Sarpy County, Nebraska
Precinct data
Results by precinct
81 precincts · 100,735 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -6868 | 802 | 1,129 | 12 | 1,943 | 41.3% | 58.1% | R+16.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -1313 | 794 | 965 | 30 | 1,789 | 44.4% | 53.9% | R+9.6 |
| Precinct -7474 | 676 | 1,030 | 20 | 1,726 | 39.2% | 59.7% | R+20.5 |
| Precinct -2424 | 701 | 956 | 18 | 1,675 | 41.9% | 57.1% | R+15.2 |
| Precinct -5757 | 770 | 882 | 20 | 1,672 | 46.1% | 52.8% | R+6.7 |
| Precinct -0202 | 795 | 850 | 25 | 1,670 | 47.6% | 50.9% | R+3.3 |
| Precinct -5252 | 687 | 943 | 29 | 1,659 | 41.4% | 56.8% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -5959 | 634 | 988 | 19 | 1,641 | 38.6% | 60.2% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -6363 | 619 | 995 | 16 | 1,630 | 38.0% | 61.0% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -2323 | 819 | 765 | 30 | 1,614 | 50.7% | 47.4% | D+3.3 |
| Precinct -4242 | 693 | 892 | 27 | 1,612 | 43.0% | 55.3% | R+12.3 |
| Precinct -4343 | 718 | 872 | 18 | 1,608 | 44.7% | 54.2% | R+9.6 |
| Precinct -7070 | 735 | 824 | 20 | 1,579 | 46.5% | 52.2% | R+5.6 |
| Precinct -1212 | 705 | 826 | 23 | 1,554 | 45.4% | 53.2% | R+7.8 |
| Precinct -0303 | 745 | 758 | 25 | 1,528 | 48.8% | 49.6% | R+0.9 |
| Precinct -1919 | 695 | 783 | 14 | 1,492 | 46.6% | 52.5% | R+5.9 |
| Precinct -6060 | 558 | 921 | 11 | 1,490 | 37.4% | 61.8% | R+24.4 |
| Precinct -5555 | 652 | 815 | 13 | 1,480 | 44.1% | 55.1% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -0404 | 724 | 732 | 20 | 1,476 | 49.1% | 49.6% | R+0.5 |
| Precinct -4040 | 566 | 888 | 17 | 1,471 | 38.5% | 60.4% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -2727 | 676 | 748 | 28 | 1,452 | 46.6% | 51.5% | R+5.0 |
| Precinct -4444 | 603 | 795 | 18 | 1,416 | 42.6% | 56.1% | R+13.6 |
| Precinct -2020 | 565 | 836 | 13 | 1,414 | 40.0% | 59.1% | R+19.2 |
| Precinct -5151 | 615 | 778 | 20 | 1,413 | 43.5% | 55.1% | R+11.5 |
| Precinct -3939 | 648 | 738 | 20 | 1,406 | 46.1% | 52.5% | R+6.4 |
| Precinct -7979 | 460 | 923 | 21 | 1,404 | 32.8% | 65.7% | R+33.0 |
| Precinct -6161 | 540 | 847 | 14 | 1,401 | 38.5% | 60.5% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -0606 | 683 | 667 | 33 | 1,383 | 49.4% | 48.2% | D+1.2 |
| Precinct -5858 | 600 | 763 | 11 | 1,374 | 43.7% | 55.5% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -7878 | 436 | 926 | 11 | 1,373 | 31.8% | 67.4% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -3131 | 579 | 762 | 23 | 1,364 | 42.4% | 55.9% | R+13.4 |
| Precinct -7171 | 592 | 751 | 18 | 1,361 | 43.5% | 55.2% | R+11.7 |
| Precinct -3434 | 676 | 645 | 18 | 1,339 | 50.5% | 48.2% | D+2.3 |
| Precinct -4646 | 696 | 620 | 20 | 1,336 | 52.1% | 46.4% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -6262 | 561 | 744 | 14 | 1,319 | 42.5% | 56.4% | R+13.9 |
| Precinct -6464 | 542 | 728 | 31 | 1,301 | 41.7% | 56.0% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -3535 | 613 | 648 | 19 | 1,280 | 47.9% | 50.6% | R+2.7 |
