Lane County, Oregon
Precinct data
Results by precinct
66 precincts · 211,240 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -16701670 | 3,630 | 2,630 | 245 | 6,505 | 55.8% | 40.4% | D+15.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -15641564 | 4,639 | 1,622 | 223 | 6,484 | 71.5% | 25.0% | D+46.5 |
| Precinct -733733 | 4,077 | 1,759 | 266 | 6,102 | 66.8% | 28.8% | D+38.0 |
| Precinct -26762676 | 2,780 | 3,011 | 223 | 6,014 | 46.2% | 50.1% | R+3.8 |
| Precinct -46004600 | 3,284 | 2,493 | 193 | 5,970 | 55.0% | 41.8% | D+13.2 |
| Precinct -15621562 | 3,773 | 1,930 | 198 | 5,901 | 63.9% | 32.7% | D+31.2 |
| Precinct -14501450 | 3,975 | 1,686 | 200 | 5,861 | 67.8% | 28.8% | D+39.1 |
| Precinct -12321232 | 4,840 | 645 | 195 | 5,680 | 85.2% | 11.4% | D+73.9 |
| Precinct -25622562 | 2,758 | 2,510 | 200 | 5,468 | 50.4% | 45.9% | D+4.5 |
| Precinct -12301230 | 4,670 | 480 | 247 | 5,397 | 86.5% | 8.9% | D+77.6 |
| Precinct -13401340 | 4,626 | 444 | 229 | 5,299 | 87.3% | 8.4% | D+78.9 |
| Precinct -43004300 | 2,352 | 2,665 | 204 | 5,221 | 45.0% | 51.0% | R+6.0 |
| Precinct -23402340 | 2,967 | 1,989 | 240 | 5,196 | 57.1% | 38.3% | D+18.8 |
| Precinct -18921892 | 3,768 | 1,101 | 217 | 5,086 | 74.1% | 21.6% | D+52.4 |
| Precinct -747747 | 1,877 | 2,952 | 189 | 5,018 | 37.4% | 58.8% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -731731 | 2,926 | 1,797 | 218 | 4,941 | 59.2% | 36.4% | D+22.8 |
| Precinct -16721672 | 2,844 | 1,790 | 175 | 4,809 | 59.1% | 37.2% | D+21.9 |
| Precinct -11261126 | 4,134 | 363 | 185 | 4,682 | 88.3% | 7.8% | D+80.5 |
| Precinct -22382238 | 3,098 | 1,303 | 224 | 4,625 | 67.0% | 28.2% | D+38.8 |
| Precinct -24562456 | 2,387 | 2,027 | 164 | 4,578 | 52.1% | 44.3% | D+7.9 |
| Precinct -751751 | 1,873 | 2,485 | 158 | 4,516 | 41.5% | 55.0% | R+13.6 |
| Precinct -14521452 | 3,045 | 1,199 | 161 | 4,405 | 69.1% | 27.2% | D+41.9 |
| Precinct -21222122 | 2,456 | 1,670 | 188 | 4,314 | 56.9% | 38.7% | D+18.2 |
| Precinct -11221122 | 3,478 | 436 | 223 | 4,137 | 84.1% | 10.5% | D+73.5 |
| Precinct -17841784 | 2,692 | 1,235 | 146 | 4,073 | 66.1% | 30.3% | D+35.8 |
| Precinct -711711 | 1,704 | 2,049 | 141 | 3,894 | 43.8% | 52.6% | R+8.9 |
| Precinct -47004700 | 1,502 | 2,234 | 149 | 3,885 | 38.7% | 57.5% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct -18941894 | 2,827 | 826 | 115 | 3,768 | 75.0% | 21.9% | D+53.1 |
| Precinct -737737 | 1,743 | 1,579 | 124 | 3,446 | 50.6% | 45.8% | D+4.8 |
| Precinct -12341234 | 2,803 | 414 | 146 | 3,363 | 83.3% | 12.3% | D+71.0 |
| Precinct -755755 | 1,173 | 1,815 | 135 | 3,123 | 37.6% | 58.1% | R+20.6 |
| Precinct -44004400 | 1,237 | 1,692 | 100 | 3,029 | 40.8% | 55.9% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -18901890 | 1,683 | 1,162 | 145 | 2,990 | 56.3% | 38.9% | D+17.4 |
| Precinct -717717 | 1,130 | 1,670 | 106 | 2,906 | 38.9% | 57.5% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -49004900 | 1,237 | 1,451 | 101 | 2,789 | 44.4% | 52.0% | R+7.7 |
| Precinct -723723 | 1,815 | 812 | 110 | 2,737 | 66.3% | 29.7% | D+36.6 |
| Precinct -759759 | 1,234 | 1,328 | 93 | 2,655 | 46.5% | 50.0% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -757757 | 1,124 | 1,431 | 81 | 2,636 | 42.6% | 54.3% | R+11.6 |
| Precinct -17861786 | 1,398 | 1,037 | 89 | 2,524 | 55.4% | 41.1% | D+14.3 |
| Precinct -765765 | 1,034 | 1,378 | 82 | 2,494 | 41.5% | 55.3% | R+13.8 |
| Precinct -705705 | 1,138 | 974 | 56 | 2,168 | 52.5% | 44.9% | D+7.6 |
| Precinct -15601560 | 1,209 | 750 | 75 | 2,034 | 59.4% | 36.9% | D+22.6 |
| Precinct -11201120 | 1,577 | 325 | 105 | 2,007 | 78.6% | 16.2% | D+62.4 |
| Precinct -739739 | 1,005 | 860 | 80 | 1,945 | 51.7% | 44.2% | D+7.5 |
| Precinct -725725 | 717 | 1,138 | 67 | 1,922 | 37.3% | 59.2% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -17821782 | 1,546 | 217 | 118 | 1,881 | 82.2% | 11.5% | D+70.7 |
| Precinct -14541454 | 1,364 | 359 | 56 | 1,779 | 76.7% | 20.2% | D+56.5 |
| Precinct -715715 | 625 | 1,057 | 53 | 1,735 | 36.0% | 60.9% | R+24.9 |
| Precinct -727727 | 661 | 970 | 48 | 1,679 | 39.4% | 57.8% | R+18.4 |
