Dearborn County, Indiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
91 precincts · 26,600 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -LOGAN 01LOGAN 01 | 183 | 1,071 | 18 | 1,272 | 14.4% | 84.2% | R+69.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -LOGAN 02LOGAN 02 | 148 | 923 | 18 | 1,089 | 13.6% | 84.8% | R+71.2 |
| Precinct -MILLER 06MILLER 06 | 221 | 778 | 18 | 1,017 | 21.7% | 76.5% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 01JACKSON 01 | 134 | 844 | 19 | 997 | 13.4% | 84.7% | R+71.2 |
| Precinct -MANCHESTER 02MANCHESTER 02 | 139 | 816 | 8 | 963 | 14.4% | 84.7% | R+70.3 |
| Precinct -HARRISON 03HARRISON 03 | 131 | 773 | 10 | 914 | 14.3% | 84.6% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -MILLER 01MILLER 01 | 174 | 710 | 14 | 898 | 19.4% | 79.1% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -MILLER 03MILLER 03 | 207 | 677 | 14 | 898 | 23.1% | 75.4% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -MILLER 04MILLER 04 | 127 | 718 | 12 | 857 | 14.8% | 83.8% | R+69.0 |
| Precinct -MILLER 02MILLER 02 | 152 | 678 | 11 | 841 | 18.1% | 80.6% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -HARRISON 02HARRISON 02 | 145 | 649 | 18 | 812 | 17.9% | 79.9% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -MANCHESTER 01MANCHESTER 01 | 135 | 640 | 10 | 785 | 17.2% | 81.5% | R+64.3 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 01WASHINGTON 01 | 176 | 577 | 13 | 766 | 23.0% | 75.3% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -MILLER 07MILLER 07 | 158 | 578 | 15 | 751 | 21.0% | 77.0% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -SPARTA 02SPARTA 02 | 118 | 590 | 14 | 722 | 16.3% | 81.7% | R+65.4 |
| Precinct -KELSO 03KELSO 03 | 97 | 592 | 1 | 690 | 14.1% | 85.8% | R+71.7 |
| Precinct -LAWRENCEBURG 03LAWRENCEBURG 03 | 152 | 524 | 9 | 685 | 22.2% | 76.5% | R+54.3 |
| Precinct -YORK 01YORK 01 | 119 | 523 | 6 | 648 | 18.4% | 80.7% | R+62.3 |
| Precinct -MILLER 05MILLER 05 | 91 | 513 | 6 | 610 | 14.9% | 84.1% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -HOGAN 01HOGAN 01 | 115 | 467 | 11 | 593 | 19.4% | 78.8% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct -LAWRENCEBURG 09LAWRENCEBURG 09 | 110 | 466 | 5 | 581 | 18.9% | 80.2% | R+61.3 |
| Precinct -GREENDALE 05GREENDALE 05 | 117 | 379 | 10 | 506 | 23.1% | 74.9% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -LAWRENCEBURG 04LAWRENCEBURG 04 | 150 | 343 | 9 | 502 | 29.9% | 68.3% | R+38.4 |
| Precinct -LAWRENCEBURG 01LAWRENCEBURG 01 | 158 | 330 | 13 | 501 | 31.5% | 65.9% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -CLAY 01CLAY 01 | 98 | 388 | 7 | 493 | 19.9% | 78.7% | R+58.8 |
| Precinct -GREENDALE 03GREENDALE 03 | 150 | 326 | 13 | 489 | 30.7% | 66.7% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct -GREENDALE 02GREENDALE 02 | 168 | 304 | 9 | 481 | 34.9% | 63.2% | R+28.3 |
| Precinct -GREENDALE 04GREENDALE 04 | 153 | 311 | 11 | 475 | 32.2% | 65.5% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -GREENDALE 01GREENDALE 01 | 155 | 313 | 6 | 474 | 32.7% | 66.0% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -CLAY 03CLAY 03 | 74 | 390 | 5 | 469 | 15.8% | 83.2% | R+67.4 |
| Precinct -CENTER 05CENTER 05 | 91 | 342 | 9 | 442 | 20.6% | 77.4% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -KELSO 02KELSO 02 | 75 | 351 | 4 | 430 | 17.4% | 81.6% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -SPARTA 03SPARTA 03 | 53 | 344 | 6 | 403 | 13.2% | 85.4% | R+72.2 |
| Precinct -CLAY 02CLAY 02 | 92 | 305 | 3 | 400 | 23.0% | 76.3% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -CENTER 06CENTER 06 | 84 | 296 | 7 | 387 | 21.7% | 76.5% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct -CENTER 03CENTER 03 | 92 | 270 | 8 | 370 | 24.9% | 73.0% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct -CENTER 02CENTER 02 | 98 | 257 | 11 | 366 | 26.8% | 70.2% | R+43.4 |
| Precinct -KELSO 01KELSO 01 | 50 | 302 | 11 | 363 | 13.8% | 83.2% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -LAWRENCEBURG 02LAWRENCEBURG 02 | 122 | 229 | 7 | 358 | 34.1% | 64.0% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -CENTER 04CENTER 04 | 87 | 262 | 4 | 353 | 24.6% | 74.2% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -LAWRENCEBURG 08LAWRENCEBURG 08 | 72 | 184 | 4 | 260 | 27.7% | 70.8% | R+43.1 |
| Precinct -SPARTA 01SPARTA 01 | 47 | 187 | 6 | 240 | 19.6% | 77.9% | R+58.3 |
| Precinct -CENTER 01CENTER 01 | 67 | 145 | 3 | 215 | 31.2% | 67.4% | R+36.3 |
| Precinct -CAESAR CREEK 01CAESAR CREEK 01 | 37 | 124 | 4 | 165 | 22.4% | 75.2% | R+52.7 |
| Precinct -HARRISON 01HARRISON 01 | 13 | 55 | 1 | 69 | 18.8% | 79.7% | R+60.9 |
