- Lead
- 7,862
- Total
- 14,633
- vs nation
- R+52.3
- Turnout
- 61.4%
Greene County, IN
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 61.4% of 24,175 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 7,714
- Total
- 14,784
- vs nation
- R+56.6
- Turnout
- 60.2%
- Lead
- 7,348
- Total
- 13,861
- vs nation
- R+55.1
- Turnout
- 56.5%
- Lead
- 4,107
- Total
- 13,141
- vs nation
- R+35.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,982
- Total
- 13,629
- vs nation
- R+21.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,003
- Total
- 13,352
- vs nation
- R+27.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,554
- Total
- 12,619
- vs nation
- R+20.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 469
- Total
- 12,862
- vs nation
- R+12.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+53.7MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 31,0212024 5-year
- Population density
- 57 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 543 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $62,0942024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 95.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+18.2 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+53.7 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Parke County, IN · twin score 96.3
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 61.4%14,839 participants ÷ 24,175 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +20.2 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- -4.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 41.2%–49.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14,839 | 24,175 ± 153 | 61.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 9,649 | 24,091 ± 143 | 40.1% | Audited | A/A |
| 15,076 | 25,034 ± 118 | 60.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 13,392 | 25,028 ± 104 | 53.5% | Audited | A/A |
| 14,229 | 25,198 ± 86 | 56.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 13,141 | 25,202 | 52.1% | Derived | — | |
| 13,629 | 24,902 | 54.7% | Derived | — | |
| 13,352 | 24,602 extrapolated | 54.3% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Greene County only. The complete district District 8 result is shown below for comparison.
Greene County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
District District 8 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 64 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
64 precincts · 14,633 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CENTER 2CENTER 2 | 245 | 817 | 15 | 1,077 | 22.7% | 75.9% | R+53.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -STOCKTON 2STOCKTON 2 | 189 | 793 | 15 | 997 | 19.0% | 79.5% | R+60.6 |
| Precinct -JACKSONJACKSON | 242 | 731 | 11 | 984 | 24.6% | 74.3% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 1RICHLAND 1 | 147 | 513 | 19 | 679 | 21.6% | 75.6% | R+53.9 |
| Precinct -TAYLORTAYLOR | 152 | 498 | 11 | 661 | 23.0% | 75.3% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 4RICHLAND 4 | 132 | 502 | 10 | 644 | 20.5% | 78.0% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -BEECH CREEK 2BEECH CREEK 2 | 161 | 440 | 5 | 606 | 26.6% | 72.6% | R+46.0 |
| Precinct -BEECH CREEK 1BEECH CREEK 1 | 135 | 440 | 10 | 585 | 23.1% | 75.2% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 2RICHLAND 2 | 148 | 394 | 18 | 560 | 26.4% | 70.4% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -STOCKTON 6STOCKTON 6 | 167 | 374 | 6 | 547 | 30.5% | 68.4% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -CENTER 1CENTER 1 | 108 | 383 | 7 | 498 | 21.7% | 76.9% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -STOCKTON 1STOCKTON 1 | 95 | 389 | 6 | 490 | 19.4% | 79.4% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -STOCKTON 7STOCKTON 7 | 115 | 353 | 7 | 475 | 24.2% | 74.3% | R+50.1 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 1JEFFERSON 1 | 100 | 359 | 8 | 467 | 21.4% | 76.9% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 3RICHLAND 3 | 118 | 329 | 5 | 452 | 26.1% | 72.8% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -WRIGHT 5WRIGHT 5 | 96 | 346 | 10 | 452 | 21.2% | 76.5% | R+55.3 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 2JEFFERSON 2 | 80 | 310 | 5 | 395 | 20.3% | 78.5% | R+58.2 |
| Precinct -WRIGHT 4WRIGHT 4 | 87 | 301 | 0 | 388 | 22.4% | 77.6% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -STOCKTON 4STOCKTON 4 | 89 | 293 | 5 | 387 | 23.0% | 75.7% | R+52.7 |
| Precinct -HIGHLANDHIGHLAND | 64 | 300 | 5 | 369 | 17.3% | 81.3% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -STOCKTON 5STOCKTON 5 | 84 | 262 | 7 | 353 | 23.8% | 74.2% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct -GRANTGRANT | 57 | 282 | 10 | 349 | 16.3% | 80.8% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct -STOCKTON 3STOCKTON 3 | 91 | 232 | 7 | 330 | 27.6% | 70.3% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -WRIGHT 3WRIGHT 3 | 46 | 225 | 7 | 278 | 16.5% | 80.9% | R+64.4 |
| Precinct -FAIRPLAYFAIRPLAY | 62 | 196 | 5 | 263 | 23.6% | 74.5% | R+51.0 |
| Precinct -WRIGHT 1WRIGHT 1 | 50 | 177 | 3 | 230 | 21.7% | 77.0% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 2WASHINGTON 2 | 42 | 176 | 2 | 220 | 19.1% | 80.0% | R+60.9 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 1WASHINGTON 1 | 41 | 159 | 2 | 202 | 20.3% | 78.7% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -STAFFORDSTAFFORD | 32 | 161 | 4 | 197 | 16.2% | 81.7% | R+65.5 |
| Precinct -SMITHSMITH | 30 | 162 | 1 | 193 | 15.5% | 83.9% | R+68.4 |
