Gibson County, Tennessee
Precinct data
Results by precinct
22 precincts · 21,648 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -1 Medina1 Medina | 464 | 2,528 | 20 | 3,012 | 15.4% | 83.9% | R+68.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -38 Dyer38 Dyer | 393 | 1,308 | 21 | 1,722 | 22.8% | 76.0% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -22 Agri Plex22 Agri Plex | 549 | 820 | 7 | 1,376 | 39.9% | 59.6% | R+19.7 |
| Precinct -26 Union Central26 Union Central | 195 | 1,091 | 18 | 1,304 | 15.0% | 83.7% | R+68.7 |
| Precinct -2 Sitka2 Sitka | 165 | 995 | 7 | 1,167 | 14.1% | 85.3% | R+71.1 |
| Precinct -28 Cumberland Pres Church28 Cumberland Pres Church | 173 | 897 | 5 | 1,075 | 16.1% | 83.4% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -31 Milan Municipal31 Milan Municipal | 229 | 725 | 5 | 959 | 23.9% | 75.6% | R+51.7 |
| Precinct -4 Gibson4 Gibson | 170 | 777 | 6 | 953 | 17.8% | 81.5% | R+63.7 |
| Precinct -14 Brazil14 Brazil | 142 | 790 | 13 | 945 | 15.0% | 83.6% | R+68.6 |
| Precinct -7 Bailey Park7 Bailey Park | 176 | 756 | 8 | 940 | 18.7% | 80.4% | R+61.7 |
| Precinct -13 Fruitland13 Fruitland | 178 | 709 | 9 | 896 | 19.9% | 79.1% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -32 Bradford32 Bradford | 146 | 734 | 12 | 892 | 16.4% | 82.3% | R+65.9 |
| Precinct -37 Good Luck37 Good Luck | 114 | 767 | 9 | 890 | 12.8% | 86.2% | R+73.4 |
| Precinct -6 Church of Christ6 Church of Christ | 287 | 497 | 9 | 793 | 36.2% | 62.7% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -40 Rutherford40 Rutherford | 116 | 601 | 10 | 727 | 16.0% | 82.7% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -17 Yorkville17 Yorkville | 77 | 568 | 8 | 653 | 11.8% | 87.0% | R+75.2 |
| Precinct -30 1st Assembly30 1st Assembly | 180 | 435 | 8 | 623 | 28.9% | 69.8% | R+40.9 |
| Precinct -29 Polk Clark29 Polk Clark | 400 | 214 | 5 | 619 | 64.6% | 34.6% | D+30.0 |
| Precinct -9 Lane Chapel9 Lane Chapel | 427 | 147 | 9 | 583 | 73.2% | 25.2% | D+48.0 |
| Precinct -8 Stigall Center8 Stigall Center | 421 | 119 | 10 | 550 | 76.5% | 21.6% | D+54.9 |
| Precinct -27 Skullbone27 Skullbone | 40 | 486 | 2 | 528 | 7.6% | 92.0% | R+84.5 |
| Precinct -18 Kenton18 Kenton | 58 | 382 | 1 | 441 | 13.2% | 86.6% | R+73.5 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +32.4% |
| 1896 | +35.2% |
| 1900 | +35.9% |
| 1904 | +34.9% |
| 1908 | +39.4% |
| 1912 | +39.5% |
| 1916 | +42.7% |
| 1920 | +29.8% |
| 1924 | +51.0% |
| 1928 | +35.9% |
| 1932 | +69.5% |
| 1936 | +66.1% |
| 1940 | +60.9% |
| 1944 | +49.3% |
| 1948 | +46.6% |
| 1952 | +27.8% |
| 1956 | +37.6% |
| 1960 | +5.5% |
| 1964 | +27.5% |
| 1968 | −0.9% |
| 1972 | −45.0% |
| 1976 | +29.9% |
| 1980 | +17.9% |
| 1984 | −6.4% |
| 1988 | −5.4% |
| 1992 | +13.1% |
| 1996 | +13.6% |
| 2000 | +2.2% |
| 2004 | −10.8% |
| 2008 | −28.7% |
| 2012 | −32.1% |
| 2016 | −43.6% |
| 2020 | −47.0% |
| 2024 | −51.9% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 30,499 |
| 2018 | 29,608 |
| 2020 | 31,066 |
| 2022 | 31,284 |
| 2024 | 32,416 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+248 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +2,112 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $56,031 in average income, against $64,830 for residents who stayed — 14% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+30.5 on average — 21 points more Democratic-leaning than Gibson County, TN itself (R+51.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Madison County, TN401R+18.2
- Carroll County, TN70R+61.6
- Crockett County, TN63R+58.7
- Dyer County, TN57R+61.8
- Shelby County, TN55D+25.4
- Weakley County, TN53R+58.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Madison County, TN286
- Carroll County, TN87
- Crockett County, TN60
- Weakley County, TN57
- Obion County, TN50
- Dyer County, TN47
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +289 |
| 2012 | −222 |
| 2013 | −238 |
| 2014 | +91 |
| 2015 | −65 |
| 2016 | +23 |
| 2017 | +104 |
| 2018 | −2 |
| 2019 | +34 |
| 2021 | +433 |
| 2022 | +618 |
| 2023 | +424 |
| 2024 | +375 |
| 2025 | +248 |
Gibson County's flat cotton-country landscape anchors an electorate that has voted Republican for president by double-digit margins for decades, reaching R+52 in 2024—a gap that has widened steadily as rural realignment accelerated across the region.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 69.5 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 51.9 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 51.9 points.
A population of 50,869, a 75% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $62,755 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Cross County and Poinsett County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Gibson County, Tennessee. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/47053/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.