- Lead
- 5,361
- Total
- 16,508
- vs nation
- R+31.0
- Turnout
- 64.0%
Dodge County, NE
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 64.0% of 26,221 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 5,440
- Total
- 16,938
- vs nation
- R+36.6
- Turnout
- 65.7%
- Lead
- 5,389
- Total
- 15,529
- vs nation
- R+36.8
- Turnout
- 70.4%
- Lead
- 3,322
- Total
- 14,950
- vs nation
- R+26.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,868
- Total
- 15,550
- vs nation
- R+19.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,466
- Total
- 16,172
- vs nation
- R+31.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,850
- Total
- 14,472
- vs nation
- R+27.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,303
- Total
- 14,688
- vs nation
- R+24.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+32.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 37,3512024 5-year
- Population density
- 71 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 529 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $74,3292024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 77.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 18.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+34.6 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+44.2 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Otoe County, NE · twin score 83.6
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 64.0%16,786 participants ÷ 26,221 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +22.0 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- +0.2 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 41.1%–42.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16,786 | 26,221 ± 372 | 64.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 11,695 | 26,776 ± 314 | 43.7% | Audited | A/A |
| 17,147 | 26,089 ± 277 | 65.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 12,221 | 26,210 ± 244 | 46.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 18,645 | 26,499 ± 294 | 70.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 14,950 | 26,809 | 55.8% | Derived | — | |
| 15,550 | 26,517 | 58.6% | Derived | — | |
| 16,172 | 26,225 extrapolated | 61.7% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Dodge County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Dodge County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 32 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
32 precincts · 16,443 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -FREMONT 4D 019FREMONT 4D 019 | 360 | 647 | 10 | 1,017 | 35.4% | 63.6% | R+28.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -FREMONT 4C 018FREMONT 4C 018 | 361 | 605 | 10 | 976 | 37.0% | 62.0% | R+25.0 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 2C 008FREMONT 2C 008 | 274 | 587 | 10 | 871 | 31.5% | 67.4% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 1C 003FREMONT 1C 003 | 289 | 564 | 4 | 857 | 33.7% | 65.8% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 1E 005FREMONT 1E 005 | 276 | 465 | 12 | 753 | 36.7% | 61.8% | R+25.1 |
| Precinct -PLATTE WEST TWP 027PLATTE WEST TWP 027 | 179 | 524 | 15 | 718 | 24.9% | 73.0% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct -NORTH BEND CITY 021NORTH BEND CITY 021 | 183 | 463 | 7 | 653 | 28.0% | 70.9% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 1D 004FREMONT 1D 004 | 263 | 358 | 15 | 636 | 41.4% | 56.3% | R+14.9 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 1A 001FREMONT 1A 001 | 230 | 362 | 13 | 605 | 38.0% | 59.8% | R+21.8 |
| Precinct -UN-CT-RG-PV TWPS 032UN-CT-RG-PV TWPS 032 | 117 | 475 | 1 | 593 | 19.7% | 80.1% | R+60.4 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 2A 006FREMONT 2A 006 | 227 | 344 | 14 | 585 | 38.8% | 58.8% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 4A 016FREMONT 4A 016 | 222 | 335 | 2 | 559 | 39.7% | 59.9% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 2B 007FREMONT 2B 007 | 203 | 344 | 5 | 552 | 36.8% | 62.3% | R+25.5 |
| Precinct -NICKERSON-MAPLE TWPS 028NICKERSON-MAPLE TWPS 028 | 149 | 396 | 3 | 548 | 27.2% | 72.3% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 3D 014FREMONT 3D 014 | 196 | 302 | 8 | 506 | 38.7% | 59.7% | R+20.9 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 2E 010FREMONT 2E 010 | 213 | 260 | 8 | 481 | 44.3% | 54.1% | R+9.8 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 1B 002FREMONT 1B 002 | 177 | 290 | 9 | 476 | 37.2% | 60.9% | R+23.7 |
| Precinct -HOOPER CITY 029HOOPER CITY 029 | 90 | 370 | 6 | 466 | 19.3% | 79.4% | R+60.1 |
