HarrisDemocratic33.1%23,082TrumpRepublican65.4%45,652KennedyIndependent0.8%551
R+32.4- Lead
- 22,570
- Total
- 69,765
- vs nation
- R+30.9
- Turnout
- 51.4%
Akashiccounty
Elkhart County, IN
Contests in this Place (86 available)
President34 · 1892–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1892–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 51.4% of 138,883 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic35.1%26,108TrumpRepublican63.1%46,972JorgensenLibertarian1.7%1,241
R+28.0- Lead
- 20,864
- Total
- 74,387
- vs nation
- R+32.5
- Turnout
- 55.4%
ClintonDemocratic31.3%20,667TrumpRepublican63.2%41,810JohnsonLibertarian4.1%2,716
R+32.0- Lead
- 21,143
- Total
- 66,109
- vs nation
- R+34.1
- Turnout
- 51.2%
ObamaDemocratic35.9%24,399RomneyRepublican62.3%42,378JohnsonLibertarian1.5%1,044
R+26.4- Lead
- 17,979
- Total
- 68,029
- vs nation
- R+30.3
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic43.9%31,398McCainRepublican55.1%39,396OtherAll other candidates0.9%664
R+11.2- Lead
- 7,998
- Total
- 71,458
- vs nation
- R+18.5
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic29.3%17,966BushRepublican70.0%42,967OtherAll other candidates0.7%447
R+40.7- Lead
- 25,001
- Total
- 61,380
- vs nation
- R+38.3
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic30.1%16,402BushRepublican67.5%36,756OtherAll other candidates2.4%1,324
R+37.4- Lead
- 20,354
- Total
- 54,482
- vs nation
- R+37.9
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic32.6%16,598DoleRepublican56.6%28,770PerotReform10.1%5,133
R+23.9- Lead
- 12,172
- Total
- 50,850
- vs nation
- R+32.5
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+32.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 207,1322024 5-year
- Population density
- 447 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 463 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $68,5612024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 69.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 4.7%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 20.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+26.8 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+50.1 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Clinton County, IN · twin score 85.8
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 51.4%71,415 participants ÷ 138,883 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +23.5 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 27.9%–37.7%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71,415 | 138,883 ± 1,229 | 51.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 44,851 | 140,759 ± 1,209 | 31.9% | Audited | A/A |
| 76,961 | 138,919 ± 1,083 | 55.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 64,687 | 136,562 ± 815 | 47.4% | Audited | A/A |
| 68,591 | 133,939 ± 965 | 51.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 68,029 | 131,391 | 51.8% | Derived | — | |
| 71,458 | 129,133 | 55.3% | Derived | — | |
| 61,380 | 126,875 extrapolated | 48.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Elkhart County only. The complete district District 2 result is shown below for comparison.
