- Lead
- 8,574
- Total
- 17,735
- vs nation
- R+46.9
- Turnout
- 62.7%
Huntington County, IN
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 62.7% of 28,514 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 8,892
- Total
- 17,829
- vs nation
- R+54.3
- Turnout
- 64.2%
- Lead
- 8,143
- Total
- 16,181
- vs nation
- R+52.4
- Turnout
- 58.3%
- Lead
- 6,266
- Total
- 15,797
- vs nation
- R+43.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,448
- Total
- 16,328
- vs nation
- R+34.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 7,740
- Total
- 15,627
- vs nation
- R+47.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,994
- Total
- 14,620
- vs nation
- R+41.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,988
- Total
- 14,076
- vs nation
- R+36.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+48.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 36,7982024 5-year
- Population density
- 96 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 383 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $66,3012024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 92.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.7%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 3.2%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+13.5 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+50.3 in 2016MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Whitley County, IN · twin score 93.9
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 62.7%17,878 participants ÷ 28,514 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +23.9 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.2 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 38.8%–54.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17,878 | 28,514 ± 155 | 62.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 11,444 | 28,381 ± 173 | 40.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 18,129 | 28,229 ± 170 | 64.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 18,546 | 28,123 ± 130 | 65.9% | Audited | A/A |
| 16,470 | 28,229 ± 167 | 58.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 15,797 | 28,198 | 56.0% | Derived | — | |
| 16,328 | 28,618 | 57.1% | Derived | — | |
| 15,627 | 29,038 extrapolated | 53.8% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Huntington County only. The complete district District 3 result is shown below for comparison.
Huntington County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
District District 3 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 71 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
71 precincts · 17,735 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -UNIONUNION | 141 | 615 | 8 | 764 | 18.5% | 80.5% | R+62.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 04HUNTINGTON 04 | 205 | 544 | 12 | 761 | 26.9% | 71.5% | R+44.5 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 02JACKSON 02 | 149 | 552 | 13 | 714 | 20.9% | 77.3% | R+56.4 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 01JACKSON 01 | 173 | 492 | 9 | 674 | 25.7% | 73.0% | R+47.3 |
| Precinct -CLEAR CREEK 01CLEAR CREEK 01 | 139 | 512 | 16 | 667 | 20.8% | 76.8% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -ROCK CREEKROCK CREEK | 117 | 522 | 18 | 657 | 17.8% | 79.5% | R+61.6 |
| Precinct -SALAMONIE 02SALAMONIE 02 | 154 | 478 | 13 | 645 | 23.9% | 74.1% | R+50.2 |
| Precinct -LANCASTERLANCASTER | 120 | 512 | 10 | 642 | 18.7% | 79.8% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 07AHUNTINGTON 07A | 150 | 459 | 11 | 620 | 24.2% | 74.0% | R+49.8 |
| Precinct -DALLAS 01DALLAS 01 | 113 | 468 | 11 | 592 | 19.1% | 79.1% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 03JACKSON 03 | 180 | 365 | 13 | 558 | 32.3% | 65.4% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 12AHUNTINGTON 12A | 124 | 425 | 6 | 555 | 22.3% | 76.6% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct -CLEAR CREEK 02CLEAR CREEK 02 | 114 | 429 | 11 | 554 | 20.6% | 77.4% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 06AHUNTINGTON 06A | 130 | 405 | 12 | 547 | 23.8% | 74.0% | R+50.3 |
| Precinct -SALAMONIE 01SALAMONIE 01 | 146 | 394 | 4 | 544 | 26.8% | 72.4% | R+45.6 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 06HUNTINGTON 06 | 165 | 358 | 9 | 532 | 31.0% | 67.3% | R+36.3 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 11HUNTINGTON 11 | 121 | 393 | 13 | 527 | 23.0% | 74.6% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 08HUNTINGTON 08 | 142 | 367 | 7 | 516 | 27.5% | 71.1% | R+43.6 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 04JACKSON 04 | 161 | 321 | 8 | 490 | 32.9% | 65.5% | R+32.7 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 05AHUNTINGTON 05A | 148 | 324 | 11 | 483 | 30.6% | 67.1% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 02HUNTINGTON 02 | 165 | 271 | 13 | 449 | 36.7% | 60.4% | R+23.6 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 02AHUNTINGTON 02A | 134 | 296 | 7 | 437 | 30.7% | 67.7% | R+37.1 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 11AHUNTINGTON 11A | 114 | 303 | 13 | 430 | 26.5% | 70.5% | R+44.0 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 09HUNTINGTON 09 | 128 | 285 | 8 | 421 | 30.4% | 67.7% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONJEFFERSON | 86 | 297 | 6 | 389 | 22.1% | 76.3% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 05HUNTINGTON 05 | 144 | 228 | 12 | 384 | 37.5% | 59.4% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -WARRENWARREN | 81 | 300 | 2 | 383 | 21.1% | 78.3% | R+57.2 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 12HUNTINGTON 12 | 68 | 279 | 9 | 356 | 19.1% | 78.4% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 07HUNTINGTON 07 | 86 | 259 | 8 | 353 | 24.4% | 73.4% | R+49.0 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 03HUNTINGTON 03 | 103 | 231 | 12 | 346 | 29.8% | 66.8% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 10HUNTINGTON 10 | 95 | 245 | 6 | 346 | 27.5% | 70.8% | R+43.4 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 01HUNTINGTON 01 | 93 | 246 | 3 | 342 | 27.2% | 71.9% | R+44.7 |
