Kingman County, Kansas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
58 precincts · 3,947 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -KS095000150KS095000150 | 144 | 412 | 21 | 577 | 25.0% | 71.4% | R+46.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -KS09500014AKS09500014A | 89 | 291 | 8 | 388 | 22.9% | 75.0% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -KS095000030KS095000030 | 79 | 263 | 3 | 345 | 22.9% | 76.2% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -KS095000100KS095000100 | 48 | 264 | 2 | 314 | 15.3% | 84.1% | R+68.8 |
| Precinct -KS095000170KS095000170 | 71 | 210 | 6 | 287 | 24.7% | 73.2% | R+48.4 |
| Precinct -KS095000160KS095000160 | 35 | 139 | 5 | 179 | 19.6% | 77.7% | R+58.1 |
| Precinct -KS095000070KS095000070 | 29 | 131 | 6 | 166 | 17.5% | 78.9% | R+61.4 |
| Precinct -KS095000230KS095000230 | 23 | 126 | 1 | 150 | 15.3% | 84.0% | R+68.7 |
| Precinct -KS095000190KS095000190 | 15 | 119 | 4 | 138 | 10.9% | 86.2% | R+75.4 |
| Precinct -KS095000260KS095000260 | 29 | 106 | 2 | 137 | 21.2% | 77.4% | R+56.2 |
| Precinct -KS095000110KS095000110 | 14 | 107 | 1 | 122 | 11.5% | 87.7% | R+76.2 |
| Precinct -KS09500027AKS09500027A | 17 | 93 | 1 | 111 | 15.3% | 83.8% | R+68.5 |
| Precinct -KS095000060KS095000060 | 16 | 74 | 1 | 91 | 17.6% | 81.3% | R+63.7 |
| Precinct -KS09500027CKS09500027C | 19 | 64 | 1 | 84 | 22.6% | 76.2% | R+53.6 |
| Precinct -KS095000220KS095000220 | 17 | 64 | 2 | 83 | 20.5% | 77.1% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -KS095000120KS095000120 | 8 | 68 | 1 | 77 | 10.4% | 88.3% | R+77.9 |
| Precinct -KS095000080KS095000080 | 18 | 53 | 4 | 75 | 24.0% | 70.7% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -KS095000130KS095000130 | 7 | 64 | 1 | 72 | 9.7% | 88.9% | R+79.2 |
| Precinct -KS095000180KS095000180 | 15 | 53 | 0 | 68 | 22.1% | 77.9% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -KS095000010KS095000010 | 4 | 61 | 2 | 67 | 6.0% | 91.0% | R+85.1 |
| Precinct -KS095000090KS095000090 | 8 | 57 | 0 | 65 | 12.3% | 87.7% | R+75.4 |
| Precinct -KS095000200KS095000200 | 7 | 52 | 2 | 61 | 11.5% | 85.2% | R+73.8 |
| Precinct -KS095000250KS095000250 | 9 | 49 | 1 | 59 | 15.3% | 83.1% | R+67.8 |
| Precinct -KS095000040KS095000040 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 55 | 7.3% | 92.7% | R+85.5 |
| Precinct -KS095000210KS095000210 | 3 | 48 | 0 | 51 | 5.9% | 94.1% | R+88.2 |
| Precinct -KS095000050KS095000050 | 12 | 35 | 0 | 47 | 25.5% | 74.5% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct -KS095000240KS095000240 | 10 | 36 | 0 | 46 | 21.7% | 78.3% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -KS095000020KS095000020 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 32 | 9.4% | 90.6% | R+81.3 |
| Allen Township Voting District20_20095000010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Belmont Township Voting District20_20095000020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Bennett Township Voting District20_20095000030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Canton Township Voting District20_20095000040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chikaskia Township Voting District20_20095000050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Dale Township Voting District20_20095000060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Dresden Township Voting District20_20095000070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Eagle Township Voting District20_20095000080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Eureka Township Voting District20_20095000090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Evan Township Voting District20_20095000100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Galesburg Township Voting District20_20095000110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Hoosier Township Voting District20_20095000120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Kingman Township Voting District20_20095000130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Kingman Ward 120_2009500014A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Kingman Ward 1 Exclave20_2009500014B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Kingman Ward 220_20095000150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Kingman Ward 320_20095000160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Kingman Ward 420_20095000170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Liberty Township Voting District20_20095000180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ninnescah Township Voting District20_20095000190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Peters Township Voting District20_20095000200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Richland Township Voting District20_20095000210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Rochester Township Voting District20_20095000220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Rural Township Voting District20_20095000230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Union Township Voting District20_20095000240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Valley Township Voting District20_20095000250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Vinita Township Voting District20_20095000260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| White Township Part A Enclave Voting District20_2009500027B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| White Township Part A Voting District20_2009500027A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| White Township Part B Voting District20_2009500027C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −43.1% |
| 1896 | +16.8% |
| 1900 | −4.1% |
| 1904 | −37.1% |
| 1908 | +1.2% |
| 1912 | +35.4% |
| 1916 | +14.9% |
| 1920 | −28.3% |
| 1924 | −30.1% |
| 1928 | −39.8% |
| 1932 | +22.3% |
| 1936 | +29.5% |
| 1940 | −9.6% |
| 1944 | −28.1% |
| 1948 | −13.4% |
| 1952 | −54.6% |
| 1956 | −38.5% |
| 1960 | −25.1% |
| 1964 | +7.4% |
| 1968 | −29.1% |
| 1972 | −41.2% |
| 1976 | +7.4% |
| 1980 | −36.0% |
| 1984 | −45.3% |
| 1988 | −20.9% |
| 1992 | −13.9% |
| 1996 | −40.2% |
| 2000 | −44.1% |
| 2004 | −50.4% |
| 2008 | −44.8% |
| 2012 | −51.5% |
| 2016 | −57.9% |
| 2020 | −60.2% |
| 2024 | −59.9% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 16.2%500 | 81.7%2,527 | 3,094 |
| 2020 | R | 21.5%846 | 73.6%2,902 | 3,943 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 5.6 points more Democratic.
5,615 registered voters · 2025
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+107 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −37 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $50,773 in average income, against $66,174 for residents who stayed — 23% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+18.0 on average — 42 points more Democratic-leaning than Kingman County, KS itself (R+59.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sedgwick County, KS84R+13.8
- Reno County, KS21R+34.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sedgwick County, KS88
- Reno County, KS21
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +32 |
| 2012 | −35 |
| 2013 | +17 |
| 2014 | −129 |
| 2015 | −13 |
| 2016 | −179 |
| 2017 | −33 |
| 2018 | +32 |
| 2019 | −48 |
| 2021 | +38 |
| 2022 | +85 |
| 2023 | +69 |
| 2024 | +20 |
| 2025 | +107 |
Kingman County sits in south-central Kansas's hard-winter-wheat corridor, where a thinly spread agricultural population has delivered some of the state's widest presidential margins for decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 35.4 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 60.2 points in 2020. The 2024 margin was 59.9 points.
A population of 7,186, a 90% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $59,842 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Mitchell County and Sheridan County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Kingman County, Kansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/20095/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.