HarrisDemocratic32.0%24,880TrumpRepublican66.3%51,588KennedyIndependent0.9%730
R+34.3- Lead
- 26,708
- Total
- 77,832
- vs nation
- R+32.8
- Turnout
- 64.8%
Akashiccounty
Johnson County, IN
Contests in this Place (88 available)
President34 · 1892–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1892–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 64.8% of 122,120 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic31.6%24,376TrumpRepublican66.3%51,219JorgensenLibertarian2.1%1,618
R+34.7- Lead
- 26,843
- Total
- 77,258
- vs nation
- R+39.2
- Turnout
- 69.2%
ClintonDemocratic25.8%17,318TrumpRepublican67.7%45,456JohnsonLibertarian5.1%3,455
R+41.9- Lead
- 28,138
- Total
- 67,147
- vs nation
- R+44.0
- Turnout
- 63.6%
ObamaDemocratic29.7%17,260RomneyRepublican68.0%39,513JohnsonLibertarian2.0%1,150
R+38.3- Lead
- 22,253
- Total
- 58,092
- vs nation
- R+42.2
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic36.8%21,553McCainRepublican62.2%36,487OtherAll other candidates1.0%604
R+25.5- Lead
- 14,934
- Total
- 58,644
- vs nation
- R+32.7
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic25.6%13,109BushRepublican73.7%37,765OtherAll other candidates0.7%381
R+48.1- Lead
- 24,656
- Total
- 51,255
- vs nation
- R+45.6
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic28.3%11,952BushRepublican69.5%29,404OtherAll other candidates2.2%928
R+41.3- Lead
- 17,452
- Total
- 42,284
- vs nation
- R+41.8
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic28.7%11,278DoleRepublican60.5%23,733PerotReform10.1%3,975
R+31.7- Lead
- 12,455
- Total
- 39,259
- vs nation
- R+40.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+34.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 166,3152024 5-year
- Population density
- 519 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 320 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $90,4542024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 83.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 3.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 4.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+35.8 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+54.9 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Hendricks County, IN · twin score 94.1
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 64.8%79,163 participants ÷ 122,120 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +30.9 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- +5.8 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 33.9%–50.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79,163 | 122,120 ± 842 | 64.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 45,737 | 119,338 ± 811 | 38.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 79,176 | 114,383 ± 782 | 69.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 73,064 | 110,446 ± 618 | 66.2% | Audited | A/A |
| 67,973 | 106,798 ± 641 | 63.6% | Audited | A/A | |
| 58,092 | 100,990 | 57.5% | Derived | — | |
| 58,644 | 99,368 | 59.0% | Derived | — | |
| 51,255 | 97,746 extrapolated | 52.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Johnson County only. The complete district District 6 result is shown below for comparison.
Johnson County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Cynthia (Cinde) Wirth0—
David Lawrence Boyd0—
Nicholas Frederick Baker0—
William Kory Amyx0—
District District 6 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 247 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
247 precincts · 77,832 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 44WHITE RIVER 44 | 443 | 928 | 25 | 1,396 | 31.7% | 66.5% | R+34.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 15WHITE RIVER 15 | 400 | 846 | 23 | 1,269 | 31.5% | 66.7% | R+35.1 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 22PLEASANT 22 | 437 | 792 | 19 | 1,248 | 35.0% | 63.5% | R+28.4 |
| Precinct -NEEDHAM 05NEEDHAM 05 | 409 | 793 | 19 | 1,221 | 33.5% | 64.9% | R+31.4 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 21PLEASANT 21 | 314 | 860 | 17 | 1,191 | 26.4% | 72.2% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 45PLEASANT 45 | 463 | 663 | 16 | 1,142 | 40.5% | 58.1% | R+17.5 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 03PLEASANT 03 | 365 | 751 | 12 | 1,128 | 32.4% | 66.6% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 21WHITE RIVER 21 | 418 | 609 | 12 | 1,039 | 40.2% | 58.6% | R+18.4 |
| Precinct -NINEVEH 01NINEVEH 01 | 183 | 831 | 15 | 1,029 | 17.8% | 80.8% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 09FRANKLIN 09 | 326 | 661 | 20 | 1,007 | 32.4% | 65.6% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -NEEDHAM 02NEEDHAM 02 | 357 | 604 | 19 | 980 | 36.4% | 61.6% | R+25.2 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 19PLEASANT 19 | 279 | 680 | 20 | 979 | 28.5% | 69.5% | R+41.0 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 42PLEASANT 42 | 387 | 562 | 19 | 968 | 40.0% | 58.1% | R+18.1 |
| Precinct -HENSLEY 03HENSLEY 03 | 171 | 770 | 12 | 953 | 17.9% | 80.8% | R+62.9 |
