 276 | 261 | 17 | 554 | 49.8% | 47.1% | D+2.7 |
| Precinct -PERRY TPERRY T | 162 | 370 | 18 | 550 | 29.5% | 67.3% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -LAKE ALAKE A | 116 | 423 | 8 | 547 | 21.2% | 77.3% | R+56.1 |
| Precinct -315315 | 239 | 288 | 18 | 545 | 43.9% | 52.8% | R+9.0 |
| Precinct -321321 | 215 | 316 | 13 | 544 | 39.5% | 58.1% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -NH 4BNH 4B | 182 | 356 | 6 | 544 | 33.5% | 65.4% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct -459459 | 224 | 304 | 12 | 540 | 41.5% | 56.3% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct -MAUMEEMAUMEE | 88 | 439 | 10 | 537 | 16.4% | 81.8% | R+65.4 |
| Precinct -217217 | 269 | 245 | 20 | 534 | 50.4% | 45.9% | D+4.5 |
| Precinct -366366 | 260 | 261 | 12 | 533 | 48.8% | 49.0% | R+0.2 |
| Precinct -154154 | 219 | 291 | 14 | 524 | 41.8% | 55.5% | R+13.7 |
| Precinct -CEDAR CREEK CCEDAR CREEK C | 178 | 332 | 10 | 520 | 34.2% | 63.8% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -297297 | 330 | 173 | 15 | 518 | 63.7% | 33.4% | D+30.3 |
| Precinct -471471 | 231 | 277 | 9 | 517 | 44.7% | 53.6% | R+8.9 |
| Precinct -460460 | 284 | 223 | 9 | 516 | 55.0% | 43.2% | D+11.8 |
| Precinct -162162 | 212 | 292 | 10 | 514 | 41.2% | 56.8% | R+15.6 |
| Precinct -261261 | 212 | 289 | 12 | 513 | 41.3% | 56.3% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -CEDAR CREEK FCEDAR CREEK F | 81 | 423 | 7 | 511 | 15.9% | 82.8% | R+66.9 |
| Precinct -175175 | 213 | 283 | 13 | 509 | 41.8% | 55.6% | R+13.8 |
| Precinct -367367 | 224 | 277 | 8 | 509 | 44.0% | 54.4% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -415415 | 248 | 245 | 16 | 509 | 48.7% | 48.1% | D+0.6 |
| Precinct -184184 | 222 | 272 | 10 | 504 | 44.0% | 54.0% | R+9.9 |
| Precinct -475475 | 207 | 284 | 11 | 502 | 41.2% | 56.6% | R+15.3 |
| Precinct -663663 | 369 | 116 | 11 | 496 | 74.4% | 23.4% | D+51.0 |
| Precinct -ADAMS GADAMS G | 158 | 328 | 7 | 493 | 32.0% | 66.5% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -509509 | 314 | 166 | 11 | 491 | 64.0% | 33.8% | D+30.1 |
| Precinct -478478 | 224 | 258 | 7 | 489 | 45.8% | 52.8% | R+7.0 |
| Precinct -418418 | 211 | 266 | 9 | 486 | 43.4% | 54.7% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -658658 | 404 | 75 | 5 | 484 | 83.5% | 15.5% | D+68.0 |
| Precinct -670670 | 365 | 110 | 8 | 483 | 75.6% | 22.8% | D+52.8 |
| Precinct -NH 5BNH 5B | 175 | 305 | 3 | 483 | 36.2% | 63.1% | R+26.9 |
| Precinct -169169 | 226 | 241 | 12 | 479 | 47.2% | 50.3% | R+3.1 |
| Precinct -307307 | 232 | 240 | 5 | 477 | 48.6% | 50.3% | R+1.7 |
| Precinct -665665 | 373 | 96 | 3 | 472 | 79.0% | 20.3% | D+58.7 |
| Precinct -411411 | 233 | 230 | 7 | 470 | 49.6% | 48.9% | D+0.6 |
| Precinct -671671 | 336 | 126 | 7 | 469 | 71.6% | 26.9% | D+44.8 |
| Precinct -503503 | 292 | 162 | 13 | 467 | 62.5% | 34.7% | D+27.8 |
| Precinct -MONROEVILLEMONROEVILLE | 133 | 319 | 14 | 466 | 28.5% | 68.5% | R+39.9 |
| Precinct -476476 | 187 | 268 | 8 | 463 | 40.4% | 57.9% | R+17.5 |
| Precinct -NH 5CNH 5C | 162 | 284 | 15 | 461 | 35.1% | 61.6% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -157157 | 239 | 212 | 8 | 459 | 52.1% | 46.2% | D+5.9 |
| Precinct -GRABILLGRABILL | 103 | 350 | 6 | 459 | 22.4% | 76.3% | R+53.8 |
| Precinct -327327 | 199 | 251 | 7 | 457 | 43.5% | 54.9% | R+11.4 |
| Precinct -291291 | 292 | 144 | 14 | 450 | 64.9% | 32.0% | D+32.9 |
