- Lead
- 20,447
- Total
- 46,369
- vs nation
- R+42.6
- Turnout
- 61.2%
Allen County, OH
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 61.2% of 76,555 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 18,967
- Total
- 48,006
- vs nation
- R+44.0
- Turnout
- 61.8%
- Lead
- 17,193
- Total
- 46,735
- vs nation
- R+38.9
- Turnout
- 58.7%
- Lead
- 11,588
- Total
- 48,708
- vs nation
- R+27.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 10,418
- Total
- 50,495
- vs nation
- R+27.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 16,110
- Total
- 49,256
- vs nation
- R+30.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 14,651
- Total
- 43,795
- vs nation
- R+34.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 8,796
- Total
- 43,948
- vs nation
- R+28.5
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+44.1MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 101,3482024 5-year
- Population density
- 252 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 403 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $64,0382024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 79.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 9.6%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 3.6%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+25.9 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+46.5 in 1984MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Pettis County, MO · twin score 69.9
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 61.2%46,845 participants ÷ 76,555 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +19.2 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.3 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 42.0%–45.5%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46,845 | 76,555 ± 361 | 61.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 33,031 | 77,500 ± 312 | 42.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 48,353 | 78,255 ± 340 | 61.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 36,660 | 78,870 ± 303 | 46.5% | Audited | A/A |
| 46,735 | 79,616 ± 240 | 58.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 48,708 | 80,040 | 60.9% | Derived | — | |
| 50,495 | 78,335 | 64.5% | Derived | — | |
| 49,256 | 76,630 extrapolated | 64.3% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 208 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
208 precincts · 46,361 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -JACKSON AJACKSON A | 105 | 763 | 6 | 874 | 12.0% | 87.3% | R+75.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -MARION AMARION A | 116 | 718 | 4 | 838 | 13.8% | 85.7% | R+71.8 |
| Precinct -JACKSON BJACKSON B | 96 | 735 | 6 | 837 | 11.5% | 87.8% | R+76.3 |
| Precinct -AMANDA EAMANDA E | 111 | 708 | 11 | 830 | 13.4% | 85.3% | R+71.9 |
| Precinct -MARION BMARION B | 114 | 630 | 7 | 751 | 15.2% | 83.9% | R+68.7 |
| Precinct -AUGLAIZE BAUGLAIZE B | 119 | 622 | 6 | 747 | 15.9% | 83.3% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN GAMERICAN G | 176 | 545 | 7 | 728 | 24.2% | 74.9% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct -BLUFFTON ABLUFFTON A | 297 | 424 | 4 | 725 | 41.0% | 58.5% | R+17.5 |
| Precinct -LIMA 7ALIMA 7A | 304 | 415 | 4 | 723 | 42.0% | 57.4% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -LIMA 4DLIMA 4D | 302 | 386 | 7 | 695 | 43.5% | 55.5% | R+12.1 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE GSHAWNEE G | 176 | 494 | 4 | 674 | 26.1% | 73.3% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -SUGAR CREEKSUGAR CREEK | 100 | 569 | 4 | 673 | 14.9% | 84.5% | R+69.7 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE DSHAWNEE D | 191 | 467 | 13 | 671 | 28.5% | 69.6% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE FSHAWNEE F | 210 | 449 | 8 | 667 | 31.5% | 67.3% | R+35.8 |
| Precinct -BLUFFTON CBLUFFTON C | 223 | 436 | 6 | 665 | 33.5% | 65.6% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE JSHAWNEE J | 140 | 517 | 6 | 663 | 21.1% | 78.0% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN JAMERICAN J | 162 | 486 | 5 | 653 | 24.8% | 74.4% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -LIMA 4ALIMA 4A | 267 | 370 | 8 | 645 | 41.4% | 57.4% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY CPERRY C | 112 | 530 | 3 | 645 | 17.4% | 82.2% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -BLUFFTON BBLUFFTON B | 236 | 384 | 11 | 631 | 37.4% | 60.9% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN HAMERICAN H | 166 | 454 | 6 | 626 | 26.5% | 72.5% | R+46.0 |