| Precinct -HENSLEY 02HENSLEY 02 | 173 | 739 | 19 | 931 | 18.6% | 79.4% | R+60.8 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 29WHITE RIVER 29 | 315 | 597 | 16 | 928 | 33.9% | 64.3% | R+30.4 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 16FRANKLIN 16 | 284 | 606 | 13 | 903 | 31.5% | 67.1% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 39WHITE RIVER 39 | 336 | 547 | 10 | 893 | 37.6% | 61.3% | R+23.6 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 43PLEASANT 43 | 311 | 519 | 9 | 839 | 37.1% | 61.9% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 14WHITE RIVER 14 | 321 | 500 | 16 | 837 | 38.4% | 59.7% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 09WHITE RIVER 09 | 241 | 585 | 10 | 836 | 28.8% | 70.0% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 16WHITE RIVER 16 | 288 | 530 | 13 | 831 | 34.7% | 63.8% | R+29.1 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 07WHITE RIVER 07 | 310 | 505 | 6 | 821 | 37.8% | 61.5% | R+23.8 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 11PLEASANT 11 | 308 | 495 | 16 | 819 | 37.6% | 60.4% | R+22.8 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 46WHITE RIVER 46 | 332 | 463 | 17 | 812 | 40.9% | 57.0% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 32WHITE RIVER 32 | 273 | 521 | 11 | 805 | 33.9% | 64.7% | R+30.8 |
| Precinct -NINEVEH 02NINEVEH 02 | 176 | 599 | 29 | 804 | 21.9% | 74.5% | R+52.6 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 03WHITE RIVER 03 | 311 | 485 | 7 | 803 | 38.7% | 60.4% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 45WHITE RIVER 45 | 247 | 538 | 14 | 799 | 30.9% | 67.3% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 19FRANKLIN 19 | 240 | 494 | 21 | 755 | 31.8% | 65.4% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -NEEDHAM 01NEEDHAM 01 | 165 | 574 | 8 | 747 | 22.1% | 76.8% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 12WHITE RIVER 12 | 262 | 472 | 13 | 747 | 35.1% | 63.2% | R+28.1 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 31PLEASANT 31 | 195 | 535 | 14 | 744 | 26.2% | 71.9% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 50PLEASANT 50 | 230 | 488 | 17 | 735 | 31.3% | 66.4% | R+35.1 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 08WHITE RIVER 08 | 191 | 523 | 16 | 730 | 26.2% | 71.6% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 22WHITE RIVER 22 | 260 | 456 | 10 | 726 | 35.8% | 62.8% | R+27.0 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 33PLEASANT 33 | 235 | 468 | 10 | 713 | 33.0% | 65.6% | R+32.7 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 01FRANKLIN 01 | 202 | 489 | 19 | 710 | 28.5% | 68.9% | R+40.4 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 14PLEASANT 14 | 220 | 476 | 14 | 710 | 31.0% | 67.0% | R+36.1 |
| Precinct -UNION 01UNION 01 | 168 | 522 | 12 | 702 | 23.9% | 74.4% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 11WHITE RIVER 11 | 208 | 483 | 6 | 697 | 29.8% | 69.3% | R+39.5 |
| Precinct -CLARK 03CLARK 03 | 166 | 501 | 8 | 675 | 24.6% | 74.2% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 35WHITE RIVER 35 | 172 | 496 | 7 | 675 | 25.5% | 73.5% | R+48.0 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 28PLEASANT 28 | 218 | 429 | 22 | 669 | 32.6% | 64.1% | R+31.5 |
| Precinct -CLARK 02CLARK 02 | 123 | 529 | 10 | 662 | 18.6% | 79.9% | R+61.3 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 34WHITE RIVER 34 | 180 | 440 | 9 | 629 | 28.6% | 70.0% | R+41.3 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 39PLEASANT 39 | 238 | 378 | 12 | 628 | 37.9% | 60.2% | R+22.3 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 15FRANKLIN 15 | 140 | 458 | 19 | 617 | 22.7% | 74.2% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 38WHITE RIVER 38 | 188 | 419 | 7 | 614 | 30.6% | 68.2% | R+37.6 |
| Precinct -NEEDHAM 04NEEDHAM 04 | 224 | 371 | 10 | 605 | 37.0% | 61.3% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 38PLEASANT 38 | 217 | 359 | 13 | 589 | 36.8% | 61.0% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -UNION 02UNION 02 | 112 | 455 | 9 | 576 | 19.4% | 79.0% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 25WHITE RIVER 25 | 229 | 335 | 10 | 574 | 39.9% | 58.4% | R+18.5 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 06WHITE RIVER 06 | 181 | 356 | 13 | 550 | 32.9% | 64.7% | R+31.8 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 13PLEASANT 13 | 265 | 268 | 9 | 542 | 48.9% | 49.4% | R+0.6 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 42WHITE RIVER 42 | 239 | 289 | 14 | 542 | 44.1% | 53.3% | R+9.2 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 40PLEASANT 40 | 185 | 347 | 6 | 538 | 34.4% | 64.5% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 47PLEASANT 47 | 201 | 325 | 7 | 533 | 37.7% | 61.0% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 04WHITE RIVER 04 | 179 | 338 | 8 | 525 | 34.1% | 64.4% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 01WHITE RIVER 01 | 179 | 328 | 12 | 519 | 34.5% | 63.2% | R+28.7 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 02PLEASANT 02 | 133 | 375 | 8 | 516 | 25.8% | 72.7% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 17PLEASANT 17 | 195 | 315 | 6 | 516 | 37.8% | 61.0% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 24WHITE RIVER 24 | 153 | 351 | 10 | 514 | 29.8% | 68.3% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -NEEDHAM 03NEEDHAM 03 | 115 | 389 | 6 | 510 | 22.5% | 76.3% | R+53.7 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 07PLEASANT 07 | 117 | 387 | 3 | 507 | 23.1% | 76.3% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 34PLEASANT 34 | 136 | 356 | 9 | 501 | 27.1% | 71.1% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 08PLEASANT 08 | 183 | 311 | 6 | 500 | 36.6% | 62.2% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 06FRANKLIN 06 | 139 | 346 | 6 | 491 | 28.3% | 70.5% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 01PLEASANT 01 | 132 | 348 | 6 | 486 | 27.2% | 71.6% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 16PLEASANT 16 | 157 | 320 | 9 | 486 | 32.3% | 65.8% | R+33.5 |
