Cass County, Nebraska
Precinct data
Results by precinct
30 precincts · 15,755 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -TIPTON 001TIPTON 001 | 392 | 896 | 27 | 1,315 | 29.8% | 68.1% | R+38.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -SOUTH ROCK BLUFF 017SOUTH ROCK BLUFF 017 | 336 | 866 | 17 | 1,219 | 27.6% | 71.0% | R+43.5 |
| Precinct -BUCCANEER BAY 007BUCCANEER BAY 007 | 389 | 560 | 17 | 966 | 40.3% | 58.0% | R+17.7 |
| Precinct -SOUTH PLATTSMOUTH 020SOUTH PLATTSMOUTH 020 | 249 | 648 | 13 | 910 | 27.4% | 71.2% | R+43.8 |
| Precinct -NORTH ROCK BLUFF 016NORTH ROCK BLUFF 016 | 226 | 499 | 10 | 735 | 30.7% | 67.9% | R+37.1 |
| Precinct -EIGHT MILE GROVE 013EIGHT MILE GROVE 013 | 199 | 529 | 4 | 732 | 27.2% | 72.3% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -WEST LOUISVILLE 010WEST LOUISVILLE 010 | 202 | 491 | 15 | 708 | 28.5% | 69.4% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -SOUTH BEND 006SOUTH BEND 006 | 215 | 460 | 5 | 680 | 31.6% | 67.6% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct -STOVE CREEK 004STOVE CREEK 004 | 191 | 423 | 9 | 623 | 30.7% | 67.9% | R+37.2 |
| Precinct -NORTH PLATTSMOUTH 019NORTH PLATTSMOUTH 019 | 166 | 445 | 7 | 618 | 26.9% | 72.0% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -SALT CREEK 003SALT CREEK 003 | 173 | 408 | 12 | 593 | 29.2% | 68.8% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -EAST LOUISVILLE 009EAST LOUISVILLE 009 | 197 | 381 | 7 | 585 | 33.7% | 65.1% | R+31.5 |
| Precinct -MURDOCK 005MURDOCK 005 | 146 | 287 | 3 | 436 | 33.5% | 65.8% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct -PCT 1 WARD 1-023PCT 1 WARD 1-023 | 169 | 236 | 9 | 414 | 40.8% | 57.0% | R+16.2 |
| Precinct -WEST ROCK BLUFF 018WEST ROCK BLUFF 018 | 116 | 290 | 7 | 413 | 28.1% | 70.2% | R+42.1 |
| Precinct -PCT 2 WARD 4-030PCT 2 WARD 4-030 | 119 | 276 | 3 | 398 | 29.9% | 69.3% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -PCT 1 WARD 2-025PCT 1 WARD 2-025 | 144 | 239 | 9 | 392 | 36.7% | 61.0% | R+24.2 |
| Precinct -PCT 1 WARD 3-027PCT 1 WARD 3-027 | 107 | 265 | 7 | 379 | 28.2% | 69.9% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -LIBERTY 015LIBERTY 015 | 120 | 251 | 7 | 378 | 31.7% | 66.4% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -PCT 2 WARD 2-026PCT 2 WARD 2-026 | 125 | 230 | 6 | 361 | 34.6% | 63.7% | R+29.1 |
| Precinct -NORTH WEEPING WATER 021NORTH WEEPING WATER 021 | 110 | 222 | 13 | 345 | 31.9% | 64.3% | R+32.5 |
| Precinct -PCT 2 WARD 3-028PCT 2 WARD 3-028 | 114 | 226 | 5 | 345 | 33.0% | 65.5% | R+32.5 |
| Precinct -PCT 2 WARD 1-024PCT 2 WARD 1-024 | 118 | 218 | 6 | 342 | 34.5% | 63.7% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -CENTER 008CENTER 008 | 93 | 238 | 2 | 333 | 27.9% | 71.5% | R+43.5 |
| Precinct -SOUTH WEEPING WATER 022SOUTH WEEPING WATER 022 | 100 | 213 | 5 | 318 | 31.4% | 67.0% | R+35.5 |
| Precinct -AVOCA 011AVOCA 011 | 66 | 223 | 7 | 296 | 22.3% | 75.3% | R+53.0 |
| Precinct -MCKELVERLY 002MCKELVERLY 002 | 77 | 213 | 4 | 294 | 26.2% | 72.4% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct -PCT 1 WARD 4-029PCT 1 WARD 4-029 | 90 | 175 | 7 | 272 | 33.1% | 64.3% | R+31.3 |
| Precinct -NEHAWKA 014NEHAWKA 014 | 42 | 170 | 1 | 213 | 19.7% | 79.8% | R+60.1 |
| Precinct -MOUNT PLEASANT 012MOUNT PLEASANT 012 | 33 | 107 | 2 | 142 | 23.2% | 75.4% | R+52.1 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −31.7% |
| 1896 | −3.6% |
| 1900 | −12.5% |
| 1904 | −27.0% |
| 1908 | −1.1% |
| 1912 | +24.0% |
| 1916 | +14.1% |
| 1920 | −22.6% |
| 1924 | −17.5% |
| 1928 | −28.7% |
| 1932 | +29.7% |
| 1936 | +14.5% |
| 1940 | −12.9% |
| 1944 | −18.7% |
| 1948 | −7.4% |
| 1952 | −32.3% |
| 1956 | −27.7% |
| 1960 | −23.4% |
| 1964 | +14.9% |
| 1968 | −26.2% |
| 1972 | −42.8% |
| 1976 | −8.4% |
| 1980 | −40.8% |
| 1984 | −36.9% |
| 1988 | −11.8% |
| 1992 | −13.7% |
| 1996 | −14.5% |
| 2000 | −24.2% |
| 2004 | −35.9% |
| 2008 | −19.5% |
| 2012 | −26.2% |
| 2016 | −38.4% |
| 2020 | −35.1% |
| 2024 | −37.0% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 1.3 points.
19,636 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+149 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,564 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $67,991 in average income, against $95,801 for residents who stayed — 29% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+4.0 on average — 33 points more Democratic-leaning than Cass County, NE itself (R+37.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sarpy County, NE238R+11.6
- Douglas County, NE193D+10.1
- Lancaster County, NE123D+4.3
- Otoe County, NE26R+38.8
- Saunders County, NE24R+46.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sarpy County, NE193
- Douglas County, NE174
- Lancaster County, NE115
- Saunders County, NE30
- Otoe County, NE29
- Pottawattamie County, IA24
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −99 |
| 2012 | −162 |
| 2013 | +107 |
| 2014 | +63 |
| 2015 | −25 |
| 2016 | +172 |
| 2017 | +256 |
| 2018 | +209 |
| 2019 | +17 |
| 2021 | +515 |
| 2022 | +86 |
| 2023 | +262 |
| 2024 | +14 |
| 2025 | +149 |
Cass County sits just south of the Omaha metro, where low-density exurban growth has accompanied consistently large Republican presidential margins — 37 points in 2024 — making it one of the more reliably right-leaning counties in the state's eastern tier.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 29.7 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 42.8 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 37.0 points.
A population of 27,161, a 91% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $91,836 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Mills County and Washington County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cass County, Nebraska. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/31025/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.