- Lead
- 20,866
- Total
- 53,150
- vs nation
- R+37.8
- Turnout
- 61.8%
Wayne County, OH
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 61.8% of 87,143 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 20,099
- Total
- 54,283
- vs nation
- R+41.5
- Turnout
- 63.4%
- Lead
- 17,239
- Total
- 50,845
- vs nation
- R+36.0
- Turnout
- 59.1%
- Lead
- 10,443
- Total
- 51,562
- vs nation
- R+24.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 7,630
- Total
- 52,276
- vs nation
- R+21.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 12,093
- Total
- 51,848
- vs nation
- R+20.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 11,122
- Total
- 42,436
- vs nation
- R+26.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,778
- Total
- 40,548
- vs nation
- R+20.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+39.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 116,5882024 5-year
- Population density
- 210 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 555 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $73,5742024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 92.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+33.1 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+49.2 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Knox County, OH · twin score 83.1
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 61.8%53,865 participants ÷ 87,143 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +18.6 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 43.2%–46.5%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53,865 | 87,143 ± 404 | 61.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 39,126 | 87,300 ± 420 | 44.8% | Audited | A/A |
| 54,848 | 86,524 ± 331 | 63.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 40,798 | 86,610 ± 366 | 47.1% | Audited | A/A |
| 50,845 | 86,047 ± 295 | 59.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 51,562 | 84,683 | 60.9% | Derived | — | |
| 52,276 | 83,834 | 62.4% | Derived | — | |
| 51,848 | 82,985 extrapolated | 62.5% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 163 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
163 precincts · 53,140 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 4-CPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 4-C | 518 | 698 | 10 | 1,226 | 42.3% | 56.9% | R+14.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 4-DPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 4-D | 563 | 640 | 13 | 1,216 | 46.3% | 52.6% | R+6.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 3-CPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 3-C | 483 | 653 | 13 | 1,149 | 42.0% | 56.8% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ORRVILLE CITY 3PRECINCT ORRVILLE CITY 3 | 385 | 735 | 11 | 1,131 | 34.0% | 65.0% | R+30.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT RITTMAN CITY 3PRECINCT RITTMAN CITY 3 | 316 | 802 | 12 | 1,130 | 28.0% | 71.0% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SUGAR CREEK TWP 2PRECINCT SUGAR CREEK TWP 2 | 255 | 800 | 9 | 1,064 | 24.0% | 75.2% | R+51.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CHESTER TWP 1PRECINCT CHESTER TWP 1 | 261 | 794 | 8 | 1,063 | 24.6% | 74.7% | R+50.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SUGAR CREEK TWP 1PRECINCT SUGAR CREEK TWP 1 | 203 | 843 | 10 | 1,056 | 19.2% | 79.8% | R+60.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WAYNE TWP 1PRECINCT WAYNE TWP 1 | 302 | 736 | 11 | 1,049 | 28.8% | 70.2% | R+41.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 2-DPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 2-D | 524 | 481 | 17 | 1,022 | 51.3% | 47.1% | D+4.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BAUGHMAN TWP 2PRECINCT BAUGHMAN TWP 2 | 184 | 822 | 10 | 1,016 | 18.1% | 80.9% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 3PRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 3 | 297 | 703 | 9 | 1,009 | 29.4% | 69.7% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SUGAR CREEK TWP 3 DALTONPRECINCT SUGAR CREEK TWP 3 DALTON | 232 | 757 | 10 | 999 | 23.2% | 75.8% | R+52.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CANAAN TWP 1PRECINCT CANAAN TWP 1 | 183 | 802 | 10 | 995 | 18.4% | 80.6% | R+62.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CANAAN TWP 2 CRESTONPRECINCT CANAAN TWP 2 CRESTON | 241 | 746 | 8 | 995 | 24.2% | 75.0% | R+50.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 4-APRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 4-A | 596 | 378 | 8 | 982 | 60.7% | 38.5% | D+22.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 1PRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 1 | 227 | 743 | 8 | 978 | 23.2% | 76.0% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER TWP 2PRECINCT WOOSTER TWP 2 | 265 | 706 | 6 | 977 | 27.1% | 72.3% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CONGRESS TWP 2PRECINCT CONGRESS TWP 2 | 199 | 754 | 12 | 965 | 20.6% | 78.1% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT GREEN TWP 1PRECINCT GREEN TWP 1 | 208 | 747 | 8 | 963 | 21.6% | 77.6% | R+56.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 6PRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 6 | 287 | 641 | 9 | 937 | 30.6% | 68.4% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT GREEN TWP 2PRECINCT GREEN TWP 2 | 225 | 707 | 3 | 935 | 24.1% | 75.6% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 2PRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 2 | 266 | 661 | 4 | 931 | 28.6% | 71.0% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 4 DTOWNPRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 4 DTOWN | 346 | 548 | 13 | 907 | 38.1% | 60.4% | R+22.