| Precinct -BLUE RIVER 03BLUE RIVER 03 | 75 | 406 | 4 | 485 | 15.5% | 83.7% | R+68.2 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 37WHITE RIVER 37 | 208 | 267 | 8 | 483 | 43.1% | 55.3% | R+12.2 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 41WHITE RIVER 41 | 177 | 299 | 7 | 483 | 36.6% | 61.9% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 27WHITE RIVER 27 | 164 | 302 | 16 | 482 | 34.0% | 62.7% | R+28.6 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 02FRANKLIN 02 | 199 | 268 | 12 | 479 | 41.5% | 55.9% | R+14.4 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 48PLEASANT 48 | 207 | 264 | 8 | 479 | 43.2% | 55.1% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 32PLEASANT 32 | 191 | 280 | 6 | 477 | 40.0% | 58.7% | R+18.7 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 17FRANKLIN 17 | 178 | 281 | 13 | 472 | 37.7% | 59.5% | R+21.8 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 19WHITE RIVER 19 | 156 | 304 | 9 | 469 | 33.3% | 64.8% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 35PLEASANT 35 | 146 | 306 | 11 | 463 | 31.5% | 66.1% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 13WHITE RIVER 13 | 140 | 312 | 9 | 461 | 30.4% | 67.7% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 09PLEASANT 09 | 153 | 291 | 15 | 459 | 33.3% | 63.4% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 30WHITE RIVER 30 | 177 | 273 | 7 | 457 | 38.7% | 59.7% | R+21.0 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 18FRANKLIN 18 | 178 | 274 | 4 | 456 | 39.0% | 60.1% | R+21.1 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 18PLEASANT 18 | 116 | 329 | 9 | 454 | 25.6% | 72.5% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 12PLEASANT 12 | 134 | 309 | 7 | 450 | 29.8% | 68.7% | R+38.9 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 40WHITE RIVER 40 | 146 | 294 | 7 | 447 | 32.7% | 65.8% | R+33.1 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 07FRANKLIN 07 | 228 | 208 | 9 | 445 | 51.2% | 46.7% | D+4.5 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 17WHITE RIVER 17 | 160 | 268 | 12 | 440 | 36.4% | 60.9% | R+24.5 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 36WHITE RIVER 36 | 143 | 287 | 9 | 439 | 32.6% | 65.4% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 33WHITE RIVER 33 | 130 | 301 | 5 | 436 | 29.8% | 69.0% | R+39.2 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 20WHITE RIVER 20 | 139 | 287 | 3 | 429 | 32.4% | 66.9% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -NINEVEH 03NINEVEH 03 | 94 | 327 | 6 | 427 | 22.0% | 76.6% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 18WHITE RIVER 18 | 137 | 275 | 12 | 424 | 32.3% | 64.9% | R+32.5 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 49PLEASANT 49 | 144 | 261 | 12 | 417 | 34.5% | 62.6% | R+28.1 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 46PLEASANT 46 | 88 | 316 | 7 | 411 | 21.4% | 76.9% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 20FRANKLIN 20 | 136 | 271 | 3 | 410 | 33.2% | 66.1% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 30PLEASANT 30 | 153 | 248 | 9 | 410 | 37.3% | 60.5% | R+23.2 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 31WHITE RIVER 31 | 160 | 244 | 5 | 409 | 39.1% | 59.7% | R+20.5 |
| Precinct -BLUE RIVER 02BLUE RIVER 02 | 87 | 313 | 3 | 403 | 21.6% | 77.7% | R+56.1 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 05WHITE RIVER 05 | 121 | 278 | 4 | 403 | 30.0% | 69.0% | R+39.0 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 06PLEASANT 06 | 124 | 266 | 5 | 395 | 31.4% | 67.3% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 10WHITE RIVER 10 | 127 | 260 | 7 | 394 | 32.2% | 66.0% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 26WHITE RIVER 26 | 118 | 263 | 12 | 393 | 30.0% | 66.9% | R+36.9 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 04FRANKLIN 04 | 169 | 209 | 10 | 388 | 43.6% | 53.9% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -UNION 03UNION 03 | 87 | 283 | 4 | 374 | 23.3% | 75.7% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 11FRANKLIN 11 | 132 | 229 | 10 | 371 | 35.6% | 61.7% | R+26.1 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 10FRANKLIN 10 | 97 | 261 | 10 | 368 | 26.4% | 70.9% | R+44.6 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 28WHITE RIVER 28 | 115 | 240 | 7 | 362 | 31.8% | 66.3% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 44PLEASANT 44 | 142 | 208 | 5 | 355 | 40.0% | 58.6% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -BLUE RIVER 04BLUE RIVER 04 | 69 | 267 | 5 | 341 | 20.2% | 78.3% | R+58.1 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 04PLEASANT 04 | 135 | 194 | 10 | 339 | 39.8% | 57.2% | R+17.4 |
| Precinct -CLARK 01CLARK 01 | 56 | 264 | 10 | 330 | 17.0% | 80.0% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 29PLEASANT 29 | 124 | 201 | 5 | 330 | 37.6% | 60.9% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -BLUE RIVER 05BLUE RIVER 05 | 64 | 258 | 4 | 326 | 19.6% | 79.1% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -BLUE RIVER 01BLUE RIVER 01 | 58 | 264 | 3 | 325 | 17.8% | 81.2% | R+63.4 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 03FRANKLIN 03 | 119 | 189 | 7 | 315 | 37.8% | 60.0% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 13FRANKLIN 13 | 92 | 218 | 4 | 314 | 29.3% | 69.4% | R+40.1 |