Elkhart County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Jamee Decio0—
Shaun Michael Maeyens0—
District District 2 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 230 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
230 precincts · 69,765 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -YORK 02YORK 02 | 165 | 789 | 8 | 962 | 17.2% | 82.0% | R+64.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -ELKHART 15ELKHART 15 | 445 | 489 | 11 | 945 | 47.1% | 51.7% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 02WASHINGTON 02 | 245 | 673 | 12 | 930 | 26.3% | 72.4% | R+46.0 |
| Precinct -OLIVE 02OLIVE 02 | 189 | 679 | 19 | 887 | 21.3% | 76.6% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -CLEVELAND 03CLEVELAND 03 | 305 | 542 | 9 | 856 | 35.6% | 63.3% | R+27.7 |
| Precinct -CLINTON 01CLINTON 01 | 129 | 711 | 15 | 855 | 15.1% | 83.2% | R+68.1 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 16OSOLO 16 | 272 | 571 | 12 | 855 | 31.8% | 66.8% | R+35.0 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 01OSOLO 01 | 282 | 549 | 13 | 844 | 33.4% | 65.0% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 11OSOLO 11 | 348 | 481 | 15 | 844 | 41.2% | 57.0% | R+15.8 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 03CONCORD 03 | 342 | 480 | 21 | 843 | 40.6% | 56.9% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 02JACKSON 02 | 125 | 707 | 8 | 840 | 14.9% | 84.2% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 09ELKHART 09 | 340 | 490 | 4 | 834 | 40.8% | 58.8% | R+18.0 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 01JEFFERSON 01 | 157 | 669 | 7 | 833 | 18.8% | 80.3% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 04JEFFERSON 04 | 215 | 601 | 16 | 832 | 25.8% | 72.2% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -LOCKE 02LOCKE 02 | 156 | 655 | 16 | 827 | 18.9% | 79.2% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -CLEVELAND 01CLEVELAND 01 | 236 | 565 | 14 | 815 | 29.0% | 69.3% | R+40.4 |
| Precinct -MIDDLEBURY 05MIDDLEBURY 05 | 136 | 662 | 11 | 809 | 16.8% | 81.8% | R+65.0 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 19ELKHART 19 | 472 | 322 | 9 | 803 | 58.8% | 40.1% | D+18.7 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 28CONCORD 28 | 211 | 569 | 13 | 793 | 26.6% | 71.8% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 06JEFFERSON 06 | 180 | 593 | 17 | 790 | 22.8% | 75.1% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 12OSOLO 12 | 289 | 487 | 11 | 787 | 36.7% | 61.9% | R+25.2 |
| Precinct -HARRISON 01HARRISON 01 | 158 | 614 | 5 | 777 | 20.3% | 79.0% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 02CONCORD 02 | 377 | 390 | 7 | 774 | 48.7% | 50.4% | R+1.7 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 12ELKHART 12 | 547 | 213 | 12 | 772 | 70.9% | 27.6% | D+43.3 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 16ELKHART 16 | 296 | 452 | 15 | 763 | 38.8% | 59.2% | R+20.4 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 01WASHINGTON 01 | 185 | 565 | 1 | 751 | 24.6% | 75.2% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -BAUGO 07BAUGO 07 | 158 | 581 | 10 | 749 | 21.1% | 77.6% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 13OSOLO 13 | 239 | 500 | 7 | 746 | 32.0% | 67.0% | R+35.0 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 29CONCORD 29 | 194 | 539 | 10 | 743 | 26.1% | 72.5% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 27CONCORD 27 | 258 | 470 | 8 | 736 | 35.1% | 63.9% | R+28.8 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 03JACKSON 03 | 125 | 595 | 15 | 735 | 17.0% | 81.0% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 14ELKHART 14 | 457 | 269 | 8 | 734 | 62.3% | 36.6% | D+25.6 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 18ELKHART 18 | 276 | 445 | 13 | 734 | 37.6% | 60.6% | R+23.0 |
| Precinct -BENTON 01BENTON 01 | 116 | 597 | 16 | 729 | 15.9% | 81.9% | R+66.0 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 05OSOLO 05 | 243 | 461 | 13 | 717 | 33.9% | 64.3% | R+30.4 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 03WASHINGTON 03 | 215 | 488 | 9 | 712 | 30.2% | 68.5% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -CLEVELAND 02CLEVELAND 02 | 190 | 512 | 9 | 711 | 26.7% | 72.0% | R+45.3 |
| Precinct -MIDDLEBURY 01MIDDLEBURY 01 | 158 | 540 | 10 | 708 | 22.3% | 76.3% | R+54.0 |
| Precinct -UNION 02UNION 02 | 164 | 535 | 8 | 707 | 23.2% | 75.7% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 02OSOLO 02 | 194 | 505 | 6 | 705 | 27.5% | 71.6% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 10ELKHART 10 | 260 | 423 | 5 | 688 | 37.8% | 61.5% | R+23.7 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 14OSOLO 14 | 265 | 411 | 12 | 688 | 38.5% | 59.7% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 02JEFFERSON 02 | 108 | 562 | 9 | 679 | 15.9% | 82.8% | R+66.9 |
| Precinct -BAUGO 04BAUGO 04 | 132 | 530 | 8 | 670 | 19.7% | 79.1% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 04ELKHART 04 | 235 | 416 | 18 | 669 | 35.1% | 62.2% | R+27.1 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 01JACKSON 01 | 121 | 535 | 7 | 663 | 18.3% | 80.7% | R+62.4 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 17CONCORD 17 | 255 | 402 | 3 | 660 | 38.6% | 60.9% | R+22.3 |
