- Lead
- 6,647
- Total
- 21,874
- vs nation
- R+28.9
- Turnout
- 74.2%
Delta County, MI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 74.2% of 29,644 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 5,601
- Total
- 21,151
- vs nation
- R+30.9
- Turnout
- 74.1%
- Lead
- 4,685
- Total
- 18,594
- vs nation
- R+27.3
- Turnout
- 64.9%
- Lead
- 1,204
- Total
- 18,130
- vs nation
- R+10.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,211
- Total
- 19,064
- vs nation
- R+0.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 299
- Total
- 19,238
- vs nation
- D+0.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 901
- Total
- 17,316
- vs nation
- R+5.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,636
- Total
- 16,150
- vs nation
- D+7.8
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+30.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 36,8132024 5-year
- Population density
- 31 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 1,171 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $57,8092024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 89.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+38.7 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+64.1 in 1904MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Menominee County, MI · twin score 90.6
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 74.2%21,999 participants ÷ 29,644 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.1 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -0.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 59.1%–63.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21,999 | 29,644 ± 132 | 74.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 17,474 | 29,615 ± 121 | 59.0% | Audited | A/A |
| 21,247 | 28,656 ± 125 | 74.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 16,753 | 28,742 ± 146 | 58.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 18,797 | 28,981 ± 125 | 64.9% | Audited | A/A | |
| 18,130 | 29,162 | 62.2% | Derived | — | |
| 19,064 | 29,301 | 65.1% | Derived | — | |
| 19,238 | 29,440 extrapolated | 65.3% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 45 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
45 precincts · 21,874 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Wells Township, Precinct 2Wells Township, Precinct 2 | 585 | 1,423 | 32 | 2,040 | 28.7% | 69.8% | R+41.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -City of Escanaba, Precinct 3City of Escanaba, Precinct 3 | 799 | 1,054 | 24 | 1,877 | 42.6% | 56.2% | R+13.6 |
| Precinct -City of Escanaba, Precinct 2City of Escanaba, Precinct 2 | 696 | 1,028 | 19 | 1,743 | 39.9% | 59.0% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -City of Escanaba, Precinct 1City of Escanaba, Precinct 1 | 685 | 863 | 36 | 1,584 | 43.2% | 54.5% | R+11.2 |
| Precinct -City of Gladstone, Precinct 2City of Gladstone, Precinct 2 | 519 | 973 | 29 | 1,521 | 34.1% | 64.0% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct -Escanaba Township, Precinct 1Escanaba Township, Precinct 1 | 416 | 1,017 | 20 | 1,453 | 28.6% | 70.0% | R+41.4 |
| Precinct -City of Gladstone, Precinct 1City of Gladstone, Precinct 1 | 547 | 846 | 23 | 1,416 | 38.6% | 59.7% | R+21.1 |
| Precinct -Ford River Township, Precinct 1Ford River Township, Precinct 1 | 439 | 881 | 18 | 1,338 | 32.8% | 65.8% | R+33.0 |
| Precinct -Masonville Township, Precinct 1Masonville Township, Precinct 1 | 340 | 738 | 15 | 1,093 | 31.1% | 67.5% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -Wells Township, Precinct 1Wells Township, Precinct 1 | 338 | 671 | 7 | 1,016 | 33.3% | 66.0% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -City of Escanaba, Precinct 4City of Escanaba, Precinct 4 | 418 | 564 | 10 | 992 | 42.1% | 56.9% | R+14.7 |
| Precinct -Bark River Township, Precinct 1Bark River Township, Precinct 1 | 214 | 750 | 13 | 977 | 21.9% | 76.8% | R+54.9 |
| Precinct -Escanaba Township, Precinct 2Escanaba Township, Precinct 2 | 247 | 576 | 15 | 838 | 29.5% | 68.7% | R+39.3 |
| Precinct -Brampton Township, Precinct 1Brampton Township, Precinct 1 | 228 | 437 | 9 | 674 | 33.8% | 64.8% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -Ensign Township, Precinct 1Ensign Township, Precinct 1 | 196 | 380 | 5 | 581 | 33.7% | 65.4% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -Garden Township, Precinct 1Garden Township, Precinct 1 | 189 | 358 | 5 | 552 | 34.2% | 64.9% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -Maple Ridge Township, Precinct 1Maple Ridge Township, Precinct 1 | 128 | 346 | 8 | 482 | 26.6% | 71.8% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -Baldwin Township, Precinct 1Baldwin Township, Precinct 1 | 119 | 356 | 3 | 478 | 24.9% | 74.5% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -Cornell Township, Precinct 1Cornell Township, Precinct 1 | 95 | 276 | 4 | 375 | 25.3% | 73.6% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -Nahma Township, Precinct 1Nahma Township, Precinct 1 | 91 | 248 | 4 | 343 | 26.5% | 72.3% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct -Bay De Noc Township, Precinct 1Bay De Noc Township, Precinct 1 | 97 | 159 | 3 | 259 | 37.5% | 61.4% | R+23.9 |
