Rawlins County, Kansas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
35 precincts · 1,403 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -KS153000050KS153000050 | 61 | 295 | 7 | 363 | 16.8% | 81.3% | R+64.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -KS153000020KS153000020 | 17 | 120 | 6 | 143 | 11.9% | 83.9% | R+72.0 |
| Precinct -KS153000150KS153000150 | 4 | 129 | 0 | 133 | 3.0% | 97.0% | R+94.0 |
| Precinct -KS153000170KS153000170 | 12 | 87 | 2 | 101 | 11.9% | 86.1% | R+74.3 |
| Precinct -KS15300009AKS15300009A | 4 | 93 | 2 | 99 | 4.0% | 93.9% | R+89.9 |
| Precinct -KS153000100KS153000100 | 11 | 66 | 1 | 78 | 14.1% | 84.6% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -KS153000040KS153000040 | 15 | 58 | 3 | 76 | 19.7% | 76.3% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -KS153000130KS153000130 | 8 | 64 | 1 | 73 | 11.0% | 87.7% | R+76.7 |
| Precinct -KS153000030KS153000030 | 9 | 50 | 4 | 63 | 14.3% | 79.4% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct -KS153000080KS153000080 | 10 | 51 | 2 | 63 | 15.9% | 81.0% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct -KS153000070KS153000070 | 5 | 47 | 2 | 54 | 9.3% | 87.0% | R+77.8 |
| Precinct -KS153000120KS153000120 | 7 | 43 | 2 | 52 | 13.5% | 82.7% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -KS153000140KS153000140 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 26 | 7.7% | 92.3% | R+84.6 |
| Precinct -KS153000160KS153000160 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 25 | 20.0% | 76.0% | R+56.0 |
| Precinct -KS153000010KS153000010 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 24 | 12.5% | 87.5% | R+75.0 |
| Precinct -KS153000110KS153000110 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 17 | 5.9% | 94.1% | R+88.2 |
| Precinct -KS153000060KS153000060 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 13 | 15.4% | 84.6% | R+69.2 |
| Achilles Township Voting District20_20153000010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Atwood City Precinct 1 East20_20153000020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Atwood City Precinct 1 North20_20153000030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Atwood City Precinct 1 West20_20153000040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Atwood City Precinct 220_20153000050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Atwood Township Voting District20_20153000060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Driftwood Township Voting District20_20153000070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| East Center Voting District20_20153000080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Herl Township South Voting District20_2015300009B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Herl Township Voting District20_2015300009A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Herndon City Voting District20_20153000100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Jefferson Township Voting District20_20153000110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ludell Township Voting District20_20153000120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| McDonald City Voting District20_20153000130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Mirage Township Voting District20_20153000140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Rocewood Township Voting District20_20153000150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Union Township Voting District20_20153000160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| West Center Voting District20_20153000170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −43.8% |
| 1896 | +16.2% |
| 1900 | +7.2% |
| 1904 | −28.1% |
| 1908 | +0.9% |
| 1912 | +26.3% |
| 1916 | +20.4% |
| 1920 | −38.9% |
| 1924 | −17.8% |
| 1928 | −17.5% |
| 1932 | +34.5% |
| 1936 | +19.5% |
| 1940 | −16.9% |
| 1944 | −24.2% |
| 1948 | −11.7% |
| 1952 | −51.9% |
| 1956 | −40.1% |
| 1960 | −24.1% |
| 1964 | −14.7% |
| 1968 | −40.6% |
| 1972 | −45.1% |
| 1976 | −11.5% |
| 1980 | −52.8% |
| 1984 | −58.3% |
| 1988 | −35.6% |
| 1992 | −32.6% |
| 1996 | −56.0% |
| 2000 | −59.9% |
| 2004 | −65.4% |
| 2008 | −62.9% |
| 2012 | −71.5% |
| 2016 | −71.8% |
| 2020 | −69.6% |
| 2024 | −72.6% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 9.4%109 | 87.4%1,010 | 1,155 |
| 2020 | R | 15.2%227 | 80.5%1,204 | 1,495 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 6.3 points more Democratic.
1,988 registered voters · 2025
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+21 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −10 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $36,192 in average income, against $102,392 for residents who stayed — 65% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +22 |
| 2012 | +4 |
| 2013 | +64 |
| 2014 | −5 |
| 2015 | −35 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2017 | −14 |
| 2018 | +12 |
| 2019 | +10 |
| 2021 | +2 |
| 2022 | −21 |
| 2023 | −42 |
| 2024 | −28 |
| 2025 | +21 |
Rawlins County's sparse, agriculture-dependent population of roughly 3,000 produced an R+72.6 presidential margin in 2024, placing it among the most one-sided counties in a state already dominated by wide rural Republican margins.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 34.5 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 72.6 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 72.6 points.
A population of 2,516, a 89% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $67,742 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Sheridan County and Wallace County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Rawlins County, Kansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/20153/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.