HarrisDemocratic54.1%148,733TrumpRepublican43.9%120,919OtherAll other candidates0.6%1,742
D+10.1- Lead
- 27,814
- Total
- 275,145
- vs nation
- D+11.6
- Turnout
- 68.2%
Akashiccounty
Douglas County, NE
Contests in this Place (88 available)
President34 · 1892–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1892–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 68.2% of 407,413 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic54.4%150,350TrumpRepublican43.1%119,159JorgensenLibertarian2.0%5,442
D+11.3- Lead
- 31,191
- Total
- 276,540
- vs nation
- D+6.8
- Turnout
- 71.5%
ClintonDemocratic47.3%113,798TrumpRepublican45.0%108,077JohnsonLibertarian4.3%10,402
D+2.4- Lead
- 5,721
- Total
- 240,433
- vs nation
- D+0.3
- Turnout
- 66.6%
ObamaDemocratic47.5%106,456RomneyRepublican50.6%113,220GrayLibertarian1.2%2,763
R+3.0- Lead
- 6,764
- Total
- 223,927
- vs nation
- R+6.9
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic51.5%116,810McCainRepublican46.9%106,291OtherAll other candidates1.6%3,600
D+4.6- Lead
- 10,519
- Total
- 226,701
- vs nation
- R+2.6
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic40.2%83,330BushRepublican58.3%120,813OtherAll other candidates1.4%2,928
R+18.1- Lead
- 37,483
- Total
- 207,071
- vs nation
- R+15.6
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic40.0%73,347BushRepublican55.2%101,025NaderGreen3.9%7,109
R+15.1- Lead
- 27,678
- Total
- 183,156
- vs nation
- R+15.6
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic39.3%70,708DoleRepublican51.4%92,334PerotReform8.3%14,863
R+12.0- Lead
- 21,626
- Total
- 179,721
- vs nation
- R+20.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+10.1MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 590,7362024 5-year
- Population density
- 1,809 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 327 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $80,3912024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 65.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 10.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 14.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+32.6 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+35.6 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Lancaster County, NE · twin score 94.3
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 68.2%277,926 participants ÷ 407,413 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +23.6 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- +1.8 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 44.6%–50.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 277,926 | 407,413 ± 1,832 | 68.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 193,687 | 403,874 ± 1,862 | 48.0% | Audited | A/A |
| 278,494 | 389,248 ± 1,531 | 71.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 207,077 | 381,173 ± 1,284 | 54.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 247,742 | 372,218 ± 1,276 | 66.6% | Audited | A/A | |
| 223,927 | 356,440 | 62.8% | Derived | — | |
| 226,701 | 343,711 | 66.0% | Derived | — | |
| 207,071 | 330,982 extrapolated | 62.6% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Douglas County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Douglas County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Larry Marvin0—
Lynne Walz0—
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 233 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
233 precincts · 273,403 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 22WARD 08 PCT 22 | 852 | 1,066 | 14 | 1,932 | 44.1% | 55.2% | R+11.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 28WARD 08 PCT 28 | 727 | 1,167 | 21 | 1,915 | 38.0% | 60.9% | R+23.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 25WARD 08 PCT 25 | 808 | 1,042 | 23 | 1,873 | 43.1% | 55.6% | R+12.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 23WARD 08 PCT 23 | 825 | 997 | 29 | 1,851 | 44.6% | 53.9% | R+9.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 44WARD 08 PCT 44 | 672 | 1,135 | 17 | 1,824 | 36.8% | 62.2% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 13WARD 08 PCT 13 | 613 | 1,179 | 19 | 1,811 | 33.8% | 65.1% | R+31.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 16WARD 08 PCT 16 | 842 | 943 | 17 | 1,802 | 46.7% | 52.3% | R+5.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 17WARD 08 PCT 17 | 853 | 910 | 15 | 1,778 | 48.0% | 51.2% | R+3.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 18WARD 08 PCT 18 | 775 | 944 | 13 | 1,732 | 44.7% | 54.5% | R+9.