| Precinct -2828 | 624 | 625 | 24 | 1,273 | 49.0% | 49.1% | R+0.1 |
| Precinct -5656 | 581 | 667 | 22 | 1,270 | 45.7% | 52.5% | R+6.8 |
| Precinct -7373 | 366 | 877 | 13 | 1,256 | 29.1% | 69.8% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -0505 | 622 | 609 | 22 | 1,253 | 49.6% | 48.6% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -1111 | 559 | 642 | 19 | 1,220 | 45.8% | 52.6% | R+6.8 |
| Precinct -3333 | 615 | 562 | 32 | 1,209 | 50.9% | 46.5% | D+4.4 |
| Precinct -6969 | 565 | 626 | 14 | 1,205 | 46.9% | 52.0% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -3838 | 498 | 680 | 16 | 1,194 | 41.7% | 57.0% | R+15.2 |
| Precinct -4545 | 536 | 641 | 13 | 1,190 | 45.0% | 53.9% | R+8.8 |
| Precinct -8181 | 367 | 790 | 11 | 1,168 | 31.4% | 67.6% | R+36.2 |
| Precinct -1717 | 554 | 590 | 12 | 1,156 | 47.9% | 51.0% | R+3.1 |
| Precinct -0707 | 566 | 568 | 18 | 1,152 | 49.1% | 49.3% | R+0.2 |
| Precinct -5353 | 553 | 576 | 15 | 1,144 | 48.3% | 50.3% | R+2.0 |
| Precinct -1515 | 510 | 614 | 18 | 1,142 | 44.7% | 53.8% | R+9.1 |
| Precinct -8080 | 265 | 865 | 12 | 1,142 | 23.2% | 75.7% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -1616 | 553 | 568 | 11 | 1,132 | 48.9% | 50.2% | R+1.3 |
| Precinct -4848 | 492 | 619 | 16 | 1,127 | 43.7% | 54.9% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -3636 | 483 | 628 | 15 | 1,126 | 42.9% | 55.8% | R+12.9 |
| Precinct -0101 | 615 | 495 | 14 | 1,124 | 54.7% | 44.0% | D+10.7 |
| Precinct -7777 | 433 | 672 | 17 | 1,122 | 38.6% | 59.9% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -3030 | 543 | 551 | 20 | 1,114 | 48.7% | 49.5% | R+0.7 |
| Precinct -6565 | 463 | 622 | 15 | 1,100 | 42.1% | 56.5% | R+14.5 |
| Precinct -1818 | 486 | 591 | 14 | 1,091 | 44.5% | 54.2% | R+9.6 |
| Precinct -4949 | 536 | 527 | 19 | 1,082 | 49.5% | 48.7% | D+0.8 |
| Precinct -1414 | 508 | 537 | 17 | 1,062 | 47.8% | 50.6% | R+2.7 |
| Precinct -1010 | 493 | 544 | 24 | 1,061 | 46.5% | 51.3% | R+4.8 |
| Precinct -4747 | 445 | 588 | 7 | 1,040 | 42.8% | 56.5% | R+13.8 |
| Precinct -5050 | 452 | 578 | 8 | 1,038 | 43.5% | 55.7% | R+12.1 |
| Precinct -4141 | 417 | 590 | 4 | 1,011 | 41.2% | 58.4% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -5454 | 469 | 525 | 16 | 1,010 | 46.4% | 52.0% | R+5.5 |
| Precinct -2929 | 447 | 541 | 6 | 994 | 45.0% | 54.4% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -2222 | 412 | 562 | 8 | 982 | 42.0% | 57.2% | R+15.3 |
| Precinct -0808 | 481 | 488 | 12 | 981 | 49.0% | 49.7% | R+0.7 |
| Precinct -2121 | 468 | 448 | 17 | 933 | 50.2% | 48.0% | D+2.1 |
| Precinct -3737 | 445 | 478 | 8 | 931 | 47.8% | 51.3% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -0909 | 366 | 502 | 16 | 884 | 41.4% | 56.8% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -7676 | 263 | 585 | 4 | 852 | 30.9% | 68.7% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -7272 | 230 | 581 | 10 | 821 | 28.0% | 70.8% | R+42.8 |
| Precinct -3232 | 397 | 398 | 6 | 801 | 49.6% | 49.7% | R+0.1 |
