Monroe County, Indiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
150 precincts · 59,598 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -RICHLAND 8RICHLAND 8 | 769 | 700 | 37 | 1,506 | 51.1% | 46.5% | D+4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PERRY 23PERRY 23 | 888 | 572 | 30 | 1,490 | 59.6% | 38.4% | D+21.2 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 01VAN BUREN 01 | 770 | 548 | 33 | 1,351 | 57.0% | 40.6% | D+16.4 |
| Precinct -CLEAR CREEK 01CLEAR CREEK 01 | 502 | 701 | 37 | 1,240 | 40.5% | 56.5% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTONWASHINGTON | 518 | 693 | 27 | 1,238 | 41.8% | 56.0% | R+14.1 |
| Precinct -PERRY 27PERRY 27 | 760 | 415 | 33 | 1,208 | 62.9% | 34.4% | D+28.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY 21PERRY 21 | 895 | 269 | 28 | 1,192 | 75.1% | 22.6% | D+52.5 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 01RICHLAND 01 | 554 | 607 | 28 | 1,189 | 46.6% | 51.1% | R+4.5 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 04RICHLAND 04 | 568 | 568 | 31 | 1,167 | 48.7% | 48.7% | Even |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 07RICHLAND 07 | 614 | 488 | 23 | 1,125 | 54.6% | 43.4% | D+11.2 |
| Precinct -PERRY 05PERRY 05 | 731 | 322 | 30 | 1,083 | 67.5% | 29.7% | D+37.8 |
| Precinct -PERRY 4PERRY 4 | 689 | 361 | 25 | 1,075 | 64.1% | 33.6% | D+30.5 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 2RICHLAND 2 | 513 | 539 | 21 | 1,073 | 47.8% | 50.2% | R+2.4 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 04VAN BUREN 04 | 339 | 707 | 14 | 1,060 | 32.0% | 66.7% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -BENTON 01BENTON 01 | 536 | 491 | 26 | 1,053 | 50.9% | 46.6% | D+4.3 |
| Precinct -CLEAR CREEK 03CLEAR CREEK 03 | 507 | 524 | 18 | 1,049 | 48.3% | 50.0% | R+1.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY 24PERRY 24 | 499 | 521 | 19 | 1,039 | 48.0% | 50.1% | R+2.1 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 06VAN BUREN 06 | 471 | 503 | 29 | 1,003 | 47.0% | 50.1% | R+3.2 |
| Precinct -BENTON 02BENTON 02 | 597 | 380 | 23 | 1,000 | 59.7% | 38.0% | D+21.7 |
| Precinct -SALT CREEKSALT CREEK | 594 | 363 | 25 | 982 | 60.5% | 37.0% | D+23.5 |
| Precinct -PERRY 22PERRY 22 | 675 | 277 | 21 | 973 | 69.4% | 28.5% | D+40.9 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 05VAN BUREN 05 | 381 | 550 | 18 | 949 | 40.1% | 58.0% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 03VAN BUREN 03 | 584 | 321 | 17 | 922 | 63.3% | 34.8% | D+28.5 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 12BLOOMINGTON 12 | 535 | 357 | 25 | 917 | 58.3% | 38.9% | D+19.4 |
| Precinct -PERRY 03PERRY 03 | 669 | 214 | 29 | 912 | 73.4% | 23.5% | D+49.9 |
| Precinct -PERRY 11PERRY 11 | 653 | 212 | 21 | 886 | 73.7% | 23.9% | D+49.8 |
| Precinct -PERRY 25PERRY 25 | 436 | 429 | 17 | 882 | 49.4% | 48.6% | D+0.8 |
| Precinct -INDIAN CREEKINDIAN CREEK | 316 | 537 | 18 | 871 | 36.3% | 61.7% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -PERRY 26PERRY 26 | 672 | 184 | 14 | 870 | 77.2% | 21.1% | D+56.1 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 15BLOOMINGTON 15 | 518 | 329 | 22 | 869 | 59.6% | 37.9% | D+21.7 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 6RICHLAND 6 | 254 | 579 | 25 | 858 | 29.6% | 67.5% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct -PERRY 18PERRY 18 | 720 | 112 | 12 | 844 | 85.3% | 13.3% | D+72.0 |
| Precinct -BEAN BLOSSOM 1BEAN BLOSSOM 1 | 229 | 577 | 19 | 825 | 27.8% | 69.9% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -PERRY 19PERRY 19 | 582 | 202 | 24 | 808 | 72.0% | 25.0% | D+47.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY 12PERRY 12 | 597 | 178 | 17 | 792 | 75.4% | 22.5% | D+52.9 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 5RICHLAND 5 | 341 | 420 | 18 | 779 | 43.8% | 53.9% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -PERRY 10PERRY 10 | 555 | 206 | 14 | 775 | 71.6% | 26.6% | D+45.0 |
| Precinct -BEAN BLOSSOM 02BEAN BLOSSOM 02 | 276 | 481 | 14 | 771 | 35.8% | 62.4% | R+26.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY 14PERRY 14 | 633 | 115 | 19 | 767 | 82.5% | 15.0% | D+67.5 |
| Precinct -CLEAR CREEK 02CLEAR CREEK 02 | 333 | 406 | 18 | 757 | 44.0% | 53.6% | R+9.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY 16PERRY 16 | 668 | 66 | 14 | 748 | 89.3% | 8.8% | D+80.5 |
| Precinct -PERRY 17PERRY 17 | 572 | 133 | 18 | 723 | 79.1% | 18.4% | D+60.7 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 11BLOOMINGTON 11 | 439 | 262 | 21 | 722 | 60.8% | 36.3% | D+24.5 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 06BLOOMINGTON 06 | 608 | 100 | 12 | 720 | 84.4% | 13.9% | D+70.6 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 17BLOOMINGTON 17 | 540 | 161 | 18 | 719 | 75.1% | 22.4% | D+52.7 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 09BLOOMINGTON 09 | 588 | 108 | 18 | 714 | 82.4% | 15.1% | D+67.2 |
| Precinct -PERRY 09PERRY 09 | 553 | 140 | 18 | 711 | 77.8% | 19.7% | D+58.1 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 10BLOOMINGTON 10 | 581 | 86 | 15 | 682 | 85.2% | 12.6% | D+72.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY 08PERRY 08 | 610 | 50 | 15 | 675 | 90.4% | 7.4% | D+83.0 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 13BLOOMINGTON 13 | 508 | 134 | 25 | 667 | 76.2% | 20.1% | D+56.1 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 21BLOOMINGTON 21 | 564 | 88 | 14 | 666 | 84.7% | 13.2% | D+71.5 |
