Walker County, Alabama
Precinct data
Results by precinct
45 precincts · 29,786 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -JASPER MALLJASPER MALL | 354 | 1,960 | 21 | 2,335 | 15.2% | 83.9% | R+68.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -FARMSTEAD BAPTISTFARMSTEAD BAPTIST | 264 | 2,017 | 22 | 2,303 | 11.5% | 87.6% | R+76.1 |
| Precinct -BEVILL ST_ COMM_ COLLEGEBEVILL ST_ COMM_ COLLEGE | 167 | 1,515 | 8 | 1,690 | 9.9% | 89.6% | R+79.8 |
| Precinct -CURRY COMM_ CTR_CURRY COMM_ CTR_ | 127 | 1,230 | 12 | 1,369 | 9.3% | 89.8% | R+80.6 |
| Precinct -CORDOVA CITY HALLCORDOVA CITY HALL | 222 | 1,074 | 12 | 1,308 | 17.0% | 82.1% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct -MEADOWSMITH LIBRARYMEADOWSMITH LIBRARY | 409 | 863 | 13 | 1,285 | 31.8% | 67.2% | R+35.3 |
| Precinct -PARRISH TOWN HALLPARRISH TOWN HALL | 201 | 954 | 9 | 1,164 | 17.3% | 82.0% | R+64.7 |
| Precinct -DORA CIVIC CTR_DORA CIVIC CTR_ | 231 | 922 | 10 | 1,163 | 19.9% | 79.3% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct -UNION CHAPEL COMM_ CTR_UNION CHAPEL COMM_ CTR_ | 110 | 1,047 | 5 | 1,162 | 9.5% | 90.1% | R+80.6 |
| Precinct -BOLDO FIRE STATIONBOLDO FIRE STATION | 115 | 963 | 6 | 1,084 | 10.6% | 88.8% | R+78.2 |
| Precinct -MEMORIAL PARK NATATORIUMMEMORIAL PARK NATATORIUM | 193 | 818 | 11 | 1,022 | 18.9% | 80.0% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -CARBON HILL COMM_ CTR_CARBON HILL COMM_ CTR_ | 106 | 744 | 7 | 857 | 12.4% | 86.8% | R+74.4 |
| Precinct -LITTLE VINES CHURCHLITTLE VINES CHURCH | 78 | 761 | 6 | 845 | 9.2% | 90.1% | R+80.8 |
| Precinct -OAKMAN COMM_ CTR_OAKMAN COMM_ CTR_ | 136 | 657 | 5 | 798 | 17.0% | 82.3% | R+65.3 |
| Precinct -PROSPECT METHODIST CHPROSPECT METHODIST CH | 50 | 674 | 4 | 728 | 6.9% | 92.6% | R+85.7 |
| Precinct -NEW HOPE MISSIONARYNEW HOPE MISSIONARY | 59 | 654 | 5 | 718 | 8.2% | 91.1% | R+82.9 |
| Precinct -PINEYWOODS FIRE DEPT_PINEYWOODS FIRE DEPT_ | 46 | 605 | 1 | 652 | 7.1% | 92.8% | R+85.7 |
| Precinct -JASPER HOUSING AUTH_ GYMJASPER HOUSING AUTH_ GYM | 318 | 308 | 3 | 629 | 50.6% | 49.0% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -NAUVOO COMM CTR_NAUVOO COMM CTR_ | 60 | 501 | 6 | 567 | 10.6% | 88.4% | R+77.8 |
| Precinct -LAMON CHAPEL UMCLAMON CHAPEL UMC | 39 | 519 | 0 | 558 | 7.0% | 93.0% | R+86.0 |
| Precinct -TWILLEY TOWN CHTWILLEY TOWN CH | 141 | 389 | 9 | 539 | 26.2% | 72.2% | R+46.0 |
| Precinct -OLD HERMAN CHOLD HERMAN CH | 38 | 435 | 4 | 477 | 8.0% | 91.2% | R+83.2 |
| Precinct -SIPSEY COMM_ CTR_SIPSEY COMM_ CTR_ | 112 | 354 | 3 | 469 | 23.9% | 75.5% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -UNION HALL GOODSPRINGSUNION HALL GOODSPRINGS | 30 | 415 | 5 | 450 | 6.7% | 92.2% | R+85.6 |
| Precinct -SARAGOSSA COMM_ CTR_SARAGOSSA COMM_ CTR_ | 33 | 399 | 2 | 434 | 7.6% | 91.9% | R+84.3 |
| Precinct -EDGIL GROVE BAPTIST CHURCHEDGIL GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH | 32 | 352 | 1 | 385 | 8.3% | 91.4% | R+83.1 |
| Precinct -MCCOLLUM MIDWAY FIRE/RESCMCCOLLUM MIDWAY FIRE/RESC | 23 | 339 | 0 | 362 | 6.4% | 93.6% | R+87.3 |
| Precinct -MANCHESTER COMM_ BLDG_MANCHESTER COMM_ BLDG_ | 32 | 324 | 3 | 359 | 8.9% | 90.3% | R+81.3 |
| Precinct -CROSSROADS CH OF CHRISTCROSSROADS CH OF CHRIST | 15 | 340 | 2 | 357 | 4.2% | 95.2% | R+91.0 |
| Precinct -DILWORTH COMM_ CTR_DILWORTH COMM_ CTR_ | 40 | 308 | 1 | 349 | 11.5% | 88.3% | R+76.8 |
| Precinct -ARGO FIRE DEPT_ARGO FIRE DEPT_ | 48 | 290 | 2 | 340 | 14.1% | 85.3% | R+71.2 |
| Precinct -TUTWILER FIRE DEPT_TUTWILER FIRE DEPT_ | 24 | 289 | 1 | 314 | 7.6% | 92.0% | R+84.4 |
| Precinct -NEW BETHANY CH OF GODNEW BETHANY CH OF GOD | 13 | 269 | 2 | 284 | 4.6% | 94.7% | R+90.1 |
| Precinct -JASPER ABUNDANT LIFE CHJASPER ABUNDANT LIFE CH | 25 | 249 | 4 | 278 | 9.0% | 89.6% | R+80.6 |
