Chatham County, Georgia
Precinct data
Results by precinct
87 precincts · 141,109 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -7-14C7-14C | 2,748 | 1,704 | 30 | 4,482 | 61.3% | 38.0% | D+23.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -6-11C6-11C | 2,202 | 1,151 | 29 | 3,382 | 65.1% | 34.0% | D+31.1 |
| Precinct -4-14C4-14C | 1,277 | 1,971 | 14 | 3,262 | 39.1% | 60.4% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -6-10C6-10C | 1,631 | 1,449 | 16 | 3,096 | 52.7% | 46.8% | D+5.9 |
| Precinct -7-10C7-10C | 1,858 | 982 | 27 | 2,867 | 64.8% | 34.3% | D+30.6 |
| Precinct -7-07C7-07C | 1,091 | 1,668 | 25 | 2,784 | 39.2% | 59.9% | R+20.7 |
| Precinct -7-12C7-12C | 1,604 | 1,149 | 15 | 2,768 | 57.9% | 41.5% | D+16.4 |
| Precinct -1-01C1-01C | 1,705 | 907 | 25 | 2,637 | 64.7% | 34.4% | D+30.3 |
| Precinct -7-16C7-16C | 1,612 | 966 | 29 | 2,607 | 61.8% | 37.1% | D+24.8 |
| Precinct -1-17C1-17C | 850 | 1,729 | 14 | 2,593 | 32.8% | 66.7% | R+33.9 |
| Precinct -4-07C4-07C | 968 | 1,608 | 13 | 2,589 | 37.4% | 62.1% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -8-16C8-16C | 1,309 | 1,147 | 19 | 2,475 | 52.9% | 46.3% | D+6.5 |
| Precinct -7-08C7-08C | 779 | 1,606 | 14 | 2,399 | 32.5% | 66.9% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -4-08C4-08C | 748 | 1,506 | 28 | 2,282 | 32.8% | 66.0% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -6-09C6-09C | 1,282 | 972 | 21 | 2,275 | 56.4% | 42.7% | D+13.6 |
| Precinct -4-13C4-13C | 825 | 1,412 | 13 | 2,250 | 36.7% | 62.8% | R+26.1 |
| Precinct -1-16C1-16C | 619 | 1,610 | 15 | 2,244 | 27.6% | 71.7% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -7-15C7-15C | 1,454 | 752 | 16 | 2,222 | 65.4% | 33.8% | D+31.6 |
| Precinct -7-06C7-06C | 1,076 | 1,029 | 12 | 2,117 | 50.8% | 48.6% | D+2.2 |
| Precinct -7-13C7-13C | 855 | 1,245 | 16 | 2,116 | 40.4% | 58.8% | R+18.4 |
| Precinct -7-17C7-17C | 836 | 1,255 | 9 | 2,100 | 39.8% | 59.8% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -8-17C8-17C | 1,270 | 791 | 9 | 2,070 | 61.4% | 38.2% | D+23.1 |
| Precinct -7-04C7-04C | 1,521 | 509 | 14 | 2,044 | 74.4% | 24.9% | D+49.5 |
| Precinct -2-09C2-09C | 1,682 | 318 | 24 | 2,024 | 83.1% | 15.7% | D+67.4 |
| Precinct -4-12C4-12C | 668 | 1,351 | 5 | 2,024 | 33.0% | 66.7% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct -7-09C7-09C | 1,180 | 803 | 5 | 1,988 | 59.4% | 40.4% | D+19.0 |
| Precinct -6-03C6-03C | 1,151 | 823 | 12 | 1,986 | 58.0% | 41.4% | D+16.5 |
| Precinct -5-10C5-10C | 1,778 | 135 | 7 | 1,920 | 92.6% | 7.0% | D+85.6 |
| Precinct -4-06C4-06C | 558 | 1,296 | 12 | 1,866 | 29.9% | 69.5% | R+39.5 |
| Precinct -7-11C7-11C | 1,198 | 649 | 17 | 1,864 | 64.3% | 34.8% | D+29.5 |
| Precinct -4-05C4-05C | 657 | 1,193 | 9 | 1,859 | 35.3% | 64.2% | R+28.8 |
| Precinct -4-04C4-04C | 605 | 1,182 | 13 | 1,800 | 33.6% | 65.7% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -4-02C4-02C | 645 | 1,129 | 15 | 1,789 | 36.1% | 63.1% | R+27.1 |
| Precinct -6-02C6-02C | 770 | 978 | 10 | 1,758 | 43.8% | 55.6% | R+11.8 |
| Precinct -3-13C3-13C | 1,139 | 594 | 17 | 1,750 | 65.1% | 33.9% | D+31.1 |
| Precinct -1-05C1-05C | 1,077 | 635 | 20 | 1,732 | 62.2% | 36.7% | D+25.5 |
| Precinct -5-11C5-11C | 1,322 | 370 | 12 | 1,704 | 77.6% | 21.7% | D+55.9 |