| Precinct -PERRY 32PERRY 32 | 529 | 113 | 5 | 647 | 81.8% | 17.5% | D+64.3 |
| Precinct -PERRY 02PERRY 02 | 438 | 194 | 14 | 646 | 67.8% | 30.0% | D+37.8 |
| Precinct -PERRY 13PERRY 13 | 457 | 162 | 17 | 636 | 71.9% | 25.5% | D+46.4 |
| Precinct -PERRY 31PERRY 31 | 546 | 62 | 18 | 626 | 87.2% | 9.9% | D+77.3 |
| Precinct -PERRY 01PERRY 01 | 473 | 121 | 16 | 610 | 77.5% | 19.8% | D+57.7 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 02BLOOMINGTON 02 | 457 | 134 | 13 | 604 | 75.7% | 22.2% | D+53.5 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 02VAN BUREN 02 | 304 | 274 | 16 | 594 | 51.2% | 46.1% | D+5.1 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 03RICHLAND 03 | 250 | 316 | 16 | 582 | 43.0% | 54.3% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 16BLOOMINGTON 16 | 440 | 119 | 11 | 570 | 77.2% | 20.9% | D+56.3 |
| Precinct -PERRY 29PERRY 29 | 382 | 173 | 10 | 565 | 67.6% | 30.6% | D+37.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY 20PERRY 20 | 439 | 111 | 7 | 557 | 78.8% | 19.9% | D+58.9 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 14BLOOMINGTON 14 | 353 | 151 | 12 | 516 | 68.4% | 29.3% | D+39.1 |
| Precinct -PERRY 06PERRY 06 | 385 | 65 | 20 | 470 | 81.9% | 13.8% | D+68.1 |
| Precinct -PERRY 15PERRY 15 | 416 | 35 | 6 | 457 | 91.0% | 7.7% | D+83.4 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 22BLOOMINGTON 22 | 310 | 56 | 9 | 375 | 82.7% | 14.9% | D+67.7 |
| Precinct -PERRY 30PERRY 30 | 261 | 34 | 15 | 310 | 84.2% | 11.0% | D+73.2 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 05BLOOMINGTON 05 | 258 | 39 | 4 | 301 | 85.7% | 13.0% | D+72.8 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 23BLOOMINGTON 23 | 220 | 68 | 3 | 291 | 75.6% | 23.4% | D+52.2 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 20BLOOMINGTON 20 | 227 | 44 | 10 | 281 | 80.8% | 15.7% | D+65.1 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 08BLOOMINGTON 08 | 242 | 28 | 8 | 278 | 87.1% | 10.1% | D+77.0 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 03BLOOMINGTON 03 | 206 | 56 | 7 | 269 | 76.6% | 20.8% | D+55.8 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 18BLOOMINGTON 18 | 200 | 42 | 6 | 248 | 80.6% | 16.9% | D+63.7 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 24BLOOMINGTON 24 | 135 | 84 | 3 | 222 | 60.8% | 37.8% | D+23.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY 07PERRY 07 | 179 | 19 | 2 | 200 | 89.5% | 9.5% | D+80.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY 28PERRY 28 | 123 | 37 | 2 | 162 | 75.9% | 22.8% | D+53.1 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 19BLOOMINGTON 19 | 128 | 28 | 3 | 159 | 80.5% | 17.6% | D+62.9 |
| Precinct -POLKPOLK | 71 | 84 | 4 | 159 | 44.7% | 52.8% | R+8.2 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 01BLOOMINGTON 01 | 115 | 19 | 10 | 144 | 79.9% | 13.2% | D+66.7 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 04BLOOMINGTON 04 | 93 | 9 | 4 | 106 | 87.7% | 8.5% | D+79.2 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 07BLOOMINGTON 07 | 66 | 37 | 3 | 106 | 62.3% | 34.9% | D+27.4 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 09RICHLAND 09 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct -BEAN BLOSSOM 3BEAN BLOSSOM 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| BEAN BLOSSOM 0118_1810500010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BEAN BLOSSOM 0218_1810500020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BENTON 0118_1810500030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BENTON 0218_1810500040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 0118_1810500050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 0218_1810500060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 0318_1810500070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 0418_1810500080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 0518_1810500090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 0618_1810500100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 0718_1810500110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 0818_1810500120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 0918_1810500130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 1018_1810500140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 1118_1810500150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 1218_1810500160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 1318_1810500170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 1418_1810500180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 1518_1810500190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 1618_1810500200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMINGTON 1718_1810500210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CLEAR CREEK 0118_1810500220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CLEAR CREEK 0218_1810500230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| INDIAN CREEK18_1810500240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 0118_1810500250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 0218_1810500260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 0318_1810500270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 0418_1810500280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 