| Precinct -LIMA 2CLIMA 2C | 233 | 384 | 7 | 624 | 37.3% | 61.5% | R+24.2 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN IAMERICAN I | 128 | 485 | 8 | 621 | 20.6% | 78.1% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -BATH BBATH B | 89 | 527 | 5 | 621 | 14.3% | 84.9% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -LIMA 7CLIMA 7C | 247 | 363 | 6 | 616 | 40.1% | 58.9% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct -BATH GBATH G | 170 | 440 | 2 | 612 | 27.8% | 71.9% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -LIMA 2BLIMA 2B | 233 | 373 | 1 | 607 | 38.4% | 61.4% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE ISHAWNEE I | 136 | 465 | 6 | 607 | 22.4% | 76.6% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct -BATH HBATH H | 162 | 439 | 3 | 604 | 26.8% | 72.7% | R+45.9 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN AAMERICAN A | 119 | 478 | 5 | 602 | 19.8% | 79.4% | R+59.6 |
| Precinct -LIMA 7BLIMA 7B | 227 | 363 | 11 | 601 | 37.8% | 60.4% | R+22.6 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE LSHAWNEE L | 104 | 490 | 4 | 598 | 17.4% | 81.9% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct -AUGLAIZE AAUGLAIZE A | 67 | 527 | 1 | 595 | 11.3% | 88.6% | R+77.3 |
| Precinct -LIMA 2ALIMA 2A | 229 | 364 | 1 | 594 | 38.6% | 61.3% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE KSHAWNEE K | 125 | 447 | 1 | 573 | 21.8% | 78.0% | R+56.2 |
| Precinct -ELIDA AELIDA A | 114 | 455 | 3 | 572 | 19.9% | 79.5% | R+59.6 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE BSHAWNEE B | 150 | 414 | 6 | 570 | 26.3% | 72.6% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE HSHAWNEE H | 153 | 412 | 4 | 569 | 26.9% | 72.4% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -BATH DBATH D | 108 | 450 | 9 | 567 | 19.0% | 79.4% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE ASHAWNEE A | 147 | 409 | 9 | 565 | 26.0% | 72.4% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND BRICHLAND B | 116 | 436 | 5 | 557 | 20.8% | 78.3% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -ELIDA BELIDA B | 111 | 439 | 6 | 556 | 20.0% | 79.0% | R+59.0 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND ARICHLAND A | 108 | 438 | 9 | 555 | 19.5% | 78.9% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -DELPHOS 1ADELPHOS 1A | 126 | 410 | 6 | 542 | 23.2% | 75.6% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -DELPHOS 2ADELPHOS 2A | 131 | 403 | 4 | 538 | 24.3% | 74.9% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY APERRY A | 115 | 415 | 6 | 536 | 21.5% | 77.4% | R+56.0 |
| Precinct -BATH ABATH A | 113 | 417 | 3 | 533 | 21.2% | 78.2% | R+57.0 |
| Precinct -LIMA 1BLIMA 1B | 184 | 342 | 5 | 531 | 34.7% | 64.4% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE ESHAWNEE E | 179 | 349 | 2 | 530 | 33.8% | 65.8% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -LIMA 4CLIMA 4C | 213 | 309 | 3 | 525 | 40.6% | 58.9% | R+18.3 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN LAMERICAN L | 191 | 327 | 3 | 521 | 36.7% | 62.8% | R+26.1 |
| Precinct -DELPHOS 1BDELPHOS 1B | 114 | 397 | 3 | 514 | 22.2% | 77.2% | R+55.1 |
| Precinct -LIMA 1ALIMA 1A | 203 | 301 | 6 | 510 | 39.8% | 59.0% | R+19.2 |
| Precinct -BATH CBATH C | 85 | 419 | 5 | 509 | 16.7% | 82.3% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -MONROE EMONROE E | 49 | 451 | 3 | 503 | 9.7% | 89.7% | R+79.9 |
| Precinct -BATH FBATH F | 102 | 394 | 4 | 500 | 20.4% | 78.8% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -SPENCER ASPENCER A | 63 | 427 | 4 | 494 | 12.8% | 86.4% | R+73.7 |
| Precinct -SPENCERVILLE ASPENCERVILLE A | 93 | 377 | 4 | 474 | 19.6% | 79.5% | R+59.9 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN CAMERICAN C | 110 | 355 | 5 | 470 | 23.4% | 75.5% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN KAMERICAN K | 139 | 328 | 3 | 470 | 29.6% | 69.8% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -MONROE WMONROE W | 50 | 408 | 3 | 461 | 10.8% | 88.5% | R+77.7 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN FAMERICAN F | 140 | 314 | 4 | 458 | 30.6% | 68.6% | R+38.0 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN BAMERICAN B | 123 | 329 | 1 | 453 | 27.2% | 72.6% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -LIMA 4BLIMA 4B | 235 | 204 | 6 | 445 | 52.8% | 45.8% | D+7.0 |
| Precinct -AMANDA NAMANDA N | 67 | 373 | 1 | 441 | 15.2% | 84.6% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -SPENCERVILLE BSPENCERVILLE B | 71 | 359 | 9 | 439 | 16.2% | 81.8% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -LIMA 6ALIMA 6A | 216 | 209 | 9 | 434 | 49.8% | 48.2% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY BPERRY B | 116 | 310 | 5 | 431 | 26.9% | 71.9% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -SHAWNEE CSHAWNEE C | 109 | 314 | 4 | 427 | 25.5% | 73.5% | R+48.0 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN DAMERICAN D | 219 | 184 | 5 | 408 | 53.7% | 45.1% | D+8.6 |
| Precinct -AMERICAN EAMERICAN E | 146 | 261 | 1 | 408 | 35.8% | 64.0% | R+28.2 |
| Precinct -LIMA 3CLIMA 3C | 149 | 255 | 3 | 407 | 36.6% | 62.7% | R+26.0 |
| Precinct -BATH IBATH I | 93 | 305 | 5 | 403 | 23.1% | 75.7% | R+52.6 |
| Precinct -LIMA 3BLIMA 3B | 198 | 176 | 3 | 377 | 52.5% | 46.7% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -BATH EBATH E | 85 | 290 | 1 | 376 | 22.6% | 77.1% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -LIMA 3ALIMA 3A | 170 | 178 | 3 | 351 | 48.4% | 50.7% | R+2.3 |
