Minnehaha County, South Dakota
Precinct data
Results by precinct
156 precincts · 93,986 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -4-174-17 | 784 | 1,429 | 43 | 2,256 | 34.8% | 63.3% | R+28.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -3-163-16 | 797 | 1,347 | 53 | 2,197 | 36.3% | 61.3% | R+25.0 |
| Precinct -3-193-19 | 868 | 1,216 | 42 | 2,126 | 40.8% | 57.2% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -VP-15VP-15 | 693 | 1,351 | 45 | 2,089 | 33.2% | 64.7% | R+31.5 |
| Precinct -VP-05VP-05 | 666 | 1,366 | 49 | 2,081 | 32.0% | 65.6% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -VP-07VP-07 | 606 | 1,410 | 45 | 2,061 | 29.4% | 68.4% | R+39.0 |
| Precinct -VP-21VP-21 | 583 | 1,418 | 30 | 2,031 | 28.7% | 69.8% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -VP-03VP-03 | 635 | 1,289 | 41 | 1,965 | 32.3% | 65.6% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -4-154-15 | 802 | 1,096 | 47 | 1,945 | 41.2% | 56.3% | R+15.1 |
| Precinct -2-172-17 | 801 | 944 | 44 | 1,789 | 44.8% | 52.8% | R+8.0 |
| Precinct -1-171-17 | 688 | 1,025 | 48 | 1,761 | 39.1% | 58.2% | R+19.1 |
| Precinct -4-164-16 | 720 | 1,008 | 19 | 1,747 | 41.2% | 57.7% | R+16.5 |
| Precinct -3-103-10 | 726 | 982 | 35 | 1,743 | 41.7% | 56.3% | R+14.7 |
| Precinct -VP-09VP-09 | 447 | 1,144 | 38 | 1,629 | 27.4% | 70.2% | R+42.8 |
| Precinct -VP-10VP-10 | 461 | 1,120 | 35 | 1,616 | 28.5% | 69.3% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -2-22-2 | 798 | 754 | 37 | 1,589 | 50.2% | 47.5% | D+2.8 |
| Precinct -2-142-14 | 715 | 810 | 15 | 1,540 | 46.4% | 52.6% | R+6.2 |
| Precinct -3-93-9 | 709 | 742 | 46 | 1,497 | 47.4% | 49.6% | R+2.2 |
| Precinct -3-143-14 | 602 | 854 | 32 | 1,488 | 40.5% | 57.4% | R+16.9 |
| Precinct -4-124-12 | 712 | 718 | 42 | 1,472 | 48.4% | 48.8% | R+0.4 |
| Precinct -VP-02VP-02 | 465 | 958 | 37 | 1,460 | 31.8% | 65.6% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -1-101-10 | 623 | 779 | 34 | 1,436 | 43.4% | 54.2% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -5-125-12 | 787 | 606 | 37 | 1,430 | 55.0% | 42.4% | D+12.7 |
| Precinct -3-173-17 | 568 | 802 | 22 | 1,392 | 40.8% | 57.6% | R+16.8 |
| Precinct -1-61-6 | 653 | 670 | 30 | 1,353 | 48.3% | 49.5% | R+1.3 |
| Precinct -3-153-15 | 601 | 703 | 25 | 1,329 | 45.2% | 52.9% | R+7.7 |
| Precinct -2-62-6 | 619 | 672 | 37 | 1,328 | 46.6% | 50.6% | R+4.0 |
| Precinct -4-114-11 | 538 | 742 | 35 | 1,315 | 40.9% | 56.4% | R+15.5 |
| Precinct -1-91-9 | 593 | 658 | 25 | 1,276 | 46.5% | 51.6% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -2-32-3 | 600 | 632 | 43 | 1,275 | 47.1% | 49.6% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -2-182-18 | 511 | 736 | 21 | 1,268 | 40.3% | 58.0% | R+17.7 |
| Precinct -2-12-1 | 609 | 606 | 23 | 1,238 | 49.2% | 48.9% | D+0.2 |
| Precinct -VP-16VP-16 | 337 | 870 | 24 | 1,231 | 27.4% | 70.7% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -5-185-18 | 699 | 473 | 41 | 1,213 | 57.6% | 39.0% | D+18.6 |
| Precinct -4-184-18 | 432 | 766 | 14 | 1,212 | 35.6% | 63.2% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -5-45-4 | 767 | 405 | 30 | 1,202 | 63.8% | 33.7% | D+30.1 |
| Precinct -3-123-12 | 466 | 685 | 22 | 1,173 | 39.7% | 58.4% | R+18.7 |
| Precinct -5-195-19 | 581 | 558 | 33 | 1,172 | 49.6% | 47.6% | D+2.0 |
| Precinct -2-92-9 | 606 | 535 | 30 | 1,171 | 51.8% | 45.7% | D+6.1 |
| Precinct -5-65-6 | 571 | 506 | 36 | 1,113 | 51.3% | 45.5% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -5-15-1 | 627 | 427 | 48 | 1,102 | 56.9% | 38.7% | D+18.1 |
| Precinct -VP-04VP-04 | 351 | 727 | 21 | 1,099 | 31.9% | 66.2% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -4-194-19 | 517 | 534 | 23 | 1,074 | 48.1% | 49.7% | R+1.6 |
| Precinct -5-225-22 | 539 | 486 | 46 | 1,071 | 50.3% | 45.4% | D+4.9 |
| Precinct -3-113-11 | 433 | 606 | 27 | 1,066 | 40.6% | 56.8% | R+16.2 |
| Precinct -4-94-9 | 535 | 476 | 34 | 1,045 | 51.2% | 45.6% | D+5.6 |
| Precinct -VP-13VP-13 | 223 | 786 | 23 | 1,032 | 21.6% | 76.2% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -5-205-20 | 476 | 497 | 29 | 1,002 | 47.5% | 49.6% | R+2.1 |
| Precinct -5-85-8 | 603 | 337 | 26 | 966 | 62.4% | 34.9% | D+27.5 |
| Precinct -VP-08VP-08 | 245 | 683 | 12 | 940 | 26.1% | 72.7% | R+46.6 |
| Precinct -4-44-4 | 426 | 444 | 27 | 897 | 47.5% | 49.5% | R+2.0 |
| Precinct -3-133-13 | 414 | 460 | 14 | 888 | 46.6% | 51.8% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -3-13-1 | 440 | 420 | 25 | 885 | 49.7% | 47.5% | D+2.3 |