| Precinct -DALLAS 02DALLAS 02 | 83 | 252 | 4 | 339 | 24.5% | 74.3% | R+49.9 |
| Precinct -WAYNEWAYNE | 45 | 222 | 8 | 275 | 16.4% | 80.7% | R+64.4 |
| Precinct -POLKPOLK | 36 | 203 | 1 | 240 | 15.0% | 84.6% | R+69.6 |
| Precinct -HUNTINGTON 01AHUNTINGTON 01A | 63 | 138 | 2 | 203 | 31.0% | 68.0% | R+36.9 |
| CLEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP18_1806900010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DALLAS TOWNSHIP 0118_1806900020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DALLAS TOWNSHIP 0218_1806900030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 0118_1806900040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 01A18_1806900050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 0218_1806900060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 02A18_1806900070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 0318_1806900080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 0418_1806900090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 0518_1806900100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 05A18_1806900110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 0618_1806900120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 06A18_1806900130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 0718_1806900140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 07A18_1806900150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 0818_1806900160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 0918_1806900170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 1018_1806900180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 1118_1806900190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 11A18_1806900200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 1218_1806900210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 12A18_1806900220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HUNTINGTON 13 (NV)18_1806900230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON TOWNSHIP 0118_1806900240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON TOWNSHIP 0218_1806900250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JACKSON TOWNSHIP 0318_1806900260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP18_1806900270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LANCASTER TOWNSHIP18_1806900280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| POLK TOWNSHIP18_1806900290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ROCK CREEK TOWNSHIP18_1806900300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SALAMONIE TOWNSHIP 0118_1806900310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SALAMONIE TOWNSHIP 0218_1806900320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| UNION TOWNSHIP18_1806900330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WARREN TOWNSHIP18_1806900340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WAYNE TOWNSHIP18_1806900350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Huntington County, IN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
55.3%
9,308 votes · D+11.1
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 55.0%
Republican
George H. W. Bush1988
74.9%
11,675 votes · R+50.0
Runner-up · George W. Bush, 2004 · 74.3%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
9,308votes
55.3% of the vote · D+11.1
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 8,697 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
13,147votes
73.7% of the vote · R+49.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 12,990 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
James M. Cox1920
+15.6pts D vs U.S.
Place R+10.6 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · John W. Davis, 1924 · +11.8 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+54.3pts R vs U.S.
Place R+49.9 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +52.4 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Huntington County, IN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 24.0%3,948 | 76.0%12,481 | 16,429 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 25,615 |
| 2018 | 23,853 |
| 2020 | 25,073 |
| 2022 | 24,315 |
| 2024 | 24,999 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+244 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −163 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,720 in average income, against $68,315 for residents who stayed — 24% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+30.9 on average — 17 points more Democratic-leaning than Huntington County, IN itself (R+48.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Allen County, IN275R+12.5
- Wabash County, IN69R+50.8
- Wells County, IN66R+57.8
- Whitley County, IN54R+49.9
- Grant County, IN40R+41.7
- Kosciusko County, IN21R+52.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Allen County, IN258
- Wells County, IN67
- Wabash County, IN54
- Grant County, IN46
- Whitley County, IN38
- Kosciusko County, IN20
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +34 |
| 2012 | −211 |
| 2013 | −207 |
| 2014 | −176 |
| 2015 | −151 |
| 2016 | −200 |
| 2017 | −80 |
| 2018 | −31 |
| 2019 | +238 |
| 2021 | +213 |
| 2022 | +65 |
| 2023 | +8 |
| 2024 | +91 |
| 2025 | +244 |
Huntington County, a rural north-central Indiana county of about 38,000, delivered a 48-point Republican presidential margin in 2024, placing it among the state's most decisively one-sided jurisdictions in recent cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 13.5 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 50.3 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.5 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 48.3 points.
A population of 36,798, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $66,301 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Whitley County and Decatur County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Huntington County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18069/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.