| Precinct -CLEVELAND 06CLEVELAND 06 | 238 | 411 | 9 | 658 | 36.2% | 62.5% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -BAUGO 03BAUGO 03 | 201 | 441 | 9 | 651 | 30.9% | 67.7% | R+36.9 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 08ELKHART 08 | 322 | 315 | 13 | 650 | 49.5% | 48.5% | D+1.1 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 01ELKHART 01 | 264 | 374 | 7 | 645 | 40.9% | 58.0% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -UNION 01UNION 01 | 90 | 543 | 12 | 645 | 14.0% | 84.2% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -CLEVELAND 05CLEVELAND 05 | 227 | 393 | 6 | 626 | 36.3% | 62.8% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 13CONCORD 13 | 310 | 294 | 12 | 616 | 50.3% | 47.7% | D+2.6 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 05JEFFERSON 05 | 132 | 465 | 16 | 613 | 21.5% | 75.9% | R+54.3 |
| Precinct -OLIVE 01OLIVE 01 | 96 | 509 | 8 | 613 | 15.7% | 83.0% | R+67.4 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 07ELKHART 07 | 252 | 345 | 7 | 604 | 41.7% | 57.1% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -YORK 01YORK 01 | 125 | 474 | 5 | 604 | 20.7% | 78.5% | R+57.8 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 10OSOLO 10 | 242 | 349 | 12 | 603 | 40.1% | 57.9% | R+17.7 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 03JEFFERSON 03 | 152 | 435 | 13 | 600 | 25.3% | 72.5% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -MIDDLEBURY 04MIDDLEBURY 04 | 129 | 464 | 7 | 600 | 21.5% | 77.3% | R+55.8 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 05ELKHART 05 | 221 | 373 | 5 | 599 | 36.9% | 62.3% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 13ELKHART 13 | 338 | 250 | 10 | 598 | 56.5% | 41.8% | D+14.7 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 24CONCORD 24 | 196 | 380 | 17 | 593 | 33.1% | 64.1% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 08CONCORD 08 | 209 | 370 | 9 | 588 | 35.5% | 62.9% | R+27.4 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 04OSOLO 04 | 192 | 374 | 7 | 573 | 33.5% | 65.3% | R+31.8 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 03ELKHART 03 | 245 | 309 | 18 | 572 | 42.8% | 54.0% | R+11.2 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 08OSOLO 08 | 261 | 302 | 7 | 570 | 45.8% | 53.0% | R+7.2 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 21CONCORD 21 | 298 | 257 | 9 | 564 | 52.8% | 45.6% | D+7.3 |
| Precinct -UNION 03UNION 03 | 113 | 446 | 5 | 564 | 20.0% | 79.1% | R+59.0 |
| Precinct -BAUGO 05BAUGO 05 | 117 | 431 | 4 | 552 | 21.2% | 78.1% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 09OSOLO 09 | 196 | 340 | 4 | 540 | 36.3% | 63.0% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 06OSOLO 06 | 190 | 339 | 10 | 539 | 35.3% | 62.9% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 23CONCORD 23 | 216 | 300 | 4 | 520 | 41.5% | 57.7% | R+16.2 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 26CONCORD 26 | 162 | 352 | 6 | 520 | 31.2% | 67.7% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 07OSOLO 07 | 203 | 288 | 11 | 502 | 40.4% | 57.4% | R+16.9 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 04WASHINGTON 04 | 129 | 360 | 8 | 497 | 26.0% | 72.4% | R+46.5 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 01CONCORD 01 | 201 | 278 | 9 | 488 | 41.2% | 57.0% | R+15.8 |
| Precinct -CLEVELAND 04CLEVELAND 04 | 126 | 348 | 7 | 481 | 26.2% | 72.3% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -MIDDLEBURY 03MIDDLEBURY 03 | 122 | 347 | 11 | 480 | 25.4% | 72.3% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 04CONCORD 04 | 251 | 218 | 10 | 479 | 52.4% | 45.5% | D+6.9 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 03OSOLO 03 | 137 | 332 | 9 | 478 | 28.7% | 69.5% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -MIDDLEBURY 02MIDDLEBURY 02 | 102 | 368 | 5 | 475 | 21.5% | 77.5% | R+56.0 |
| Precinct -BAUGO 02BAUGO 02 | 129 | 338 | 7 | 474 | 27.2% | 71.3% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 18CONCORD 18 | 161 | 303 | 8 | 472 | 34.1% | 64.2% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 07CONCORD 07 | 231 | 230 | 7 | 468 | 49.4% | 49.1% | D+0.2 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 17ELKHART 17 | 305 | 154 | 7 | 466 | 65.5% | 33.0% | D+32.4 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 20CONCORD 20 | 124 | 332 | 7 | 463 | 26.8% | 71.7% | R+44.9 |
| Precinct -CLEVELAND 07CLEVELAND 07 | 187 | 260 | 12 | 459 | 40.7% | 56.6% | R+15.9 |
| Precinct -UNION 04UNION 04 | 90 | 365 | 4 | 459 | 19.6% | 79.5% | R+59.9 |
| Precinct -BAUGO 06BAUGO 06 | 95 | 357 | 6 | 458 | 20.7% | 77.9% | R+57.2 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 21ELKHART 21 | 135 | 315 | 8 | 458 | 29.5% | 68.8% | R+39.3 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 31CONCORD 31 | 134 | 312 | 10 | 456 | 29.4% | 68.4% | R+39.0 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 06ELKHART 06 | 203 | 246 | 6 | 455 | 44.6% | 54.1% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 30CONCORD 30 | 154 | 288 | 8 | 450 | 34.2% | 64.0% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct -BAUGO 01BAUGO 01 | 135 | 306 | 6 | 447 | 30.2% | 68.5% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 20ELKHART 20 | 119 | 321 | 4 | 444 | 26.8% | 72.3% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -OSOLO 15OSOLO 15 | 132 | 288 | 7 | 427 | 30.9% | 67.4% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -HARRISON 02HARRISON 02 | 64 | 334 | 4 | 402 | 15.9% | 83.1% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 16CONCORD 16 | 266 | 129 | 4 | 399 | 66.7% | 32.3% | D+34.3 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 05CONCORD 05 | 199 | 193 | 6 | 398 | 50.0% | 48.5% | D+1.5 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 25CONCORD 25 | 197 | 193 | 2 | 392 | 50.3% | 49.2% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -BENTON 02BENTON 02 | 50 | 332 | 9 | 391 | 12.8% | 84.9% | R+72.1 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 11CONCORD 11 | 264 | 122 | 3 | 389 | 67.9% | 31.4% | D+36.5 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 22CONCORD 22 | 130 | 251 | 5 | 386 | 33.7% | 65.0% | R+31.3 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 19CONCORD 19 | 147 | 224 | 12 | 383 | 38.4% | 58.5% | R+20.1 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 09CONCORD 09 | 178 | 163 | 8 | 349 | 51.0% | 46.7% | D+4.3 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 33CONCORD 33 | 123 | 204 | 6 | 333 | 36.9% | 61.3% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 10CONCORD 10 | 194 | 95 | 8 | 297 | 65.3% | 32.0% | D+33.3 |
| Precinct -LOCKE 01LOCKE 01 | 31 | 257 | 5 | 293 | 10.6% | 87.7% | R+77.1 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 32CONCORD 32 | 110 | 167 | 7 | 284 | 38.7% | 58.8% | R+20.1 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 15CONCORD 15 | 214 | 56 | 3 | 273 | 78.4% | 20.5% | D+57.9 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 12CONCORD 12 | 130 | 124 | 3 | 257 | 50.6% | 48.2% | D+2.3 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 11ELKHART 11 | 111 | 117 | 6 | 234 | 47.4% | 50.0% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -ELKHART 02ELKHART 02 | 45 | 145 | 4 | 194 | 23.2% | 74.7% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 14CONCORD 14 | 69 | 56 | 2 | 127 | 54.3% | 44.1% | D+10.2 |
| Precinct -CONCORD 06CONCORD 06 | 56 | 67 | 1 | 124 | 45.2% | 54.0% | R+8.9 |
| BAUGO 100 (NV)18_1803901120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BAUGO 7318_1803900660 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BAUGO 7418_1803900670 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BAUGO 7518_1803900680 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BAUGO 7618_1803900690 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BAUGO 77 (NV)18_1803901110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BENTON 7818_1803900700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLEVELAND 10818_1803900990 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLEVELAND 7918_1803900710 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLEVELAND 8018_1803900720 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLEVELAND 8118_1803900730 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLEVELAND 8218_1803900740 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLINTON 8318_1803900750 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 110 (NV)18_1803901130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 11118_1803901000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 11218_1803901010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 11318_1803901020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 11418_1803901030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 11618_1803901040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 11918_1803901070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 12118_1803901080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 2418_1803900210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 2518_1803900220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 2618_1803900230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 2718_1803900240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 3018_1803900270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 3218_1803900280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 3418_1803900290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 3518_1803900300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 3618_1803900310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 4118_1803900360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 4218_1803900370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 4318_1803900380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 4418_1803900390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 4518_1803900400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 4618_1803900410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 4718_1803900420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 4818_1803900430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 5018_1803900440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 5118_1803900450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 5218_1803900460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 5418_1803900470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 5518_1803900480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 5618_1803900490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 5718_1803900500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 5818_1803900510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 5918_1803900520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 