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 41WARD 08 PCT 41 | 761 | 912 | 10 | 1,683 | 45.2% | 54.2% | R+9.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 43WARD 08 PCT 43 | 607 | 1,054 | 11 | 1,672 | 36.3% | 63.0% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 23WARD 07 PCT 23 | 719 | 918 | 29 | 1,666 | 43.2% | 55.1% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 24WARD 05 PCT 24 | 737 | 890 | 19 | 1,646 | 44.8% | 54.1% | R+9.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 20WARD 08 PCT 20 | 624 | 993 | 20 | 1,637 | 38.1% | 60.7% | R+22.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 04WARD 06 PCT 04 | 865 | 719 | 24 | 1,608 | 53.8% | 44.7% | D+9.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 19WARD 08 PCT 19 | 883 | 715 | 7 | 1,605 | 55.0% | 44.5% | D+10.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 21WARD 08 PCT 21 | 709 | 865 | 22 | 1,596 | 44.4% | 54.2% | R+9.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 21WARD 05 PCT 21 | 704 | 869 | 12 | 1,585 | 44.4% | 54.8% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 12WARD 05 PCT 12 | 725 | 845 | 13 | 1,583 | 45.8% | 53.4% | R+7.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 08WARD 06 PCT 08 | 808 | 749 | 14 | 1,571 | 51.4% | 47.7% | D+3.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 12WARD 07 PCT 12 | 836 | 708 | 25 | 1,569 | 53.3% | 45.1% | D+8.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 14WARD 07 PCT 14 | 743 | 802 | 22 | 1,567 | 47.4% | 51.2% | R+3.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 13WARD 05 PCT 13 | 724 | 816 | 24 | 1,564 | 46.3% | 52.2% | R+5.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 15WARD 06 PCT 15 | 728 | 813 | 11 | 1,552 | 46.9% | 52.4% | R+5.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 27WARD 01 PCT 27 | 1,058 | 479 | 14 | 1,551 | 68.2% | 30.9% | D+37.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 01WARD 06 PCT 01 | 891 | 642 | 13 | 1,546 | 57.6% | 41.5% | D+16.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 30WARD 07 PCT 30 | 769 | 759 | 17 | 1,545 | 49.8% | 49.1% | D+0.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 23WARD 05 PCT 23 | 684 | 827 | 26 | 1,537 | 44.5% | 53.8% | R+9.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 26WARD 01 PCT 26 | 1,146 | 364 | 16 | 1,526 | 75.1% | 23.9% | D+51.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 24WARD 02 PCT 24 | 1,094 | 404 | 27 | 1,525 | 71.7% | 26.5% | D+45.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 13WARD 07 PCT 13 | 822 | 683 | 14 | 1,519 | 54.1% | 45.0% | D+9.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 15WARD 08 PCT 15 | 905 | 588 | 26 | 1,519 | 59.6% | 38.7% | D+20.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 27WARD 08 PCT 27 | 666 | 830 | 19 | 1,515 | 44.0% | 54.8% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 16WARD 03 PCT 16 | 1,054 | 433 | 16 | 1,503 | 70.1% | 28.8% | D+41.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 07WARD 03 PCT 07 | 1,055 | 429 | 16 | 1,500 | 70.3% | 28.6% | D+41.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 09WARD 06 PCT 09 | 920 | 557 | 23 | 1,500 | 61.3% | 37.1% | D+24.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 11WARD 07 PCT 11 | 782 | 703 | 13 | 1,498 | 52.2% | 46.9% | D+5.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 40WARD 08 PCT 40 | 575 | 890 | 27 | 1,492 | 38.5% | 59.7% | R+21.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 10WARD 06 PCT 10 | 847 | 618 | 25 | 1,490 | 56.8% | 41.5% | D+15.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 10WARD 07 PCT 10 | 743 | 720 | 12 | 1,475 | 50.4% | 48.8% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 21WARD 06 PCT 21 | 632 | 833 | 9 | 1,474 | 42.9% | 56.5% | R+13.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 23WARD 06 PCT 23 | 643 | 807 | 23 | 1,473 | 43.7% | 54.8% | R+11.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 24WARD 06 PCT 24 | 652 | 793 | 19 | 1,464 | 44.5% | 54.2% | R+9.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 08WARD 03 PCT 08 | 1,075 | 371 | 15 | 1,461 | 73.6% | 25.4% | D+48.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 20WARD 05 PCT 20 | 499 | 953 | 8 | 1,460 | 34.2% | 65.3% | R+31.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 21WARD 07 PCT 21 | 682 | 755 | 22 | 1,459 | 46.7% | 51.7% | R+5.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 16WARD 06 PCT 16 | 756 | 682 | 19 | 1,457 | 51.9% | 46.8% | D+5.