| Precinct -ABOITE LABOITE L | 190 | 249 | 7 | 446 | 42.6% | 55.8% | R+13.2 |
| Precinct -456456 | 281 | 150 | 12 | 443 | 63.4% | 33.9% | D+29.6 |
| Precinct -575575 | 228 | 198 | 17 | 443 | 51.5% | 44.7% | D+6.8 |
| Precinct -656656 | 307 | 126 | 7 | 440 | 69.8% | 28.6% | D+41.1 |
| Precinct -561561 | 276 | 154 | 7 | 437 | 63.2% | 35.2% | D+27.9 |
| Precinct -259259 | 161 | 259 | 14 | 434 | 37.1% | 59.7% | R+22.6 |
| Precinct -LAFAYETTE CLAFAYETTE C | 136 | 285 | 8 | 429 | 31.7% | 66.4% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -504504 | 269 | 141 | 15 | 425 | 63.3% | 33.2% | D+30.1 |
| Precinct -469469 | 195 | 212 | 15 | 422 | 46.2% | 50.2% | R+4.0 |
| Precinct -567567 | 338 | 60 | 5 | 403 | 83.9% | 14.9% | D+69.0 |
| Precinct -296296 | 289 | 99 | 14 | 402 | 71.9% | 24.6% | D+47.3 |
| Precinct -213213 | 242 | 148 | 11 | 401 | 60.3% | 36.9% | D+23.4 |
| Precinct -557557 | 273 | 120 | 1 | 394 | 69.3% | 30.5% | D+38.8 |
| Precinct -211211 | 184 | 196 | 10 | 390 | 47.2% | 50.3% | R+3.1 |
| Precinct -364364 | 208 | 171 | 9 | 388 | 53.6% | 44.1% | D+9.5 |
| Precinct -ABOITE ZABOITE Z | 204 | 177 | 3 | 384 | 53.1% | 46.1% | D+7.0 |
| Precinct -270270 | 183 | 186 | 13 | 382 | 47.9% | 48.7% | R+0.8 |
| Precinct -313313 | 164 | 205 | 11 | 380 | 43.2% | 53.9% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -692692 | 331 | 44 | 4 | 379 | 87.3% | 11.6% | D+75.7 |
| Precinct -PERRY RPERRY R | 90 | 282 | 6 | 378 | 23.8% | 74.6% | R+50.8 |
| Precinct -581581 | 189 | 178 | 10 | 377 | 50.1% | 47.2% | D+2.9 |
| Precinct -ST JOE EST JOE E | 167 | 206 | 4 | 377 | 44.3% | 54.6% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -594594 | 212 | 146 | 14 | 372 | 57.0% | 39.2% | D+17.7 |
| Precinct -608608 | 302 | 66 | 4 | 372 | 81.2% | 17.7% | D+63.4 |
| Precinct -200200 | 158 | 204 | 9 | 371 | 42.6% | 55.0% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -576576 | 167 | 187 | 13 | 367 | 45.5% | 51.0% | R+5.4 |
| Precinct -512512 | 239 | 109 | 16 | 364 | 65.7% | 29.9% | D+35.7 |
| Precinct -209209 | 188 | 168 | 7 | 363 | 51.8% | 46.3% | D+5.5 |
| Precinct -577577 | 152 | 203 | 6 | 361 | 42.1% | 56.2% | R+14.1 |
| Precinct -290290 | 165 | 190 | 5 | 360 | 45.8% | 52.8% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -578578 | 212 | 141 | 5 | 358 | 59.2% | 39.4% | D+19.8 |
| Precinct -ADAMS BADAMS B | 102 | 254 | 1 | 357 | 28.6% | 71.1% | R+42.6 |
| Precinct -MONROEMONROE | 85 | 260 | 6 | 351 | 24.2% | 74.1% | R+49.9 |
| Precinct -197197 | 163 | 180 | 5 | 348 | 46.8% | 51.7% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -672672 | 281 | 55 | 12 | 348 | 80.7% | 15.8% | D+64.9 |
| Precinct -654654 | 275 | 63 | 8 | 346 | 79.5% | 18.2% | D+61.3 |
| Precinct -660660 | 255 | 84 | 4 | 343 | 74.3% | 24.5% | D+49.9 |
| Precinct -502502 | 208 | 120 | 14 | 342 | 60.8% | 35.1% | D+25.7 |
| Precinct -652652 | 291 | 43 | 4 | 338 | 86.1% | 12.7% | D+73.4 |
| Precinct -610610 | 244 | 83 | 8 | 335 | 72.8% | 24.8% | D+48.1 |
| Precinct -579579 | 175 | 151 | 7 | 333 | 52.6% | 45.3% | D+7.2 |
| Precinct -298298 | 212 | 110 | 5 | 327 | 64.8% | 33.6% | D+31.2 |
| Precinct -158158 | 138 | 182 | 5 | 325 | 42.5% | 56.0% | R+13.5 |
| Precinct -212212 | 157 | 161 | 6 | 324 | 48.5% | 49.7% | R+1.2 |
| Precinct -WAYNE AWAYNE A | 173 | 139 | 5 | 317 | 54.6% | 43.8% | D+10.7 |
| Precinct -682682 | 249 | 53 | 10 | 312 | 79.8% | 17.0% | D+62.8 |
