Pike County, Illinois
Precinct data
Results by precinct
65 precincts · 7,560 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PITTSFIELD 3PITTSFIELD 3 | 127 | 499 | 20 | 646 | 19.7% | 77.2% | R+57.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PITTSFIELD 1PITTSFIELD 1 | 106 | 521 | 13 | 640 | 16.6% | 81.4% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -NEWBURGNEWBURG | 92 | 469 | 16 | 577 | 15.9% | 81.3% | R+65.3 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT HILLPLEASANT HILL | 104 | 442 | 13 | 559 | 18.6% | 79.1% | R+60.5 |
| Precinct -PITTSFIELD 4PITTSFIELD 4 | 87 | 375 | 9 | 471 | 18.5% | 79.6% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -BARRY 2BARRY 2 | 88 | 328 | 15 | 431 | 20.4% | 76.1% | R+55.7 |
| Precinct -BARRY 1BARRY 1 | 40 | 260 | 2 | 302 | 13.2% | 86.1% | R+72.8 |
| Precinct -GRIGGSVILLE 1GRIGGSVILLE 1 | 63 | 223 | 4 | 290 | 21.7% | 76.9% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -GRIGGSVILLE 2GRIGGSVILLE 2 | 51 | 225 | 4 | 280 | 18.2% | 80.4% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -PERRYPERRY | 52 | 215 | 8 | 275 | 18.9% | 78.2% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -PITTSFIELD 2PITTSFIELD 2 | 65 | 188 | 12 | 265 | 24.5% | 70.9% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -ATLASATLAS | 30 | 219 | 6 | 255 | 11.8% | 85.9% | R+74.1 |
| Precinct -MONTEZUMAMONTEZUMA | 30 | 218 | 5 | 253 | 11.9% | 86.2% | R+74.3 |
| Precinct -KINDERHOOK 2KINDERHOOK 2 | 49 | 197 | 4 | 250 | 19.6% | 78.8% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT VALEPLEASANT VALE | 40 | 198 | 7 | 245 | 16.3% | 80.8% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct -MARTINSBURGMARTINSBURG | 29 | 196 | 1 | 226 | 12.8% | 86.7% | R+73.9 |
| Precinct -SPRING CREEKSPRING CREEK | 20 | 204 | 2 | 226 | 8.8% | 90.3% | R+81.4 |
| Precinct -NEW SALEM 1NEW SALEM 1 | 34 | 129 | 7 | 170 | 20.0% | 75.9% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -DETROITDETROIT | 29 | 130 | 6 | 165 | 17.6% | 78.8% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -KINDERHOOK 1KINDERHOOK 1 | 24 | 133 | 1 | 158 | 15.2% | 84.2% | R+69.0 |
| Precinct -HADLEYHADLEY | 17 | 122 | 1 | 140 | 12.1% | 87.1% | R+75.0 |
| Precinct -DERRYDERRY | 19 | 108 | 2 | 129 | 14.7% | 83.7% | R+69.0 |
| Precinct -HARDINHARDIN | 18 | 94 | 4 | 116 | 15.5% | 81.0% | R+65.5 |
| Precinct -FAIRMOUNTFAIRMOUNT | 9 | 88 | 3 | 100 | 9.0% | 88.0% | R+79.0 |
| Precinct -PEARLPEARL | 14 | 82 | 4 | 100 | 14.0% | 82.0% | R+68.0 |
| Precinct -NEW SALEM 2NEW SALEM 2 | 22 | 75 | 1 | 98 | 22.4% | 76.5% | R+54.1 |
| Precinct -CHAMBERSBURGCHAMBERSBURG | 32 | 58 | 1 | 91 | 35.2% | 63.7% | R+28.6 |
| Precinct -FLINTFLINT | 7 | 32 | 1 | 40 | 17.5% | 80.0% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -LEVEELEVEE | 2 | 24 | 0 | 26 | 7.7% | 92.3% | R+84.6 |
| Precinct -ROSSROSS | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -CINCINNATICINCINNATI | 2 | 11 | 0 | 13 | 15.4% | 84.6% | R+69.2 |
| ATLAS 1 Voting District17_1714901801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ATLAS 2 Voting District17_1714901802 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ATLAS 3 Voting District17_1714901803 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BARRY 1 Voting District17_1714902001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BARRY 2 Voting District17_1714902002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CHAMBERSBURG 1 Voting District17_1714900101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CINCINNATI 1 Voting District17_1714902301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| DERRY 1 Voting District17_1714901701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| DETROIT 1 Voting District17_1714900301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FAIRMOUNT 1 Voting District17_1714901101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FLINT 1 Voting District17_1714900201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GRIGGSVILLE 1 Voting District17_1714900701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GRIGGSVILLE 2 Voting District17_1714900702 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HADLEY 1 Voting District17_1714901601 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HARDIN 1 Voting