- Lead
- 6,744
- Total
- 19,476
- vs nation
- R+33.2
- Turnout
- 75.1%
Wexford County, MI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 75.1% of 26,080 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 6,264
- Total
- 18,265
- vs nation
- R+38.8
- Turnout
- 71.9%
- Lead
- 5,564
- Total
- 15,370
- vs nation
- R+38.3
- Turnout
- 62.0%
- Lead
- 2,266
- Total
- 14,898
- vs nation
- R+19.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 665
- Total
- 15,704
- vs nation
- R+11.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,932
- Total
- 15,160
- vs nation
- R+16.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,889
- Total
- 12,982
- vs nation
- R+15.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 644
- Total
- 11,888
- vs nation
- R+3.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+34.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 34,0772024 5-year
- Population density
- 60 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 565 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $61,0852024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 90.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.1%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+18.8 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+69.6 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Newaygo County, MI · twin score 83.6
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 75.1%19,584 participants ÷ 26,080 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +5.6 ptsHigh-turnout, durable
- Drop-off vs state
- -9.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 69.5%–69.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19,584 | 26,080 ± 176 | 75.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 17,145 | 25,872 ± 150 | 66.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 18,354 | 25,539 ± 123 | 71.9% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 14,242 | 25,190 ± 108 | 56.5% | Audited | A/A |
| 15,494 | 25,003 ± 103 | 62.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 14,898 | 24,685 | 60.4% | Derived | — | |
| 15,704 | 23,819 | 65.9% | Derived | — | |
| 15,160 | 22,953 extrapolated | 66.0% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 40 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
40 precincts · 19,476 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Haring Township, Precinct 1Haring Township, Precinct 1 | 585 | 1,436 | 21 | 2,042 | 28.6% | 70.3% | R+41.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -City of Cadillac, Precinct 1City of Cadillac, Precinct 1 | 693 | 1,071 | 29 | 1,793 | 38.7% | 59.7% | R+21.1 |
| Precinct -City of Cadillac, Precinct 3City of Cadillac, Precinct 3 | 760 | 995 | 37 | 1,792 | 42.4% | 55.5% | R+13.1 |
| Precinct -Cherry Grove Township, Precinct 1Cherry Grove Township, Precinct 1 | 572 | 1,124 | 28 | 1,724 | 33.2% | 65.2% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct -City of Cadillac, Precinct 2City of Cadillac, Precinct 2 | 709 | 959 | 20 | 1,688 | 42.0% | 56.8% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct -Clam Lake Township, Precinct 1Clam Lake Township, Precinct 1 | 510 | 1,104 | 20 | 1,634 | 31.2% | 67.6% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -Selma Township, Precinct 1Selma Township, Precinct 1 | 423 | 893 | 21 | 1,337 | 31.6% | 66.8% | R+35.2 |
| Precinct -Hanover Township, Precinct 1Hanover Township, Precinct 1 | 282 | 744 | 10 | 1,036 | 27.2% | 71.8% | R+44.6 |
| Precinct -Springville Township, Precinct 1Springville Township, Precinct 1 | 252 | 724 | 17 | 993 | 25.4% | 72.9% | R+47.5 |
| Precinct -Cedar Creek Township, Precinct 1Cedar Creek Township, Precinct 1 | 256 | 720 | 12 | 988 | 25.9% | 72.9% | R+47.0 |
| Precinct -Wexford Township, Precinct 1Wexford Township, Precinct 1 | 162 | 549 | 15 | 726 | 22.3% | 75.6% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -City of Manton, Precinct 1City of Manton, Precinct 1 | 165 | 437 | 8 | 610 | 27.0% | 71.6% | R+44.6 |
| Precinct -Colfax Township, Precinct 1Colfax Township, Precinct 1 | 151 | 402 | 2 | 555 | 27.2% | 72.4% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -Liberty Township, Precinct 1Liberty Township, Precinct 1 | 103 | 431 | 5 | 539 | 19.1% | 80.0% | R+60.9 |
| Precinct -Antioch Township, Precinct 1Antioch Township, Precinct 1 | 152 | 355 | 8 | 515 | 29.5% | 68.9% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -Boon Township, Precinct 1Boon Township, Precinct 1 | 133 | 256 | 12 | 401 | 33.2% | 63.8% | R+30.7 |
| Precinct -Greenwood Township, Precinct 1Greenwood Township, Precinct 1 | 94 | 280 | 5 | 379 | 24.8% | 73.9% | R+49.1 |
| Precinct -Slagle Township, Precinct 1Slagle Township, Precinct 1 | 96 | 225 | 8 | 329 | 29.2% | 68.4% | R+39.2 |
| Precinct -South Branch Township, Precinct 1South Branch Township, Precinct 1 | 94 | 164 | 2 | 260 | 36.2% | 63.1% | R+26.9 |
