- Lead
- 3,737
- Total
- 6,174
- vs nation
- R+59.1
- Turnout
- 62.4%
Goshen County, WY
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 62.4% of 9,961 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 3,675
- Total
- 6,241
- vs nation
- R+63.3
- Turnout
- 60.0%
- Lead
- 3,494
- Total
- 5,796
- vs nation
- R+62.4
- Turnout
- 55.4%
- Lead
- 2,720
- Total
- 5,806
- vs nation
- R+50.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,110
- Total
- 5,912
- vs nation
- R+43.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,548
- Total
- 5,779
- vs nation
- R+41.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,483
- Total
- 5,520
- vs nation
- R+45.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,066
- Total
- 5,513
- vs nation
- R+27.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+60.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 12,6052024 5-year
- Population density
- 5.7 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 2,226 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $58,9292024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 84.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 10.2%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+16.8 in 1916MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+60.5 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Lake County, OR · twin score 93.0
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 62.4%6,214 participants ÷ 9,961 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +10.5 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -7.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 51.9%–52.5%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6,214 | 9,961 ± 137 | 62.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 4,936 | 9,976 ± 178 | 49.5% | Audited | A/A |
| 6,272 | 10,458 ± 175 | 60.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 4,850 | 10,517 ± 193 | 46.1% | Audited | A/A |
| 5,868 | 10,599 ± 160 | 55.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 5,806 | 10,477 | 55.4% | Derived | — | |
| 5,912 | 9,392 | 62.9% | Derived | — | |
| 5,779 | 8,307 extrapolated | 69.6% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Goshen County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Goshen County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 62 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
62 precincts · 6,174 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -7-1 City of Torrington7-1 City of Torrington | 613 | 1,729 | 68 | 2,410 | 25.4% | 71.7% | R+46.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -7-2 Torrington7-2 Torrington | 158 | 821 | 17 | 996 | 15.9% | 82.4% | R+66.6 |
| Precinct -7-3 Torrington7-3 Torrington | 160 | 519 | 12 | 691 | 23.2% | 75.1% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -8-1 Lingle8-1 Lingle | 46 | 330 | 7 | 383 | 12.0% | 86.2% | R+74.2 |
| Precinct -18-1 La Grange18-1 La Grange | 20 | 290 | 4 | 314 | 6.4% | 92.4% | R+86.0 |
| Precinct -9-2 Fort Laramie9-2 Fort Laramie | 38 | 234 | 5 | 277 | 13.7% | 84.5% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -15-1 Yoder15-1 Yoder | 36 | 224 | 1 | 261 | 13.8% | 85.8% | R+72.0 |
| Precinct -16-1 Huntley16-1 Huntley | 19 | 212 | 5 | 236 | 8.1% | 89.8% | R+81.8 |
| Precinct -8-2 Lingle8-2 Lingle | 17 | 134 | 3 | 154 | 11.0% | 87.0% | R+76.0 |
| Precinct -13-1 Veteran13-1 Veteran | 23 | 107 | 1 | 131 | 17.6% | 81.7% | R+64.1 |
| Precinct -17-1 Hawk Springs17-1 Hawk Springs | 8 | 106 | 1 | 115 | 7.0% | 92.2% | R+85.2 |
| Precinct -2-1 Jay EM2-1 Jay EM | 12 | 91 | 1 | 104 | 11.5% | 87.5% | R+76.0 |
| Precinct -1-1 Prairie Center1-1 Prairie Center | 3 | 71 | 0 | 74 | 4.1% | 95.9% | R+91.9 |
| Precinct -20-1 Iowa Center20-1 Iowa Center | 3 | 25 | 0 | 28 | 10.7% | 89.3% | R+78.6 |
| FT LARAMIE INSIDE Voting District56_560150902 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FT LARAMIE INSIDE Voting District56_560150902 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FT LARAMIE OUTSIDE Voting District56_560150901 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FT LARAMIE OUTSIDE Voting District56_560150901 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HAWK SPRINGS Voting District56_560151701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HAWK SPRINGS Voting District56_560151701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTLEY Voting District56_560151601 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTLEY Voting District56_560151601 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IOWA CENTER Voting District56_560152001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IOWA CENTER Voting District56_560152001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JAY EM Voting District56_560150201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JAY EM Voting District56_560150201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LA GRANGE INSIDE Voting District56_560151802 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LA GRANGE INSIDE Voting District56_560151802 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LA GRANGE OUTSIDE Voting District56_560151801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LA GRANGE OUTSIDE Voting District56_560151801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LINGLE INSIDE Voting District56_560150802 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LINGLE INSIDE Voting District56_560150802 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LINGLE OUTSIDE Voting District56_560150801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LINGLE OUTSIDE Voting District56_560150801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MEYERS Voting District56_560150101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MEYERS Voting District56_560150101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #1 Voting District56_560151001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #1 Voting District56_560151001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #2 Voting District56_560151002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #2 Voting District56_560151002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #3 Voting District56_560151003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #3 Voting District56_560151003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #4 Voting District56_560151004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #4 Voting District56_560151004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #5 Voting District56_560151005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #5 Voting District56_560151005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #6 Voting District56_560151006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #6 Voting District56_560151006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #7 Voting District56_560151007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON #7 Voting District56_560151007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON EAST Voting District56_560151008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON EAST Voting District56_560151008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON SOUTH Voting District56_560151010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON SOUTH Voting District56_560151010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON WEST Voting District56_560151009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TORRINGTON WEST Voting District56_560151009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VETERAN Voting District56_560151301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VETERAN Voting District56_560151301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| YODER INSIDE Voting District56_560151502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| YODER INSIDE Voting District56_560151502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| YODER OUTSIDE Voting District56_560151501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| YODER OUTSIDE Voting District56_560151501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Goshen County, WY · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1912–2024 · 29 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Woodrow Wilson1916
56.6%
1,096 votes · D+16.8
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 55.5%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
79.3%
4,893 votes · R+60.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 78.2%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
2,749votes
51.4% of the vote · D+2.7
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 2,639 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
4,893votes
79.3% of the vote · R+60.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 4,878 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Woodrow Wilson1916
+13.7pts D vs U.S.
Place D+16.8 · U.S. D+3.1
Runner-up · Adlai Stevenson, 1956 · +1.4 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+63.3pts R vs U.S.
Place R+58.9 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +62.4 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Goshen County, WY. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 16.1%938 | 83.9%4,876 | 5,814 |
| 2020 | R | 18.0%1,037 | 82.0%4,722 | 5,759 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 15 points more Democratic than the rolls.
6,171 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+49 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +116 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,447 in average income, against $72,093 for residents who stayed — 20% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+41.4 on average — 19 points more Democratic-leaning than Goshen County, WY itself (R+60.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Scotts Bluff County, NE33R+47.5
- Laramie County, WY22R+32.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Scotts Bluff County, NE37
- Laramie County, WY37
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +184 |
| 2012 | +58 |
| 2013 | −113 |
| 2014 | −43 |
| 2015 | −6 |
| 2016 | −233 |
| 2017 | +28 |
| 2018 | −59 |
| 2019 | −78 |
| 2021 | +115 |
| 2022 | +139 |
| 2023 | +74 |
| 2024 | +1 |
| 2025 | +49 |
Goshen County, anchored by the small city of Torrington, delivers some of the widest Republican presidential margins in a state already dominated by right-leaning voters, reflecting its sparse, agriculturally rooted population along the Nebraska border.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 16.8 points in 1916 and a Republican high of 60.5 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 60.5 points.
A population of 12,605, a 85% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $58,929 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Lake County and Washington County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Goshen County, Wyoming. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/56015/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.