HarrisDemocratic35.6%19,824TrumpRepublican62.5%34,837KennedyIndependent1.3%705
R+26.9- Lead
- 15,013
- Total
- 55,730
- vs nation
- R+25.5
- Turnout
- 55.4%
Akashiccounty
Madison County, IN
Contests in this Place (89 available)
President34 · 1892–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1892–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 55.4% of 102,164 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic37.7%19,524TrumpRepublican60.3%31,215JorgensenLibertarian2.0%1,026
R+22.6- Lead
- 11,691
- Total
- 51,793
- vs nation
- R+27.0
- Turnout
- 53.0%
ClintonDemocratic34.2%18,595TrumpRepublican59.5%32,376JohnsonLibertarian4.9%2,690
R+25.3- Lead
- 13,781
- Total
- 54,378
- vs nation
- R+27.4
- Turnout
- 55.4%
ObamaDemocratic46.5%24,407RomneyRepublican51.0%26,769JohnsonLibertarian2.3%1,182
R+4.5- Lead
- 2,362
- Total
- 52,510
- vs nation
- R+8.4
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic52.6%30,152McCainRepublican46.0%26,403OtherAll other candidates1.4%785
D+6.5- Lead
- 3,749
- Total
- 57,340
- vs nation
- R+0.7
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic39.9%21,882BushRepublican59.3%32,526OtherAll other candidates0.8%447
R+19.4- Lead
- 10,644
- Total
- 54,855
- vs nation
- R+16.9
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic44.8%23,403BushRepublican53.5%27,956OtherAll other candidates1.6%857
R+8.7- Lead
- 4,553
- Total
- 52,216
- vs nation
- R+9.2
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic44.3%23,772DoleRepublican43.1%23,151PerotReform12.0%6,447
D+1.2- Lead
- 621
- Total
- 53,720
- vs nation
- R+7.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+26.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 131,9002024 5-year
- Population density
- 292 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 452 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $63,0372024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 82.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 6.1%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 5.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+31.1 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+30.1 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Delaware County, IN · twin score 94.4
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 55.4%56,614 participants ÷ 102,164 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +17.1 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -8.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 38.3%–43.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56,614 | 102,164 ± 353 | 55.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 36,435 | 101,327 ± 360 | 36.0% | Audited | A/A |
| 53,029 | 99,990 ± 329 | 53.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 49,021 | 99,653 ± 293 | 49.2% | Audited | A/A |
| 55,267 | 99,778 ± 359 | 55.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 52,510 | 99,569 | 52.7% | Derived | — | |
| 57,340 | 99,853 | 57.4% | Derived | — | |
| 54,855 | 100,137 extrapolated | 54.8% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Madison County only. The complete district District 5 result is shown below for comparison.
Madison County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Deborah A Pickett0—
Dylan McKenna0—
J.D. Ford0—
Jackson Franklin0—
Phil Goss0—
Steven Avitabile Avit0—
Show all 7 candidates
Tara Nelson0—
District District 5 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 224 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
224 precincts · 55,872 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -GREEN 3GREEN 3 | 718 | 954 | 43 | 1,715 | 41.9% | 55.6% | R+13.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -FALL CREEK 3FALL CREEK 3 | 417 | 774 | 35 | 1,226 | 34.0% | 63.1% | R+29.1 |
| Precinct -FALL CREEK 6FALL CREEK 6 | 363 | 784 | 30 | 1,177 | 30.8% | 66.6% | R+35.8 |
| Precinct -GREEN 2GREEN 2 | 311 | 720 | 24 | 1,055 | 29.5% | 68.2% | R+38.8 |
| Precinct -JACKSONJACKSON | 234 | 788 | 18 | 1,040 | 22.5% | 75.8% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -FALL CREEK 2FALL CREEK 2 | 228 | 659 | 20 | 907 | 25.1% | 72.7% | R+47.5 |
| Precinct -STONEY CREEK 2STONEY CREEK 2 | 225 | 632 | 12 | 869 | 25.9% | 72.7% | R+46.8 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON TWP 3ANDERSON TWP 3 | 339 | 483 | 15 | 837 | 40.5% | 57.7% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 4-4ANDERSON 4-4 | 562 | 259 | 14 | 835 | 67.3% | 31.0% | D+36.3 |
| Precinct -FALL CREEK 7FALL CREEK 7 | 273 | 539 | 17 | 829 | 32.9% | 65.0% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -FALL CREEK 8FALL CREEK 8 | 243 | 533 | 20 | 796 | 30.5% | 67.0% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -ADAMS 2ADAMS 2 | 193 | 583 | 18 | 794 | 24.3% | 73.4% | R+49.1 |
