Aitkin County, Minnesota
Precinct data
Results by precinct
105 precincts · 10,446 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -AITKIN CITYAITKIN CITY | 437 | 657 | 26 | 1,120 | 39.0% | 58.7% | R+19.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -SHAMROCK TWPSHAMROCK TWP | 344 | 561 | 11 | 916 | 37.6% | 61.2% | R+23.7 |
| Precinct -FARM ISLAND TWPFARM ISLAND TWP | 306 | 548 | 7 | 861 | 35.5% | 63.6% | R+28.1 |
| Precinct -NORDLAND TWPNORDLAND TWP | 272 | 496 | 9 | 777 | 35.0% | 63.8% | R+28.8 |
| Precinct -HAZELTON TWPHAZELTON TWP | 196 | 390 | 10 | 596 | 32.9% | 65.4% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -AITKIN TWPAITKIN TWP | 182 | 390 | 9 | 581 | 31.3% | 67.1% | R+35.8 |
| Precinct -LAKESIDE TWPLAKESIDE TWP | 127 | 282 | 6 | 415 | 30.6% | 68.0% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -SPENCER TWPSPENCER TWP | 110 | 247 | 10 | 367 | 30.0% | 67.3% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -GLEN TWPGLEN TWP | 130 | 200 | 6 | 336 | 38.7% | 59.5% | R+20.8 |
| Precinct -HILL CITYHILL CITY | 105 | 212 | 4 | 321 | 32.7% | 66.0% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -HILL LAKE TWPHILL LAKE TWP | 83 | 180 | 1 | 264 | 31.4% | 68.2% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -MALMO TWPMALMO TWP | 74 | 159 | 4 | 237 | 31.2% | 67.1% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct -WAUKENABO TWPWAUKENABO TWP | 65 | 152 | 11 | 228 | 28.5% | 66.7% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -FLEMING TWPFLEMING TWP | 71 | 152 | 4 | 227 | 31.3% | 67.0% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -JEVNE TWPJEVNE TWP | 52 | 164 | 5 | 221 | 23.5% | 74.2% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct -NW AITKIN UNORGNW AITKIN UNORG | 70 | 147 | 3 | 220 | 31.8% | 66.8% | R+35.0 |
| Precinct -WEALTHWOOD TWPWEALTHWOOD TWP | 77 | 127 | 5 | 209 | 36.8% | 60.8% | R+23.9 |
| Precinct -WAGNER TWPWAGNER TWP | 63 | 139 | 6 | 208 | 30.3% | 66.8% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -BALL BLUFF TWPBALL BLUFF TWP | 66 | 103 | 6 | 175 | 37.7% | 58.9% | R+21.1 |
| Precinct -WORKMAN TWPWORKMAN TWP | 41 | 124 | 3 | 168 | 24.4% | 73.8% | R+49.4 |
| Precinct -MCGREGOR CITYMCGREGOR CITY | 47 | 104 | 4 | 155 | 30.3% | 67.1% | R+36.8 |
| Precinct -LOGAN TWPLOGAN TWP | 44 | 96 | 1 | 141 | 31.2% | 68.1% | R+36.9 |
| Precinct -IDUN TWPIDUN TWP | 35 | 100 | 5 | 140 | 25.0% | 71.4% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -KIMBERLY TWPKIMBERLY TWP | 39 | 87 | 4 | 130 | 30.0% | 66.9% | R+36.9 |
| Precinct -HAUGEN TWPHAUGEN TWP | 49 | 78 | 2 | 129 | 38.0% | 60.5% | R+22.5 |
| Precinct -SPALDING TWPSPALDING TWP | 56 | 52 | 1 | 109 | 51.4% | 47.7% | D+3.7 |
| Precinct -TURNER TWPTURNER TWP | 50 | 53 | 0 | 103 | 48.5% | 51.5% | R+2.9 |
| Precinct -MACVILLE TWPMACVILLE TWP | 33 | 62 | 3 | 98 | 33.7% | 63.3% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -MORRISON TWPMORRISON TWP | 18 | 75 | 1 | 94 | 19.1% | 79.8% | R+60.6 |
| Precinct -WILLIAMS TWPWILLIAMS TWP | 20 | 69 | 2 | 91 | 22.0% | 75.8% | R+53.8 |
| Precinct -CLARK TWPCLARK TWP | 32 | 56 | 0 | 88 | 36.4% | 63.6% | R+27.3 |
| Precinct -RICE RIVER TWPRICE RIVER TWP | 29 | 56 | 2 | 87 | 33.3% | 64.4% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -PALISADE CITYPALISADE CITY | 32 | 48 | 1 | 81 | 39.5% | 59.3% | R+19.8 |
| Precinct -PLINY TWPPLINY TWP | 12 | 51 | 2 | 65 | 18.5% | 78.5% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -MCGREGOR TWPMCGREGOR TWP | 15 | 41 | 0 | 56 | 26.8% | 73.2% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -CORNISH TWPCORNISH TWP | 19 | 24 | 0 | 43 | 44.2% | 55.8% | R+11.6 |
| Precinct -BEAVER TWPBEAVER TWP | 19 | 21 | 1 | 41 | 46.3% | 51.2% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -SEAVEY TWPSEAVEY TWP | 4 | 36 | 0 | 40 | 10.0% | 90.0% | R+80.0 |
| Precinct -SALO TWPSALO TWP | 18 | 20 | 0 | 38 | 47.4% | 52.6% | R+5.3 |
| Precinct -MILLWARD TWPMILLWARD TWP | 14 | 18 | 0 | 32 | 43.8% | 56.3% | R+12.5 |
| Precinct -VERDON TWPVERDON TWP | 10 | 20 | 0 | 30 | 33.3% | 66.7% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -UNORG 47-24 (DAVIDSON UNORG)UNORG 47-24 (DAVIDSON UNORG) | 11 | 14 | 3 | 28 | 39.3% | 50.0% | R+10.7 |
| Precinct -LEE TWPLEE TWP | 2 | 25 | 0 | 27 | 7.4% | 92.6% | R+85.2 |
