- Lead
- 1,028
- Total
- 2,423
- vs nation
- R+41.0
- Turnout
- 62.4%
Brule County, SD
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 62.4% of 3,965 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 1,077
- Total
- 2,490
- vs nation
- R+47.7
- Turnout
- 64.9%
- Lead
- 994
- Total
- 2,288
- vs nation
- R+45.5
- Turnout
- 60.6%
- Lead
- 675
- Total
- 2,379
- vs nation
- R+32.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 442
- Total
- 2,439
- vs nation
- R+25.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 504
- Total
- 2,629
- vs nation
- R+16.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 450
- Total
- 2,167
- vs nation
- R+21.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 110
- Total
- 2,404
- vs nation
- R+3.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+42.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 5,2832024 5-year
- Population density
- 6.5 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 817 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $73,7202024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 81.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.6%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+53.6 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+43.4 in 2016MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- McCook County, SD · twin score 79.2
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 62.4%2,476 participants ÷ 3,965 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +9.4 ptsHigh-turnout, durable
- Drop-off vs state
- -2.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 53.1%–55.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,476 | 3,965 ± 100 | 62.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 2,195 | 3,950 ± 58 | 55.6% | Audited | C/A |
| 2,521 | 3,883 ± 82 | 64.9% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 2,152 | 3,884 ± 95 | 55.4% | Audited | A/A |
| 2,380 | 3,930 ± 65 | 60.6% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2,379 | 3,917 | 60.7% | Derived | — | |
| 2,439 | 3,619 | 67.4% | Derived | — | |
| 2,629 | 3,321 extrapolated | 79.2% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Brule County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Brule County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 15 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
15 precincts · 2,423 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -11 | 444 | 816 | 41 | 1,301 | 34.1% | 62.7% | R+28.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -22 | 92 | 443 | 12 | 547 | 16.8% | 81.0% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -33 | 91 | 318 | 9 | 418 | 21.8% | 76.1% | R+54.3 |
| Precinct -44 | 39 | 117 | 1 | 157 | 24.8% | 74.5% | R+49.7 |
| VTD precinct 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Chamberlain district 2D2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Chamberlain district 3D3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Chamberlain district 4D4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Kimball ward 1W1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Kimball ward 2W2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Kimball ward 3W3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Brule County, SD · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
74.4%
2,465 votes · D+50.3
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 69.5%
Republican
Donald Trump2020
70.3%
1,750 votes · R+43.3
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 69.9%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
2,465votes
74.4% of the vote · D+50.3
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 2,274 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
1,750votes
70.3% of the vote · R+43.3
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 1,694 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Woodrow Wilson1912
+34.1pts D vs U.S.
Place D+53.6 · U.S. D+19.5
Runner-up · Adlai Stevenson, 1956 · +33.4 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+47.7pts R vs U.S.
Place R+43.3 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +45.5 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Brule County, SD. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 100.0%2,073 | 2,073 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 11 points more Republican than the rolls.
3,277 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−42 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −271 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $36,662 in average income, against $72,778 for residents who stayed — 50% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+39.5 on average — 3.0 points more Democratic-leaning than Brule County, SD itself (R+42.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lyman County, SD22R+39.5
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +6 |
| 2012 | −17 |
| 2013 | +52 |
| 2014 | −100 |
| 2015 | −60 |
| 2016 | −49 |
| 2017 | +84 |
| 2018 | −125 |
| 2019 | +41 |
| 2021 | −26 |
| 2022 | +39 |
| 2023 | −14 |
| 2024 | −60 |
| 2025 | −42 |
Brule County sits along the Missouri River in central South Dakota, where a sparse, agriculture-driven population has delivered Republican presidential margins exceeding 40 points in recent cycles, consistent with broader trends across the state's rural interior.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 53.6 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 43.4 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.8 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 42.4 points.
A population of 5,283, a 81% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $73,720 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of McCook County and Rock County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Brule County, South Dakota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/46015/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.