| Precinct -LIMA 6CLIMA 6C | 273 | 64 | 5 | 342 | 79.8% | 18.7% | D+61.1 |
| Precinct -LIMA 5DLIMA 5D | 161 | 175 | 3 | 339 | 47.5% | 51.6% | R+4.1 |
| Precinct -LIMA 6BLIMA 6B | 185 | 134 | 3 | 322 | 57.5% | 41.6% | D+15.8 |
| Precinct -LIMA 1CLIMA 1C | 134 | 184 | 2 | 320 | 41.9% | 57.5% | R+15.6 |
| Precinct -LIMA 5CLIMA 5C | 218 | 70 | 2 | 290 | 75.2% | 24.1% | D+51.0 |
| Precinct -CAIROCAIRO | 38 | 205 | 2 | 245 | 15.5% | 83.7% | R+68.2 |
| Precinct -LIMA 5ALIMA 5A | 109 | 117 | 5 | 231 | 47.2% | 50.6% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -DELPHOS 2BDELPHOS 2B | 42 | 165 | 1 | 208 | 20.2% | 79.3% | R+59.1 |
| Precinct -HARRODHARROD | 32 | 168 | 0 | 200 | 16.0% | 84.0% | R+68.0 |
| Precinct -LIMA 5BLIMA 5B | 120 | 72 | 1 | 193 | 62.2% | 37.3% | D+24.9 |
| Precinct -LAFAYETTELAFAYETTE | 32 | 147 | 0 | 179 | 17.9% | 82.1% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -BEAVERDAMBEAVERDAM | 14 | 110 | 2 | 126 | 11.1% | 87.3% | R+76.2 |
| AMANDA TWP E Voting District39_39003003ACT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMANDA TWP N Voting District39_39003003ACU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP A Voting District39_39003003ACW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP B Voting District39_39003003ACX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP C Voting District39_39003003ACY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP E Voting District39_39003003ADA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP F Voting District39_39003003ADB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP G Voting District39_39003003ADC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP H Voting District39_39003003ADD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| American Twp I Voting District39_39003000057 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP J Voting District39_39003003ADF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP K Voting District39_39003003ADG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP L Voting District39_39003003ADI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP M Voting District39_39003003ADJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP N Voting District39_39003003ADK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP O Voting District39_39003003ADL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP P Voting District39_39003003ADO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AMERICAN TWP Q Voting District39_39003003ADP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AUGLAIZE TWP A Voting District39_39003003ADT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AUGLAIZE TWP B Voting District39_39003003ADW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP A Voting District39_39003003ADY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP B Voting District39_39003003ADZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP C Voting District39_39003003AEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP D Voting District39_39003003AEB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP E Voting District39_39003003AEC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP F Voting District39_39003003AED | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP G Voting District39_39003003AEE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP H Voting District39_39003003AEF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP I Voting District39_39003003AEG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP J Voting District39_39003003AEI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP K Voting District39_39003003AEJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BATH TWP L Voting District39_39003003AEK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BEAVERDAM VILLAGE Voting District39_39003003AFE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLUFFTON VILLAGE A Voting District39_39003003AFI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLUFFTON VILLAGE B Voting District39_39003003AFJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLUFFTON VILLAGE C Voting District39_39003003AFK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLUFFTON VILLAGE D Voting District39_39003003AFL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLUFFTON VILLAGE E Voting District39_39003003AFM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CAIRO VILLAGE Voting District39_39003003AEW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DELPHOS 1A Voting District39_39003003AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DELPHOS 1B Voting District39_39003003AAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DELPHOS 2A Voting District39_39003003AAE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DELPHOS 2B Voting District39_39003003AAG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELIDA VILLAGE