| Precinct -GREEN 4GREEN 4 | 265 | 507 | 16 | 788 | 33.6% | 64.3% | R+30.7 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 5-6ANDERSON 5-6 | 377 | 392 | 15 | 784 | 48.1% | 50.0% | R+1.9 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 1VAN BUREN 1 | 214 | 549 | 17 | 780 | 27.4% | 70.4% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -MONROE 8MONROE 8 | 163 | 596 | 16 | 775 | 21.0% | 76.9% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -LAFAYETTE 1LAFAYETTE 1 | 181 | 553 | 15 | 749 | 24.2% | 73.8% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 3RICHLAND 3 | 224 | 501 | 17 | 742 | 30.2% | 67.5% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 3-8ANDERSON 3-8 | 305 | 409 | 17 | 731 | 41.7% | 56.0% | R+14.2 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 5-3ANDERSON 5-3 | 337 | 373 | 15 | 725 | 46.5% | 51.4% | R+5.0 |
| Precinct -LAFAYETTE 2LAFAYETTE 2 | 184 | 492 | 16 | 692 | 26.6% | 71.1% | R+44.5 |
| Precinct -ADAMS 1ADAMS 1 | 183 | 493 | 11 | 687 | 26.6% | 71.8% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 1-5ANDERSON 1-5 | 291 | 377 | 19 | 687 | 42.4% | 54.9% | R+12.5 |
| Precinct -ADAMS 4ADAMS 4 | 157 | 495 | 18 | 670 | 23.4% | 73.9% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct -UNION 5UNION 5 | 229 | 423 | 10 | 662 | 34.6% | 63.9% | R+29.3 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 2RICHLAND 2 | 197 | 437 | 20 | 654 | 30.1% | 66.8% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -FALL CREEK 4FALL CREEK 4 | 246 | 394 | 12 | 652 | 37.7% | 60.4% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 1-7ANDERSON 1-7 | 267 | 367 | 13 | 647 | 41.3% | 56.7% | R+15.5 |
| Precinct -UNION 7UNION 7 | 206 | 428 | 10 | 644 | 32.0% | 66.5% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -UNION 2UNION 2 | 270 | 354 | 12 | 636 | 42.5% | 55.7% | R+13.2 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 1-2ANDERSON 1-2 | 276 | 337 | 13 | 626 | 44.1% | 53.8% | R+9.7 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 3-7ANDERSON 3-7 | 248 | 353 | 17 | 618 | 40.1% | 57.1% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 3-6ANDERSON 3-6 | 284 | 315 | 10 | 609 | 46.6% | 51.7% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 3-2ANDERSON 3-2 | 262 | 320 | 19 | 601 | 43.6% | 53.2% | R+9.7 |
| Precinct -STONEY CREEK 3STONEY CREEK 3 | 159 | 425 | 17 | 601 | 26.5% | 70.7% | R+44.3 |
| Precinct -MONROE 7MONROE 7 | 169 | 421 | 10 | 600 | 28.2% | 70.2% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -STONEY CREEK 1STONEY CREEK 1 | 182 | 392 | 19 | 593 | 30.7% | 66.1% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -UNION 1UNION 1 | 193 | 381 | 12 | 586 | 32.9% | 65.0% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 11PIPE CREEK 11 | 142 | 426 | 10 | 578 | 24.6% | 73.7% | R+49.1 |
| Precinct -UNION 6UNION 6 | 210 | 352 | 14 | 576 | 36.5% | 61.1% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 4PIPE CREEK 4 | 153 | 404 | 10 | 567 | 27.0% | 71.3% | R+44.3 |
| Precinct -GREEN 1GREEN 1 | 154 | 400 | 9 | 563 | 27.4% | 71.0% | R+43.7 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 3-3ANDERSON 3-3 | 239 | 311 | 10 | 560 | 42.7% | 55.5% | R+12.9 |
| Precinct -FALL CREEK 1FALL CREEK 1 | 186 | 360 | 11 | 557 | 33.4% | 64.6% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -FALL CREEK 5FALL CREEK 5 | 202 | 337 | 11 | 550 | 36.7% | 61.3% | R+24.5 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 10PIPE CREEK 10 | 177 | 365 | 8 | 550 | 32.2% | 66.4% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 12PIPE CREEK 12 | 122 | 398 | 11 | 531 | 23.0% | 75.0% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 5-4ANDERSON 5-4 | 204 | 314 | 11 | 529 | 38.6% | 59.4% | R+20.8 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 3-9ANDERSON 3-9 | 195 | 304 | 14 | 513 | 38.0% | 59.3% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 5-2ANDERSON 5-2 | 223 | 273 | 10 | 506 | 44.1% | 54.0% | R+9.9 |
| Precinct -UNION 4UNION 4 | 169 | 318 | 15 | 502 | 33.7% | 63.3% | R+29.7 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 3-1ANDERSON 3-1 | 206 | 280 | 7 | 493 | 41.8% | 56.8% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 3-4ANDERSON 3-4 | 173 | 298 | 9 | 480 | 36.0% | 62.1% | R+26.0 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 1PIPE CREEK 1 | 127 | 334 | 8 | 469 | 27.1% | 71.2% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -UNION 3UNION 3 | 164 | 287 | 16 | 467 | 35.1% | 61.5% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 4-1ANDERSON 4-1 | 324 | 133 | 8 | 465 | 69.7% | 28.6% | D+41.1 |
| Precinct -LAFAYETTE 3LAFAYETTE 3 | 149 | 305 | 9 | 463 | 32.2% | 65.9% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON TWP 2ANDERSON TWP 2 | 224 | 224 | 14 | 462 | 48.5% | 48.5% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -MONROE 6MONROE 6 | 87 | 366 | 9 | 462 | 18.8% | 79.2% | R+60.4 |
