Alcona County, Michigan
Precinct data
Results by precinct
24 precincts · 7,483 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Greenbush Township, Precinct 1Greenbush Township, Precinct 1 | 305 | 592 | 15 | 912 | 33.4% | 64.9% | R+31.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Harrisville Township, Precinct 1Harrisville Township, Precinct 1 | 251 | 597 | 10 | 858 | 29.3% | 69.6% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct -Alcona Township, Precinct 1Alcona Township, Precinct 1 | 262 | 578 | 9 | 849 | 30.9% | 68.1% | R+37.2 |
| Precinct -Caledonia Township, Precinct 1Caledonia Township, Precinct 1 | 241 | 575 | 3 | 819 | 29.4% | 70.2% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -Curtis Township, Precinct 1Curtis Township, Precinct 1 | 222 | 551 | 4 | 777 | 28.6% | 70.9% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -Hawes Township, Precinct 1Hawes Township, Precinct 1 | 214 | 552 | 8 | 774 | 27.6% | 71.3% | R+43.7 |
| Precinct -Mikado Township, Precinct 1Mikado Township, Precinct 1 | 108 | 454 | 11 | 573 | 18.8% | 79.2% | R+60.4 |
| Precinct -Haynes Township, Precinct 1Haynes Township, Precinct 1 | 165 | 383 | 7 | 555 | 29.7% | 69.0% | R+39.3 |
| Precinct -Gustin Township, Precinct 1Gustin Township, Precinct 1 | 104 | 374 | 5 | 483 | 21.5% | 77.4% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -Mitchell Township, Precinct 1Mitchell Township, Precinct 1 | 56 | 247 | 6 | 309 | 18.1% | 79.9% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -City of Harrisville, Precinct 1City of Harrisville, Precinct 1 | 127 | 155 | 6 | 288 | 44.1% | 53.8% | R+9.7 |
| Precinct -Millen Township, Precinct 1Millen Township, Precinct 1 | 85 | 199 | 2 | 286 | 29.7% | 69.6% | R+39.9 |
| 0010104000001001-01040-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0011246000001001-12460-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0011932000001001-19320-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0013482000001001-34820-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0013574000001001-35740-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0013686000001001-36860-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0013688000001001-36880-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0013722000001001-37220-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0013738000001001-37380-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0015388000001001-53880-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0015406000001001-54060-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0015474000001001-54740-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −18.1% |
| 1896 | −44.7% |
| 1900 | −69.7% |
| 1904 | −78.4% |
| 1908 | −60.1% |
| 1912 | −14.8% |
| 1916 | −11.1% |
| 1920 | −56.7% |
| 1924 | −59.4% |
| 1928 | −58.1% |
| 1932 | +0.2% |
| 1936 | −14.8% |
| 1940 | −32.0% |
| 1944 | −35.3% |
| 1948 | −33.1% |
| 1952 | −30.5% |
| 1956 | −43.2% |
| 1960 | −32.8% |
| 1964 | +14.6% |
| 1968 | −28.4% |
| 1972 | −33.5% |
| 1976 | −6.6% |
| 1980 | −20.7% |
| 1984 | −33.1% |
| 1988 | −21.4% |
| 1992 | +2.4% |
| 1996 | +7.1% |
| 2000 | −7.6% |
| 2004 | −11.0% |
| 2008 | −7.9% |
| 2012 | −18.0% |
| 2016 | −39.8% |
| 2020 | −38.3% |
| 2024 | −41.7% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 9,347 |
| 2018 | 9,269 |
| 2020 | 9,895 |
| 2022 | 10,353 |
| 2024 | 10,638 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+159 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,676 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $58,127 in average income, against $60,511 for residents who stayed — 4% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+11.7 on average — 30 points more Democratic-leaning than Alcona County, MI itself (R+41.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Iosco County, MI48R+30.6
- Alpena County, MI41R+28.6
- Oakland County, MI26D+10.6
- Wayne County, MI25D+29.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Iosco County, MI52
- Alpena County, MI49
- Oakland County, MI22
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −22 |
| 2012 | −32 |
| 2013 | +91 |
| 2014 | +8 |
| 2015 | +25 |
| 2016 | +149 |
| 2017 | +73 |
| 2018 | +155 |
| 2019 | +150 |
| 2021 | +267 |
| 2022 | +234 |
| 2023 | +230 |
| 2024 | +189 |
| 2025 | +159 |
Alcona's aging, rural population along Michigan's northeastern Lower Peninsula has produced some of the state's widest presidential margins, with the 2024 gap exceeding 40 points in a county of fewer than 12,000 residents.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 14.6 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 78.4 points in 1904. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 41.7 points.
A population of 10,397, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $54,993 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Roscommon County and Oscoda County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Alcona County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26001/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.