| Precinct -709709 | 722 | 877 | 47 | 1,646 | 43.9% | 53.3% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct -17801780 | 1,057 | 435 | 86 | 1,578 | 67.0% | 27.6% | D+39.4 |
| Precinct -701701 | 777 | 733 | 47 | 1,557 | 49.9% | 47.1% | D+2.8 |
| Precinct -48004800 | 657 | 833 | 58 | 1,548 | 42.4% | 53.8% | R+11.4 |
| Precinct -753753 | 496 | 868 | 37 | 1,401 | 35.4% | 62.0% | R+26.6 |
| Precinct -13421342 | 981 | 193 | 56 | 1,230 | 79.8% | 15.7% | D+64.1 |
| Precinct -11241124 | 1,010 | 171 | 44 | 1,225 | 82.4% | 14.0% | D+68.5 |
| Precinct -713713 | 389 | 739 | 27 | 1,155 | 33.7% | 64.0% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -45004500 | 522 | 552 | 33 | 1,107 | 47.2% | 49.9% | R+2.7 |
| Precinct -42004200 | 495 | 420 | 40 | 955 | 51.8% | 44.0% | D+7.9 |
| Precinct -741741 | 537 | 283 | 39 | 859 | 62.5% | 32.9% | D+29.6 |
| Precinct -743743 | 383 | 293 | 38 | 714 | 53.6% | 41.0% | D+12.6 |
| Precinct -707707 | 281 | 390 | 23 | 694 | 40.5% | 56.2% | R+15.7 |
| Precinct -721721 | 357 | 302 | 28 | 687 | 52.0% | 44.0% | D+8.0 |
| Precinct -729729 | 318 | 202 | 0 | 520 | 61.2% | 38.8% | D+22.3 |
| Precinct -719719 | 210 | 224 | 0 | 434 | 48.4% | 51.6% | R+3.2 |
| Precinct -703703 | 148 | 111 | 0 | 259 | 57.1% | 42.9% | D+14.3 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −25.8% |
| 1896 | +7.7% |
| 1900 | −10.2% |
| 1904 | −43.9% |
| 1908 | −18.9% |
| 1912 | +8.1% |
| 1916 | −9.8% |
| 1920 | −30.0% |
| 1924 | −37.1% |
| 1928 | −51.8% |
| 1932 | +2.2% |
| 1936 | +23.2% |
| 1940 | +2.9% |
| 1944 | −10.2% |
| 1948 | −13.9% |
| 1952 | −28.1% |
| 1956 | −12.3% |
| 1960 | −5.2% |
| 1964 | +34.6% |
| 1968 | −6.3% |
| 1972 | −1.6% |
| 1976 | +9.4% |
| 1980 | −2.0% |
| 1984 | +2.0% |
| 1988 | +18.6% |
| 1992 | +21.3% |
| 1996 | +15.2% |
| 2000 | +11.2% |
| 2004 | +17.6% |
| 2008 | +27.4% |
| 2012 | +23.4% |
| 2016 | +18.6% |
| 2020 | +24.3% |
| 2024 | +22.9% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | D | 60.8%110,577 | 36.1%65,606 | 181,785 |
| 2020 | D | 61.3%133,033 | 34.8%75,550 | 216,922 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Democratic; the presidential vote runs 8.2 points more Republican.
281,184 registered voters · 2024 · up from 276,984 in 2022
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+522 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +26,720 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $59,607 in average income, against $84,029 for residents who stayed — 29% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+11.6 on average — 11 points more Republican-leaning than Lane County, OR itself (D+22.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Multnomah County, OR452D+61.6
- Linn County, OR378R+24.3
- Douglas County, OR320R+37.5
- Benton County, OR316D+39.3
- Washington County, OR258D+33.7
- Marion County, OR251R+2.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Multnomah County, OR689
- Linn County, OR443
- Washington County, OR350
- Deschutes County, OR340
- Douglas County, OR330
- Benton County, OR268
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +674 |
| 2012 | +536 |
| 2013 | +77 |
| 2014 | +1,718 |
| 2015 | +3,301 |
| 2016 | +5,851 |
| 2017 | +6,018 |
| 2018 | +3,323 |
| 2019 | +3,487 |
| 2021 | +2,758 |
| 2022 | +1,459 |
| 2023 | −3,469 |
| 2024 | +465 |
| 2025 | +522 |
Lane County's presidential margins have held well to the left of the national average, driven by the University of Oregon city of Eugene, though its vast forested eastern reaches consistently temper that advantage with a more conservative rural vote.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 34.6 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 51.8 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 22.9 points.
A population of 384,207, a 78% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $71,544 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Humboldt County and Multnomah County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Lane County, Oregon. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/41039/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.