| Precinct -MONROE 2MONROE 2 | 102 | 343 | 5 | 450 | 22.7% | 76.2% | R+53.6 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 5-1ANDERSON 5-1 | 183 | 255 | 4 | 442 | 41.4% | 57.7% | R+16.3 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 1-6ANDERSON 1-6 | 170 | 262 | 6 | 438 | 38.8% | 59.8% | R+21.0 |
| Precinct -UNION 8UNION 8 | 152 | 274 | 9 | 435 | 34.9% | 63.0% | R+28.0 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 6PIPE CREEK 6 | 112 | 313 | 4 | 429 | 26.1% | 73.0% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 3-5ANDERSON 3-5 | 122 | 293 | 13 | 428 | 28.5% | 68.5% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 4-7ANDERSON 4-7 | 170 | 241 | 12 | 423 | 40.2% | 57.0% | R+16.8 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 9PIPE CREEK 9 | 94 | 317 | 7 | 418 | 22.5% | 75.8% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 6-1ANDERSON 6-1 | 217 | 179 | 18 | 414 | 52.4% | 43.2% | D+9.2 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 4RICHLAND 4 | 135 | 271 | 8 | 414 | 32.6% | 65.5% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -LAFAYETTE 4LAFAYETTE 4 | 153 | 239 | 9 | 401 | 38.2% | 59.6% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 1-1ANDERSON 1-1 | 169 | 221 | 10 | 400 | 42.3% | 55.3% | R+13.0 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 1-3ANDERSON 1-3 | 160 | 225 | 11 | 396 | 40.4% | 56.8% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -MONROE 1MONROE 1 | 113 | 262 | 9 | 384 | 29.4% | 68.2% | R+38.8 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 5-5ANDERSON 5-5 | 164 | 202 | 12 | 378 | 43.4% | 53.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -MONROE 4MONROE 4 | 105 | 258 | 7 | 370 | 28.4% | 69.7% | R+41.4 |
| Precinct -MONROE 3MONROE 3 | 124 | 240 | 5 | 369 | 33.6% | 65.0% | R+31.4 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 3PIPE CREEK 3 | 109 | 251 | 9 | 369 | 29.5% | 68.0% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 2-6ANDERSON 2-6 | 147 | 191 | 15 | 353 | 41.6% | 54.1% | R+12.5 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 2-1ANDERSON 2-1 | 116 | 232 | 3 | 351 | 33.0% | 66.1% | R+33.0 |
| Precinct -BOONEBOONE | 62 | 273 | 6 | 341 | 18.2% | 80.1% | R+61.9 |
| Precinct -MONROE 5MONROE 5 | 89 | 235 | 14 | 338 | 26.3% | 69.5% | R+43.2 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 2-7ANDERSON 2-7 | 145 | 185 | 7 | 337 | 43.0% | 54.9% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 6RICHLAND 6 | 131 | 185 | 13 | 329 | 39.8% | 56.2% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 2-8ANDERSON 2-8 | 127 | 189 | 3 | 319 | 39.8% | 59.2% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 6-6ANDERSON 6-6 | 193 | 123 | 2 | 318 | 60.7% | 38.7% | D+22.0 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 2-4ANDERSON 2-4 | 136 | 171 | 7 | 314 | 43.3% | 54.5% | R+11.1 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 1-4ANDERSON 1-4 | 144 | 161 | 5 | 310 | 46.5% | 51.9% | R+5.5 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 6-5ANDERSON 6-5 | 163 | 137 | 7 | 307 | 53.1% | 44.6% | D+8.5 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 6-3ANDERSON 6-3 | 129 | 161 | 7 | 297 | 43.4% | 54.2% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 2PIPE CREEK 2 | 70 | 222 | 4 | 296 | 23.6% | 75.0% | R+51.4 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 8PIPE CREEK 8 | 85 | 202 | 4 | 291 | 29.2% | 69.4% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 4-3ANDERSON 4-3 | 219 | 62 | 4 | 285 | 76.8% | 21.8% | D+55.1 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 6-4ANDERSON 6-4 | 204 | 67 | 7 | 278 | 73.4% | 24.1% | D+49.3 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 5RICHLAND 5 | 73 | 168 | 10 | 251 | 29.1% | 66.9% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 1RICHLAND 1 | 42 | 202 | 6 | 250 | 16.8% | 80.8% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -DUCK CREEK 1DUCK CREEK 1 | 47 | 195 | 7 | 249 | 18.9% | 78.3% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 7PIPE CREEK 7 | 82 | 160 | 7 | 249 | 32.9% | 64.3% | R+31.3 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 6-2ANDERSON 6-2 | 113 | 118 | 4 | 235 | 48.1% | 50.2% | R+2.1 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 2-3ANDERSON 2-3 | 92 | 138 | 1 | 231 | 39.8% | 59.7% | R+19.9 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 6-7ANDERSON 6-7 | 93 | 128 | 7 | 228 | 40.8% | 56.1% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 4-5ANDERSON 4-5 | 148 | 49 | 4 | 201 | 73.6% | 24.4% | D+49.3 |
| Precinct -PIPE CREEK 5PIPE CREEK 5 | 52 | 140 | 2 | 194 | 26.8% | 72.2% | R+45.4 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 2-5ANDERSON 2-5 | 75 | 104 | 1 | 180 | 41.7% | 57.8% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 2-2ANDERSON 2-2 | 67 | 107 | 3 | 177 | 37.9% | 60.5% | R+22.6 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 4-6ANDERSON 4-6 | 98 | 66 | 7 | 171 | 57.3% | 38.6% | D+18.7 |