| Precinct -2626 | 347 | 369 | 11 | 727 | 47.7% | 50.8% | R+3.0 |
| Precinct -6767 | 213 | 464 | 10 | 687 | 31.0% | 67.5% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -6666 | 186 | 413 | 11 | 610 | 30.5% | 67.7% | R+37.2 |
| Precinct -7575 | 169 | 354 | 3 | 526 | 32.1% | 67.3% | R+35.2 |
| Precinct -2525 | 59 | 84 | 4 | 147 | 40.1% | 57.1% | R+17.0 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −15.5% |
| 1896 | +26.6% |
| 1900 | +15.5% |
| 1904 | −17.4% |
| 1908 | +8.6% |
| 1912 | +25.3% |
| 1916 | +19.3% |
| 1920 | −22.8% |
| 1924 | −4.5% |
| 1928 | −2.8% |
| 1932 | +45.4% |
| 1936 | +31.4% |
| 1940 | +7.9% |
| 1944 | +0.2% |
| 1948 | +5.4% |
| 1952 | −18.1% |
| 1956 | −20.9% |
| 1960 | −10.6% |
| 1964 | +11.6% |
| 1968 | −21.9% |
| 1972 | −49.4% |
| 1976 | −23.0% |
| 1980 | −42.5% |
| 1984 | −49.2% |
| 1988 | −29.6% |
| 1992 | −24.0% |
| 1996 | −25.6% |
| 2000 | −31.7% |
| 2004 | −38.9% |
| 2008 | −15.9% |
| 2012 | −23.1% |
| 2016 | −21.2% |
| 2020 | −11.2% |
| 2024 | −11.6% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 6.8 points more Republican.
131,783 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+2,188 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +20,089 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $68,347 in average income, against $104,218 for residents who stayed — 34% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+3.6 on average — 15 points more Democratic-leaning than Sarpy County, NE itself (R+11.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Douglas County, NE3,901D+10.1
- Lancaster County, NE350D+4.3
- Pottawattamie County, IA205R+19.9
- Cass County, NE193R+37.0
- Maricopa County, AZ72R+3.5
- Bexar County, TX53D+9.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Douglas County, NE3,452
- Lancaster County, NE268
- Cass County, NE238
- Pottawattamie County, IA229
- Saunders County, NE71
- Maricopa County, AZ69
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +939 |
| 2012 | +792 |
| 2013 | +1,415 |
| 2014 | +811 |
| 2015 | +1,340 |
| 2016 | +1,230 |
| 2017 | +1,417 |
| 2018 | +1,117 |
| 2019 | +1,607 |
| 2021 | +1,485 |
| 2022 | +1,415 |
| 2023 | +1,994 |
| 2024 | +2,339 |
| 2025 | +2,188 |
Sarpy County sits at the edge of the Omaha metro and has added residents faster than almost any Nebraska county this decade, drawing young families and defense-sector workers tied to Offutt Air Force Base. Its R+11.7 margin in 2024 is notably narrower than Nebraska's rural interior.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 45.4 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 49.4 points in 1972. The 2024 margin was 11.6 points.
A population of 197,389, a 76% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $103,321 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hamilton County and Ottawa County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Sarpy County, Nebraska. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/31153/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.