| Precinct -MCGRATH CITYMCGRATH CITY | 4 | 23 | 0 | 27 | 14.8% | 85.2% | R+70.4 |
| Precinct -WHITE PINE TWPWHITE PINE TWP | 7 | 18 | 2 | 27 | 25.9% | 66.7% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -TAMARACK CITYTAMARACK CITY | 4 | 20 | 1 | 25 | 16.0% | 80.0% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -BALSAM TWPBALSAM TWP | 9 | 10 | 0 | 19 | 47.4% | 52.6% | R+5.3 |
| Precinct -LIBBY TWP ELIBBY TWP E | 7 | 11 | 0 | 18 | 38.9% | 61.1% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -UNORG 45-24 (JEWETT UNORG)UNORG 45-24 (JEWETT UNORG) | 5 | 13 | 0 | 18 | 27.8% | 72.2% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -LIBBY TWP WLIBBY TWP W | 8 | 8 | 0 | 16 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Even |
| Precinct -NE AITKIN UNORGNE AITKIN UNORG | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 33.3% | 66.7% | R+33.3 |
| Aitkin Twp. Voting District27_270010010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Aitkin Voting District27_270010005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ball Bluff Twp. Voting District27_270010015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Balsam Twp. Voting District27_270010020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Beaver Twp. Voting District27_270010025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clark Twp. Voting District27_270010030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Cornish Twp. Voting District27_270010035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Farm Island Twp. Voting District27_270010040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fleming Twp. Voting District27_270010045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Glen Twp. Voting District27_270010050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Haugen Twp. Voting District27_270010055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Hazelton Twp. Voting District27_270010060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Hill City Voting District27_270010065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Hill Lake Twp. Voting District27_270010070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Idun Twp. Voting District27_270010075 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Jevne Twp. Voting District27_270010080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Kimberly Twp. Voting District27_270010085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lakeside Twp. Voting District27_270010090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lee Twp. Voting District27_270010095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Libby Twp. E Voting District27_270010100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Libby Twp. W Voting District27_270010105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Logan Twp. Voting District27_270010110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Macville Twp. Voting District27_270010130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Malmo Twp. Voting District27_270010135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| McGrath Voting District27_270010115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| McGregor Twp. Voting District27_270010125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| McGregor Voting District27_270010120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Millward Twp. Voting District27_270010132 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Morrison Twp. Voting District27_270010140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NE Aitkin Unorg. Voting District27_270010240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Nordland Twp. Voting District27_270010145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NW Aitkin Unorg. P-1 Voting District27_270010260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NW Aitkin Unorg. P-2 Voting District27_270010290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Palisade Voting District27_270010150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Pliny Twp. Voting District27_270010155 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Rice River Twp. Voting District27_270010160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Salo Twp. Voting District27_270010165 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Seavey Twp. Voting District27_270010170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Shamrock Twp. Voting District27_270010175 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Spalding Twp. Voting District27_270010180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Spencer Twp. Voting District27_270010185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Tamarack Voting District27_270010190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Turner Twp. Voting District27_270010195 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Unorg. 