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 01WARD 01 PCT 01 | 812 | 614 | 26 | 1,452 | 55.9% | 42.3% | D+13.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 06WARD 01 PCT 06 | 853 | 578 | 12 | 1,443 | 59.1% | 40.1% | D+19.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 28WARD 07 PCT 28 | 705 | 724 | 11 | 1,440 | 49.0% | 50.3% | R+1.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 09WARD 03 PCT 09 | 946 | 458 | 34 | 1,438 | 65.8% | 31.8% | D+33.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 18WARD 06 PCT 18 | 662 | 756 | 19 | 1,437 | 46.1% | 52.6% | R+6.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 03WARD 06 PCT 03 | 720 | 699 | 17 | 1,436 | 50.1% | 48.7% | D+1.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 31WARD 07 PCT 31 | 721 | 697 | 18 | 1,436 | 50.2% | 48.5% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 25WARD 05 PCT 25 | 621 | 801 | 13 | 1,435 | 43.3% | 55.8% | R+12.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 11WARD 05 PCT 11 | 696 | 729 | 8 | 1,433 | 48.6% | 50.9% | R+2.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 15WARD 03 PCT 15 | 974 | 437 | 19 | 1,430 | 68.1% | 30.6% | D+37.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 08WARD 01 PCT 08 | 747 | 652 | 24 | 1,423 | 52.5% | 45.8% | D+6.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 06WARD 07 PCT 06 | 772 | 637 | 14 | 1,423 | 54.3% | 44.8% | D+9.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 18WARD 01 PCT 18 | 1,063 | 330 | 22 | 1,415 | 75.1% | 23.3% | D+51.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 06WARD 05 PCT 06 | 609 | 788 | 15 | 1,412 | 43.1% | 55.8% | R+12.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 31WARD 06 PCT 31 | 511 | 885 | 16 | 1,412 | 36.2% | 62.7% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 10WARD 05 PCT 10 | 705 | 686 | 17 | 1,408 | 50.1% | 48.7% | D+1.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 11WARD 06 PCT 11 | 737 | 651 | 16 | 1,404 | 52.5% | 46.4% | D+6.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 23WARD 03 PCT 23 | 827 | 547 | 24 | 1,398 | 59.2% | 39.1% | D+20.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 42WARD 08 PCT 42 | 570 | 809 | 18 | 1,397 | 40.8% | 57.9% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 09WARD 07 PCT 09 | 781 | 586 | 26 | 1,393 | 56.1% | 42.1% | D+14.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 08WARD 07 PCT 08 | 738 | 629 | 24 | 1,391 | 53.1% | 45.2% | D+7.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 20WARD 01 PCT 20 | 1,011 | 361 | 18 | 1,390 | 72.7% | 26.0% | D+46.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 16WARD 05 PCT 16 | 685 | 678 | 25 | 1,388 | 49.4% | 48.8% | D+0.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 29WARD 06 PCT 29 | 555 | 818 | 12 | 1,385 | 40.1% | 59.1% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 27WARD 07 PCT 27 | 791 | 572 | 19 | 1,382 | 57.2% | 41.4% | D+15.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 01WARD 07 PCT 01 | 750 | 610 | 20 | 1,380 | 54.3% | 44.2% | D+10.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 18WARD 07 PCT 18 | 692 | 661 | 25 | 1,378 | 50.2% | 48.0% | D+2.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 14WARD 06 PCT 14 | 700 | 649 | 25 | 1,374 | 50.9% | 47.2% | D+3.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 19WARD 05 PCT 19 | 606 | 755 | 12 | 1,373 | 44.1% | 55.0% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 07WARD 04 PCT 07 | 704 | 648 | 20 | 1,372 | 51.3% | 47.2% | D+4.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 19WARD 06 PCT 19 | 643 | 715 | 14 | 1,372 | 46.9% | 52.1% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 07WARD 06 PCT 07 | 735 | 615 | 19 | 1,369 | 53.7% | 44.9% | D+8.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 17WARD 01 PCT 17 | 775 | 582 | 11 | 1,368 | 56.7% | 42.5% | D+14.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 21WARD 03 PCT 21 | 844 | 503 | 18 | 1,365 | 61.8% | 36.8% | D+25.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 07WARD 05 PCT 07 | 724 | 612 | 24 | 1,360 | 53.2% | 45.0% | D+8.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 17WARD 06 PCT 17 | 736 | 603 | 17 | 1,356 | 54.3% | 44.5% | D+9.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 13WARD 06 PCT 13 | 700 | 632 | 21 | 1,353 | 51.7% | 46.7% | D+5.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 06WARD 06 PCT 06 | 720 | 619 | 12 | 1,351 | 53.3% | 45.8% | D+7.