Wabash County, Indiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
52 precincts · 13,980 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -NOBLE 06NOBLE 06 | 236 | 573 | 14 | 823 | 28.7% | 69.6% | R+40.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PAW PAWPAW PAW | 130 | 659 | 10 | 799 | 16.3% | 82.5% | R+66.2 |
| Precinct -NOBLE 10NOBLE 10 | 130 | 593 | 6 | 729 | 17.8% | 81.3% | R+63.5 |
| Precinct -LAGRO 02LAGRO 02 | 117 | 563 | 7 | 687 | 17.0% | 82.0% | R+64.9 |
| Precinct -WALTZWALTZ | 103 | 547 | 12 | 662 | 15.6% | 82.6% | R+67.1 |
| Precinct -NOBLE 07NOBLE 07 | 168 | 469 | 5 | 642 | 26.2% | 73.1% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 02PLEASANT 02 | 119 | 504 | 6 | 629 | 18.9% | 80.1% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -CHESTER 03CHESTER 03 | 203 | 386 | 20 | 609 | 33.3% | 63.4% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -NOBLE 08NOBLE 08 | 154 | 429 | 10 | 593 | 26.0% | 72.3% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -NOBLE 11NOBLE 11 | 98 | 472 | 10 | 580 | 16.9% | 81.4% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct -CHESTER 06CHESTER 06 | 157 | 374 | 9 | 540 | 29.1% | 69.3% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -LIBERTY 02LIBERTY 02 | 94 | 434 | 10 | 538 | 17.5% | 80.7% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -CHESTER 05CHESTER 05 | 247 | 275 | 10 | 532 | 46.4% | 51.7% | R+5.3 |
| Precinct -NOBLE 03NOBLE 03 | 135 | 375 | 11 | 521 | 25.9% | 72.0% | R+46.1 |
| Precinct -NOBLE 05NOBLE 05 | 141 | 369 | 9 | 519 | 27.2% | 71.1% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -LIBERTY 01LIBERTY 01 | 101 | 406 | 4 | 511 | 19.8% | 79.5% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -NOBLE 09NOBLE 09 | 82 | 423 | 6 | 511 | 16.0% | 82.8% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -LAGRO 01LAGRO 01 | 72 | 426 | 4 | 502 | 14.3% | 84.9% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -CHESTER 01CHESTER 01 | 109 | 351 | 9 | 469 | 23.2% | 74.8% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -NOBLE 04NOBLE 04 | 159 | 294 | 7 | 460 | 34.6% | 63.9% | R+29.3 |
| Precinct -CHESTER 04CHESTER 04 | 198 | 219 | 9 | 426 | 46.5% | 51.4% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 01PLEASANT 01 | 81 | 306 | 9 | 396 | 20.5% | 77.3% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -CHESTER 02CHESTER 02 | 81 | 290 | 7 | 378 | 21.4% | 76.7% | R+55.3 |
| Precinct -NOBLE 02NOBLE 02 | 119 | 201 | 9 | 329 | 36.2% | 61.1% | R+24.9 |
| Precinct -NOBLE 01NOBLE 01 | 60 | 249 | 6 | 315 | 19.0% | 79.0% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -LAGRO 03LAGRO 03 | 41 | 238 | 1 | 280 | 14.6% | 85.0% | R+70.4 |
| CHESTER 0118_1816900010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CHESTER 0218_1816900020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CHESTER 0318_1816900030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CHESTER 0418_1816900040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CHESTER 0518_1816900050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CHESTER 0618_1816900060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LAGRO 0118_1816900070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LAGRO 0218_1816900080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LAGRO 0318_1816900090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LIBERTY 0118_1816900100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LIBERTY 0218_1816900110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOBLE 0118_1816900120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOBLE 0218_1816900130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOBLE 0318_1816900140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOBLE 0418_1816900150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOBLE 0518_1816900160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOBLE 0618_1816900170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOBLE 0718_1816900180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOBLE 0818_1816900190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOBLE 0918_1816900200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOBLE 1018_1816900210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOBLE 1118_1816900220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PAW PAW18_1816900230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT 0118_1816900240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT 0218_1816900245 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WALTZ18_1816900250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −19.1% |
| 1896 | −19.5% |
| 1900 | −20.5% |
| 1904 | −28.1% |
| 1908 | −12.8% |
| 1912 | +14.8% |
| 1916 | −8.9% |
| 1920 | −24.0% |
| 1924 | −26.8% |
| 1928 | −37.3% |
| 1932 | −0.7% |
| 1936 | −7.5% |
| 1940 | −23.2% |
| 1944 | −27.5% |
| 1948 | −26.1% |
| 1952 | −38.0% |
| 1956 | −43.0% |
| 1960 | −36.8% |
| 1964 | +4.0% |
| 1968 | −28.5% |
| 1972 | −36.9% |
| 1976 | −19.7% |
| 1980 | −28.7% |
| 1984 | −41.2% |
| 1988 | −37.2% |
| 1992 | −16.8% |
| 1996 | −18.6% |
| 2000 | −31.4% |
| 2004 | −41.8% |
| 2008 | −20.1% |
| 2012 | −36.2% |
| 2016 | −50.2% |
| 2020 | −49.9% |
| 2024 | −50.8% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 22,798 |
| 2018 | 20,450 |
| 2020 | 21,088 |
| 2022 | 20,966 |
| 2024 | 20,840 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+92 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −644 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $50,451 in average income, against $72,223 for residents who stayed — 30% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+44.9 on average — 5.9 points more Democratic-leaning than Wabash County, IN itself (R+50.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Kosciusko County, IN90R+52.2
- Miami County, IN72R+54.5
- Huntington County, IN54R+48.3
- Grant County, IN48R+41.7
- Allen County, IN38R+12.5
- Howard County, IN28R+35.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Kosciusko County, IN79
- Grant County, IN78
- Huntington County, IN69
- Miami County, IN63
- Allen County, IN56
- Howard County, IN29
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −240 |
| 2012 | −134 |
| 2013 | −18 |
| 2014 | −89 |
| 2015 | −149 |
| 2016 | −278 |
| 2017 | −32 |
| 2018 | −69 |
| 2019 | −113 |
| 2021 | +171 |
| 2022 | +123 |
| 2023 | −30 |
| 2024 | +122 |
| 2025 | +92 |
Wabash County, anchored by the small industrial city of Wabash, delivered a 50-point Republican presidential margin in 2024, reflecting the deep partisan consolidation that has reshaped small-town manufacturing counties across the Midwest over the past decade.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 14.8 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 50.8 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 50.8 points.
A population of 30,844, a 92% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $66,806 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Rush County and Tipton County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Wabash County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18169/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.