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PLAIN TWP 1PRECINCT PLAIN TWP 1 | 166 | 708 | 13 | 887 | 18.7% | 79.8% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 3-BPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 3-B | 349 | 501 | 5 | 855 | 40.8% | 58.6% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FRANKLIN TWP 2PRECINCT FRANKLIN TWP 2 | 207 | 637 | 9 | 853 | 24.3% | 74.7% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 2-APRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 2-A | 369 | 474 | 9 | 852 | 43.3% | 55.6% | R+12.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CLINTON TWP 1PRECINCT CLINTON TWP 1 | 168 | 675 | 8 | 851 | 19.7% | 79.3% | R+59.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BAUGHMAN TWP 1PRECINCT BAUGHMAN TWP 1 | 195 | 646 | 7 | 848 | 23.0% | 76.2% | R+53.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER TWP 3PRECINCT WOOSTER TWP 3 | 234 | 600 | 11 | 845 | 27.7% | 71.0% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PLAIN TWP 2PRECINCT PLAIN TWP 2 | 216 | 610 | 7 | 833 | 25.9% | 73.2% | R+47.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WAYNE TWP 3PRECINCT WAYNE TWP 3 | 241 | 579 | 6 | 826 | 29.2% | 70.1% | R+40.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ORRVILLE CITY 1PRECINCT ORRVILLE CITY 1 | 294 | 517 | 10 | 821 | 35.8% | 63.0% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 3-APRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 3-A | 372 | 442 | 7 | 821 | 45.3% | 53.8% | R+8.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MILTON TWP 1PRECINCT MILTON TWP 1 | 122 | 678 | 4 | 804 | 15.2% | 84.3% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FRANKLIN TWP 1PRECINCT FRANKLIN TWP 1 | 143 | 640 | 7 | 790 | 18.1% | 81.0% | R+62.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 5 DTOWNPRECINCT CHIPPEWA TWP 5 DTOWN | 290 | 476 | 12 | 778 | 37.3% | 61.2% | R+23.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT GREEN TWP 3 SMITHVILLEPRECINCT GREEN TWP 3 SMITHVILLE | 160 | 571 | 4 | 735 | 21.8% | 77.7% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT EAST UNION TWP 4PRECINCT EAST UNION TWP 4 | 159 | 567 | 4 | 730 | 21.8% | 77.7% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ORRVILLE CITY 2PRECINCT ORRVILLE CITY 2 | 233 | 484 | 5 | 722 | 32.3% | 67.0% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MILTON TWP 2PRECINCT MILTON TWP 2 | 126 | 566 | 1 | 693 | 18.2% | 81.7% | R+63.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 1-CPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 1-C | 316 | 350 | 7 | 673 | 47.0% | 52.0% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CONGRESS TWP 3PRECINCT CONGRESS TWP 3 | 124 | 537 | 7 | 668 | 18.6% | 80.4% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ORRVILLE CITY 4-BPRECINCT ORRVILLE CITY 4-B | 256 | 404 | 7 | 667 | 38.4% | 60.6% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER TWP 1PRECINCT WOOSTER TWP 1 | 162 | 471 | 3 | 636 | 25.5% | 74.1% | R+48.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 1-BPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 1-B | 299 | 329 | 6 | 634 | 47.2% | 51.9% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT EAST UNION TWP 1PRECINCT EAST UNION TWP 1 | 124 | 491 | 6 | 621 | 20.0% | 79.1% | R+59.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 1-APRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 1-A | 239 | 373 | 8 | 620 | 38.5% | 60.2% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CANAAN TWP 3PRECINCT CANAAN TWP 3 | 120 | 487 | 5 | 612 | 19.6% | 79.6% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CHESTER TWP 2PRECINCT CHESTER TWP 2 | 116 | 483 | 5 | 604 | 19.2% | 80.0% | R+60.8 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT RITTMAN CITY 2PRECINCT RITTMAN CITY 2 | 194 | 394 | 6 | 594 | 32.7% | 66.3% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CONGRESS TWP 1 W SALEMPRECINCT CONGRESS TWP 1 W SALEM | 126 | 461 | 5 | 592 | 21.3% | 77.9% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ORRVILLE CITY 4-APRECINCT ORRVILLE CITY 4-A | 194 | 389 | 6 | 589 | 32.9% | 66.0% | R+33.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 4-BPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 4-B | 274 | 310 | 4 | 588 | 46.6% | 52.7% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT EAST UNION TWP 3 APL CRKPRECINCT EAST UNION TWP 3 APL CRK | 112 | 459 | 4 | 575 | 19.5% | 79.8% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CLINTON TWP 2 SHREVEPRECINCT CLINTON TWP 2 SHREVE | 127 | 438 | 8 | 573 | 22.2% | 76.4% | R+54.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SALT CREEK TWP 1PRECINCT SALT CREEK TWP 1 | 86 | 478 | 4 | 568 | 15.1% | 84.2% | R+69.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT RITTMAN CITY 1PRECINCT RITTMAN CITY 1 | 157 | 374 | 2 | 533 | 29.5% | 70.2% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PAINT TWP 1PRECINCT PAINT TWP 1 | 50 | 477 | 4 | 531 | 9.4% | 89.8% | R+80.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT RITTMAN CITY 4PRECINCT RITTMAN CITY 4 | 138 | 369 | 5 | 512 | 27.0% | 72.1% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WAYNE TWP 2PRECINCT WAYNE TWP 2 | 211 | 298 | 1 | 510 | 41.4% | 58.4% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 2-CPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 2-C | 211 | 250 | 5 | 466 | 45.3% | 53.6% | R+8.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 3-EPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 3-E | 202 | 246 | 4 | 452 | 44.7% | 54.4% | R+9.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 2-BPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 2-B | 260 | 136 | 2 | 398 | 65.3% | 34.2% | D+31.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT EAST UNION TWP 2PRECINCT EAST UNION TWP 2 | 53 | 292 | 3 | 348 | 15.2% | 83.9% | R+68.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 3-DPRECINCT WOOSTER CITY 3-D | 137 | 200 | 0 | 337 | 40.7% | 59.3% | R+18.7 |