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 10WARD 08 PCT 10 | 820 | 498 | 28 | 1,346 | 60.9% | 37.0% | D+23.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 27WARD 06 PCT 27 | 494 | 833 | 15 | 1,342 | 36.8% | 62.1% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 18WARD 05 PCT 18 | 654 | 666 | 19 | 1,339 | 48.8% | 49.7% | R+0.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 22WARD 03 PCT 22 | 733 | 582 | 20 | 1,335 | 54.9% | 43.6% | D+11.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 18WARD 02 PCT 18 | 971 | 338 | 24 | 1,333 | 72.8% | 25.4% | D+47.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 22WARD 01 PCT 22 | 792 | 523 | 16 | 1,331 | 59.5% | 39.3% | D+20.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 46WARD 08 PCT 46 | 321 | 995 | 15 | 1,331 | 24.1% | 74.8% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 20WARD 06 PCT 20 | 649 | 662 | 18 | 1,329 | 48.8% | 49.8% | R+1.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 17WARD 07 PCT 17 | 751 | 546 | 12 | 1,309 | 57.4% | 41.7% | D+15.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 13WARD 03 PCT 13 | 950 | 337 | 21 | 1,308 | 72.6% | 25.8% | D+46.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 32WARD 08 PCT 32 | 549 | 743 | 4 | 1,296 | 42.4% | 57.3% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 36WARD 08 PCT 36 | 362 | 929 | 5 | 1,296 | 27.9% | 71.7% | R+43.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 03WARD 05 PCT 03 | 609 | 676 | 9 | 1,294 | 47.1% | 52.2% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 20WARD 07 PCT 20 | 614 | 666 | 8 | 1,288 | 47.7% | 51.7% | R+4.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 08WARD 05 PCT 08 | 617 | 659 | 11 | 1,287 | 47.9% | 51.2% | R+3.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 03WARD 07 PCT 03 | 729 | 534 | 24 | 1,287 | 56.6% | 41.5% | D+15.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 29WARD 07 PCT 29 | 538 | 736 | 11 | 1,285 | 41.9% | 57.3% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 18WARD 03 PCT 18 | 759 | 504 | 18 | 1,281 | 59.3% | 39.3% | D+19.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 01WARD 02 PCT 01 | 730 | 521 | 26 | 1,277 | 57.2% | 40.8% | D+16.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 05WARD 04 PCT 05 | 819 | 436 | 18 | 1,273 | 64.3% | 34.2% | D+30.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 25WARD 06 PCT 25 | 527 | 726 | 19 | 1,272 | 41.4% | 57.1% | R+15.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 05WARD 05 PCT 05 | 616 | 635 | 17 | 1,268 | 48.6% | 50.1% | R+1.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 05WARD 06 PCT 05 | 803 | 454 | 11 | 1,268 | 63.3% | 35.8% | D+27.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 03WARD 01 PCT 03 | 813 | 431 | 18 | 1,262 | 64.4% | 34.2% | D+30.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 19WARD 01 PCT 19 | 957 | 287 | 15 | 1,259 | 76.0% | 22.8% | D+53.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 17WARD 05 PCT 17 | 585 | 660 | 12 | 1,257 | 46.5% | 52.5% | R+6.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 16WARD 01 PCT 16 | 770 | 460 | 25 | 1,255 | 61.4% | 36.7% | D+24.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 38WARD 08 PCT 38 | 601 | 639 | 13 | 1,253 | 48.0% | 51.0% | R+3.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 22WARD 06 PCT 22 | 573 | 664 | 14 | 1,251 | 45.8% | 53.1% | R+7.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 37WARD 08 PCT 37 | 587 | 647 | 11 | 1,245 | 47.1% | 52.0% | R+4.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 26WARD 05 PCT 26 | 572 | 651 | 16 | 1,239 | 46.2% | 52.5% | R+6.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 20WARD 03 PCT 20 | 741 | 471 | 22 | 1,234 | 60.0% | 38.2% | D+21.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 24WARD 01 PCT 24 | 805 | 403 | 15 | 1,223 | 65.8% | 33.0% | D+32.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 35WARD 08 PCT 35 | 418 | 783 | 20 | 1,221 | 34.2% | 64.1% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 25WARD 01 PCT 25 | 940 | 241 | 27 | 1,208 | 77.8% | 20.0% | D+57.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 02WARD 06 PCT 02 | 630 | 563 | 12 | 1,205 | 52.3% | 46.7% | D+5.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 19WARD 07 PCT 19 | 551 | 640 | 13 | 1,204 | 45.8% | 53.2% | R+7.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 47WARD 08 PCT 47 | 438 | 739 | 21 | 1,198 | 36.6% | 61.7% | R+25.