| Precinct -5-215-21 | 473 | 388 | 16 | 877 | 53.9% | 44.2% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -VP-01VP-01 | 224 | 623 | 16 | 863 | 26.0% | 72.2% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -1-41-4 | 489 | 353 | 14 | 856 | 57.1% | 41.2% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -3-183-18 | 398 | 422 | 17 | 837 | 47.6% | 50.4% | R+2.9 |
| Precinct -4-84-8 | 400 | 401 | 17 | 818 | 48.9% | 49.0% | R+0.1 |
| Precinct -5-235-23 | 462 | 333 | 22 | 817 | 56.5% | 40.8% | D+15.8 |
| Precinct -4-134-13 | 399 | 387 | 22 | 808 | 49.4% | 47.9% | D+1.5 |
| Precinct -4-24-2 | 385 | 381 | 28 | 794 | 48.5% | 48.0% | D+0.5 |
| Precinct -5-165-16 | 340 | 422 | 23 | 785 | 43.3% | 53.8% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -1-191-19 | 366 | 388 | 28 | 782 | 46.8% | 49.6% | R+2.8 |
| Precinct -VP-17VP-17 | 187 | 547 | 20 | 754 | 24.8% | 72.5% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -3-53-5 | 310 | 397 | 18 | 725 | 42.8% | 54.8% | R+12.0 |
| Precinct -4-74-7 | 307 | 401 | 12 | 720 | 42.6% | 55.7% | R+13.1 |
| Precinct -4-54-5 | 306 | 369 | 18 | 693 | 44.2% | 53.2% | R+9.1 |
| Precinct -4-64-6 | 279 | 392 | 14 | 685 | 40.7% | 57.2% | R+16.5 |
| Precinct -5-105-10 | 337 | 281 | 21 | 639 | 52.7% | 44.0% | D+8.8 |
| Precinct -2-82-8 | 319 | 288 | 18 | 625 | 51.0% | 46.1% | D+5.0 |
| Precinct -5-75-7 | 398 | 213 | 14 | 625 | 63.7% | 34.1% | D+29.6 |
| Precinct -5-25-2 | 365 | 215 | 21 | 601 | 60.7% | 35.8% | D+25.0 |
| Precinct -1-51-5 | 288 | 283 | 25 | 596 | 48.3% | 47.5% | D+0.8 |
| Precinct -3-203-20 | 204 | 319 | 15 | 538 | 37.9% | 59.3% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -VP-11VP-11 | 112 | 406 | 9 | 527 | 21.3% | 77.0% | R+55.8 |
| Precinct -4-34-3 | 267 | 241 | 15 | 523 | 51.1% | 46.1% | D+5.0 |
| Precinct -5-95-9 | 295 | 184 | 16 | 495 | 59.6% | 37.2% | D+22.4 |
| Precinct -5-155-15 | 248 | 214 | 21 | 483 | 51.3% | 44.3% | D+7.0 |
| Precinct -VP-06VP-06 | 128 | 320 | 10 | 458 | 27.9% | 69.9% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -4-104-10 | 181 | 243 | 8 | 432 | 41.9% | 56.3% | R+14.4 |
| Precinct -5-35-3 | 188 | 163 | 3 | 354 | 53.1% | 46.0% | D+7.1 |
| VTD 0202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1-11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1-1010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1-1717 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1-22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1-33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1-44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1-55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1-66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1-88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1-99 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1146_46099N11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1546_46099N15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 1646_46099NVP16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 2-11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 2-1414 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 2-22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 2-33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 2-44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 2-66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 2-77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 2-88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 2-99 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 2146_46099N21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 346_46099N3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 3-1010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 3-1111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 3-1212 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 3-1414 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 3-1515 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 3-1616 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 3-1717 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 3-55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 3-66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 3-77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 3-88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 446_46099N4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 4-11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 