A Voting District39_39003003ADQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELIDA VILLAGE B Voting District39_39003003ADR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FT SHAW VILLAGE A Voting District39_39003003AGB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FT SHAW VILLAGE B Voting District39_39003003AGC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FT SHAW VILLAGE C Voting District39_39003003AGD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HARROD VILLAGE Voting District39_39003003ADU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON TWP A Voting District39_39003003AEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON TWP B Voting District39_39003003AEQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAFAYETTE VILLAGE Voting District39_39003003AEO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 1A Voting District39_39003003AAH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 1B Voting District39_39003003AAJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 1C Voting District39_39003003AAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 1D Voting District39_39003003AAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 1E Voting District39_39003003AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 2A Voting District39_39003003AAO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 2B Voting District39_39003003AAP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 2C Voting District39_39003003AAQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 2D Voting District39_39003003AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 2E Voting District39_39003003AAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 2F Voting District39_39003003AAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 2G Voting District39_39003003AAV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 3A Voting District39_39003003AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 3B Voting District39_39003003AAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 3C Voting District39_39003003AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 4A Voting District39_39003003ABE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 4B Voting District39_39003003ABF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 4C Voting District39_39003003ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 4D Voting District39_39003003ABI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 4E Voting District39_39003003ABJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 4F Voting District39_39003003ABK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 4G Voting District39_39003003ABM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 5A Voting District39_39003003ABP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 5B Voting District39_39003003ABQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 5C Voting District39_39003003ABR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 5D Voting District39_39003003ABT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 6A Voting District39_39003003ABW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 6B Voting District39_39003003ABX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 6C Voting District39_39003003ABZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 6D Voting District39_39003003ACA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 6E Voting District39_39003003ACB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 6F Voting District39_39003003ACC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 7A Voting District39_39003003ACD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 7B Voting District39_39003003ACE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 7C Voting District39_39003003ACG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 7D Voting District39_39003003ACH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 7E Voting District39_39003003ACI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 8A Voting District39_39003003ACM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 8B Voting District39_39003003ACN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIMA 8C Voting District39_39003003ACO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MARION TWP A Voting District39_39003003AES | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MARION TWP B Voting District39_39003003AET | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE TWP E Voting District39_39003003AEX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONROE TWP W Voting District39_39003003AEY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY TWP A Voting District39_39003003AFB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY TWP B Voting District39_39003003AFC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY TWP E Voting District39_39003003AEZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY TWP N Voting