- Lead
- 843
- Total
- 6,051
- vs nation
- R+12.5
- Turnout
- 68.1%
Conecuh County, AL
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 68.1% of 8,970 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 476
- Total
- 6,441
- vs nation
- R+11.8
- Turnout
- 66.9%
- Lead
- 340
- Total
- 6,551
- vs nation
- R+7.3
- Turnout
- 67.6%
- Lead
- 116
- Total
- 7,022
- vs nation
- R+2.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 41
- Total
- 6,943
- vs nation
- R+7.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 552
- Total
- 6,021
- vs nation
- R+6.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 84
- Total
- 5,551
- vs nation
- D+1.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 810
- Total
- 5,461
- vs nation
- D+6.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+13.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 11,2752024 5-year
- Population density
- 13 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 850 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $41,3272024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 50.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 44.9%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+95.6 in 1940MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+81.3 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Tensas Parish, LA · twin score 97.7
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 68.1%6,105 participants ÷ 8,970 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +18.1 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -7.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 50.0%–50.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6,105 | 8,970 ± 77 | 68.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 4,489 | 9,196 ± 87 | 48.8% | Audited | A/A |
| 6,472 | 9,672 ± 122 | 66.9% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 4,930 | 9,806 ± 52 | 50.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 6,640 | 9,823 ± 67 | 67.6% | Audited | A/A | |
| 7,022 | 10,152 | 69.2% | Derived | — | |
| 6,943 | 9,980 | 69.6% | Derived | — | |
| 6,021 | 9,808 extrapolated | 61.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Conecuh County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Conecuh County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 27 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
27 precincts · 6,049 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -DAVID BURT BLDGDAVID BURT BLDG | 221 | 414 | 9 | 644 | 34.3% | 64.3% | R+30.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CARVER REC_CARVER REC_ | 440 | 105 | 2 | 547 | 80.4% | 19.2% | D+61.2 |
| Precinct -BELLEVILLE FIREBELLEVILLE FIRE | 338 | 102 | 0 | 440 | 76.8% | 23.2% | D+53.6 |
| Precinct -REPTON TOWN HALLREPTON TOWN HALL | 157 | 227 | 6 | 390 | 40.3% | 58.2% | R+17.9 |
| Precinct -OLD CASTLEBERRYOLD CASTLEBERRY | 22 | 342 | 3 | 367 | 6.0% | 93.2% | R+87.2 |
| Precinct -ANTIOCH VOTINGANTIOCH VOTING | 16 | 251 | 2 | 269 | 5.9% | 93.3% | R+87.4 |
| Precinct -CHINA REC_ & EDCHINA REC_ & ED | 138 | 128 | 2 | 268 | 51.5% | 47.8% | D+3.7 |
| Precinct -LYEFFION FIRELYEFFION FIRE | 52 | 201 | 2 | 255 | 20.4% | 78.8% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -OLD FIELD CHURCHOLD FIELD CHURCH | 169 | 79 | 0 | 248 | 68.1% | 31.9% | D+36.3 |
| Precinct -SANDCUT FIRESANDCUT FIRE | 9 | 228 | 3 | 240 | 3.8% | 95.0% | R+91.3 |
| Precinct -HEALTH DEPT_HEALTH DEPT_ | 163 | 63 | 2 | 228 | 71.5% | 27.6% | D+43.9 |
| Precinct -LENOX COMM_LENOX COMM_ | 10 | 198 | 1 | 209 | 4.8% | 94.7% | R+90.0 |
| Precinct -NAZARENE BAPTISTNAZARENE BAPTIST | 129 | 66 | 2 | 197 | 65.5% | 33.5% | D+32.0 |
| Precinct -BERMUDA COMM_BERMUDA COMM_ | 52 | 136 | 3 | 191 | 27.2% | 71.2% | R+44.0 |
| Precinct -ROBINSONS MILLROBINSONS MILL | 96 | 95 | 0 | 191 | 50.3% | 49.7% | D+0.5 |
| Precinct -CASTLEBERRY FIRECASTLEBERRY FIRE | 114 | 47 | 2 | 163 | 69.9% | 28.8% | D+41.1 |