| Precinct -LOGAN-HOOPER TWPS 030LOGAN-HOOPER TWPS 030 | 131 | 317 | 5 | 453 | 28.9% | 70.0% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 3E 015FREMONT 3E 015 | 178 | 255 | 5 | 438 | 40.6% | 58.2% | R+17.6 |
| Precinct -WEBSTER TWP 024WEBSTER TWP 024 | 69 | 355 | 8 | 432 | 16.0% | 82.2% | R+66.2 |
| Precinct -SCRIBNER CITY 022SCRIBNER CITY 022 | 88 | 328 | 7 | 423 | 20.8% | 77.5% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 4B 017FREMONT 4B 017 | 150 | 236 | 4 | 390 | 38.5% | 60.5% | R+22.1 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 2D 009FREMONT 2D 009 | 107 | 197 | 7 | 311 | 34.4% | 63.3% | R+28.9 |
| Precinct -PLATTE EAST TWP 026PLATTE EAST TWP 026 | 105 | 195 | 2 | 302 | 34.8% | 64.6% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct -ELKHORN TOWNSHIP 031ELKHORN TOWNSHIP 031 | 78 | 214 | 3 | 295 | 26.4% | 72.5% | R+46.1 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 3C 013FREMONT 3C 013 | 112 | 177 | 1 | 290 | 38.6% | 61.0% | R+22.4 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 4E 020FREMONT 4E 020 | 107 | 176 | 4 | 287 | 37.3% | 61.3% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 3A 011FREMONT 3A 011 | 118 | 140 | 4 | 262 | 45.0% | 53.4% | R+8.4 |
| Precinct -CUMING-EVERETT TWPS 023CUMING-EVERETT TWPS 023 | 50 | 203 | 5 | 258 | 19.4% | 78.7% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -PEBBLE TWP 025PEBBLE TWP 025 | 32 | 200 | 4 | 236 | 13.6% | 84.7% | R+71.2 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 3B 012FREMONT 3B 012 | 100 | 111 | 3 | 214 | 46.7% | 51.9% | R+5.1 |
presidential history
Party record book
Dodge County, NE · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
66.8%
7,247 votes · D+34.6
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 55.7%
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
72.0%
9,837 votes · R+44.0
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 · 71.5%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
7,247votes
66.8% of the vote · D+34.6
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 6,731 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
10,984votes
64.8% of the vote · R+32.1
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 10,795 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
+16.8pts D vs U.S.
Place D+34.6 · U.S. D+17.8
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1908 · +13.9 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2016
+36.8pts R vs U.S.
Place R+34.7 · U.S. D+2.1
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · +36.6 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Dodge County, NE. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 0 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 1.2 points.
22,225 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+7 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −864 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,905 in average income, against $75,313 for residents who stayed — 31% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+16.6 on average — 16 points more Democratic-leaning than Dodge County, NE itself (R+32.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Douglas County, NE211D+10.1
- Saunders County, NE69R+46.2
- Washington County, NE65R+42.2
- Lancaster County, NE54D+4.3
- Sarpy County, NE42R+11.6
- Platte County, NE29R+58.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Douglas County, NE270
- Lancaster County, NE87
- Saunders County, NE72
- Sarpy County, NE46
- Burt County, NE33
- Washington County, NE28
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +196 |
| 2012 | −335 |
| 2013 | −142 |
| 2014 | −7 |
| 2015 | −157 |
| 2016 | −67 |
| 2017 | −12 |
| 2018 | −155 |
| 2019 | −275 |
| 2021 | +31 |
| 2022 | −98 |
| 2023 | +59 |
| 2024 | +91 |
| 2025 | +7 |
Dodge County's county seat, Fremont, gives it an urban anchor uncommon in Nebraska's smaller counties, yet presidential margins have held well above R+30 for the past several cycles, reflecting the region's deep conservative tilt.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 34.6 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 44.2 points in 1920. The 2024 margin was 32.5 points.
A population of 37,351, a 78% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $74,329 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Otoe County and Dubois County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Dodge County, Nebraska. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/31053/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.