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 14WARD 08 PCT 14 | 419 | 755 | 13 | 1,187 | 35.3% | 63.6% | R+28.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 30WARD 08 PCT 30 | 500 | 673 | 14 | 1,187 | 42.1% | 56.7% | R+14.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 02WARD 03 PCT 02 | 904 | 261 | 21 | 1,186 | 76.2% | 22.0% | D+54.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 22WARD 07 PCT 22 | 574 | 599 | 9 | 1,182 | 48.6% | 50.7% | R+2.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 09WARD 05 PCT 09 | 607 | 557 | 16 | 1,180 | 51.4% | 47.2% | D+4.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 05WARD 03 PCT 05 | 894 | 258 | 26 | 1,178 | 75.9% | 21.9% | D+54.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 15WARD 05 PCT 15 | 560 | 601 | 11 | 1,172 | 47.8% | 51.3% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 22WARD 05 PCT 22 | 528 | 632 | 10 | 1,170 | 45.1% | 54.0% | R+8.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 21WARD 01 PCT 21 | 763 | 380 | 22 | 1,165 | 65.5% | 32.6% | D+32.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 19WARD 03 PCT 19 | 761 | 384 | 18 | 1,163 | 65.4% | 33.0% | D+32.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 01WARD 05 PCT 01 | 626 | 511 | 20 | 1,157 | 54.1% | 44.2% | D+9.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 12WARD 01 PCT 12 | 833 | 298 | 25 | 1,156 | 72.1% | 25.8% | D+46.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 06WARD 04 PCT 06 | 706 | 417 | 20 | 1,143 | 61.8% | 36.5% | D+25.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 10WARD 03 PCT 10 | 802 | 313 | 21 | 1,136 | 70.6% | 27.6% | D+43.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 17WARD 03 PCT 17 | 731 | 379 | 24 | 1,134 | 64.5% | 33.4% | D+31.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 14WARD 05 PCT 14 | 524 | 564 | 19 | 1,107 | 47.3% | 50.9% | R+3.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 11WARD 01 PCT 11 | 664 | 427 | 15 | 1,106 | 60.0% | 38.6% | D+21.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 15WARD 01 PCT 15 | 639 | 448 | 19 | 1,106 | 57.8% | 40.5% | D+17.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 13WARD 01 PCT 13 | 715 | 355 | 30 | 1,100 | 65.0% | 32.3% | D+32.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 29WARD 08 PCT 29 | 451 | 640 | 9 | 1,100 | 41.0% | 58.2% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 28WARD 01 PCT 28 | 700 | 379 | 13 | 1,092 | 64.1% | 34.7% | D+29.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 04WARD 03 PCT 04 | 815 | 250 | 27 | 1,092 | 74.6% | 22.9% | D+51.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 26WARD 08 PCT 26 | 563 | 499 | 13 | 1,075 | 52.4% | 46.4% | D+6.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 04WARD 05 PCT 04 | 556 | 498 | 17 | 1,071 | 51.9% | 46.5% | D+5.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 14WARD 01 PCT 14 | 672 | 370 | 23 | 1,065 | 63.1% | 34.7% | D+28.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 16WARD 04 PCT 16 | 587 | 462 | 16 | 1,065 | 55.1% | 43.4% | D+11.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 18WARD 04 PCT 18 | 568 | 473 | 21 | 1,062 | 53.5% | 44.5% | D+8.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 12WARD 06 PCT 12 | 486 | 558 | 18 | 1,062 | 45.8% | 52.5% | R+6.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 21WARD 04 PCT 21 | 538 | 499 | 13 | 1,050 | 51.2% | 47.5% | D+3.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 16WARD 07 PCT 16 | 636 | 379 | 31 | 1,046 | 60.8% | 36.2% | D+24.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 17WARD 04 PCT 17 | 517 | 517 | 11 | 1,045 | 49.5% | 49.5% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 01WARD 03 PCT 01 | 807 | 207 | 28 | 1,042 | 77.4% | 19.9% | D+57.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 09WARD 04 PCT 09 | 644 | 371 | 23 | 1,038 | 62.0% | 35.7% | D+26.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 03WARD 03 PCT 03 | 783 | 233 | 21 | 1,037 | 75.5% | 22.5% | D+53.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 03WARD 02 PCT 03 | 731 | 283 | 22 | 1,036 | 70.6% | 27.3% | D+43.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 45WARD 08 PCT 45 | 301 | 724 | 11 | 1,036 | 29.1% | 69.9% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 11WARD 02 PCT 11 | 838 | 178 | 19 | 1,035 | 81.0% | 17.2% | D+63.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 15WARD 04 PCT 15 | 677 | 329 | 11 | 1,017 | 66.6% | 32.4% | D+34.