| Voting District BAUGHMAN TWP 139_39169169ABP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District BAUGHMAN TWP 239_39169169ABQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District BAUGHMAN TWP 3 MRSH/VILL39_39169169ABR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CANAAN TWP 139_39169169ABS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CANAAN TWP 2 BURBANK39_39169169ABU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CANAAN TWP 3 CRESTON39_39169169ABV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CANAAN TWP 439_39169169ABT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CANAAN TWP 5 CRESTON39_39169169ABW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHESTER TWP 139_39169169ABX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHESTER TWP 239_39169169ABY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHESTER TWP 339_39169169ABZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHIPPEWA TWP 139_39169169ACA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHIPPEWA TWP 239_39169169ACB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHIPPEWA TWP 3 DOY/TOWN39_39169169ACG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHIPPEWA TWP 5 RITTMAN39_39169169ACC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHIPPEWA TWP 6 DOY/TOWN39_39169169ACI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHIPPEWA TWP 739_39169169ACD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHIPPEWA TWP 8 NORTON39_39169169ACE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHIPPEWA TWP 939_39169169ACF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CHIPPEWA TWP4 DOY/TOWN39_39169169ACH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CLINTON TWP 1 SHREVE39_39169169ACL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CLINTON TWP 239_39169169ACJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CLINTON TWP 3 SHREVE39_39169169ACM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CLINTON TWP 439_39169169ACK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CONGRESS TWP 1 W SALEM39_39169169ACN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CONGRESS TWP 239_39169169ACO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District CONGRESS TWP 3 CONGRESS39_39169169ACP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District EAST UNION TWP 139_39169169ACQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District EAST UNION TWP 239_39169169ACR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District EAST UNION TWP 3 APL CRK39_39169169ACT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District EAST UNION TWP 439_39169169ACS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District FRANKLIN TWP 139_39169169ACU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District FRANKLIN TWP 239_39169169ACV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District GREEN TWP 139_39169169ACW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District GREEN TWP 239_39169169ACX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District GREEN TWP 3 SMITHVILLE39_39169169ACZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District GREEN TWP 4 SMITHVILLE39_39169169ADA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District GREEN TWP 539_39169169ACY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MILTON TWP 139_39169169ADB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MILTON TWP 239_39169169ADC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MILTON TWP 339_39169169ADD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MILTON TWP 4 RITTMAN39_39169169AAI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MILTON TWP 5 RITTMAN39_39169169AAJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MILTON TWP 6 RITTMAN39_39169169AAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MILTON TWP 7 RITTMAN39_39169169AAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MILTON TWP 8 RITTMAN39_39169169AAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District MILTON TWP 9 RITTMAN39_39169169AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District ORRVILLE CITY 1-A39_39169169AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District ORRVILLE CITY 1-B39_39169169AAB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District ORRVILLE CITY 2-A39_39169169AAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District ORRVILLE CITY 3-A39_39169169AAE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District ORRVILLE CITY 3-B39_39169169AAF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District ORRVILLE CITY 4-A39_39169169AAG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District ORRVILLE CITY 4-B39_39169169AAH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District PAINT TWP 1 MT EATON39_39169169ADE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District PLAIN TWP 139_39169169ADF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District PLAIN TWP 239_39169169ADG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District SALT CREEK TWP 1 FREDERICKSBURG39_39169169ADH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District SUGAR CREEK TWP 139_39169169ADI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District SUGAR CREEK TWP 239_39169169ADJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District SUGAR CREEK TWP 3 DALTON39_39169169ADL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District