- Lead
- 4,053
- Total
- 7,976
- vs nation
- R+49.3
- Turnout
- 67.0%
Tipton County, IN
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 67.0% of 12,064 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 4,276
- Total
- 8,116
- vs nation
- R+57.1
- Turnout
- 69.8%
- Lead
- 4,002
- Total
- 7,510
- vs nation
- R+55.4
- Turnout
- 64.7%
- Lead
- 2,341
- Total
- 7,373
- vs nation
- R+35.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,202
- Total
- 7,827
- vs nation
- R+22.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,425
- Total
- 7,892
- vs nation
- R+40.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,392
- Total
- 7,316
- vs nation
- R+33.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,502
- Total
- 7,385
- vs nation
- R+28.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+50.8MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 15,3462024 5-year
- Population density
- 59 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 261 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $76,1562024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 92.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.1%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 3.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+19.8 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+53.3 in 2016MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Rush County, IN · twin score 97.4
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 67.0%8,088 participants ÷ 12,064 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +24.9 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- -0.2 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 42.1%–53.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8,088 | 12,064 ± 111 | 67.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 5,415 | 12,062 ± 116 | 44.9% | Audited | A/A |
| 8,267 | 11,842 ± 128 | 69.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 7,424 | 11,991 ± 146 | 61.9% | Audited | A/A |
| 7,765 | 12,009 ± 133 | 64.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 7,373 | 12,227 | 60.3% | Derived | — | |
| 7,827 | 12,073 | 64.8% | Derived | — | |
| 7,892 | 11,919 extrapolated | 66.2% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Tipton County only. The complete district District 5 result is shown below for comparison.
Tipton County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Show all 7 candidates
District District 5 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 30 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
30 precincts · 7,998 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -LIBERTY 01LIBERTY 01 | 179 | 483 | 10 | 672 | 26.6% | 71.9% | R+45.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CICERO 7CICERO 7 | 159 | 496 | 13 | 668 | 23.8% | 74.3% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct -LIBERTY 02LIBERTY 02 | 120 | 532 | 13 | 665 | 18.0% | 80.0% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -CICERO 02CICERO 02 | 225 | 412 | 11 | 648 | 34.7% | 63.6% | R+28.9 |
| Precinct -PRAIRIE 01PRAIRIE 01 | 120 | 502 | 8 | 630 | 19.0% | 79.7% | R+60.6 |
| Precinct -CICERO 05CICERO 05 | 152 | 453 | 15 | 620 | 24.5% | 73.1% | R+48.5 |
| Precinct -CICERO 01CICERO 01 | 154 | 437 | 18 | 609 | 25.3% | 71.8% | R+46.5 |
| Precinct -WILDCAT 01WILDCAT 01 | 108 | 479 | 12 | 599 | 18.0% | 80.0% | R+61.9 |
| Precinct -CICERO 03CICERO 03 | 153 | 396 | 13 | 562 | 27.2% | 70.5% | R+43.2 |
| Precinct -CICERO 4CICERO 4 | 131 | 386 | 10 | 527 | 24.9% | 73.2% | R+48.4 |
| Precinct -MADISON 02MADISON 02 | 91 | 308 | 7 | 406 | 22.4% | 75.9% | R+53.4 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 01JEFFERSON 01 | 74 | 324 | 7 | 405 | 18.3% | 80.0% | R+61.7 |
| Precinct -CICERO 06CICERO 06 | 97 | 276 | 6 | 379 | 25.6% | 72.8% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -MADISON 01MADISON 01 | 54 | 248 | 12 | 314 | 17.2% | 79.0% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 02JEFFERSON 02 | 76 | 214 | 4 | 294 | 25.9% | 72.8% | R+46.9 |
| CICERO 118_1815900010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CICERO 218_1815900020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CICERO 318_1815900030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CICERO 418_1815900040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CICERO 518_1815900050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CICERO 618_1815900060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CICERO 718_1815900070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON 118_1815900090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| JEFFERSON 218_1815900100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIBERTY 118_1815900110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LIBERTY 218_1815900120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON 118_1815900130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MADISON 218_1815900140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRAIRIE 118_1815900150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WILDCAT 118_1815900160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Tipton County, IN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
56.2%
4,898 votes · D+14.0
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 54.9%
Republican
Donald Trump2020
75.3%
6,110 votes · R+52.7
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 74.5%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
4,898votes
56.2% of the vote · D+14.0
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 4,796 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
6,110votes
75.3% of the vote · R+52.7
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 5,946 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
James M. Cox1920
+21.5pts D vs U.S.
Place R+4.7 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · John W. Davis, 1924 · +18.8 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+57.1pts R vs U.S.
Place R+52.7 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +55.4 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Tipton County, IN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 24.3%1,731 | 75.7%5,384 | 7,115 |
| 2020 | R | 25.6%1,906 | 74.4%5,540 | 7,446 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 12,633 |
| 2018 | 10,995 |
| 2020 | 11,520 |
| 2022 | 11,855 |
| 2024 | 12,191 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−43 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −547 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $58,025 in average income, against $74,596 for residents who stayed — 22% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+12.9 on average — 38 points more Democratic-leaning than Tipton County, IN itself (R+50.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Hamilton County, IN125R+6.1
- Howard County, IN81R+35.3
- Madison County, IN38R+26.9
- Marion County, IN37D+27.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Howard County, IN113
- Hamilton County, IN80
- Madison County, IN55
- Marion County, IN27
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −50 |
| 2012 | −131 |
| 2013 | −65 |
| 2014 | −153 |
| 2015 | −130 |
| 2016 | −70 |
| 2017 | −11 |
| 2018 | −12 |
| 2019 | +43 |
| 2021 | +21 |
| 2022 | +21 |
| 2023 | −9 |
| 2024 | +42 |
| 2025 | −43 |
Tipton County's flat, agricultural terrain anchors a voting pattern as uniform as its landscape — the 2024 presidential margin of R+50.8 placed it among Indiana's most one-sided counties, with a population under 17,000 that has trended steadily toward consolidated rural preferences.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 19.8 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 53.3 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.9 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 50.8 points.
A population of 15,346, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $76,156 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Rush County and Clay County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Tipton County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18159/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.