HarrisDemocratic20.2%755TrumpRepublican78.1%2,918KennedyIndependent1.2%46
R+57.9- Lead
- 2,163
- Total
- 3,736
- vs nation
- R+56.4
- Turnout
- 70.9%
Akashiccounty
Hutchinson County, SD
Contests in this Place (84 available)
President34 · 1892–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1892–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 70.9% of 5,378 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic20.2%762TrumpRepublican78.2%2,944JorgensenLibertarian1.6%61
R+57.9- Lead
- 2,182
- Total
- 3,767
- vs nation
- R+62.4
- Turnout
- 70.0%
ClintonDemocratic20.6%692TrumpRepublican74.8%2,517JohnsonLibertarian3.3%112
R+54.2- Lead
- 1,825
- Total
- 3,365
- vs nation
- R+56.3
- Turnout
- 62.1%
ObamaDemocratic26.9%923RomneyRepublican71.6%2,451OtherAll other candidates1.5%51
R+44.6- Lead
- 1,528
- Total
- 3,425
- vs nation
- R+48.5
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic34.4%1,242McCainRepublican63.3%2,285OtherAll other candidates2.2%81
R+28.9- Lead
- 1,043
- Total
- 3,608
- vs nation
- R+36.2
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic28.4%1,177BushRepublican69.9%2,899OtherAll other candidates1.7%71
R+41.5- Lead
- 1,722
- Total
- 4,147
- vs nation
- R+39.1
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic29.0%1,052BushRepublican68.9%2,497OtherAll other candidates2.1%76
R+39.9- Lead
- 1,445
- Total
- 3,625
- vs nation
- R+40.4
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic32.9%1,285DoleRepublican55.7%2,177PerotReform10.5%409
R+22.8- Lead
- 892
- Total
- 3,911
- vs nation
- R+31.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+57.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 7,4042024 5-year
- Population density
- 9.1 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 813 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $73,9772024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 90.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.1%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+40.9 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+68.9 in 1944MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Thayer County, NE · twin score 88.4
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 70.9%3,811 participants ÷ 5,378 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +10.3 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -2.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 60.6%–65.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,811 | 5,378 ± 71 | 70.9% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 3,248 | 5,442 ± 68 | 59.7% | Audited | C/A |
| 3,799 | 5,431 ± 71 | 70.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 3,320 | 5,475 ± 132 | 60.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 3,421 | 5,506 ± 105 | 62.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 3,425 | 5,553 | 61.7% | Derived | — | |
| 3,608 | 5,541 | 65.1% | Derived | — | |
| 4,147 | 5,529 extrapolated | 75.0% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Hutchinson County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Hutchinson County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Dusty Johnson0—
Jon Hansen0—
Larry Rhoden0—
Toby Doeden0—
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 13 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
13 precincts · 3,736 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -22 | 226 | 696 | 21 | 943 | 24.0% | 73.8% | R+49.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -44 | 205 | 539 | 13 | 757 | 27.1% | 71.2% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -11 | 113 | 593 | 7 | 713 | 15.8% | 83.2% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -33 | 105 | 423 | 12 | 540 | 19.4% | 78.3% | R+58.9 |
| Precinct -55 | 68 | 379 | 7 | 454 | 15.0% | 83.5% | R+68.5 |
| Precinct -66 | 38 | 288 | 3 | 329 | 11.6% | 87.5% | R+76.0 |
| VTD precinct 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 5 City of Parkston5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Hutchinson County, SD · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
69.9%
3,630 votes · D+40.9
Runner-up · Al Smith, 1928 · 46.6%
Republican
Thomas E. Dewey1944
84.5%
3,799 votes · R+68.9
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 · 83.2%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
3,630votes
69.9% of the vote · D+40.9
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 2,500 votes
Republican
Wendell Willkie1940
5,051votes
82.1% of the vote · R+64.2
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 · 4,322 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
+23.2pts D vs U.S.
Place D+40.9 · U.S. D+17.8
Runner-up · Al Smith, 1928 · +11.4 pts
Republican
Thomas E. Dewey1944
+76.4pts R vs U.S.
Place R+68.9 · U.S. D+7.5
Runner-up · Wendell Willkie, 1940 · +74.1 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
RKyle SchoenfishState Senate · 19
RDrew PetersonState House · 19
RJessica BahmullerState House · 19
Seats representing Hutchinson County, SD. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 1 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 100.0%3,301 | 3,301 |
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2026R+56.9
Presidential vote · 2024R+57.9
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 1.0 points.
4,983 registered voters · 2026
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+9 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net +4 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $46,459 in average income, against $86,116 for residents who stayed — 46% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+25.0 on average — 33 points more Democratic-leaning than Hutchinson County, SD itself (R+57.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Minnehaha County, SD26R+12.7
- Davison County, SD25R+37.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Davison County, SD26
- Minnehaha County, SD22
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −47 |
| 2012 | +9 |
| 2013 | −34 |
| 2014 | +35 |
| 2015 | +42 |
| 2016 | +55 |
| 2017 | −5 |
| 2018 | −57 |
| 2019 | −30 |
| 2021 | +1 |
| 2022 | −9 |
| 2023 | +39 |
| 2024 | −4 |
| 2025 | +9 |
Hutchinson County's German-Russian settler heritage anchors a deeply rural agricultural community where Republican presidential margins have exceeded 50 points in multiple consecutive cycles, making it among the state's most predictable precincts.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 40.9 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 68.9 points in 1944. The 2024 margin was 57.9 points.
A population of 7,404, a 91% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $73,977 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Thayer County and Walworth County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Thayer County
Nebraska
88.4twin score
% unaffiliated2000–2020 trajectory≠ % Evangelical
Walworth County
South Dakota
87.8twin score
% unaffiliated2000–2024 trajectory≠ % Evangelical
Dawson County
Montana
86.7twin score
2016–2024 trajectory% Evangelical≠ German ancestry
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Hutchinson County, South Dakota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/46067/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
South Dakota at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Hutchinson County, South Dakota vote in 2024?
In 2024, Hutchinson County, South Dakota voted Republican by 57.9 points (R+57.9), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 3,736 votes cast, 755 went Democratic and 2,918 went Republican.
When did Hutchinson County, South Dakota last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Hutchinson County, South Dakota voted Democratic was 1932.
How many people live in Hutchinson County, South Dakota?
Hutchinson County, South Dakota has a population of 7,404 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Hutchinson County, South Dakota?
Median household income in Hutchinson County, South Dakota is $73,977 — below the national median of $80,734. The South Dakota state median is $75,081.
What is the political history of Hutchinson County, South Dakota?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Hutchinson County, South Dakota from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 1 went Democratic and 31 went Republican.