| Precinct -HENSLEY 01HENSLEY 01 | 50 | 247 | 8 | 305 | 16.4% | 81.0% | R+64.6 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 23WHITE RIVER 23 | 81 | 210 | 8 | 299 | 27.1% | 70.2% | R+43.1 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 43WHITE RIVER 43 | 84 | 207 | 4 | 295 | 28.5% | 70.2% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 10PLEASANT 10 | 94 | 195 | 3 | 292 | 32.2% | 66.8% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 27PLEASANT 27 | 121 | 156 | 6 | 283 | 42.8% | 55.1% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 15PLEASANT 15 | 73 | 204 | 5 | 282 | 25.9% | 72.3% | R+46.5 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 14FRANKLIN 14 | 79 | 186 | 5 | 270 | 29.3% | 68.9% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 24PLEASANT 24 | 93 | 147 | 5 | 245 | 38.0% | 60.0% | R+22.0 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 05PLEASANT 05 | 80 | 153 | 11 | 244 | 32.8% | 62.7% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -WHITE RIVER 02WHITE RIVER 02 | 90 | 143 | 7 | 240 | 37.5% | 59.6% | R+22.1 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 08FRANKLIN 08 | 51 | 184 | 3 | 238 | 21.4% | 77.3% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 26PLEASANT 26 | 82 | 146 | 5 | 233 | 35.2% | 62.7% | R+27.5 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 05FRANKLIN 05 | 92 | 124 | 8 | 224 | 41.1% | 55.4% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 25PLEASANT 25 | 85 | 123 | 5 | 213 | 39.9% | 57.7% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -FRANKLIN 12FRANKLIN 12 | 69 | 128 | 5 | 202 | 34.2% | 63.4% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 37PLEASANT 37 | 98 | 98 | 4 | 200 | 49.0% | 49.0% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 20PLEASANT 20 | 61 | 116 | 3 | 180 | 33.9% | 64.4% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 23PLEASANT 23 | 67 | 105 | 5 | 177 | 37.9% | 59.3% | R+21.5 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 41PLEASANT 41 | 36 | 118 | 3 | 157 | 22.9% | 75.2% | R+52.2 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 36PLEASANT 36 | 51 | 100 | 4 | 155 | 32.9% | 64.5% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -NINEVEH 04 (NV)NINEVEH 04 (NV) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| BLUE RIVER 0118_1808100010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLUE RIVER 0218_1808100020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLUE RIVER 0318_1808100030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLUE RIVER 0418_1808100040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLUE RIVER 0518_1808100050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLARK 0118_1808100060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLARK 0218_1808100070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 0118_1808100080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 0218_1808100090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 0318_1808100100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 0418_1808100110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 0518_1808100120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 0618_1808100130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 0718_1808100140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 0818_1808100150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 0918_1808100160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 1018_1808100170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 1118_1808100180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 1218_1808100190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 1318_1808100200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 1418_1808100210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 1518_1808100220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FRANKLIN 1618_1808100230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HENSLEY 0118_1808100240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HENSLEY 0218_1808100250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HENSLEY 0318_1808100260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEEDHAM 0118_1808100270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEEDHAM 0218_1808100280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEEDHAM 0318_1808100290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEEDHAM 0418_1808100300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NINEVEH 0118_1808100310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NINEVEH 0218_1808100320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NINEVEH 0318_1808100330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NINEVEH 04 (NV)18_1808100340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 0118_1808100350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 0218_1808100360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 0318_1808100370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 0418_1808100380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 0518_1808100390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 0618_1808100400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 0718_1808100410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 