4-1010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 4-1111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 4-1212 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 4-1313 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 4-44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 4-55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 4-66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 4-77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 4-88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 4-99 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 546_46099N5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-1010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-1111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-1212 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-1313 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-1414 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-1515 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-1616 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 5-99 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD 66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD VP 0146_46099NVP01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD VP 1746_46099NVP17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD VP0-808 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD VP1046_46099NVP10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD VP1246_46099NVP12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD VP1346_46099N13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD VP946_46099NVP9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD-0707 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VTD3-99 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −40.8% |
| 1896 | +4.6% |
| 1900 | −16.2% |
| 1904 | −56.7% |
| 1908 | −33.8% |
| 1912 | +42.4% |
| 1916 | −10.0% |
| 1920 | −43.8% |
| 1924 | −46.3% |
| 1928 | −33.7% |
| 1932 | +10.1% |
| 1936 | +2.9% |
| 1940 | −15.2% |
| 1944 | −15.3% |
| 1948 | −8.7% |
| 1952 | −43.0% |
| 1956 | −26.0% |
| 1960 | −21.1% |
| 1964 | +11.0% |
| 1968 | −9.7% |
| 1972 | −0.1% |
| 1976 | −2.7% |
| 1980 | −12.1% |
| 1984 | −12.9% |
| 1988 | +4.2% |
| 1992 | +3.0% |
| 1996 | +3.8% |
| 2000 | −10.4% |
| 2004 | −15.3% |
| 2008 | +0.7% |
| 2012 | −7.4% |
| 2016 | −14.6% |
| 2020 | −9.5% |
| 2024 | −12.7% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 33.4%24,772 | 62.8%46,551 | 74,144 |
| 2020 | R | 42.4%38,799 | 57.6%52,773 | 91,572 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 7.3 points more Republican.
137,415 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+879 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +7,774 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $69,832 in average income, against $104,150 for residents who stayed — 33% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+21.8 on average — 9.1 points more Republican-leaning than Minnehaha County, SD itself (R+12.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lincoln County, SD1,664R+26.5
- Brookings County, SD180R+17.4
- Pennington County, SD133R+26.4
- Lake County, SD103R+31.2
- Davison County, SD100R+37.8
- Maricopa County, AZ97R+3.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lincoln County, SD1,899
- Maricopa County, AZ128
- Hennepin County, MN127
- Brookings County, SD115
- Pennington County, SD89
- Turner County, SD69
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −351 |
| 2012 | +968 |
| 2013 | +1,573 |
| 2014 | +597 |
| 2015 | +259 |
| 2016 | −238 |
| 2017 | +255 |
| 2018 | −327 |
| 2019 | +414 |
| 2021 | +794 |
| 2022 | +1,610 |
| 2023 | +1,069 |
| 2024 | +272 |
| 2025 | +879 |
Home to Sioux Falls, Minnehaha holds roughly one-sixth of South Dakota's total population, and its suburban growth has gradually compressed what was once a wider Republican presidential margin over the past decade.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 42.4 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 56.7 points in 1904. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 12.7 points.
A population of 203,289, a 79% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $76,880 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Cass County and Clay County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Minnehaha County, South Dakota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/46099/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.