| Precinct -PUMPKIN CENTER BAPT CHPUMPKIN CENTER BAPT CH | 23 | 235 | 0 | 258 | 8.9% | 91.1% | R+82.2 |
| Precinct -CARBON HILL ABUNDANT LIFECARBON HILL ABUNDANT LIFE | 35 | 220 | 1 | 256 | 13.7% | 85.9% | R+72.3 |
| Precinct -MCCOLLUM NAT'L GUARDMCCOLLUM NAT'L GUARD | 27 | 222 | 1 | 250 | 10.8% | 88.8% | R+78.0 |
| Precinct -TOWNLEY VFD #2TOWNLEY VFD #2 | 22 | 212 | 4 | 238 | 9.2% | 89.1% | R+79.8 |
| Precinct -ELDRIDGE CITY HALLELDRIDGE CITY HALL | 9 | 219 | 2 | 230 | 3.9% | 95.2% | R+91.3 |
| Precinct -TOWNLEY COMM_ CTR_TOWNLEY COMM_ CTR_ | 23 | 181 | 2 | 206 | 11.2% | 87.9% | R+76.7 |
| Precinct -RICES CHAPEL CHRICES CHAPEL CH | 19 | 174 | 1 | 194 | 9.8% | 89.7% | R+79.9 |
| Precinct -KANSAS CITY HALLKANSAS CITY HALL | 16 | 149 | 2 | 167 | 9.6% | 89.2% | R+79.6 |
| Precinct -CORONA BAPTIST CHCORONA BAPTIST CH | 14 | 139 | 1 | 154 | 9.1% | 90.3% | R+81.2 |
| Precinct -PLEASANTFIELD COMM_PLEASANTFIELD COMM_ | 12 | 108 | 1 | 121 | 9.9% | 89.3% | R+79.3 |
| Precinct -LIBERTY HILL CHLIBERTY HILL CH | 11 | 67 | 0 | 78 | 14.1% | 85.9% | R+71.8 |
Presidential margin, 1876–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1876 | +22.5% |
| 1880 | +39.3% |
| 1884 | +2.0% |
| 1888 | +3.6% |
| 1892 | +51.6% |
| 1896 | +6.1% |
| 1900 | −15.0% |
| 1904 | +22.8% |
| 1908 | +8.7% |
| 1912 | +33.1% |
| 1916 | +10.6% |
| 1920 | +2.3% |
| 1924 | +14.7% |
| 1928 | +7.5% |
| 1932 | +49.5% |
| 1936 | +53.4% |
| 1940 | +49.3% |
| 1944 | +34.4% |
| 1948 | −30.7% |
| 1952 | +32.3% |
| 1956 | +19.2% |
| 1960 | +19.5% |
| 1964 | −58.4% |
| 1968 | −3.4% |
| 1972 | −58.7% |
| 1976 | +37.3% |
| 1980 | +21.1% |
| 1984 | −9.5% |
| 1988 | +1.4% |
| 1992 | +12.0% |
| 1996 | +12.4% |
| 2000 | −7.3% |
| 2004 | −35.8% |
| 2008 | −46.4% |
| 2012 | −52.9% |
| 2016 | −67.7% |
| 2020 | −67.9% |
| 2024 | −71.7% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 11.7%2,083 | 85.5%15,206 | 17,788 |
| 2020 | R | 19.3%5,978 | 80.7%25,016 | 30,994 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 47,717 |
| 2020 | 49,226 |
| 2022 | 47,917 |
| 2024 | 49,224 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+267 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −88 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $56,223 in average income, against $88,588 for residents who stayed — 37% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+27.3 on average — 44 points more Democratic-leaning than Walker County, AL itself (R+71.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Jefferson County, AL350D+10.4
- Winston County, AL98R+83.5
- Cullman County, AL61R+80.3
- Tuscaloosa County, AL36R+20.3
- Blount County, AL32R+80.9
- Fayette County, AL29R+71.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Jefferson County, AL295
- Winston County, AL82
- Cullman County, AL60
- Tuscaloosa County, AL42
- Shelby County, AL39
- Blount County, AL31
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −339 |
| 2012 | −315 |
| 2013 | −66 |
| 2014 | −293 |
| 2015 | −153 |
| 2016 | −220 |
| 2017 | −329 |
| 2018 | +32 |
| 2019 | +75 |
| 2021 | −19 |
| 2022 | +218 |
| 2023 | +540 |
| 2024 | +514 |
| 2025 | +267 |
Walker County's coal-mining heritage and majority-white, working-class demographics have driven its Republican presidential margins past 70 points, among the widest gaps recorded statewide in recent cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 53.4 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 71.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 71.7 points.
A population of 64,841, a 86% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $56,509 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Fayette County and Lincoln County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Walker County, Alabama. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/01127/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.