0818_1808100420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 0918_1808100430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 1018_1808100440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 1118_1808100450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 1218_1808100460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 1318_1808100470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 1418_1808100480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 1518_1808100490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 1618_1808100500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 1718_1808100510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 1818_1808100520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 1918_1808100530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 2018_1808100540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 2118_1808100550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 2218_1808100560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 2318_1808100570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 2418_1808100580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 2518_1808100590 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 2618_1808100600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 2718_1808100610 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 2818_1808100620 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 2918_1808100630 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 3018_1808100640 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 3118_1808100650 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 3218_1808100660 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 3318_1808100670 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 3418_1808100680 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 3518_1808100690 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 3618_1808100700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 3718_1808100710 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 3818_1808100720 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 3918_1808100730 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PLEASANT 4018_1808100740 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 0118_1808100750 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 0218_1808100760 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 0318_1808100770 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 0118_1808100780 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 0218_1808100790 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 0318_1808100800 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 0418_1808100810 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 0518_1808100820 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 0618_1808100830 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 0718_1808100840 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 0818_1808100850 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 0918_1808100860 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 1018_1808100870 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 1118_1808100880 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 1218_1808100890 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 1318_1808100900 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 1418_1808100910 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 1518_1808100920 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 1618_1808100930 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 1718_1808100940 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 1818_1808100950 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 1918_1808100960 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 2018_1808100970 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 2118_1808100980 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 2218_1808100990 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 2318_1808101000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 2418_1808101010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 2518_1808101020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 2618_1808101030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 2718_1808101040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 2818_1808101050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 2918_1808101060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 3018_1808101070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WHITE RIVER 3118_1808101080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Johnson County, IN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
59.2%
6,940 votes · D+20.0
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1896 · 56.5%
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
77.2%
17,537 votes · R+54.9
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 74.9%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
24,880votes
32.0% of the vote · R+34.3
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 24,376 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
51,588votes
66.3% of the vote · R+34.3
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 51,219 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
James M. Cox1920
+31.7pts D vs U.S.