6018_1803900530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 6118_1803900540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD 6218_1803900550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 0118_1803900010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 0218_1803900020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 0318_1803900030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 0418_1803900040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 0518_1803900050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 0618_1803900060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 0718_1803900070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 0818_1803900080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 1018_1803900090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 1118_1803900100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 1218_1803900110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 1318_1803900120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 1418_1803900130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 1518_1803900140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 1618_1803900150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 1718_1803900160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 1918_1803900170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 2018_1803900180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 2118_1803900190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 2218_1803900200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HARRISON 8418_1803900760 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HARRISON 9918_1803900910 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON 8518_1803900770 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON 8618_1803900780 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON 11718_1803901050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON 11818_1803901060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON 8718_1803900790 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON 8818_1803900800 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LOCKE 16818_1803901090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LOCKE 6818_1803900610 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LOCKE 6918_1803900620 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIDDLEBURY 10618_1803900970 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIDDLEBURY 18018_1803901100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIDDLEBURY 8918_1803900810 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIDDLEBURY 9018_1803900820 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OLIVE 9118_1803900830 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OLIVE 9818_1803900900 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 10118_1803900920 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 10218_1803900930 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 10318_1803900940 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 10418_1803900950 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 10518_1803900960 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 10718_1803900980 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 2818_1803900250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 2918_1803900260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 3718_1803900320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 3818_1803900330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 3918_1803900340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 4018_1803900350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 6318_1803900560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 6418_1803900570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 6518_1803900580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 6618_1803900590 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OSOLO 6718_1803900600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 7018_1803900630 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 7118_1803900640 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION 7218_1803900650 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 9218_1803900840 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 9318_1803900850 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 9418_1803900860 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 9518_1803900870 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| YORK 9618_1803900880 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| YORK 9718_1803900890 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Elkhart County, IN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
51.7%
21,679 votes · D+4.3
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 50.3%
Republican
Herbert Hoover1928
74.8%
20,876 votes · R+50.1
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 72.0%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
31,398votes
43.9% of the vote · R+11.2
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 26,108 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
46,972votes
63.1% of the vote · R+28.0
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 45,652 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Woodrow Wilson1912
+7.3pts D vs U.S.