| Precinct -ANDERSON TWP 1ANDERSON TWP 1 | 52 | 71 | 2 | 125 | 41.6% | 56.8% | R+15.2 |
| Precinct -GREEN 5GREEN 5 | 33 | 60 | 3 | 96 | 34.4% | 62.5% | R+28.1 |
| Precinct -FALL CREEK 10FALL CREEK 10 | 18 | 71 | 5 | 94 | 19.1% | 75.5% | R+56.4 |
| Precinct -DUCK CREEK 2DUCK CREEK 2 | 17 | 35 | 0 | 52 | 32.7% | 67.3% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -FALL CREEK 9FALL CREEK 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 75.0% | 25.0% | D+50.0 |
| Precinct -ADAMS 3ADAMS 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| ADAMS - ANDERSON 318_1809500030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ADAMS 0118_1809500010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ADAMS 0218_1809500020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 01-0118_1809500040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 01-0218_1809500050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 01-0318_1809500060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 01-0418_1809500070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 01-0518_1809500080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 01-0618_1809500090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 01-0718_1809500100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 02-0118_1809500110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 02-0218_1809500120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 02-0318_1809500130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 02-0418_1809500140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 02-0618_1809500160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 02-0718_1809500170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 02-0818_1809500180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 02-1018_1809500200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 03-0118_1809500220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 03-0218_1809500230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 03-0318_1809500240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 03-0418_1809500250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 03-0718_1809500280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 03-0818_1809500290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 03-0918_1809500300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 04-0118_1809500310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 04-0318_1809500330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 04-0418_1809500340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 04-0518_1809500350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 04-0618_1809500360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 04-0718_1809500370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 05-0118_1809500390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 05-0618_1809500440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 06-0118_1809500450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 06-0218_1809500460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 06-0418_1809500480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 2-1118_1809500210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 2-518_1809500150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 2-918_1809500190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 3-518_1809500260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 3-618_1809500270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 4-218_1809500320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 4-818_1809500380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 5-218_1809500400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 5-318_1809500410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 5-418_1809500420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 5-518_1809500430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 6-318_1809500470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 6-518_1809500490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 6-618_1809500500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON CITY 6-718_1809500510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON TWP 0218_1809500530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON TWP 118_1809500520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ANDERSON TWP 318_1809500540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BOONE 0118_1809500550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DUCK CREEK 0218_1809500570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DUCK CREEK 0318_1809500575 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DUCK