Ogemaw County, Michigan
Precinct data
Results by precinct
34 precincts · 12,622 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -West Branch Township, Precinct 1West Branch Township, Precinct 1 | 387 | 1,179 | 25 | 1,591 | 24.3% | 74.1% | R+49.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Mills Township, Precinct 2Mills Township, Precinct 2 | 331 | 812 | 12 | 1,155 | 28.7% | 70.3% | R+41.6 |
| Precinct -City of West Branch, Precinct 1City of West Branch, Precinct 1 | 401 | 677 | 21 | 1,099 | 36.5% | 61.6% | R+25.1 |
| Precinct -Churchill Township, Precinct 1Churchill Township, Precinct 1 | 304 | 753 | 11 | 1,068 | 28.5% | 70.5% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -Hill Township, Precinct 1Hill Township, Precinct 1 | 330 | 612 | 8 | 950 | 34.7% | 64.4% | R+29.7 |
| Precinct -Mills Township, Precinct 1Mills Township, Precinct 1 | 245 | 645 | 14 | 904 | 27.1% | 71.3% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -Edwards Township, Precinct 1Edwards Township, Precinct 1 | 251 | 639 | 6 | 896 | 28.0% | 71.3% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -Rose Township, Precinct 1Rose Township, Precinct 1 | 235 | 580 | 13 | 828 | 28.4% | 70.0% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -Ogemaw Township, Precinct 1Ogemaw Township, Precinct 1 | 220 | 551 | 15 | 786 | 28.0% | 70.1% | R+42.1 |
| Precinct -Foster Township, Precinct 1Foster Township, Precinct 1 | 166 | 408 | 4 | 578 | 28.7% | 70.6% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -Horton Township, Precinct 1Horton Township, Precinct 1 | 112 | 427 | 8 | 547 | 20.5% | 78.1% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct -Cumming Township, Precinct 1Cumming Township, Precinct 1 | 137 | 346 | 3 | 486 | 28.2% | 71.2% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -Richland Township, Precinct 1Richland Township, Precinct 1 | 136 | 321 | 5 | 462 | 29.4% | 69.5% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct -Klacking Township, Precinct 1Klacking Township, Precinct 1 | 97 | 301 | 4 | 402 | 24.1% | 74.9% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct -Logan Township, Precinct 1Logan Township, Precinct 1 | 104 | 271 | 7 | 382 | 27.2% | 70.9% | R+43.7 |
| Precinct -Goodar Township, Precinct 1Goodar Township, Precinct 1 | 59 | 192 | 5 | 256 | 23.0% | 75.0% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -City of Rose City, Precinct 1City of Rose City, Precinct 1 | 63 | 165 | 4 | 232 | 27.2% | 71.1% | R+44.0 |
| 1291574000001129-15740-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1291926000001129-19260-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1292502000001129-25020-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1292986000001129-29860-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1293286000001129-32860-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1293830000001129-38300-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1293932000001129-39320-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1294364000001129-43640-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1294916000001129-49160-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1295434000001129-54340-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1295434000002129-54340-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1296030000001129-60300-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1296832000001129-68320-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1296960000001129-69600-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1296968001001129-69680-01001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1298558001001129-85580-01001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1298560000001129-85600-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −6.8% |
| 1896 | −16.6% |
| 1900 | −37.9% |
| 1904 | −56.7% |
| 1908 | −42.9% |
| 1912 | −13.0% |
| 1916 | −7.9% |
| 1920 | −55.7% |
| 1924 | −67.4% |
| 1928 | −47.3% |
| 1932 | +5.4% |
| 1936 | +4.0% |
| 1940 | −31.3% |
| 1944 | −39.6% |
| 1948 | −32.1% |
| 1952 | −48.4% |
| 1956 | −38.5% |
| 1960 | −17.5% |
| 1964 | +27.2% |
| 1968 | −19.0% |
| 1972 | −23.7% |
| 1976 | +4.9% |
| 1980 | −9.1% |
| 1984 | −21.9% |
| 1988 | −1.0% |
| 1992 | +11.8% |
| 1996 | +20.1% |
| 2000 | +1.9% |
| 2004 | −2.2% |
| 2008 | +2.4% |
| 2012 | −6.2% |
| 2016 | −36.4% |
| 2020 | −40.1% |
| 2024 | −42.0% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 16,596 |
| 2018 | 16,439 |
| 2020 | 17,859 |
| 2022 | 18,437 |
| 2024 | 18,897 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+206 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,390 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $49,711 in average income, against $55,958 for residents who stayed — 11% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+14.6 on average — 27 points more Democratic-leaning than Ogemaw County, MI itself (R+42.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Iosco County, MI47R+30.6
- Wayne County, MI45D+29.0
- Arenac County, MI42R+40.6
- Macomb County, MI35R+13.7
- Oakland County, MI34D+10.6
- Roscommon County, MI33R+32.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Iosco County, MI58
- Arenac County, MI42
- Roscommon County, MI34
- Bay County, MI30
- Wayne County, MI29
- Oakland County, MI24
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −28 |
| 2012 | −58 |
| 2013 | −79 |
| 2014 | −93 |
| 2015 | +40 |
| 2016 | +104 |
| 2017 | +163 |
| 2018 | +85 |
| 2019 | +199 |
| 2021 | +169 |
| 2022 | +324 |
| 2023 | +234 |
| 2024 | +124 |
| 2025 | +206 |
Ogemaw, a lightly populated county in Michigan's Lower Peninsula, delivered a 42-point Republican presidential margin in 2024 — among the widest in the state — reflecting the region's predominantly rural, non-college white demographic profile.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 27.2 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 67.4 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 42.0 points.
A population of 20,885, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $54,666 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Gladwin County and Arenac County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Ogemaw County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26129/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.