- Lead
- 9,584
- Total
- 15,583
- vs nation
- R+60.0
- Turnout
- 52.2%
Sequoyah County, OK
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 52.2% of 29,937 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 9,078
- Total
- 15,386
- vs nation
- R+63.5
- Turnout
- 49.1%
- Lead
- 7,827
- Total
- 14,437
- vs nation
- R+56.3
- Turnout
- 46.6%
- Lead
- 5,385
- Total
- 13,771
- vs nation
- R+43.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,012
- Total
- 13,920
- vs nation
- R+43.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,955
- Total
- 14,775
- vs nation
- R+17.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,189
- Total
- 12,254
- vs nation
- R+10.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 932
- Total
- 12,124
- vs nation
- R+0.8
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+61.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 39,8602024 5-year
- Population density
- 59 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 674 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $51,0932024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 60.6%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.9%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 5.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+43.9 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+61.5 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Johnston County, OK · twin score 94.5
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 52.2%15,621 participants ÷ 29,937 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +13.6 ptsPersistently low turnout
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.2 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 38.6%–40.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15,621 | 29,937 ± 147 | 52.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 10,595 | 29,838 ± 150 | 35.5% | Audited | C/A |
| 15,413 | 31,387 ± 147 | 49.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 11,570 | 31,257 ± 137 | 37.0% | Audited | A/A |
| 14,479 | 31,056 ± 120 | 46.6% | Audited | A/A | |
| 13,771 | 30,971 | 44.5% | Derived | — | |
| 13,920 | 29,859 | 46.6% | Derived | — | |
| 14,775 | 28,747 extrapolated | 51.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Sequoyah County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Sequoyah County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 57 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
57 precincts · 15,583 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -680106680106 | 150 | 817 | 10 | 977 | 15.4% | 83.6% | R+68.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -680204680204 | 153 | 757 | 11 | 921 | 16.6% | 82.2% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -680301680301 | 200 | 686 | 11 | 897 | 22.3% | 76.5% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct -680303680303 | 192 | 629 | 12 | 833 | 23.0% | 75.5% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -680101680101 | 114 | 664 | 5 | 783 | 14.6% | 84.8% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -680103680103 | 136 | 641 | 6 | 783 | 17.4% | 81.9% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct -680208680208 | 189 | 535 | 6 | 730 | 25.9% | 73.3% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -680104680104 | 110 | 603 | 5 | 718 | 15.3% | 84.0% | R+68.7 |
| Precinct -680107680107 | 182 | 482 | 8 | 672 | 27.1% | 71.7% | R+44.6 |
| Precinct -680310680310 | 95 | 565 | 11 | 671 | 14.2% | 84.2% | R+70.0 |
| Precinct -680102680102 | 99 | 536 | 10 | 645 | 15.3% | 83.1% | R+67.8 |
| Precinct -680205680205 | 148 | 468 | 7 | 623 | 23.8% | 75.1% | R+51.4 |
| Precinct -680105680105 | 113 | 471 | 10 | 594 | 19.0% | 79.3% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -680305680305 | 87 | 492 | 5 | 584 | 14.9% | 84.2% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -680306680306 | 76 | 483 | 7 | 566 | 13.4% | 85.3% | R+71.9 |
| Precinct -680203680203 | 112 | 434 | 7 | 553 | 20.3% | 78.5% | R+58.2 |
| Precinct -680207680207 | 118 | 427 | 4 | 549 | 21.5% | 77.8% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -680209680209 | 98 | 422 | 9 | 529 | 18.5% | 79.8% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -680210680210 | 107 | 399 | 7 | 513 | 20.9% | 77.8% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct -680302680302 | 114 | 339 | 11 | 464 | 24.6% | 73.1% | R+48.5 |
| Precinct -680202680202 | 91 | 364 | 7 | 462 | 19.7% | 78.8% | R+59.1 |
| Precinct -680307680307 | 65 | 355 | 3 | 423 | 15.4% | 83.9% | R+68.6 |
| Precinct -680309680309 | 62 | 338 | 3 | 403 | 15.4% | 83.9% | R+68.5 |
| Precinct -680201680201 | 53 | 299 | 10 | 362 | 14.6% | 82.6% | R+68.0 |
| Precinct -680308680308 | 43 | 285 | 0 | 328 | 13.1% | 86.9% | R+73.8 |
| Voting District 10140_40135101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 10240_40135102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 10340_40135103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 10440_40135104 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 10540_40135105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 10640_40135106 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 10740_40135107 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 10840_40135108 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 20140_40135201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 20240_40135202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 20340_40135203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 20440_40135204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 20540_40135205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 20640_40135206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 20740_40135207 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 20840_40135208 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 20940_40135209 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 21040_40135210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 21140_40135211 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 21240_40135212 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 30140_40135301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 30240_40135302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 30340_40135303 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 30440_40135304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 30540_40135305 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 30640_40135306 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 30740_40135307 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 30840_40135308 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 30940_40135309 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 31040_40135310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 31140_40135311 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 31240_40135312 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Sequoyah County, OK · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1908–2024 · 30 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
72.0%
4,704 votes · D+43.9
Runner-up · Harry S. Truman, 1948 · 68.2%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
80.2%
12,491 votes · R+61.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 78.7%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Bill Clinton1992
6,092votes
44.9% of the vote · D+8.6
Runner-up · John Kerry, 2004 · 5,910 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
12,491votes
80.2% of the vote · R+61.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 12,113 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+33.9pts D vs U.S.
Place D+8.7 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · Harry S. Truman, 1948 · +31.9 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+63.5pts R vs U.S.
Place R+59.0 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · +60.0 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Sequoyah County, OK. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 2 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 20.5%3,007 | 79.5%11,635 | 14,642 |
| 2020 | R | 20.8%3,108 | 79.2%11,800 | 14,908 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 27 points more Republican than the rolls.
24,791 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+350 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +966 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $49,908 in average income, against $56,504 for residents who stayed — 12% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+44.0 on average — 18 points more Democratic-leaning than Sequoyah County, OK itself (R+61.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sebastian County, AR181R+37.5
- Crawford County, AR91R+58.2
- Le Flore County, OK55R+64.8
- Muskogee County, OK51R+37.6
- Tulsa County, OK35R+15.2
- Cherokee County, OK33R+32.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sebastian County, AR183
- Crawford County, AR64
- Tulsa County, OK53
- Le Flore County, OK47
- Muskogee County, OK45
- Cherokee County, OK35
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −166 |
| 2012 | −453 |
| 2013 | −231 |
| 2014 | +59 |
| 2015 | −128 |
| 2016 | +95 |
| 2017 | −65 |
| 2018 | −125 |
| 2019 | −3 |
| 2021 | +425 |
| 2022 | +456 |
| 2023 | +459 |
| 2024 | +293 |
| 2025 | +350 |
Sequoyah County, tucked into Oklahoma's eastern corner along the Arkansas River, delivers some of the state's widest presidential margins despite a significant Cherokee Nation presence that once made it more competitive in earlier decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 43.9 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 61.5 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 61.5 points.
A population of 39,860, a 61% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $51,093 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Johnston County and Choctaw County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Sequoyah County, Oklahoma. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/40135/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.