CREEK 118_1809500560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FALL CREEK - ANDERSON 918_1809500660 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FALL CREEK 118_1809500580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FALL CREEK 218_1809500590 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FALL CREEK 318_1809500600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FALL CREEK 418_1809500610 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FALL CREEK 518_1809500620 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FALL CREEK 618_1809500630 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FALL CREEK 718_1809500640 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FALL CREEK 818_1809500650 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GREEN 0218_1809500680 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GREEN 0318_1809500690 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GREEN 118_1809500670 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON 0118_1809500700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAFAYETTE - ANDERSON 418_1809500740 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAFAYETTE 0118_1809500710 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAFAYETTE 0218_1809500720 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAFAYETTE 318_1809500730 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 0118_1809500750 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 0218_1809500770 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 0318_1809500790 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 0618_1809500840 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 418_1809500800 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 518_1809500820 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 718_1809500850 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE 818_1809500860 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 0518_1809500910 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 0618_1809500920 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 118_1809500870 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 1018_1809500960 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 1118_1809500970 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 1218_1809500980 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 218_1809500880 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 318_1809500890 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 418_1809500900 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 718_1809500930 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 818_1809500940 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIPE CREEK 918_1809500950 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -ANDERSON 4-2ANDERSON 4-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND - ANDERSON 518_1809501030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND - ANDERSON 618_1809501040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0118_1809500990 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0218_1809501000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0318_1809501010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 418_1809501020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STONEY CREEK 0118_1809501050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STONEY CREEK 0218_1809501060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION - ANDERSON 818_1809501140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 0718_1809501130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 118_1809501070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 218_1809501080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 318_1809501090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 418_1809501100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 518_1809501110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 618_1809501120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VAN BUREN 0118_1809501160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Madison County, IN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
61.5%
27,347 votes · D+24.1
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 57.7%
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
64.9%
39,036 votes · R+30.1
Runner-up · Herbert Hoover, 1928 · 64.5%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
33,325votes
57.7% of the vote · D+15.9
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 30,152 votes
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
39,036votes
64.9% of the vote · R+30.1
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 36,510 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
James M. Cox1920
+18.7pts D vs U.S.
