Carroll County, Indiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
38 precincts · 9,212 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -BURLINGTONBURLINGTON | 131 | 733 | 11 | 875 | 15.0% | 83.8% | R+68.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -DEER CREEK IDEER CREEK I | 157 | 575 | 17 | 749 | 21.0% | 76.8% | R+55.8 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON IJEFFERSON I | 203 | 525 | 7 | 735 | 27.6% | 71.4% | R+43.8 |
| Precinct -MONROE IIMONROE II | 151 | 485 | 9 | 645 | 23.4% | 75.2% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -TIPPECANOE ITIPPECANOE I | 162 | 441 | 13 | 616 | 26.3% | 71.6% | R+45.3 |
| Precinct -JACKSONJACKSON | 113 | 456 | 13 | 582 | 19.4% | 78.4% | R+58.9 |
| Precinct -DEER CREEK IIIDEER CREEK III | 170 | 370 | 16 | 556 | 30.6% | 66.5% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct -DEER CREEK VDEER CREEK V | 184 | 356 | 16 | 556 | 33.1% | 64.0% | R+30.9 |
| Precinct -TIPPECANOE IITIPPECANOE II | 163 | 368 | 4 | 535 | 30.5% | 68.8% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -CLAYCLAY | 101 | 402 | 12 | 515 | 19.6% | 78.1% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -MONROE IMONROE I | 96 | 395 | 21 | 512 | 18.8% | 77.1% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON IIJEFFERSON II | 111 | 336 | 15 | 462 | 24.0% | 72.7% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct -DEMOCRATDEMOCRAT | 94 | 353 | 7 | 454 | 20.7% | 77.8% | R+57.0 |
| Precinct -CARROLLTONCARROLLTON | 55 | 268 | 4 | 327 | 16.8% | 82.0% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTONWASHINGTON | 52 | 212 | 4 | 268 | 19.4% | 79.1% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -ADAMSADAMS | 49 | 180 | 11 | 240 | 20.4% | 75.0% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -LIBERTYLIBERTY | 39 | 165 | 5 | 209 | 18.7% | 78.9% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -MADISONMADISON | 52 | 139 | 3 | 194 | 26.8% | 71.6% | R+44.8 |
| Precinct -ROCK CREEKROCK CREEK | 37 | 143 | 2 | 182 | 20.3% | 78.6% | R+58.2 |
| ADAMS18_1801500010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BURLINGTON18_1801500020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CARROLLTON18_1801500030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CLAY18_1801500040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| DEER CREEK I18_1801500050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| DEER CREEK III18_1801500060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| DEER CREEK V18_1801500070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| DEMOCRAT18_1801500080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JACKSON18_1801500090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JEFFERSON I18_1801500100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JEFFERSON II18_1801500110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LIBERTY18_1801500120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MADISON18_1801500130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MONROE I18_1801500140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MONROE II18_1801500150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ROCK CREEK18_1801500160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TIPPECANOE I18_1801500170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TIPPECANOE II18_1801500180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON18_1801500190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +2.6% |
| 1896 | +4.1% |
| 1900 | +1.9% |
| 1904 | −4.7% |
| 1908 | +0.8% |
| 1912 | +16.5% |
| 1916 | −1.3% |
| 1920 | −8.8% |
| 1924 | −10.4% |
| 1928 | −19.9% |
| 1932 | +11.5% |
| 1936 | +2.7% |
| 1940 | −8.6% |
| 1944 | −15.2% |
| 1948 | −8.8% |
| 1952 | −29.4% |
| 1956 | −26.8% |
| 1960 | −24.2% |
| 1964 | +10.2% |
| 1968 | −23.2% |
| 1972 | −45.1% |
| 1976 | −14.0% |
| 1980 | −26.4% |
| 1984 | −32.9% |
| 1988 | −25.5% |
| 1992 | −14.5% |
| 1996 | −16.4% |
| 2000 | −25.8% |
| 2004 | −36.8% |
| 2008 | −12.8% |
| 2012 | −30.3% |
| 2016 | −50.4% |
| 2020 | −51.2% |
| 2024 | −52.1% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 14,355 |
| 2018 | 13,175 |
| 2020 | 13,872 |
| 2022 | 14,303 |
| 2024 | 14,904 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−59 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −41 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $55,732 in average income, against $74,259 for residents who stayed — 25% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+22.3 on average — 30 points more Democratic-leaning than Carroll County, IN itself (R+52.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Tippecanoe County, IN186R+0.1
- White County, IN85R+45.0
- Clinton County, IN42R+48.0
- Howard County, IN37R+35.3
- Cass County, IN27R+46.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Tippecanoe County, IN152
- White County, IN81
- Cass County, IN42
- Clinton County, IN42
- Howard County, IN40
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −167 |
| 2012 | +9 |
| 2013 | −54 |
| 2014 | −221 |
| 2015 | −58 |
| 2016 | +44 |
| 2017 | +63 |
| 2018 | +58 |
| 2019 | +13 |
| 2021 | +137 |
| 2022 | +17 |
| 2023 | +42 |
| 2024 | +135 |
| 2025 | −59 |
Carroll County's R+52.1 margin in 2024 reflects a broader pattern of consolidation in small agricultural counties across the Midwest, where low population density and a predominantly white, non-college workforce have tracked closely with Republican performance gains over the past decade.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 16.5 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 52.1 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 52.1 points.
A population of 20,535, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $65,645 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Clay County and Fulton County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Carroll County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18015/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.