| Precinct -JACKSONJACKSON | 66 | 241 | 4 | 311 | 21.2% | 77.5% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -152152 | 193 | 110 | 6 | 309 | 62.5% | 35.6% | D+26.9 |
| Precinct -304304 | 168 | 132 | 6 | 306 | 54.9% | 43.1% | D+11.8 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT APLEASANT A | 77 | 223 | 5 | 305 | 25.2% | 73.1% | R+47.9 |
| Precinct -555555 | 191 | 97 | 6 | 294 | 65.0% | 33.0% | D+32.0 |
| Precinct -662662 | 200 | 92 | 2 | 294 | 68.0% | 31.3% | D+36.7 |
| Precinct -294294 | 121 | 159 | 8 | 288 | 42.0% | 55.2% | R+13.2 |
| Precinct -605605 | 241 | 46 | 1 | 288 | 83.7% | 16.0% | D+67.7 |
| Precinct -PERRY JPERRY J | 114 | 168 | 6 | 288 | 39.6% | 58.3% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct -519519 | 174 | 106 | 7 | 287 | 60.6% | 36.9% | D+23.7 |
| Precinct -292292 | 146 | 127 | 8 | 281 | 52.0% | 45.2% | D+6.8 |
| Precinct -596596 | 163 | 103 | 11 | 277 | 58.8% | 37.2% | D+21.7 |
| Precinct -151151 | 165 | 106 | 3 | 274 | 60.2% | 38.7% | D+21.5 |
| Precinct -174174 | 156 | 112 | 6 | 274 | 56.9% | 40.9% | D+16.1 |
| Precinct -586586 | 187 | 82 | 5 | 274 | 68.2% | 29.9% | D+38.3 |
| Precinct -651651 | 226 | 33 | 7 | 266 | 85.0% | 12.4% | D+72.6 |
| Precinct -674674 | 155 | 104 | 7 | 266 | 58.3% | 39.1% | D+19.2 |
| Precinct -505505 | 174 | 65 | 10 | 249 | 69.9% | 26.1% | D+43.8 |
| Precinct -607607 | 208 | 34 | 5 | 247 | 84.2% | 13.8% | D+70.4 |
| Precinct -214214 | 153 | 81 | 6 | 240 | 63.7% | 33.8% | D+30.0 |
| Precinct -WAYNE CWAYNE C | 65 | 152 | 4 | 221 | 29.4% | 68.8% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -518518 | 144 | 69 | 7 | 220 | 65.5% | 31.4% | D+34.1 |
| Precinct -690690 | 121 | 95 | 4 | 220 | 55.0% | 43.2% | D+11.8 |
| Precinct -565565 | 120 | 93 | 6 | 219 | 54.8% | 42.5% | D+12.3 |
| Precinct -602602 | 170 | 44 | 3 | 217 | 78.3% | 20.3% | D+58.1 |
| Precinct -603603 | 177 | 27 | 5 | 209 | 84.7% | 12.9% | D+71.8 |
| Precinct -569569 | 148 | 50 | 6 | 204 | 72.5% | 24.5% | D+48.0 |
| Precinct -SCIPIOSCIPIO | 48 | 149 | 2 | 199 | 24.1% | 74.9% | R+50.8 |
| Precinct -164164 | 106 | 73 | 1 | 180 | 58.9% | 40.6% | D+18.3 |
| Precinct -216216 | 117 | 57 | 5 | 179 | 65.4% | 31.8% | D+33.5 |
| Precinct -262262 | 78 | 58 | 5 | 141 | 55.3% | 41.1% | D+14.2 |
| Precinct -NH 1JNH 1J | 38 | 86 | 3 | 127 | 29.9% | 67.7% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -WAYNE DWAYNE D | 34 | 55 | 2 | 91 | 37.4% | 60.4% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -ST JOE V1ST JOE V1 | 50 | 31 | 5 | 86 | 58.1% | 36.0% | D+22.1 |
| Precinct -ZANESVILLEZANESVILLE | 10 | 44 | 1 | 55 | 18.2% | 80.0% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -NH 2J-2NH 2J-2 | 9 | 19 | 3 | 31 | 29.0% | 61.3% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct -373373 | 8 | 14 | 1 | 23 | 34.8% | 60.9% | R+26.1 |
| Precinct -ST JOE CST JOE C | 5 | 12 | 0 | 17 | 29.4% | 70.6% | R+41.2 |
| Precinct -NH 2J-1NH 2J-1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 14 | 7.1% | 92.9% | R+85.7 |
| Precinct -NH 5ANH 5A | 5 | 8 | 0 | 13 | 38.5% | 61.5% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -667667 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 90.0% | 10.0% | D+80.0 |