| Precinct -Fairbanks Township, Precinct 1Fairbanks Township, Precinct 1 | 76 | 165 | 1 | 242 | 31.4% | 68.2% | R+36.8 |
| Baldwin Township 00001041-04900-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bark River Township 00001041-05420-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bay De Noc Township 00001041-06040-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brampton Township 00001041-09980-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cornell Township 00001041-18280-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ensign Township 00001041-26140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Escanaba City 00001041-26360-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Escanaba City 00002041-26360-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Escanaba City 00003041-26360-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Escanaba City 00004041-26360-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Escanaba Township 00001041-26380-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Escanaba Township 00002041-26380-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Escanaba Township 00003041-26380-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Fairbanks Township 00001041-26960-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ford River Township 00001041-29380-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Garden Township 00001041-31400-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Gladstone City 00001041-32300-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Gladstone City 00002041-32300-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Maple Ridge Township 00001041-51260-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Masonville Township 00001041-52220-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Nahma Township 00001041-56500-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Wells Township 00001041-85240-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Wells Township 00002041-85240-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Delta County, MI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
69.2%
10,046 votes · D+38.7
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 64.9%
Republican
Theodore Roosevelt1904
79.9%
3,332 votes · R+64.1
Runner-up · William H. Taft, 1908 · 71.7%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
10,046votes
69.2% of the vote · D+38.7
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 9,974 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
14,109votes
64.5% of the vote · R+30.4
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 13,207 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
George McGovern1972
+25.4pts D vs U.S.
Place D+2.2 · U.S. R+23.2
Runner-up · Michael Dukakis, 1988 · +18.8 pts
Republican
Theodore Roosevelt1904
+44.4pts R vs U.S.
Place R+64.1 · U.S. R+19.7
Runner-up · William H. Taft, 1908 · +37.9 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Delta County, MI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 35.7%7,474 | 64.3%13,476 | 20,950 |
| 2020 | R | 33.4%6,893 | 66.6%13,719 | 20,612 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 29,395 |
| 2018 | 28,896 |
| 2020 | 31,455 |
| 2022 | 32,269 |
| 2024 | 33,099 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+75 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +239 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $54,506 in average income, against $65,768 for residents who stayed — 17% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+18.6 on average — 12 points more Democratic-leaning than Delta County, MI itself (R+30.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Menominee County, MI60R+33.6
- Marquette County, MI59D+8.7
- Schoolcraft County, MI37R+32.0
- Alger County, MI28R+19.8
- Dickinson County, MI24R+36.3
- Brown County, WI21R+7.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Menominee County, MI72
- Marquette County, MI69
- Dickinson County, MI28
- Brown County, WI25
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −28 |
| 2012 | −38 |
| 2013 | −9 |
| 2014 | −190 |
| 2015 | −93 |
| 2016 | −131 |
| 2017 | −184 |
| 2018 | +79 |
| 2019 | +39 |
| 2021 | +223 |
| 2022 | +193 |
| 2023 | +220 |
| 2024 | +83 |
| 2025 | +75 |
Delta County sits on Little Bay de Noc along Michigan's Upper Peninsula, where a predominantly rural, non-Hispanic white population has shifted sharply toward Republican margins over the past decade, reaching R+30.4 in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 38.7 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 64.1 points in 1904. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 30.4 points.
A population of 36,813, a 90% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $57,809 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Menominee County and Schoolcraft County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Delta County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26041/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.