Place R+7.5 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1908 · +14.3 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2016
+27.4pts R vs U.S.
Place R+25.3 · U.S. D+2.1
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · +27.0 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
RMike GaskillState Senate · 25
RLori Goss-ReavesState House · 31
RElizabeth RowrayState House · 35
RKyle PierceState House · 36
REthan LawsonState House · 53
RChris JeterState House · 88
Seats representing Madison County, IN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 5 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 37.0%19,089 | 63.0%32,518 | 51,607 |
| 2020 | R | 41.2%19,861 | 58.8%28,319 | 48,180 |
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 97,694 |
| 2018 | 90,553 |
| 2020 | 90,468 |
| 2022 | 90,563 |
| 2024 | 91,497 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,878 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net +4,074 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $52,297 in average income, against $65,290 for residents who stayed — 20% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+7.4 on average — 20 points more Democratic-leaning than Madison County, IN itself (R+26.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Hamilton County, IN773R+6.1
- Marion County, IN624D+27.6
- Delaware County, IN338R+15.8
- Hancock County, IN203R+33.7
- Henry County, IN150R+47.7
- Grant County, IN84R+41.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Hamilton County, IN424
- Marion County, IN416
- Delaware County, IN397
- Hancock County, IN188
- Henry County, IN151
- Grant County, IN109
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −807 |
| 2012 | −944 |
| 2013 | +137 |
| 2014 | −572 |
| 2015 | −374 |
| 2016 | −136 |
| 2017 | +144 |
| 2018 | +157 |
| 2019 | +16 |
| 2021 | +772 |
| 2022 | +866 |
| 2023 | +1,292 |
| 2024 | +1,645 |
| 2025 | +1,878 |
Madison County anchors the Anderson metropolitan area, where decades of auto-industry contraction reshaped a once-competitive Democratic stronghold into a reliably wide Republican margin by the 2020s.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 31.1 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 30.1 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 26.9 points.
A population of 131,900, a 82% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $63,037 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Delaware County and Wayne County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Delaware County
Indiana
94.4twin score
elasticity2008 margin% unaffiliated
Wayne County
Indiana
92.1twin score
% unaffiliatedcollege share2008 margin≠ elasticity
Morgan County
Illinois
89.5twin score
elasticity2008 margin% White
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Madison County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18095/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Madison County
Indiana at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Madison County, Indiana vote in 2024?
In 2024, Madison County, Indiana voted Republican by 26.9 points (R+26.9), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 55,730 votes cast, 19,824 went Democratic and 34,837 went Republican.
When did Madison County, Indiana last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Madison County, Indiana voted Democratic was 2008.
How many people live in Madison County, Indiana?
Madison County, Indiana has a population of 131,900 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Madison County, Indiana?
Median household income in Madison County, Indiana is $63,037 — below the national median of $80,734. The Indiana state median is $71,957.
What is the political history of Madison County, Indiana?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Madison County, Indiana from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 11 went Democratic and 22 went Republican.