| Precinct -WRIGHT 2WRIGHT 2 | 42 | 131 | 2 | 175 | 24.0% | 74.9% | R+50.9 |
| Precinct -CASSCASS | 23 | 104 | 3 | 130 | 17.7% | 80.0% | R+62.3 |
| BEECH CREEK 0118_1805500010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BEECH CREEK 0218_1805500020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CASS18_1805500030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 0118_1805500040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CENTER 0218_1805500050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FAIRPLAY18_1805500060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GRANT18_1805500070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HIGHLAND18_1805500080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON18_1805500090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON 0118_1805500100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON 0218_1805500110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0118_1805500120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0218_1805500130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0318_1805500140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0418_1805500150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SMITH18_1805500160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STAFFORD18_1805500170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STOCKTON 0118_1805500180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STOCKTON 0218_1805500190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STOCKTON 0318_1805500200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STOCKTON 0418_1805500210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STOCKTON 0518_1805500220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STOCKTON 0618_1805500230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STOCKTON 0718_1805500240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TAYLOR18_1805500250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 0118_1805500260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 218_1805500270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WRIGHT 0118_1805500280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WRIGHT 0218_1805500290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WRIGHT 0318_1805500300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WRIGHT 0418_1805500310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WRIGHT 0518_1805500320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Greene County, IN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
58.8%
8,574 votes · D+18.2
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 56.1%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
76.1%
11,132 votes · R+53.7
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 75.1%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
9,730votes
56.1% of the vote · D+13.1
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 8,845 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
11,132votes
76.1% of the vote · R+53.7
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 11,103 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+20.3pts D vs U.S.
Place R+4.8 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · James M. Cox, 1920 · +18.7 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+56.6pts R vs U.S.
Place R+52.2 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +55.1 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Greene County, IN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 21.8%2,974 | 78.2%10,652 | 13,626 |
| 2020 | R | 21.3%2,986 | 78.7%11,008 | 13,994 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 21,777 |
| 2018 | 18,796 |
| 2020 | 20,063 |
| 2022 | 21,022 |
| 2024 | 22,037 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+49 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −65 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $48,915 in average income, against $65,537 for residents who stayed — 25% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+15.0 on average — 39 points more Democratic-leaning than Greene County, IN itself (R+53.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Monroe County, IN204D+27.4
- Sullivan County, IN62R+52.7
- Lawrence County, IN43R+51.0
- Owen County, IN43R+50.7
- Daviess County, IN36R+64.3
- Vigo County, IN36R+18.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Monroe County, IN181
- Sullivan County, IN83
- Vigo County, IN46
- Lawrence County, IN45
- Owen County, IN42
- Marion County, IN34
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −192 |
| 2012 | −70 |
| 2013 | −159 |
| 2014 | −14 |
| 2015 | −194 |
| 2016 | −153 |
| 2017 | +28 |
| 2018 | −67 |
| 2019 | −62 |
| 2021 | +107 |
| 2022 | +301 |
| 2023 | +173 |
| 2024 | +188 |
| 2025 | +49 |
Greene County's R+53.7 margin in 2024 places it among Indiana's most heavily one-sided counties, reflecting the deep rural realignment that has reshaped small coal-country communities across the southwestern part of the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 18.2 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 53.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 53.7 points.
A population of 31,021, a 95% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $62,094 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Parke County and Fountain County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Greene County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18055/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.