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 08WARD 08 PCT 08 | 434 | 579 | 3 | 1,016 | 42.7% | 57.0% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 34WARD 08 PCT 34 | 323 | 683 | 6 | 1,012 | 31.9% | 67.5% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 30WARD 06 PCT 30 | 338 | 655 | 17 | 1,010 | 33.5% | 64.9% | R+31.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 11WARD 08 PCT 11 | 640 | 342 | 19 | 1,001 | 63.9% | 34.2% | D+29.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 10WARD 01 PCT 10 | 555 | 429 | 14 | 998 | 55.6% | 43.0% | D+12.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 01WARD 04 PCT 01 | 570 | 411 | 16 | 997 | 57.2% | 41.2% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 07WARD 01 PCT 07 | 700 | 278 | 18 | 996 | 70.3% | 27.9% | D+42.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 22WARD 02 PCT 22 | 863 | 109 | 24 | 996 | 86.6% | 10.9% | D+75.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 14WARD 03 PCT 14 | 662 | 313 | 15 | 990 | 66.9% | 31.6% | D+35.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 23WARD 01 PCT 23 | 557 | 389 | 10 | 956 | 58.3% | 40.7% | D+17.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 21WARD 02 PCT 21 | 684 | 251 | 16 | 951 | 71.9% | 26.4% | D+45.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 04WARD 01 PCT 04 | 579 | 346 | 17 | 942 | 61.5% | 36.7% | D+24.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 02WARD 07 PCT 02 | 563 | 365 | 14 | 942 | 59.8% | 38.7% | D+21.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 02WARD 02 PCT 02 | 646 | 273 | 21 | 940 | 68.7% | 29.0% | D+39.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 05WARD 01 PCT 05 | 629 | 287 | 21 | 937 | 67.1% | 30.6% | D+36.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 02WARD 05 PCT 02 | 558 | 358 | 20 | 936 | 59.6% | 38.2% | D+21.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 04WARD 07 PCT 04 | 506 | 403 | 19 | 928 | 54.5% | 43.4% | D+11.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 05 PCT 27WARD 05 PCT 27 | 381 | 534 | 8 | 923 | 41.3% | 57.9% | R+16.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 09WARD 01 PCT 09 | 494 | 407 | 21 | 922 | 53.6% | 44.1% | D+9.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 06WARD 03 PCT 06 | 649 | 257 | 15 | 921 | 70.5% | 27.9% | D+42.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 05WARD 07 PCT 05 | 580 | 326 | 14 | 920 | 63.0% | 35.4% | D+27.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 14WARD 04 PCT 14 | 603 | 295 | 17 | 915 | 65.9% | 32.2% | D+33.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 19WARD 04 PCT 19 | 483 | 407 | 22 | 912 | 53.0% | 44.6% | D+8.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 23WARD 02 PCT 23 | 714 | 170 | 17 | 901 | 79.2% | 18.9% | D+60.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 20WARD 02 PCT 20 | 780 | 99 | 13 | 892 | 87.4% | 11.1% | D+76.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 12WARD 02 PCT 12 | 640 | 227 | 10 | 877 | 73.0% | 25.9% | D+47.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 04WARD 02 PCT 04 | 540 | 311 | 21 | 872 | 61.9% | 35.7% | D+26.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 05WARD 02 PCT 05 | 654 | 200 | 15 | 869 | 75.3% | 23.0% | D+52.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 48WARD 08 PCT 48 | 307 | 507 | 10 | 824 | 37.3% | 61.5% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 15WARD 07 PCT 15 | 380 | 435 | 8 | 823 | 46.2% | 52.9% | R+6.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 26WARD 07 PCT 26 | 528 | 278 | 14 | 820 | 64.4% | 33.9% | D+30.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 03WARD 04 PCT 03 | 480 | 325 | 6 | 811 | 59.2% | 40.1% | D+19.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 20WARD 04 PCT 20 | 449 | 342 | 10 | 801 | 56.1% | 42.7% | D+13.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 16WARD 02 PCT 16 | 594 | 179 | 16 | 789 | 75.3% | 22.7% | D+52.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 07WARD 08 PCT 07 | 352 | 429 | 8 | 789 | 44.6% | 54.4% | R+9.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 10WARD 04 PCT 10 | 434 | 344 | 5 | 783 | 55.4% | 43.9% | D+11.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 24WARD 08 PCT 24 | 345 | 426 | 7 | 778 | 44.3% | 54.8% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 10WARD 02 PCT 10 | 667 | 93 | 17 | 777 | 85.8% | 12.0% | D+73.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 01 PCT 02WARD 01 PCT 02 | 430 | 330 | 12 | 772 | 55.7% | 42.7% | D+13.