SUGAR CREEK TWP 4 DALTON39_39169169ADM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District SUGAR CREEK TWP 539_39169169ADK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WAYNE TWP 139_39169169ADN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WAYNE TWP 239_39169169ADO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WAYNE TWP 339_39169169ADP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WAYNE TWP 439_39169169ADQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 1-A39_39169169AAO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 1-B39_39169169AAP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 1-C39_39169169AAQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 1-D39_39169169AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 1-E39_39169169AAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 2-A39_39169169AAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 2-B39_39169169AAU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 2-C39_39169169AAV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 2-D39_39169169AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 2-E39_39169169AAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 2-F39_39169169AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 3-A39_39169169AAZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 3-B39_39169169ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 3-C39_39169169ABB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 3-D39_39169169ABC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 3-E39_39169169ABD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 3-F39_39169169ABE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 4-A39_39169169ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 4-B39_39169169ABI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 4-C39_39169169ABJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 4-D39_39169169ABK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 4-E39_39169169ABL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 4-F39_39169169ABM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER CITY 4-G39_39169169ABN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER TWP 139_39169169ADR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER TWP 239_39169169ADS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER TWP 339_39169169ADT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER TWP 439_39169169ADU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District WOOSTER TWP 539_39169169ADV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Wayne County, OH · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Woodrow Wilson1916
60.2%
5,930 votes · D+22.9
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 60.0%
Republican
Herbert Hoover1928
74.6%
14,192 votes · R+49.2
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1956 · 73.6%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
21,712votes
41.5% of the vote · R+14.6
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 19,808 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
36,764votes
69.2% of the vote · R+39.3
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 36,759 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Woodrow Wilson1916
+19.7pts D vs U.S.
Place D+22.9 · U.S. D+3.1
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1908 · +19.3 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+41.5pts R vs U.S.
Place R+37.0 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1960 · +38.4 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Wayne County, OH. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 27.2%13,015 | 72.8%34,822 | 47,837 |
| 2020 | R | 27.4%14,381 | 72.6%38,035 | 52,416 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 74,772 |
| 2018 | 75,115 |
| 2020 | 74,470 |
| 2022 | 73,514 |
| 2024 | 70,625 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−95 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −4,443 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $54,333 in average income, against $75,503 for residents who stayed — 28% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+21.9 on average — 17 points more Democratic-leaning than Wayne County, OH itself (R+39.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Summit County, OH315D+7.0
- Medina County, OH294R+24.8
- Stark County, OH225R+21.9
- Holmes County, OH209R+69.2
- Ashland County, OH132R+50.0
- Cuyahoga County, OH79D+31.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Stark County, OH326
- Summit County, OH314
- Medina County, OH263
- Ashland County, OH166
- Holmes County, OH163
- Cuyahoga County, OH122
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −244 |
| 2012 | −259 |
| 2013 | −257 |
| 2014 | −119 |
| 2015 | −282 |
| 2016 | −164 |
| 2017 | −899 |
| 2018 | −740 |
| 2019 | −424 |
| 2021 | −808 |
| 2022 | +424 |
| 2023 | −219 |
| 2024 | −357 |
| 2025 | −95 |
Wayne County's agricultural economy and large Amish population anchor a conservative voting pattern that has produced Republican presidential margins above 35 points in each of the last three cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 33.1 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 49.2 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 39.3 points.
A population of 116,588, a 92% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $73,574 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Knox County and Ashland County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Wayne County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39169/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.