| Precinct -1-12C1-12C | 549 | 1,114 | 8 | 1,671 | 32.9% | 66.7% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -2-05C2-05C | 1,455 | 176 | 20 | 1,651 | 88.1% | 10.7% | D+77.5 |
| Precinct -5-05C5-05C | 1,547 | 83 | 7 | 1,637 | 94.5% | 5.1% | D+89.4 |
| Precinct -1-06C1-06C | 782 | 829 | 16 | 1,627 | 48.1% | 51.0% | R+2.9 |
| Precinct -2-07C2-07C | 1,303 | 273 | 15 | 1,591 | 81.9% | 17.2% | D+64.7 |
| Precinct -3-10C3-10C | 1,363 | 217 | 11 | 1,591 | 85.7% | 13.6% | D+72.0 |
| Precinct -3-14C3-14C | 1,182 | 362 | 7 | 1,551 | 76.2% | 23.3% | D+52.9 |
| Precinct -2-04C2-04C | 1,264 | 153 | 21 | 1,438 | 87.9% | 10.6% | D+77.3 |
| Precinct -1-14C1-14C | 530 | 826 | 6 | 1,362 | 38.9% | 60.6% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -8-01C8-01C | 1,037 | 312 | 13 | 1,362 | 76.1% | 22.9% | D+53.2 |
| Precinct -3-09C3-09C | 785 | 511 | 17 | 1,313 | 59.8% | 38.9% | D+20.9 |
| Precinct -6-05C6-05C | 848 | 449 | 13 | 1,310 | 64.7% | 34.3% | D+30.5 |
| Precinct -4-11C4-11C | 525 | 752 | 7 | 1,284 | 40.9% | 58.6% | R+17.7 |
| Precinct -5-06C5-06C | 966 | 310 | 5 | 1,281 | 75.4% | 24.2% | D+51.2 |
| Precinct -3-05C3-05C | 943 | 315 | 17 | 1,275 | 74.0% | 24.7% | D+49.3 |
| Precinct -6-08C6-08C | 917 | 324 | 7 | 1,248 | 73.5% | 26.0% | D+47.5 |
| Precinct -1-08C1-08C | 608 | 615 | 14 | 1,237 | 49.2% | 49.7% | R+0.6 |
| Precinct -8-02C8-02C | 958 | 210 | 12 | 1,180 | 81.2% | 17.8% | D+63.4 |
| Precinct -3-12C3-12C | 631 | 527 | 6 | 1,164 | 54.2% | 45.3% | D+8.9 |
| Precinct -8-08C8-08C | 1,081 | 70 | 6 | 1,157 | 93.4% | 6.1% | D+87.4 |
| Precinct -6-01C6-01C | 698 | 438 | 14 | 1,150 | 60.7% | 38.1% | D+22.6 |
| Precinct -2-06C2-06C | 672 | 432 | 11 | 1,115 | 60.3% | 38.7% | D+21.5 |
| Precinct -3-02C3-02C | 733 | 368 | 14 | 1,115 | 65.7% | 33.0% | D+32.7 |
| Precinct -5-08C5-08C | 777 | 329 | 5 | 1,111 | 69.9% | 29.6% | D+40.3 |
| Precinct -1-09C1-09C | 743 | 358 | 5 | 1,106 | 67.2% | 32.4% | D+34.8 |
| Precinct -4-10C4-10C | 450 | 643 | 8 | 1,101 | 40.9% | 58.4% | R+17.5 |
| Precinct -2-12C2-12C | 887 | 157 | 18 | 1,062 | 83.5% | 14.8% | D+68.7 |
| Precinct -1-13C1-13C | 441 | 602 | 7 | 1,050 | 42.0% | 57.3% | R+15.3 |
| Precinct -8-03C8-03C | 355 | 623 | 7 | 985 | 36.0% | 63.2% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -2-02C2-02C | 794 | 184 | 6 | 984 | 80.7% | 18.7% | D+62.0 |
| Precinct -1-10C1-10C | 299 | 666 | 7 | 972 | 30.8% | 68.5% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -6-06C6-06C | 520 | 432 | 5 | 957 | 54.3% | 45.1% | D+9.2 |
| Precinct -5-03C5-03C | 834 | 103 | 3 | 940 | 88.7% | 11.0% | D+77.8 |
| Precinct -2-11C2-11C | 752 | 172 | 5 | 929 | 80.9% | 18.5% | D+62.4 |
| Precinct -8-10C8-10C | 883 | 43 | 1 | 927 | 95.3% | 4.6% | D+90.6 |
| Precinct -8-18C8-18C | 534 | 383 | 6 | 923 | 57.9% | 41.5% | D+16.4 |
| Precinct -3-04C3-04C | 828 | 83 | 2 | 913 | 90.7% | 9.1% | D+81.6 |
| Precinct -8-11C8-11C | 870 | 35 | 5 | 910 | 95.6% | 3.8% | D+91.8 |
| Precinct -5-07C5-07C | 673 | 221 | 6 | 900 | 74.8% | 24.6% | D+50.2 |
| Precinct -2-03C2-03C | 731 | 159 | 8 | 898 | 81.4% | 17.7% | D+63.7 |
| Precinct -8-12C8-12C | 681 | 208 | 6 | 895 | 76.1% | 23.2% | D+52.8 |
| Precinct -7-01C7-01C | 417 | 458 | 4 | 879 | 47.4% | 52.1% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -3-11C3-11C | 680 | 183 | 5 | 868 | 78.3% | 21.1% | D+57.3 |