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 19WARD 02 PCT 19 | 647 | 107 | 7 | 761 | 85.0% | 14.1% | D+71.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 25WARD 07 PCT 25 | 481 | 260 | 10 | 751 | 64.0% | 34.6% | D+29.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 15WARD 02 PCT 15 | 618 | 106 | 13 | 737 | 83.9% | 14.4% | D+69.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 17WARD 02 PCT 17 | 625 | 94 | 12 | 731 | 85.5% | 12.9% | D+72.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 28WARD 06 PCT 28 | 253 | 465 | 11 | 729 | 34.7% | 63.8% | R+29.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 04WARD 04 PCT 04 | 508 | 192 | 14 | 714 | 71.1% | 26.9% | D+44.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 07WARD 07 PCT 07 | 423 | 267 | 12 | 702 | 60.3% | 38.0% | D+22.2 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 07WARD 02 PCT 07 | 556 | 116 | 15 | 687 | 80.9% | 16.9% | D+64.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 08WARD 02 PCT 08 | 560 | 114 | 12 | 686 | 81.6% | 16.6% | D+65.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 12WARD 04 PCT 12 | 470 | 182 | 18 | 670 | 70.1% | 27.2% | D+43.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 39WARD 08 PCT 39 | 330 | 318 | 7 | 655 | 50.4% | 48.5% | D+1.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 06WARD 02 PCT 06 | 531 | 109 | 12 | 652 | 81.4% | 16.7% | D+64.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 11WARD 04 PCT 11 | 330 | 308 | 7 | 645 | 51.2% | 47.8% | D+3.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 12WARD 03 PCT 12 | 432 | 185 | 9 | 626 | 69.0% | 29.6% | D+39.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 13WARD 02 PCT 13 | 528 | 77 | 14 | 619 | 85.3% | 12.4% | D+72.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 09WARD 08 PCT 09 | 319 | 290 | 8 | 617 | 51.7% | 47.0% | D+4.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 09WARD 02 PCT 09 | 481 | 105 | 14 | 600 | 80.2% | 17.5% | D+62.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 03WARD 08 PCT 03 | 298 | 288 | 7 | 593 | 50.3% | 48.6% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 33WARD 08 PCT 33 | 148 | 432 | 6 | 586 | 25.3% | 73.7% | R+48.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 05WARD 08 PCT 05 | 293 | 287 | 3 | 583 | 50.3% | 49.2% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 02 PCT 14WARD 02 PCT 14 | 502 | 62 | 12 | 576 | 87.2% | 10.8% | D+76.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 13WARD 04 PCT 13 | 327 | 215 | 10 | 552 | 59.2% | 38.9% | D+20.3 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 04WARD 08 PCT 04 | 243 | 295 | 9 | 547 | 44.4% | 53.9% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -WARD 03 PCT 11WARD 03 PCT 11 | 389 | 141 | 9 | 539 | 72.2% | 26.2% | D+46.0 |
| Precinct -WARD 06 PCT 26WARD 06 PCT 26 | 189 | 343 | 6 | 538 | 35.1% | 63.8% | R+28.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 02WARD 04 PCT 02 | 303 | 189 | 5 | 497 | 61.0% | 38.0% | D+22.9 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 02WARD 08 PCT 02 | 254 | 229 | 12 | 495 | 51.3% | 46.3% | D+5.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 04 PCT 08WARD 04 PCT 08 | 326 | 155 | 13 | 494 | 66.0% | 31.4% | D+34.6 |
| Precinct -WARD 07 PCT 24WARD 07 PCT 24 | 228 | 243 | 11 | 482 | 47.3% | 50.4% | R+3.1 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 01WARD 08 PCT 01 | 223 | 246 | 9 | 478 | 46.7% | 51.5% | R+4.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 06WARD 08 PCT 06 | 243 | 209 | 6 | 458 | 53.1% | 45.6% | D+7.4 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 12WARD 08 PCT 12 | 79 | 185 | 2 | 266 | 29.7% | 69.5% | R+39.8 |
| Precinct -WARD 08 PCT 31WARD 08 PCT 31 | 66 | 77 | 2 | 145 | 45.5% | 53.1% | R+7.6 |
presidential history
Party record book
Douglas County, NE · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
65.6%
70,245 votes · D+32.6
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 62.6%
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
67.8%
101,579 votes · R+35.6
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 65.3%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
150,350votes
54.4% of the vote · D+11.3
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 148,733 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
120,919votes
43.9% of the vote · D+10.1
Runner-up · George W. Bush, 2004 · 120,813 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Woodrow Wilson1916
+21.6pts D vs U.S.