| Precinct -Henderson Township, Precinct 1Henderson Township, Precinct 1 | 32 | 99 | 4 | 135 | 23.7% | 73.3% | R+49.6 |
| Antioch Township 00001165-03060-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Boon Township 00001165-09580-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cadillac City 00001165-12320-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cadillac City 00002165-12320-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cadillac City 00003165-12320-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cedar Creek Township 00001165-14120-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cherry Grove Township 00001165-15060-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clam Lake Township 00001165-15860-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Colfax Township 00001165-17200-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Greenwood Township 00001165-35240-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hanover Township 00001165-36420-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Haring Charter Township 00001165-36600-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Henderson Township 00001165-37640-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Liberty Township 00001165-47380-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Manton City 00001165-50880-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Selma Township 00001165-72380-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Slagle Township 00001165-74220-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Branch Township 00001165-74820-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Springville Township 00001165-75940-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Wexford Township 00001165-86500-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Wexford County, MI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
59.3%
4,414 votes · D+18.8
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 53.0%
Republican
Herbert Hoover1928
84.5%
4,825 votes · R+69.6
Runner-up · Calvin Coolidge, 1924 · 77.5%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
7,379votes
47.0% of the vote · R+4.2
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 6,224 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
12,968votes
66.6% of the vote · R+34.6
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 12,102 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
George McGovern1972
−2.4pts D vs U.S.
Place R+25.6 · U.S. R+23.2
Runner-up · Bill Clinton, 1996 · −3.1 pts
Republican
Herbert Hoover1928
+52.1pts R vs U.S.
Place R+69.6 · U.S. R+17.5
Runner-up · William H. Taft, 1908 · +41.7 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Wexford County, MI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 1 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 30.1%5,555 | 69.9%12,880 | 18,435 |
| 2020 | R | 28.7%4,973 | 71.3%12,334 | 17,307 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 25,289 |
| 2018 | 25,287 |
| 2020 | 27,536 |
| 2022 | 28,387 |
| 2024 | 29,318 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+142 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,457 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,905 in average income, against $61,302 for residents who stayed — 12% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+20.9 on average — 14 points more Democratic-leaning than Wexford County, MI itself (R+34.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Grand Traverse County, MI165R+1.7
- Missaukee County, MI113R+56.0
- Osceola County, MI69R+47.9
- Kent County, MI51D+5.4
- Mecosta County, MI27R+30.0
- Manistee County, MI25R+15.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Grand Traverse County, MI112
- Missaukee County, MI107
- Osceola County, MI83
- Kent County, MI51
- Manistee County, MI25
- Mecosta County, MI24
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −183 |
| 2012 | −153 |
| 2013 | −77 |
| 2014 | +276 |
| 2015 | −19 |
| 2016 | +148 |
| 2017 | +98 |
| 2018 | +166 |
| 2019 | +160 |
| 2021 | +277 |
| 2022 | +268 |
| 2023 | +213 |
| 2024 | +141 |
| 2025 | +142 |
Wexford sits in Michigan's northern Lower Peninsula, where a sparse, predominantly white rural population has shifted decisively toward Republican presidential candidates, posting a 34-point margin in 2024 that outpaces most of the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 18.8 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 69.6 points in 1928. The 2024 margin was 34.6 points.
A population of 34,077, a 91% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $61,085 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Newaygo County and Kalkaska County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Wexford County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26165/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.