| Precinct -8-15C8-15C | 716 | 98 | 1 | 815 | 87.9% | 12.0% | D+75.8 |
| Precinct -7-05C7-05C | 416 | 313 | 3 | 732 | 56.8% | 42.8% | D+14.1 |
| Precinct -7-03C7-03C | 252 | 457 | 4 | 713 | 35.3% | 64.1% | R+28.8 |
| Precinct -8-05C8-05C | 617 | 50 | 7 | 674 | 91.5% | 7.4% | D+84.1 |
| Precinct -8-09C8-09C | 630 | 29 | 4 | 663 | 95.0% | 4.4% | D+90.6 |
| Precinct -3-03C3-03C | 561 | 71 | 3 | 635 | 88.3% | 11.2% | D+77.2 |
| Precinct -8-06C8-06C | 490 | 36 | 6 | 532 | 92.1% | 6.8% | D+85.3 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +58.5% |
| 1896 | +17.0% |
| 1900 | +57.0% |
| 1904 | +75.5% |
| 1908 | +46.0% |
| 1912 | +78.2% |
| 1916 | +71.7% |
| 1920 | +62.0% |
| 1924 | +49.4% |
| 1928 | +2.3% |
| 1932 | +65.2% |
| 1936 | +78.0% |
| 1940 | +66.9% |
| 1944 | +61.8% |
| 1948 | +20.5% |
| 1952 | −3.9% |
| 1956 | −25.1% |
| 1960 | −5.0% |
| 1964 | −17.7% |
| 1968 | +0.2% |
| 1972 | −42.0% |
| 1976 | +14.1% |
| 1980 | +3.4% |
| 1984 | −15.3% |
| 1988 | −17.2% |
| 1992 | −0.5% |
| 1996 | +5.3% |
| 2000 | −0.3% |
| 2004 | +0.2% |
| 2008 | +14.4% |
| 2012 | +12.0% |
| 2016 | +14.7% |
| 2020 | +18.8% |
| 2024 | +18.0% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | D | 59.4%62,996 | 38.9%41,189 | 106,001 |
| 2020 | D | 57.6%151,541 | 40.1%105,698 | 263,270 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 194,163 |
| 2018 | 202,358 |
| 2020 | 223,442 |
| 2022 | 230,161 |
| 2024 | 238,166 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+50 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +9,372 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $67,636 in average income, against $91,153 for residents who stayed — 26% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+0.3 on average — 18 points more Republican-leaning than Chatham County, GA itself (D+18.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Effingham County, GA586R+49.1
- Bryan County, GA418R+36.3
- Liberty County, GA296D+17.4
- Beaufort County, SC274R+14.5
- Bulloch County, GA233R+29.0
- Fulton County, GA205D+44.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Effingham County, GA956
- Bryan County, GA607
- Liberty County, GA444
- Bulloch County, GA325
- Fulton County, GA270
- Beaufort County, SC191
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +3,876 |
| 2012 | +1,759 |
| 2013 | −947 |
| 2014 | +2,386 |
| 2015 | +1,261 |
| 2016 | +103 |
| 2017 | −1,185 |
| 2018 | −1,683 |
| 2019 | −994 |
| 2021 | −39 |
| 2022 | +3,837 |
| 2023 | +922 |
| 2024 | +26 |
| 2025 | +50 |
Chatham County, anchored by Savannah, delivers some of Georgia's widest Democratic margins on the coast, driven by a majority-minority population and a dense historic urban core that consistently outpaces statewide trends.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 78.2 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 42.0 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 18.0 points.
A population of 300,879, a 45% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $71,097 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Guilford County and Richland County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Chatham County, Georgia. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/13051/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.