Sequoyah County, Oklahoma
Precinct data
Results by precinct
57 precincts · 15,583 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -680106680106 | 150 | 817 | 10 | 977 | 15.4% | 83.6% | R+68.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -680204680204 | 153 | 757 | 11 | 921 | 16.6% | 82.2% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -680301680301 | 200 | 686 | 11 | 897 | 22.3% | 76.5% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct -680303680303 | 192 | 629 | 12 | 833 | 23.0% | 75.5% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -680101680101 | 114 | 664 | 5 | 783 | 14.6% | 84.8% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -680103680103 | 136 | 641 | 6 | 783 | 17.4% | 81.9% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct -680208680208 | 189 | 535 | 6 | 730 | 25.9% | 73.3% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -680104680104 | 110 | 603 | 5 | 718 | 15.3% | 84.0% | R+68.7 |
| Precinct -680107680107 | 182 | 482 | 8 | 672 | 27.1% | 71.7% | R+44.6 |
| Precinct -680310680310 | 95 | 565 | 11 | 671 | 14.2% | 84.2% | R+70.0 |
| Precinct -680102680102 | 99 | 536 | 10 | 645 | 15.3% | 83.1% | R+67.8 |
| Precinct -680205680205 | 148 | 468 | 7 | 623 | 23.8% | 75.1% | R+51.4 |
| Precinct -680105680105 | 113 | 471 | 10 | 594 | 19.0% | 79.3% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -680305680305 | 87 | 492 | 5 | 584 | 14.9% | 84.2% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -680306680306 | 76 | 483 | 7 | 566 | 13.4% | 85.3% | R+71.9 |
| Precinct -680203680203 | 112 | 434 | 7 | 553 | 20.3% | 78.5% | R+58.2 |
| Precinct -680207680207 | 118 | 427 | 4 | 549 | 21.5% | 77.8% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -680209680209 | 98 | 422 | 9 | 529 | 18.5% | 79.8% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -680210680210 | 107 | 399 | 7 | 513 | 20.9% | 77.8% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct -680302680302 | 114 | 339 | 11 | 464 | 24.6% | 73.1% | R+48.5 |
| Precinct -680202680202 | 91 | 364 | 7 | 462 | 19.7% | 78.8% | R+59.1 |
| Precinct -680307680307 | 65 | 355 | 3 | 423 | 15.4% | 83.9% | R+68.6 |
| Precinct -680309680309 | 62 | 338 | 3 | 403 | 15.4% | 83.9% | R+68.5 |
| Precinct -680201680201 | 53 | 299 | 10 | 362 | 14.6% | 82.6% | R+68.0 |
| Precinct -680308680308 | 43 | 285 | 0 | 328 | 13.1% | 86.9% | R+73.8 |
| Voting District 10140_40135101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 10240_40135102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 10340_40135103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 10440_40135104 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 10540_40135105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 10640_40135106 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 10740_40135107 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 10840_40135108 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 20140_40135201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 20240_40135202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 20340_40135203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 20440_40135204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 20540_40135205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 20640_40135206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 20740_40135207 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 20840_40135208 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 20940_40135209 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 21040_40135210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 21140_40135211 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 21240_40135212 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 30140_40135301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 30240_40135302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 30340_40135303 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 30440_40135304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 30540_40135305 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 30640_40135306 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 30740_40135307 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 30840_40135308 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 30940_40135309 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 31040_40135310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 31140_40135311 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District 31240_40135312 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1908–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1908 | −10.2% |
| 1912 | +11.0% |
| 1916 | +13.6% |
| 1920 | −11.9% |
| 1924 | +8.7% |
| 1928 | −10.1% |
| 1932 | +43.9% |
| 1936 | +24.3% |
| 1940 | +8.0% |
| 1944 | +10.5% |
| 1948 | +36.3% |
| 1952 | +10.7% |
| 1956 | +3.3% |
| 1960 | −13.5% |
| 1964 | +20.4% |
| 1968 | −2.4% |
| 1972 | −45.3% |
| 1976 | +19.6% |
| 1980 | −8.9% |
| 1984 | −25.1% |
| 1988 | −7.1% |
| 1992 | +8.6% |
| 1996 | +7.7% |
| 2000 | −9.7% |
| 2004 | −20.0% |
| 2008 | −36.0% |
| 2012 | −39.1% |
| 2016 | −54.2% |
| 2020 | −59.0% |
| 2024 | −61.5% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 22.0%4,512 | 74.8%15,340 | 20,500 |
| 2020 | R | 21.8%3,327 | 74.5%11,370 | 15,269 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 27 points more Democratic.
24,791 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+350 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +966 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $49,908 in average income, against $56,504 for residents who stayed — 12% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+44.0 on average — 18 points more Democratic-leaning than Sequoyah County, OK itself (R+61.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sebastian County, AR181R+37.5
- Crawford County, AR91R+58.2
- Le Flore County, OK55R+64.8
- Muskogee County, OK51R+37.6
- Tulsa County, OK35R+15.2
- Cherokee County, OK33R+32.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sebastian County, AR183
- Crawford County, AR64
- Tulsa County, OK53
- Le Flore County, OK47
- Muskogee County, OK45
- Cherokee County, OK35
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −166 |
| 2012 | −453 |
| 2013 | −231 |
| 2014 | +59 |
| 2015 | −128 |
| 2016 | +95 |
| 2017 | −65 |
| 2018 | −125 |
| 2019 | −3 |
| 2021 | +425 |
| 2022 | +456 |
| 2023 | +459 |
| 2024 | +293 |
| 2025 | +350 |
Sequoyah County, tucked into Oklahoma's eastern corner along the Arkansas River, delivers some of the state's widest presidential margins despite a significant Cherokee Nation presence that once made it more competitive in earlier decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 43.9 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 61.5 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 61.5 points.
A population of 39,860, a 61% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $51,093 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Johnston County and Choctaw County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Sequoyah County, Oklahoma. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/40135/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.