| Precinct -BROWNVILLE FIREBROWNVILLE FIRE | 51 | 99 | 0 | 150 | 34.0% | 66.0% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct -RANGE FIRERANGE FIRE | 8 | 135 | 2 | 145 | 5.5% | 93.1% | R+87.6 |
| Precinct -LITTLE ZION CHURCHLITTLE ZION CHURCH | 62 | 72 | 2 | 136 | 45.6% | 52.9% | R+7.4 |
| Precinct -FLAT ROCK FIREFLAT ROCK FIRE | 17 | 101 | 0 | 118 | 14.4% | 85.6% | R+71.2 |
| Precinct -HERBERT FIREHERBERT FIRE | 23 | 93 | 0 | 116 | 19.8% | 80.2% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -PAUL FIREPAUL FIRE | 37 | 66 | 0 | 103 | 35.9% | 64.1% | R+28.2 |
| Precinct -2ND MOUNT ZION2ND MOUNT ZION | 72 | 28 | 1 | 101 | 71.3% | 27.7% | D+43.6 |
| Precinct -JOHNSVILLE FIREJOHNSVILLE FIRE | 87 | 13 | 1 | 101 | 86.1% | 12.9% | D+73.3 |
| Precinct -ANNEX VOTINGANNEX VOTING | 62 | 33 | 1 | 96 | 64.6% | 34.4% | D+30.2 |
| Precinct -BROOKLYN MASONICBROOKLYN MASONIC | 22 | 49 | 0 | 71 | 31.0% | 69.0% | R+38.0 |
| Precinct -SKINNERTON FIRESKINNERTON FIRE | 13 | 52 | 0 | 65 | 20.0% | 80.0% | R+60.0 |
presidential history
Party record book
Conecuh County, AL · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 (partial returns from 1876) · 38 presidential cycles · 38 with a vote-share denominator · 34 with a national benchmark
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1940
97.7%
2,345 votes · D+95.6
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 95.6%
Republican
Barry Goldwater1964
81.3%
2,782 votes · R+81.3
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1972 · 74.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2012
3,555votes
50.6% of the vote · D+1.7
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 3,429 votes
Republican
Ronald Reagan1984
3,538votes
55.9% of the vote · R+12.7
Runner-up · John McCain, 2008 · 3,470 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+104.8pts D vs U.S.
Place D+79.6 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · James M. Cox, 1920 · +101.1 pts
Republican
Barry Goldwater1964
+103.9pts R vs U.S.
Place R+81.3 · U.S. D+22.6
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1972 · +27.4 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Conecuh County, AL. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 10,381 |
| 2020 | 10,413 |
| 2022 | 9,878 |
| 2024 | 9,820 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−24 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,007 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $40,234 in average income, against $55,029 for residents who stayed — 27% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+36.8 on average — 23 points more Republican-leaning than Conecuh County, AL itself (R+13.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Escambia County, AL35R+46.3
- Monroe County, AL24R+23.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Escambia County, AL37
- Monroe County, AL25
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −9 |
| 2012 | −128 |
| 2013 | −94 |
| 2014 | −196 |
| 2015 | +19 |
| 2016 | −151 |
| 2017 | −28 |
| 2018 | −102 |
| 2019 | −167 |
| 2021 | −130 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | +13 |
| 2024 | −10 |
| 2025 | −24 |
Conecuh sits at the edge of Alabama's historic Black Belt, where decades of outmigration have reduced the electorate and left a demographic mix that has produced narrower margins than surrounding counties in past cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 95.6 points in 1940 and a Republican high of 81.3 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 6.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 13.9 points.
A population of 11,275, a 50% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $41,327 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Tensas Parish and Martin County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Conecuh County, Alabama. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/01035/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.