Place D+24.7 · U.S. D+3.1
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1908 · +14.5 pts
Republican
Benjamin Harrison1892
+36.8pts R vs U.S.
Place R+35.2 · U.S. D+1.7
Runner-up · Gerald Ford, 1976 · +21.8 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
OAshlei SpiveyState Senate · 13
OWoody WordekemperState Senate · 15
OChristy ArmendarizState Senate · 18
OTony SorrentinoState Senate · 39
Seats representing Douglas County, NE. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 4 state senate and 0 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 3 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2026D+1.2
Presidential vote · 2024D+10.1
Registration leans Democratic; the presidential vote runs 8.9 points more Democratic than the rolls.
368,090 registered voters · 2026
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−380 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −11,781 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $64,502 in average income, against $110,921 for residents who stayed — 42% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+9.4 on average — 20 points more Republican-leaning than Douglas County, NE itself (D+10.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sarpy County, NE3,452R+11.6
- Lancaster County, NE1,038D+4.3
- Pottawattamie County, IA692R+19.9
- Dodge County, NE270R+32.5
- Washington County, NE251R+42.2
- Maricopa County, AZ205R+3.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sarpy County, NE3,901
- Pottawattamie County, IA787
- Lancaster County, NE693
- Washington County, NE286
- Maricopa County, AZ265
- Dodge County, NE211
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +368 |
| 2012 | +903 |
| 2013 | +355 |
| 2014 | −187 |
| 2015 | −71 |
| 2016 | −648 |
| 2017 | −1,129 |
| 2018 | +44 |
| 2019 | −677 |
| 2021 | −3,668 |
| 2022 | −3,732 |
| 2023 | −1,905 |
| 2024 | −1,054 |
| 2025 | −380 |
Douglas County anchors Nebraska's lone Democratic-leaning congressional district and delivered a D+10.2 margin in 2024, making it the dominant counterweight to the state's otherwise heavily Republican rural vote.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 32.6 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 35.6 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 10.1 points.
A population of 590,736, a 66% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $80,391 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Lancaster County and Kent County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Lancaster County
Nebraska
94.3twin score
2020–2024 trajectoryelasticity12-yr trend
Kent County
Michigan
93.2twin score
12-yr trend2020–2024 trajectorypopulation scale≠ Swedish ancestry
Lake County
Illinois
91.1twin score
12-yr trend2020–2024 trajectorypopulation scale≠ median income
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Douglas County, Nebraska. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/31055/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Douglas County
Nebraska at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Douglas County, Nebraska vote in 2024?
In 2024, Douglas County, Nebraska voted Democratic by 10.1 points (D+10.1), carried by the Democratic candidate. Out of 275,145 votes cast, 148,733 went Democratic and 120,919 went Republican.
When did Douglas County, Nebraska last vote Republican?
The most recent presidential election in which Douglas County, Nebraska voted Republican was 2012.
How many people live in Douglas County, Nebraska?
Douglas County, Nebraska has a population of 590,736 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Douglas County, Nebraska?
Median household income in Douglas County, Nebraska is $80,391 — below the national median of $80,734. The Nebraska state median is $76,475.
What is the political history of Douglas County, Nebraska?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Douglas County, Nebraska from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 13 went Democratic and 21 went Republican.