District39_39003003AFA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND TWP A Voting District39_39003003AFF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND TWP B Voting District39_39003003AFG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP A Voting District39_39003003AFN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP B Voting District39_39003003AFO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP C Voting District39_39003003AFP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP D Voting District39_39003003AFQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP E Voting District39_39003003AFR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP F Voting District39_39003003AFS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP G Voting District39_39003003AFT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP H Voting District39_39003003AFU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP I Voting District39_39003003AFV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP J Voting District39_39003003AFW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP K Voting District39_39003003AFX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP L Voting District39_39003003AFY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP M Voting District39_39003003AFZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWNEE TWP N Voting District39_39003003AGA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPENCER TWP A Voting District39_39003003AGI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPENCERVILLE VLG A Voting District39_39003003AGK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPENCERVILLE VLG B Voting District39_39003003AGL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SUGAR CREEK TWP A Voting District39_39003003AGN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Allen County, OH · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Woodrow Wilson1916
55.9%
7,905 votes · D+15.5
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1896 · 55.5%
Republican
Ronald Reagan1984
73.0%
33,506 votes · R+46.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 71.6%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
19,522votes
38.7% of the vote · R+20.6
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 18,990 votes
Republican
Ronald Reagan1984
33,506votes
73.0% of the vote · R+46.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 33,201 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1908
+19.5pts D vs U.S.
Place D+10.0 · U.S. R+9.6
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1896 · +18.5 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+44.0pts R vs U.S.
Place R+39.5 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · +42.6 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Allen County, OH. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 29.3%13,433 | 70.7%32,357 | 45,790 |
| 2020 | R | 28.3%13,080 | 71.7%33,201 | 46,281 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 68,054 |
| 2018 | 69,338 |
| 2020 | 67,374 |
| 2022 | 66,650 |
| 2024 | 66,201 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−209 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −7,104 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,047 in average income, against $70,713 for residents who stayed — 28% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+44.3 on average — about the same lean as Allen County, OH (R+44.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Auglaize County, OH252R+64.6
- Van Wert County, OH137R+58.5
- Putnam County, OH130R+68.7
- Hardin County, OH107R+54.7
- Franklin County, OH94D+28.4
- Hancock County, OH81R+38.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Auglaize County, OH251
- Franklin County, OH180
- Van Wert County, OH132
- Hancock County, OH117
- Hardin County, OH113
- Putnam County, OH96
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −662 |
| 2012 | −951 |
| 2013 | −356 |
| 2014 | −452 |
| 2015 | −920 |
| 2016 | −636 |
| 2017 | −620 |
| 2018 | −523 |
| 2019 | −501 |
| 2021 | −284 |
| 2022 | −529 |
| 2023 | −336 |
| 2024 | −125 |
| 2025 | −209 |
Allen County's Republican presidential margins have exceeded 40 points in recent cycles, reflecting a rural and small-city electorate where manufacturing heritage and evangelical church density track closely with statewide GOP overperformance.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 25.9 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 46.5 points in 1984. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 44.1 points.
A population of 101,348, a 79% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $64,038 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Pettis County and Crawford County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Allen County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39003/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.