0518_1810500290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 0618_1810500300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 0718_1810500310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 0818_1810500320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 0918_1810500330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 1018_1810500340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 1118_1810500350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 1218_1810500360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 1318_1810500370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 1418_1810500380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 1518_1810500390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 1618_1810500400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 1718_1810500410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 1818_1810500420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 1918_1810500430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 2018_1810500440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 2118_1810500450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 2218_1810500460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 2318_1810500470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 2418_1810500480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PERRY 2518_1810500490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| POLK18_1810500500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICHLAND 0118_1810500510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICHLAND 0218_1810500520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICHLAND 0318_1810500530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICHLAND 0418_1810500540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICHLAND 0518_1810500550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICHLAND 0618_1810500560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICHLAND 0718_1810500570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICHLAND 0818_1810500580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICHLAND 0918_1810500590 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SALT CREEK18_1810500600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VAN BUREN 0118_1810500610 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VAN BUREN 0218_1810500620 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VAN BUREN 0318_1810500630 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VAN BUREN 0418_1810500640 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VAN BUREN 0518_1810500650 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VAN BUREN 0618_1810500660 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON18_1810500670 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −1.8% |
| 1896 | −1.8% |
| 1900 | −7.4% |
| 1904 | −13.9% |
| 1908 | −4.6% |
| 1912 | +18.3% |
| 1916 | −3.9% |
| 1920 | −8.4% |
| 1924 | −13.8% |
| 1928 | −34.4% |
| 1932 | +4.4% |
| 1936 | +2.1% |
| 1940 | −11.9% |
| 1944 | −13.5% |
| 1948 | −12.6% |
| 1952 | −21.7% |
| 1956 | −26.1% |
| 1960 | −31.5% |
| 1964 | +7.2% |
| 1968 | −10.9% |
| 1972 | −13.2% |
| 1976 | −6.5% |
| 1980 | −13.3% |
| 1984 | −19.2% |
| 1988 | −13.2% |
| 1992 | +7.0% |
| 1996 | +4.5% |
| 2000 | −4.0% |
| 2004 | +8.2% |
| 2008 | +32.2% |
| 2012 | +19.1% |
| 2016 | +23.4% |
| 2020 | +28.2% |
| 2024 | +27.4% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 112,401 |
| 2018 | 94,206 |
| 2020 | 98,247 |
| 2022 | 98,407 |
| 2024 | 94,102 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−208 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −3,051 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,367 in average income, against $87,389 for residents who stayed — 39% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+16.2 on average — 44 points more Republican-leaning than Monroe County, IN itself (D+27.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Marion County, IN359D+27.6
- Lawrence County, IN236R+51.0
- Greene County, IN181R+53.7
- Owen County, IN142R+50.7
- Hamilton County, IN128R+6.1
- Morgan County, IN87R+54.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Marion County, IN483
- Lawrence County, IN303
- Cook County, IL255
- Greene County, IN204
- Owen County, IN165
- Hamilton County, IN145
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +359 |
| 2012 | −189 |
| 2013 | −587 |
| 2014 | −54 |
| 2015 | −366 |
| 2016 | +22 |
| 2017 | −153 |
| 2018 | −931 |
| 2019 | −282 |
| 2021 | +3,962 |
| 2022 | −1,081 |
| 2023 | −1,715 |
| 2024 | −1,828 |
| 2025 | −208 |
Home to Indiana University's main campus in Bloomington, Monroe County posts Democratic presidential margins that stand well outside Indiana's statewide norm, reflecting the outsized electoral influence of a large college-town population.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 32.2 points in 2008 and a Republican high of 34.4 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 27.4 points.
A population of 140,965, a 81% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $65,868 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Boone County and Douglas County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Monroe County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18105/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.