Wagoner County, Oklahoma
Precinct data
Results by precinct
71 precincts · 38,501 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -730306730306 | 472 | 1,537 | 32 | 2,041 | 23.1% | 75.3% | R+52.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -730104730104 | 674 | 1,288 | 42 | 2,004 | 33.6% | 64.3% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -730304730304 | 503 | 1,438 | 40 | 1,981 | 25.4% | 72.6% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -730206730206 | 553 | 1,305 | 36 | 1,894 | 29.2% | 68.9% | R+39.7 |
| Precinct -730207730207 | 455 | 1,401 | 30 | 1,886 | 24.1% | 74.3% | R+50.2 |
| Precinct -730106730106 | 551 | 1,073 | 34 | 1,658 | 33.2% | 64.7% | R+31.5 |
| Precinct -730307730307 | 310 | 1,271 | 24 | 1,605 | 19.3% | 79.2% | R+59.9 |
| Precinct -730312730312 | 293 | 1,270 | 23 | 1,586 | 18.5% | 80.1% | R+61.6 |
| Precinct -730308730308 | 315 | 1,239 | 21 | 1,575 | 20.0% | 78.7% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -730103730103 | 475 | 989 | 39 | 1,503 | 31.6% | 65.8% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -730202730202 | 337 | 1,122 | 28 | 1,487 | 22.7% | 75.5% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -730109730109 | 281 | 1,138 | 27 | 1,446 | 19.4% | 78.7% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -730108730108 | 318 | 1,034 | 26 | 1,378 | 23.1% | 75.0% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -730110730110 | 297 | 1,054 | 21 | 1,372 | 21.6% | 76.8% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -730302730302 | 415 | 906 | 19 | 1,340 | 31.0% | 67.6% | R+36.6 |
| Precinct -730107730107 | 415 | 878 | 35 | 1,328 | 31.3% | 66.1% | R+34.9 |
| Precinct -730201730201 | 327 | 946 | 29 | 1,302 | 25.1% | 72.7% | R+47.5 |
| Precinct -730305730305 | 301 | 917 | 27 | 1,245 | 24.2% | 73.7% | R+49.5 |
| Precinct -730203730203 | 210 | 957 | 17 | 1,184 | 17.7% | 80.8% | R+63.1 |
| Precinct -730303730303 | 295 | 789 | 14 | 1,098 | 26.9% | 71.9% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -730205730205 | 222 | 770 | 15 | 1,007 | 22.0% | 76.5% | R+54.4 |
| Precinct -730102730102 | 191 | 807 | 8 | 1,006 | 19.0% | 80.2% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -730210730210 | 203 | 718 | 20 | 941 | 21.6% | 76.3% | R+54.7 |
| Precinct -730309730309 | 177 | 710 | 19 | 906 | 19.5% | 78.4% | R+58.8 |
| Precinct -730310730310 | 134 | 688 | 8 | 830 | 16.1% | 82.9% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -730101730101 | 228 | 572 | 15 | 815 | 28.0% | 70.2% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -730204730204 | 129 | 645 | 9 | 783 | 16.5% | 82.4% | R+65.9 |
| Precinct -730209730209 | 131 | 584 | 16 | 731 | 17.9% | 79.9% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -730208730208 | 118 | 441 | 10 | 569 | 20.7% | 77.5% | R+56.8 |
| Voting District 11040_40145110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 11140_40145111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 11240_40145112 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 11340_40145113 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 11440_40145114 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 11540_40145115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 11640_40145116 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 11740_40145117 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 11840_40145118 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 11940_40145119 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 12040_40145120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 12140_40145121 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 12240_40145122 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 12340_40145123 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 12440_40145124 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 24140_40145241 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 24240_40145242 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 24340_40145243 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 24440_40145244 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 24540_40145245 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 24640_40145246 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 24740_40145247 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 24840_40145248 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 24940_40145249 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 25040_40145250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 25140_40145251 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 25240_40145252 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 25340_40145253 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 25440_40145254 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 25540_40145255 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 37140_40145371 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 37240_40145372 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 37340_40145373 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 37440_40145374 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 37540_40145375 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 37640_40145376 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 37840_40145378 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 37940_40145379 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 38040_40145380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 38240_40145382 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 38340_40145383 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 38440_40145384 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1908–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1908 | −28.2% |
| 1912 | +19.5% |
| 1916 | +13.9% |
| 1920 | −1.9% |
| 1924 | +8.7% |
| 1928 | −21.8% |
| 1932 | +45.5% |
| 1936 | +16.8% |
| 1940 | −22.3% |
| 1944 | −18.7% |
| 1948 | +11.9% |
| 1952 | −5.6% |
| 1956 | −16.3% |
| 1960 | −13.7% |
| 1964 | +16.4% |
| 1968 | −13.2% |
| 1972 | −47.3% |
| 1976 | +7.3% |
| 1980 | −25.4% |
| 1984 | −40.5% |
| 1988 | −16.0% |
| 1992 | −9.3% |
| 1996 | −8.4% |
| 2000 | −22.0% |
| 2004 | −35.1% |
| 2008 | −41.8% |
| 2012 | −45.7% |
| 2016 | −52.0% |
| 2020 | −50.1% |
| 2024 | −49.8% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 25.3%13,595 | 71.4%38,310 | 53,664 |
| 2020 | R | 25.1%8,851 | 70.5%24,863 | 35,266 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 6.3 points more Democratic.
54,839 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,761 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +16,294 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $66,293 in average income, against $80,646 for residents who stayed — 18% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+21.7 on average — 28 points more Democratic-leaning than Wagoner County, OK itself (R+49.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Tulsa County, OK1,721R+15.2
- Muskogee County, OK177R+37.6
- Rogers County, OK169R+55.0
- Cherokee County, OK50R+32.6
- Oklahoma County, OK47R+1.7
- Creek County, OK44R+55.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Tulsa County, OK1,391
- Rogers County, OK172
- Muskogee County, OK168
- Creek County, OK75
- Cherokee County, OK64
- Mayes County, OK58
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +346 |
| 2012 | +638 |
| 2013 | +370 |
| 2014 | −223 |
| 2015 | +768 |
| 2016 | +616 |
| 2017 | +1,054 |
| 2018 | +883 |
| 2019 | +976 |
| 2021 | +2,948 |
| 2022 | +2,305 |
| 2023 | +2,317 |
| 2024 | +1,535 |
| 2025 | +1,761 |
Wagoner County sits on Tulsa's southeastern edge and has urbanized steadily over the past two decades, drawing commuter families whose arrival has reinforced rather than moderated its reliably wide Republican margins.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 45.5 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 52.0 points in 2016. The 2024 margin was 49.8 points.
A population of 86,609, a 67% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $81,207 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Rogers County and Matanuska-Susitna Borough.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Wagoner County, Oklahoma. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/40145/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.