| Precinct -461461 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -196196 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -ST JOE DST JOE D | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -612612 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -675675 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
presidential history
Party record book
Allen County, IN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Grover Cleveland1892
62.1%
10,010 votes · D+28.1
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 59.2%
Republican
Dwight D. Eisenhower1956
69.4%
58,210 votes · R+39.1
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1972 · 66.2%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
73,189votes
43.3% of the vote · R+11.2
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 71,263 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
92,083votes
54.5% of the vote · R+11.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 90,283 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Grover Cleveland1892
+26.4pts D vs U.S.
Place D+28.1 · U.S. D+1.7
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1908 · +21.4 pts
Republican
George W. Bush2000
+25.7pts R vs U.S.
Place R+25.2 · U.S. D+0.5
Runner-up · George W. Bush, 2004 · +24.8 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Allen County, IN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 4 state senate and 3 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 41.3%63,765 | 58.7%90,542 | 154,307 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 277,264 |
| 2018 | 256,489 |
| 2020 | 264,647 |
| 2022 | 270,041 |
| 2024 | 285,028 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+806 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +2,392 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,627 in average income, against $86,168 for residents who stayed — 33% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+22.6 on average — 10 points more Republican-leaning than Allen County, IN itself (R+12.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- DeKalb County, IN370R+47.1
- Whitley County, IN345R+49.9
- Marion County, IN274D+27.6
- Huntington County, IN258R+48.3
- Wells County, IN226R+57.8
- Noble County, IN216R+51.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- DeKalb County, IN426
- Marion County, IN352
- Whitley County, IN344
- Huntington County, IN275
- Noble County, IN254
- Wells County, IN228
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −145 |
| 2012 | −1,082 |
| 2013 | −245 |
| 2014 | −798 |
| 2015 | −160 |
| 2016 | −597 |
| 2017 | +80 |
| 2018 | +685 |
| 2019 | +1,492 |
| 2021 | +1,119 |
| 2022 | +499 |
| 2023 | +115 |
| 2024 | +623 |
| 2025 | +806 |
Allen County's urban core in Fort Wayne adds demographic complexity to an otherwise reliably Republican-leaning region, with the 2024 presidential margin settling at R+12.5 despite a growing Hispanic population concentrated in the city.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 28.2 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 39.1 points in 1956. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 12.5 points.
A population of 392,378, a 70% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $70,737 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Sedgwick County and Tippecanoe County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Allen County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18003/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.