Montgomery County, Indiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
54 precincts · 16,581 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -UNION 06UNION 06 | 205 | 806 | 20 | 1,031 | 19.9% | 78.2% | R+58.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CRAWFORDSVILLE 04CRAWFORDSVILLE 04 | 278 | 611 | 10 | 899 | 30.9% | 68.0% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -FRANKLINFRANKLIN | 165 | 696 | 27 | 888 | 18.6% | 78.4% | R+59.8 |
| Precinct -CLARKCLARK | 167 | 625 | 12 | 804 | 20.8% | 77.7% | R+57.0 |
| Precinct -BROWNBROWN | 112 | 669 | 13 | 794 | 14.1% | 84.3% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -UNION 03UNION 03 | 164 | 584 | 17 | 765 | 21.4% | 76.3% | R+54.9 |
| Precinct -CRAWFORDSVILLE 01CRAWFORDSVILLE 01 | 343 | 379 | 16 | 738 | 46.5% | 51.4% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -WAYNEWAYNE | 128 | 590 | 20 | 738 | 17.3% | 79.9% | R+62.6 |
| Precinct -COAL CREEKCOAL CREEK | 142 | 585 | 10 | 737 | 19.3% | 79.4% | R+60.1 |
| Precinct -UNION 05UNION 05 | 114 | 580 | 12 | 706 | 16.1% | 82.2% | R+66.0 |
| Precinct -UNION 07UNION 07 | 188 | 505 | 13 | 706 | 26.6% | 71.5% | R+44.9 |
| Precinct -CRAWFORDSVILLE 02CRAWFORDSVILLE 02 | 182 | 468 | 21 | 671 | 27.1% | 69.7% | R+42.6 |
| Precinct -WALNUTWALNUT | 149 | 509 | 13 | 671 | 22.2% | 75.9% | R+53.7 |
| Precinct -UNION 01UNION 01 | 152 | 441 | 10 | 603 | 25.2% | 73.1% | R+47.9 |
| Precinct -CRAWFORDSVILLE 07CRAWFORDSVILLE 07 | 197 | 384 | 12 | 593 | 33.2% | 64.8% | R+31.5 |
| Precinct -MADISONMADISON | 126 | 413 | 10 | 549 | 23.0% | 75.2% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -CRAWFORDSVILLE 03CRAWFORDSVILLE 03 | 180 | 352 | 8 | 540 | 33.3% | 65.2% | R+31.9 |
| Precinct -CRAWFORDSVILLE 05CRAWFORDSVILLE 05 | 158 | 360 | 17 | 535 | 29.5% | 67.3% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -CRAWFORDSVILLE 08CRAWFORDSVILLE 08 | 182 | 304 | 7 | 493 | 36.9% | 61.7% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -UNION 04UNION 04 | 98 | 362 | 10 | 470 | 20.9% | 77.0% | R+56.2 |
| Precinct -RIPLEYRIPLEY | 72 | 365 | 8 | 445 | 16.2% | 82.0% | R+65.8 |
| Precinct -CRAWFORDSVILLE 10CRAWFORDSVILLE 10 | 158 | 239 | 10 | 407 | 38.8% | 58.7% | R+19.9 |
| Precinct -UNION 02UNION 02 | 95 | 308 | 4 | 407 | 23.3% | 75.7% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -SCOTTSCOTT | 63 | 331 | 7 | 401 | 15.7% | 82.5% | R+66.8 |
| Precinct -CRAWFORDSVILLE 06CRAWFORDSVILLE 06 | 122 | 254 | 9 | 385 | 31.7% | 66.0% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -CRAWFORDSVILLE 09CRAWFORDSVILLE 09 | 153 | 209 | 8 | 370 | 41.4% | 56.5% | R+15.1 |
| Precinct -SUGAR CREEKSUGAR CREEK | 41 | 193 | 1 | 235 | 17.4% | 82.1% | R+64.7 |
| BROWN18_1810700010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CLARK18_1810700020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| COAL CREEK18_1810700030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FRANKLIN18_1810700040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MADISON18_1810700050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RIPLEY18_1810700060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SCOTT18_1810700070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SUGAR CREEK18_1810700080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| UNION 0118_1810700090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| UNION 0218_1810700100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| UNION 0318_1810700110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| UNION 0418_1810700120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| UNION 0518_1810700130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| UNION 0618_1810700140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| UNION 0718_1810700150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 0018018_1810700180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 0020018_1810700200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 0021018_1810700210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 0023018_1810700230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 0025018_1810700250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WALNUT18_1810700160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WARD 1-118_1810700170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WARD 2-118_1810700190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WARD 3-218_1810700220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WARD 4-218_1810700240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WARD 5-218_1810700260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WAYNE18_1810700270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +0.1% |
| 1896 | −2.0% |
| 1900 | −4.6% |
| 1904 | −10.3% |
| 1908 | −2.2% |
| 1912 | +13.1% |
| 1916 | −2.2% |
| 1920 | −10.1% |
| 1924 | −18.6% |
| 1928 | −28.0% |
| 1932 | +11.3% |
| 1936 | +4.4% |
| 1940 | −10.0% |
| 1944 | −19.3% |
| 1948 | −17.7% |
| 1952 | −32.3% |
| 1956 | −31.2% |
| 1960 | −33.2% |
| 1964 | +1.4% |
| 1968 | −28.6% |
| 1972 | −52.3% |
| 1976 | −27.8% |
| 1980 | −38.7% |
| 1984 | −50.5% |
| 1988 | −49.5% |
| 1992 | −29.1% |
| 1996 | −29.0% |
| 2000 | −38.1% |
| 2004 | −50.6% |
| 2008 | −19.9% |
| 2012 | −38.5% |
| 2016 | −50.4% |
| 2020 | −49.1% |
| 2024 | −48.2% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 24,186 |
| 2018 | 22,914 |
| 2020 | 24,626 |
| 2022 | 25,651 |
| 2024 | 25,092 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−5 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +293 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $52,837 in average income, against $67,683 for residents who stayed — 22% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+15.1 on average — 33 points more Democratic-leaning than Montgomery County, IN itself (R+48.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Tippecanoe County, IN128R+0.1
- Hendricks County, IN90R+21.5
- Marion County, IN83D+27.6
- Boone County, IN65R+16.0
- Fountain County, IN49R+59.9
- Putnam County, IN46R+52.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Tippecanoe County, IN107
- Marion County, IN80
- Fountain County, IN68
- Hendricks County, IN49
- Boone County, IN44
- Putnam County, IN36
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +136 |
| 2012 | −178 |
| 2013 | −165 |
| 2014 | −57 |
| 2015 | +32 |
| 2016 | −112 |
| 2017 | +63 |
| 2018 | −153 |
| 2019 | −15 |
| 2021 | +146 |
| 2022 | +296 |
| 2023 | +250 |
| 2024 | +55 |
| 2025 | −5 |
Montgomery County delivered an R+48.2 margin in the 2024 presidential race, reflecting a rural west-central Indiana electorate that has shifted decisively toward Republican candidates over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 13.1 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 52.3 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.9 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 48.2 points.
A population of 38,312, a 89% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $71,479 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Shelby County and Rush County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Montgomery County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18107/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.