| CAESAR CREEK 118_1802900010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CENTER 118_1802900020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CENTER 218_1802900030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CENTER 318_1802900040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CENTER 418_1802900050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CENTER 518_1802900060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CENTER 618_1802900070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CLAY 118_1802900080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CLAY 218_1802900090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CLAY 318_1802900100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GREENDALE 118_1802900110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GREENDALE 218_1802900120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GREENDALE 318_1802900130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GREENDALE 418_1802900140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GREENDALE 518_1802900150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HARRISON 118_1802900170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HARRISON 218_1802900180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HARRISON 318_1802900190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HOGAN 118_1802900200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JACKSON 118_1802900210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| KELSO 118_1802900220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| KELSO 218_1802900230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| KELSO 318_1802900240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LAWRENCEBURG 118_1802900250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LAWRENCEBURG 11 (NV)18_1802900320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LAWRENCEBURG 218_1802900260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LAWRENCEBURG 318_1802900270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LAWRENCEBURG 418_1802900280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LAWRENCEBURG 818_1802900290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LAWRENCEBURG 918_1802900300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LOGAN 118_1802900330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LOGAN 218_1802900340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MANCHESTER 118_1802900350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MANCHESTER 218_1802900360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MILLER 118_1802900370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MILLER 218_1802900380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MILLER 318_1802900390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MILLER 418_1802900400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MILLER 518_1802900410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MILLER 618_1802900420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MILLER 718_1802900430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SPARTA 118_1802900440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SPARTA 218_1802900450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SPARTA 318_1802900460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 118_1802900470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| YORK 118_1802900480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +19.4% |
| 1896 | +9.9% |
| 1900 | +13.9% |
| 1904 | +11.2% |
| 1908 | +14.0% |
| 1912 | +30.2% |
| 1916 | +12.6% |
| 1920 | −2.7% |
| 1924 | −2.7% |
| 1928 | −17.3% |
| 1932 | +15.2% |
| 1936 | +15.1% |
| 1940 | +1.1% |
| 1944 | −3.1% |
| 1948 | +6.0% |
| 1952 | −9.9% |
| 1956 | −13.0% |
| 1960 | −10.1% |
| 1964 | +16.9% |
| 1968 | −10.7% |
| 1972 | −29.9% |
| 1976 | +1.4% |
| 1980 | −17.6% |
| 1984 | −29.9% |
| 1988 | −23.5% |
| 1992 | −11.9% |
| 1996 | −12.5% |
| 2000 | −30.8% |
| 2004 | −36.4% |
| 2008 | −34.9% |
| 2012 | −39.7% |
| 2016 | −54.8% |
| 2020 | −55.5% |
| 2024 | −58.3% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 40,032 |
| 2018 | 38,573 |
| 2020 | 39,371 |
| 2022 | 39,894 |
| 2024 | 40,526 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−55 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +136 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $70,122 in average income, against $86,659 for residents who stayed — 19% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+20.8 on average — 38 points more Democratic-leaning than Dearborn County, IN itself (R+58.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Hamilton County, OH359D+14.9
- Ripley County, IN164R+61.4
- Boone County, KY67R+37.2
- Butler County, OH67R+26.3
- Ohio County, IN56R+55.5
- Franklin County, IN51R+64.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Hamilton County, OH280
- Ripley County, IN217
- Kenton County, KY64
- Franklin County, IN57
- Boone County, KY56
- Ohio County, IN50
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −170 |
| 2012 | −324 |
| 2013 | −57 |
| 2014 | −383 |
| 2015 | +18 |
| 2016 | −40 |
| 2017 | +202 |
| 2018 | −84 |
| 2019 | −6 |
| 2021 | +150 |
| 2022 | +248 |
| 2023 | +485 |
| 2024 | +152 |
| 2025 | −55 |
Dearborn sits in Indiana's southeastern corner along the Ohio River, where rural demographics and a manufacturing heritage have produced presidential margins exceeding 58 points in 2024, among the widest in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 30.2 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 58.3 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 58.3 points.
A population of 51,094, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $84,735 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Franklin County and Miami County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Dearborn County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18029/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.