District17_1714900901 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| KINDERHOOK 1 Voting District17_1714902201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| KINDERHOOK 2 Voting District17_1714902202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LEVEE 1 Voting District17_1714902401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MARTINSBURG 1 Voting District17_1714901401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MARTINSBURG 2 Voting District17_1714901402 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MONTEZUMA 1 Voting District17_1714900401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NEW SALEM 1 Voting District17_1714901201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NEW SALEM 2 Voting District17_1714901202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NEWBURG 1 Voting District17_1714900801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PEARL 1 Voting District17_1714900501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 1 Voting District17_1714900601 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PITTSFIELD 1 Voting District17_1714901301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PITTSFIELD 2 Voting District17_1714901302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PITTSFIELD 3 Voting District17_1714901303 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PITTSFIELD 4 Voting District17_1714901304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT HILL 1 Voting District17_1714901501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT VALE 1 Voting District17_1714902101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ROSS 1 Voting District17_1714901901 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SPRING CREEK 1 Voting District17_1714901001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +9.9% |
| 1896 | +25.9% |
| 1900 | +20.8% |
| 1904 | +1.6% |
| 1908 | +12.8% |
| 1912 | +25.7% |
| 1916 | +13.4% |
| 1920 | −12.5% |
| 1924 | +4.0% |
| 1928 | −24.9% |
| 1932 | +30.8% |
| 1936 | +18.6% |
| 1940 | +7.3% |
| 1944 | +1.7% |
| 1948 | +9.1% |
| 1952 | −10.0% |
| 1956 | −4.8% |
| 1960 | −4.4% |
| 1964 | +23.0% |
| 1968 | −8.5% |
| 1972 | −20.9% |
| 1976 | +0.3% |
| 1980 | −17.2% |
| 1984 | −14.3% |
| 1988 | +7.5% |
| 1992 | +7.5% |
| 1996 | +4.8% |
| 2000 | −18.6% |
| 2004 | −27.4% |
| 2008 | −18.8% |
| 2012 | −35.4% |
| 2016 | −57.6% |
| 2020 | −60.9% |
| 2024 | −63.7% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 21.7%1,308 | 76.5%4,611 | 6,024 |
| 2020 | R | 23.5%1,837 | 74.0%5,785 | 7,815 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 16,444 |
| 2018 | 17,201 |
| 2020 | 10,692 |
| 2022 | 9,685 |
| 2024 | 10,443 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−10 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −812 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $47,016 in average income, against $67,661 for residents who stayed — 31% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+47.4 on average — 16 points more Democratic-leaning than Pike County, IL itself (R+63.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Adams County, IL47R+47.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Adams County, IL58
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −21 |
| 2012 | −77 |
| 2013 | −149 |
| 2014 | −87 |
| 2015 | −141 |
| 2016 | −25 |
| 2017 | −56 |
| 2018 | −71 |
| 2019 | −50 |
| 2021 | +28 |
| 2022 | +25 |
| 2023 | −149 |
| 2024 | −29 |
| 2025 | −10 |
Pike County, tucked along the Mississippi River in western Illinois, has shifted decisively rightward over the past two decades — its 2024 presidential margin of R+63.7 points places it among the state's most one-sided counties by raw spread.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 30.8 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 63.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 63.7 points.
A population of 14,469, a 95% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $59,777 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Fayette County and Morgan County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Pike County, Illinois. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/17149/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.