Place D+5.5 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · Alton B. Parker, 1904 · +25.0 pts
Republican
George W. Bush2004
+45.6pts R vs U.S.
Place R+48.1 · U.S. R+2.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +44.0 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
RAaron FreemanState Senate · 32
RRod BrayState Senate · 37
RGreg WalkerState Senate · 41
RRobb GreeneState House · 47
RCraig HaggardState House · 57
RMichelle DavisState House · 58
RPeggy MayfieldState House · 60
Seats representing Johnson County, IN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 3 state senate and 4 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 1 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 31.9%22,224 | 68.1%47,399 | 69,623 |
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 108,013 |
| 2018 | 103,414 |
| 2020 | 109,058 |
| 2022 | 115,826 |
| 2024 | 123,882 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+2,497 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net +19,045 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $62,286 in average income, against $93,717 for residents who stayed — 34% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+7.1 on average — 41 points more Democratic-leaning than Johnson County, IN itself (R+34.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Marion County, IN2,623D+27.6
- Bartholomew County, IN286R+27.3
- Morgan County, IN241R+54.3
- Hendricks County, IN215R+21.5
- Hamilton County, IN160R+6.1
- Shelby County, IN132R+48.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Marion County, IN2,153
- Morgan County, IN284
- Bartholomew County, IN227
- Hamilton County, IN219
- Hendricks County, IN179
- Shelby County, IN179
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +624 |
| 2012 | +968 |
| 2013 | +1,172 |
| 2014 | +763 |
| 2015 | +1,186 |
| 2016 | +1,725 |
| 2017 | +1,490 |
| 2018 | +1,451 |
| 2019 | +1,268 |
| 2021 | +1,898 |
| 2022 | +1,074 |
| 2023 | +1,628 |
| 2024 | +1,301 |
| 2025 | +2,497 |
Johnson County has added tens of thousands of residents over two decades of suburban sprawl south of Indianapolis, yet its presidential margins have remained among the widest in the state, hitting R+34.3 in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 35.8 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 54.9 points in 1972. The 2024 margin was 34.3 points.
A population of 166,315, a 84% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $90,454 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hendricks County and Hancock County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Hendricks County
Indiana
94.1twin score
elasticity2000–2004 trajectory12-yr trend
Hancock County
Indiana
91.5twin score
12-yr trendelasticity2000–2004 trajectory≠ % Asian
Boone County
Indiana
87.4twin score
elasticity2000–2012 trajectory≠ 12-yr trend
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Johnson County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18081/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Johnson County
Indiana at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Johnson County, Indiana vote in 2024?
In 2024, Johnson County, Indiana voted Republican by 34.3 points (R+34.3), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 77,832 votes cast, 24,880 went Democratic and 51,588 went Republican.
When did Johnson County, Indiana last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Johnson County, Indiana voted Democratic was 1948.
How many people live in Johnson County, Indiana?
Johnson County, Indiana has a population of 166,315 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Johnson County, Indiana?
Median household income in Johnson County, Indiana is $90,454 — above the national median of $80,734. The Indiana state median is $71,957.
What is the political history of Johnson County, Indiana?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Johnson County, Indiana from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 11 went Democratic and 23 went Republican.