Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20226 cycles · 3 audited
2022 turnout
79.1%8,781 participants ÷ 11,097 CVAP
2016→2018 drop-off
+19.0 ptsVolatile
Drop-off vs state
+8.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
0%20%40%60%80%100%
76.3%
79.1%
200420082012201620182022
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
Cycle
Participants
CVAP
Turnout
Series
Quality
2022Mid
8,781
11,097 ± 787
79.1%
Audited
E/A
2018Mid
8,350
10,938 ± 583
76.3%
Audited
E/A
9,757
10,231 ± 453
95.4%
Audited
E/A
8,833
10,054
87.9%
Derived
—
7,401
12,618
58.7%
Derived
—
6,813
15,182 extrapolated
44.9%
Derived
—
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2022) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
2022: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 322/184.
2018: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 320/139.
2016: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 319/133.
2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
presidential history
Party record book
Black Forest, CO · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
2004–2024 · 6 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
27.2%
3,204 votes · R+42.9
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 25.7%
Republican
George W. Bush2004
80.2%
5,466 votes · R+60.9
Runner-up · Mitt Romney, 2012 · 76.3%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
3,204votes
27.2% of the vote · R+42.9
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 2,886 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
8,254votes
70.2% of the vote · R+42.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 8,085 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
−41.5pts D vs U.S.
Place R+42.9 · U.S. R+1.5
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · −50.7 pts
Republican
Mitt Romney2012
+59.1pts R vs U.S.
Place R+55.2 · U.S. D+3.9
Runner-up · George W. Bush, 2004 · +58.4 pts
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Black Forest · which candidate this place backed in each party’s presidential nominating contest, cycle by cycle. A primary is a contest inside one party, so it has no Democratic–Republican margin and is not part of the general-election record above.
Akashic reports votes cast, not delegates awarded. The two can disagree: Clinton led the 2008 national primary popular vote by less than half a point and did not win the nomination.
Primary returns are published at county grain. The figures below are El Paso County, Colorado, the county containing Black Forest — Black Forest’s own primary vote sits inside those totals and is not separately reported.
Presidential nominating contests in Black Forest, by party and cycle.
○no contest record — Akashic holds no result for that party and cycle here. It is not a claim that no contest was held. Telling apart a contest that was cancelled, one that went uncontested, and one simply not yet ingested needs a nominating-contest calendar, which is a separate ingest from results and does not exist yet.
Republican presidential primaries are not yet ingested — the Republican series runs from 1856 and is in scope. The row is kept so its absence is visible: a Democratic-only panel would otherwise read as though no one else held a contest.
Akashic carries 10 states for 2012 and 3 states for 2024. Cycles in which an incumbent president seeks renomination are thin by nature — few states run a contested primary — so a sparse column is politics, not a hole in the record.
County returns carry a leader and a lead over the runner-up, and nothing more. The full candidate field with vote shares is published at state grain — follow a cycle above to the state contest for it.
Black Forest is an unincorporated census-designated place northeast of Colorado Springs, where large-lot rural character and proximity to military installations shape a consistently high-participation electorate within one of Colorado's most reliably Republican counties.
Across the recorded series it reached a Republican high of 60.9 points in 2004. Between 2020 and 2024 the city moved 3.3 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 42.9 points.
A population of 15,738, a 86% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $145,460 describe the city. The city's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Anthem and Fallston.
Akashic
Political twins — cities
The cities whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
In 2024, Black Forest, Colorado voted Republican by 42.9 points (R+42.9), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 11,759 votes cast, 3,204 went Democratic and 8,254 went Republican.
How many people live in Black Forest, Colorado?
Black Forest, Colorado has a population of 15,738 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Black Forest, Colorado?
Median household income in Black Forest, Colorado is $145,460 — above the national median of $80,734. The Colorado state median is $95,470.
What is the political history of Black Forest, Colorado?
Akashic tracks 6 presidential elections in Black Forest, Colorado from 2004 to 2024. Of those, 0 went Democratic and 6 went Republican.