45-24 (Jewett Unorg.) Voting District27_270010082 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Unorg. 47-24 (Davidson Unorg.) Voting District27_270010038 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Unorg. 48-27 (Blind Lake Unorg.) Voting District27_270010255 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Unorg. 51-27 (Lemay Unorg.) Voting District27_270010285 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Verdon Twp. Voting District27_270010200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Wagner Twp. Voting District27_270010205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Waukenabo Twp. Voting District27_270010210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Wealthwood Twp. Voting District27_270010215 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| White Pine Twp. Voting District27_270010220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Williams Twp. Voting District27_270010225 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Workman Twp. Voting District27_270010230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −32.1% |
| 1896 | −41.5% |
| 1900 | −56.8% |
| 1904 | −69.3% |
| 1908 | −45.4% |
| 1912 | +2.4% |
| 1916 | −10.1% |
| 1920 | −55.5% |
| 1924 | −49.5% |
| 1928 | −44.8% |
| 1932 | +10.5% |
| 1936 | +20.3% |
| 1940 | −1.8% |
| 1944 | +0.4% |
| 1948 | +13.5% |
| 1952 | −13.3% |
| 1956 | −0.5% |
| 1960 | −1.9% |
| 1964 | +31.8% |
| 1968 | +14.8% |
| 1972 | −9.2% |
| 1976 | +26.4% |
| 1980 | +3.7% |
| 1984 | +7.0% |
| 1988 | +12.3% |
| 1992 | +16.5% |
| 1996 | +20.0% |
| 2000 | +0.9% |
| 2004 | −2.4% |
| 2008 | +0.1% |
| 2012 | −1.3% |
| 2016 | −25.8% |
| 2020 | −26.4% |
| 2024 | −30.8% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 10,626 |
| 2018 | 10,441 |
| 2020 | 11,145 |
| 2022 | 11,565 |
| 2024 | 12,179 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+111 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,766 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $81,195 in average income, against $72,135 for residents who stayed — 13% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+3.5 on average — 27 points more Democratic-leaning than Aitkin County, MN itself (R+30.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Crow Wing County, MN69R+31.3
- Hennepin County, MN56D+42.4
- Anoka County, MN45R+4.4
- Itasca County, MN28R+20.1
- St. Louis County, MN23D+13.7
- Wright County, MN21R+29.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Crow Wing County, MN85
- Itasca County, MN42
- Hennepin County, MN34
- St. Louis County, MN30
- Anoka County, MN29
- Mille Lacs County, MN20
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +54 |
| 2012 | −77 |
| 2013 | −60 |
| 2014 | +89 |
| 2015 | +106 |
| 2016 | +21 |
| 2017 | +156 |
| 2018 | +184 |
| 2019 | +84 |
| 2021 | +424 |
| 2022 | +298 |
| 2023 | +86 |
| 2024 | +290 |
| 2025 | +111 |
Aitkin's economy revolves around tourism, timber, and seasonal residents, and its predominantly white, non-college electorate has shifted the presidential margin from competitive to R+30 territory since the early 2000s.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 31.8 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 69.3 points in 1904. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 30.8 points.
A population of 16,056, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $60,833 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Koochiching County and Burnett County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Aitkin County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27001/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.