Place D+26.8 · U.S. D+19.5 · a third-party candidate carried the Place
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1908 · +5.3 pts
Republican
George W. Bush2004
+38.3pts R vs U.S.
Place R+40.7 · U.S. R+2.5
Runner-up · George W. Bush, 2000 · +37.9 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
RRyan MishlerState Senate · 9
RLinda RogersState Senate · 11
RBlake DoriotState Senate · 12
RDavid AbbottState House · 18
RTim WescoState House · 21
RDoug MillerState House · 48
RJoanna KingState House · 49
Seats representing Elkhart County, IN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 3 state senate and 4 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 135,800 |
| 2018 | 121,175 |
| 2020 | 124,785 |
| 2022 | 126,855 |
| 2024 | 126,874 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−949 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −11,391 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $56,829 in average income, against $83,689 for residents who stayed — 32% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+16.9 on average — 15 points more Democratic-leaning than Elkhart County, IN itself (R+32.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- St. Joseph County, IN1,090D+1.5
- Kosciusko County, IN297R+52.2
- LaGrange County, IN204R+56.8
- Cass County, MI201R+33.9
- Marshall County, IN116R+43.4
- St. Joseph County, MI108R+34.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- St. Joseph County, IN1,161
- Kosciusko County, IN309
- Cass County, MI223
- Marion County, IN167
- LaGrange County, IN147
- St. Joseph County, MI124
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −675 |
| 2012 | −685 |
| 2013 | −204 |
| 2014 | −248 |
| 2015 | +87 |
| 2016 | −999 |
| 2017 | −806 |
| 2018 | −238 |
| 2019 | −870 |
| 2021 | −1,011 |
| 2022 | −1,352 |
| 2023 | −1,965 |
| 2024 | −1,476 |
| 2025 | −949 |
Elkhart County produces roughly 80% of the nation's recreational vehicles, and its manufacturing-heavy workforce has voted Republican by more than 30 points in each of the last three presidential cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 26.8 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 50.1 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 32.4 points.
A population of 207,132, a 70% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $68,561 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Clinton County and Marshall County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Clinton County
Indiana
85.8twin score
elasticity2000–2004 trajectorymedian age≠ population scale
Marshall County
Indiana
82.5twin score
elasticity2000–2004 trajectorycollege share≠ Scottish ancestry
Grant County
Indiana
80.6twin score
elasticity2004 marginScottish ancestry≠ 12-yr trend
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Elkhart County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18039/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Elkhart County
Indiana at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Elkhart County, Indiana vote in 2024?
In 2024, Elkhart County, Indiana voted Republican by 32.4 points (R+32.4), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 69,765 votes cast, 23,082 went Democratic and 45,652 went Republican.
When did Elkhart County, Indiana last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Elkhart County, Indiana voted Democratic was 1964.
How many people live in Elkhart County, Indiana?
Elkhart County, Indiana has a population of 207,132 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Elkhart County, Indiana?
Median household income in Elkhart County, Indiana is $68,561 — below the national median of $80,734. The Indiana state median is $71,957.
What is the political history of Elkhart County, Indiana?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Elkhart County, Indiana from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 2 went Democratic and 31 went Republican.