- Lead
- 832
- Total
- 2,824
- vs nation
- R+28.0
- Turnout
- 72.2%
Big Stone County, MN
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 72.2% of 3,952 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 810
- Total
- 2,974
- vs nation
- R+31.7
- Turnout
- 77.2%
- Lead
- 687
- Total
- 2,755
- vs nation
- R+27.0
- Turnout
- 69.4%
- Lead
- 40
- Total
- 2,789
- vs nation
- R+5.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 190
- Total
- 2,990
- vs nation
- R+0.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 53
- Total
- 3,067
- vs nation
- D+4.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 60
- Total
- 2,980
- vs nation
- D+1.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 629
- Total
- 3,001
- vs nation
- D+12.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+29.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 5,1272024 5-year
- Population density
- 10 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 499 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $70,4002024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 93.6%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+56.4 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+63.6 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Lac qui Parle County, MN · twin score 92.8
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 72.2%2,852 participants ÷ 3,952 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.9 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -4.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 56.3%–62.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,852 | 3,952 ± 48 | 72.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 2,468 | 4,021 ± 39 | 61.4% | Audited | A/A |
| 2,988 | 3,869 ± 23 | 77.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 2,626 | 3,932 ± 27 | 66.8% | Audited | A/A |
| 2,796 | 4,027 ± 23 | 69.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2,789 | 4,129 | 67.5% | Derived | — | |
| 2,990 | 4,191 | 71.3% | Derived | — | |
| 3,067 | 4,253 extrapolated | 72.1% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Big Stone County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Big Stone County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Show all 7 candidates
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 47 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
47 precincts · 2,824 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -ORTONVILLE P-1ORTONVILLE P-1 | 168 | 295 | 11 | 474 | 35.4% | 62.2% | R+26.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -ORTONVILLE P-3ORTONVILLE P-3 | 138 | 188 | 4 | 330 | 41.8% | 57.0% | R+15.2 |
| Precinct -GRACEVILLEGRACEVILLE | 101 | 218 | 4 | 323 | 31.3% | 67.5% | R+36.2 |
| Precinct -ORTONVILLE P-2ORTONVILLE P-2 | 60 | 145 | 5 | 210 | 28.6% | 69.0% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct -CLINTONCLINTON | 67 | 122 | 9 | 198 | 33.8% | 61.6% | R+27.8 |
| Precinct -BIG STONE TWPBIG STONE TWP | 51 | 135 | 3 | 189 | 27.0% | 71.4% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -PRIOR TWPPRIOR TWP | 51 | 71 | 0 | 122 | 41.8% | 58.2% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -AKRON TWPAKRON TWP | 48 | 57 | 5 | 110 | 43.6% | 51.8% | R+8.2 |
| Precinct -BEARDSLEYBEARDSLEY | 38 | 66 | 4 | 108 | 35.2% | 61.1% | R+25.9 |
| Precinct -FOSTER TWPFOSTER TWP | 35 | 58 | 0 | 93 | 37.6% | 62.4% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -ODESSA TWPODESSA TWP | 15 | 68 | 2 | 85 | 17.6% | 80.0% | R+62.4 |
| Precinct -BROWNS VALLEY TWPBROWNS VALLEY TWP | 35 | 47 | 1 | 83 | 42.2% | 56.6% | R+14.5 |
| Precinct -ODESSAODESSA | 21 | 41 | 1 | 63 | 33.3% | 65.1% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -GRACEVILLE TWPGRACEVILLE TWP | 14 | 44 | 2 | 60 | 23.3% | 73.3% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -ALMOND TWPALMOND TWP | 23 | 32 | 4 | 59 | 39.0% | 54.2% | R+15.3 |
| Precinct -MALTA TWPMALTA TWP | 15 | 40 | 2 | 57 | 26.3% | 70.2% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -ARTICHOKE TWPARTICHOKE TWP | 29 | 23 | 1 | 53 | 54.7% | 43.4% | D+11.3 |
| Precinct -MOONSHINE TWPMOONSHINE TWP | 10 | 40 | 3 | 53 | 18.9% | 75.5% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -OTREY TWPOTREY TWP | 14 | 35 | 0 | 49 | 28.6% | 71.4% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -ORTONVILLE TWPORTONVILLE TWP | 17 | 27 | 0 | 44 | 38.6% | 61.4% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -TOQUA TWPTOQUA TWP | 2 | 21 | 2 | 25 | 8.0% | 84.0% | R+76.0 |
| Precinct -CORRELLCORRELL | 5 | 9 | 1 | 15 | 33.3% | 60.0% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -JOHNSONJOHNSON | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -BARRYBARRY | 7 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 70.0% | 30.0% | D+40.0 |
| Akron Twp. Voting District27_270110005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Almond Twp. Voting District27_270110010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Artichoke Twp. Voting District27_270110015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Barry Voting District27_270110020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Beardsley Voting District27_270110031 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Big Stone Twp. Voting District27_270110025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Browns Valley Twp. Voting District27_270110030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clinton Voting District27_270110035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Correll Voting District27_270110040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Foster Twp. Voting District27_270110045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Graceville Twp. Voting District27_270110055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Graceville Voting District27_270110050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Johnson Voting District27_270110056 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Malta Twp. Voting District27_270110060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Moonshine Twp. Voting District27_270110065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Odessa Twp. Voting District27_270110075 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Odessa Voting District27_270110070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ortonville P-127_270110080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ortonville P-227_270110085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ortonville Twp. Voting District27_270110086 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Otrey Twp. Voting District27_270110090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Prior Twp. Voting District27_270110095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Toqua Twp. Voting District27_270110100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Big Stone County, MN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
77.4%
3,200 votes · D+56.4
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 67.9%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
78.2%
2,415 votes · R+63.6
Runner-up · Theodore Roosevelt, 1904 · 73.1%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
3,200votes
77.4% of the vote · D+56.4
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 2,831 votes
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
2,415votes
78.2% of the vote · R+63.6
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 · 2,260 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
+38.6pts D vs U.S.
Place D+56.4 · U.S. D+17.8
Runner-up · George McGovern, 1972 · +34.0 pts
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
+37.4pts R vs U.S.
Place R+63.6 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · Theodore Roosevelt, 1904 · +34.6 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Big Stone County, MN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 32.5%905 | 67.5%1,876 | 2,781 |
| 2020 | R | 46.4%1,261 | 53.6%1,456 | 2,717 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 3,265 |
| 2018 | 3,205 |
| 2020 | 3,315 |
| 2022 | 3,224 |
| 2024 | 3,313 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−2 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −140 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,843 in average income, against $74,844 for residents who stayed — 23% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −37 |
| 2012 | −44 |
| 2013 | −50 |
| 2014 | +33 |
| 2015 | −74 |
| 2016 | +25 |
| 2017 | +21 |
| 2018 | −11 |
| 2019 | +1 |
| 2021 | +21 |
| 2022 | +3 |
| 2023 | −23 |
| 2024 | −3 |
| 2025 | −2 |
Big Stone sits along the South Dakota border with fewer than 6,000 residents spread across glacial lake plains. Republican presidential margins here have grown steadily over the past decade, reaching nearly 30 points in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 56.4 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 63.6 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 29.5 points.
A population of 5,127, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $70,400 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Lac qui Parle County and Grant County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Big Stone County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27011/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.