Northwest Hills Planning Region, Connecticut
Akashic| Donald Trump ✓Republican | 51.9% | 32,842 |
|---|---|---|
| Kamala HarrisDemocratic | 46.6% | 29,442 |
| OtherAll other candidates | 1.5% | 954 |
Precinct-level results (21 precincts) — table
| Precinct | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|
| 160-Barkhamsted | Republican | R+4.6 |
| 160-Burlington | Republican | R+2.4 |
| 160-Canaan | Democratic | D+38.6 |
| 160-Colebrook | Republican | R+15.0 |
| 160-Cornwall | Democratic | D+43.7 |
| 160-Goshen | Republican | R+11.6 |
| 160-Hartland | Republican | R+32.5 |
| 160-Harwinton | Republican | R+23.6 |
| 160-Kent | Democratic | D+35.1 |
| 160-Litchfield | Democratic | D+2.2 |
| 160-Morris | Republican | R+17.0 |
| 160-New Hartford | Republican | R+6.3 |
| 160-Norfolk | Democratic | D+27.3 |
| 160-North Canaan | Republican | R+4.1 |
| 160-Roxbury | Democratic | D+14.0 |
| 160-Salisbury | Democratic | D+56.4 |
| 160-Sharon | Democratic | D+36.8 |
| 160-Torrington | Republican | R+14.0 |
| 160-Warren | Democratic | D+2.4 |
| 160-Washington | Democratic | D+32.1 |
| 160-Winchester | Republican | R+12.8 |
Precinct data
Results by precinct
21 precincts · 64,090 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -160-Torrington160-Torrington | 6,881 | 9,168 | 247 | 16,296 | 42.2% | 56.3% | R+14.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -160-Burlington160-Burlington | 2,782 | 2,919 | 94 | 5,795 | 48.0% | 50.4% | R+2.4 |
| Precinct -160-Winchester160-Winchester | 2,310 | 3,000 | 94 | 5,404 | 42.7% | 55.5% | R+12.8 |
| Precinct -160-Litchfield160-Litchfield | 2,660 | 2,545 | 79 | 5,284 | 50.3% | 48.2% | D+2.2 |
| Precinct -160-New Hartford160-New Hartford | 2,046 | 2,325 | 76 | 4,447 | 46.0% | 52.3% | R+6.3 |
| Precinct -160-Harwinton160-Harwinton | 1,421 | 2,315 | 47 | 3,783 | 37.6% | 61.2% | R+23.6 |
| Precinct -160-Salisbury160-Salisbury | 1,959 | 528 | 50 | 2,537 | 77.2% | 20.8% | D+56.4 |
| Precinct -160-Barkhamsted160-Barkhamsted | 1,127 | 1,239 | 43 | 2,409 | 46.8% | 51.4% | R+4.6 |
| Precinct -160-Washington160-Washington | 1,456 | 742 | 27 | 2,225 | 65.4% | 33.3% | D+32.1 |
| Precinct -160-Goshen160-Goshen | 910 | 1,154 | 35 | 2,099 | 43.4% | 55.0% | R+11.6 |
| Precinct -160-Kent160-Kent | 1,252 | 592 | 38 | 1,882 | 66.5% | 31.5% | D+35.1 |
| Precinct -160-Sharon160-Sharon | 1,068 | 488 | 20 | 1,576 | 67.8% | 31.0% | D+36.8 |
| Precinct -160-Roxbury160-Roxbury | 857 | 643 | 24 | 1,524 | 56.2% | 42.2% | D+14.0 |
| Precinct -160-Morris160-Morris | 604 | 858 | 30 | 1,492 | 40.5% | 57.5% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -160-North Canaan160-North Canaan | 667 | 725 | 13 | 1,405 | 47.5% | 51.6% | R+4.1 |
| Precinct -160-Hartland160-Hartland | 430 | 855 | 21 | 1,306 | 32.9% | 65.5% | R+32.5 |
| Precinct -160-Cornwall160-Cornwall | 732 | 280 | 22 | 1,034 | 70.8% | 27.1% | D+43.7 |
| Precinct -160-Norfolk160-Norfolk | 634 | 358 | 20 | 1,012 | 62.6% | 35.4% | D+27.3 |
| Precinct -160-Colebrook160-Colebrook | 403 | 548 | 13 | 964 | 41.8% | 56.8% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -160-Warren160-Warren | 487 | 464 | 9 | 960 | 50.7% | 48.3% | D+2.4 |
| Precinct -160-Canaan160-Canaan | 451 | 198 | 7 | 656 | 68.8% | 30.2% | D+38.6 |
Presidential margin, 1876–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1876 | +6.1% |
| 1880 | −0.6% |
| 1884 | +3.9% |
| 1888 | −2.3% |
| 1892 | No data |
| 1896 | −25.7% |
| 1900 | −29.3% |
| 1904 | −30.7% |
| 1908 | −35.3% |
| 1912 | −6.1% |
| 1916 | −7.2% |
| 1920 | −33.5% |
| 1924 | −34.9% |
| 1928 | −25.8% |
| 1932 | −14.4% |
| 1936 | −1.2% |
| 1940 | −5.9% |
| 1944 | −8.3% |
| 1948 | −15.0% |
| 1952 | −24.9% |
| 1956 | −37.2% |
| 1960 | −5.1% |
| 1964 | +33.3% |
| 1968 | −1.0% |
| 1972 | −19.8% |
| 1976 | −9.6% |
| 1980 | −13.7% |
| 1984 | −30.5% |
| 1988 | −11.0% |
| 1992 | +0.7% |
| 1996 | +8.8% |
| 2000 | +5.0% |
| 2004 | −3.5% |
| 2008 | +7.3% |
| 2012 | −0.9% |
| 2016 | −10.4% |
| 2020 | −2.1% |
| 2024 | −5.4% |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 5.2 points more Democratic.
85,201 registered voters · 2025
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+367 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +2,509 over 2021–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $107,171 in average income, against $113,217 for residents who stayed — 5% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+20.3 on average — 26 points more Democratic-leaning than Northwest Hills Planning Region, CT itself (R+5.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT622D+11.2
- Capitol Planning Region, CT518D+20.1
- Western Connecticut Planning Region, CT226D+18.0
- New York County, NY117D+64.2
- Dutchess County, NY66D+5.4
- Berkshire County, MA48D+39.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Capitol Planning Region, CT506
- Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT489
- Western Connecticut Planning Region, CT135
- New York County, NY100
- Berkshire County, MA51
- Dutchess County, NY41
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2021 | +994 |
| 2022 | +446 |
| 2023 | +245 |
| 2024 | +457 |
| 2025 | +367 |
Northwest Hills Planning Region sits in New England. In 2024 it voted Republican.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 33.3 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 37.2 points in 1956. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 5.4 points.
A population of 113,216, a 82% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $93,551 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Saratoga County and Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Northwest Hills Planning Region, Connecticut. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/09160/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.