- Lead
- 58,467
- Total
- 263,316
- vs nation
- R+20.7
- Turnout
- 66.5%
Greenville County, SC
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 66.5% of 399,038 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 46,991
- Total
- 258,155
- vs nation
- R+22.7
- Turnout
- 69.1%
- Lead
- 53,349
- Total
- 215,165
- vs nation
- R+26.9
- Turnout
- 62.9%
- Lead
- 53,615
- Total
- 193,189
- vs nation
- R+31.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 45,477
- Total
- 190,657
- vs nation
- R+31.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 56,134
- Total
- 168,833
- vs nation
- R+30.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 48,904
- Total
- 140,293
- vs nation
- R+35.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 29,605
- Total
- 120,420
- vs nation
- R+33.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+22.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 548,1662024 5-year
- Population density
- 698 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 786 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $76,9322024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 65.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 15.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 11.6%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+98.9 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+62.2 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Tulsa County, OK · twin score 89.5
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 66.5%265,507 participants ÷ 399,038 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +22.4 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- +0.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 44.1%–48.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 265,507 | 399,038 ± 2,023 | 66.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 179,296 | 384,532 ± 1,811 | 46.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 258,260 | 374,007 ± 1,626 | 69.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 179,624 | 359,182 ± 1,269 | 50.0% | Audited | A/A |
| 218,227 | 347,081 ± 1,228 | 62.9% | Audited | A/A | |
| 193,189 | 320,807 | 60.2% | Derived | — | |
| 190,657 | 303,124 | 62.9% | Derived | — | |
| 168,833 | 285,441 extrapolated | 59.1% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Greenville County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Greenville County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 151 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
151 precincts · 263,316 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Walnut SpringsWalnut Springs | 1,544 | 3,081 | 83 | 4,708 | 32.8% | 65.4% | R+32.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Greenville 24Greenville 24 | 1,866 | 1,827 | 69 | 3,762 | 49.6% | 48.6% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -Moore CreekMoore Creek | 1,625 | 2,006 | 48 | 3,679 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -Mauldin 2Mauldin 2 | 1,428 | 1,748 | 50 | 3,226 | 44.3% | 54.2% | R+9.9 |
| Precinct -Sandy FlatSandy Flat | 701 | 2,486 | 37 | 3,224 | 21.7% | 77.1% | R+55.4 |
| Precinct -OnealOneal | 665 | 2,425 | 31 | 3,121 | 21.3% | 77.7% | R+56.4 |
| Precinct -Ranch CreekRanch Creek | 1,501 | 1,351 | 55 | 2,907 | 51.6% | 46.5% | D+5.2 |
| Precinct -SycamoreSycamore | 853 | 1,996 | 45 | 2,894 | 29.5% | 69.0% | R+39.5 |
| Precinct -Neely FarmsNeely Farms | 1,077 | 1,687 | 69 | 2,833 | 38.0% | 59.5% | R+21.5 |
| Precinct -RaintreeRaintree | 1,025 | 1,655 | 55 | 2,735 | 37.5% | 60.5% | R+23.0 |
| Precinct -Fountain Inn 1Fountain Inn 1 | 1,154 | 1,538 | 39 | 2,731 | 42.3% | 56.3% | R+14.1 |
| Precinct -Suber MillSuber Mill | 1,006 | 1,657 | 55 | 2,718 | 37.0% | 61.0% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -Greenville 8Greenville 8 | 1,641 | 1,016 | 58 | 2,715 | 60.4% | 37.4% | D+23.0 |
| Precinct -Reedy ForkReedy Fork | 1,147 | 1,515 | 31 | 2,693 | 42.6% | 56.3% | R+13.7 |
| Precinct -Asheton LakesAsheton Lakes | 857 | 1,741 | 42 | 2,640 | 32.5% | 65.9% | R+33.5 |
| Precinct -Granite CreekGranite Creek | 936 | 1,632 | 53 | 2,621 | 35.7% | 62.3% | R+26.6 |
| Precinct -TigervilleTigerville | 519 | 2,053 | 28 | 2,600 | 20.0% | 79.0% | R+59.0 |
| Precinct -OakviewOakview | 845 | 1,620 | 43 | 2,508 | 33.7% | 64.6% | R+30.9 |
| Precinct -Circle CreekCircle Creek | 841 | 1,579 | 39 | 2,459 | 34.2% | 64.2% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -Castle RockCastle Rock | 564 | 1,855 | 20 | 2,439 | 23.1% | 76.1% | R+52.9 |
| Precinct -SkylandSkyland | 272 | 2,113 | 27 | 2,412 | 11.3% | 87.6% | R+76.3 |
| Precinct -EnoreeEnoree | 989 | 1,350 | 51 | 2,390 | 41.4% | 56.5% | R+15.1 |
| Precinct -Slater MariettaSlater Marietta | 397 | 1,877 | 40 | 2,314 | 17.2% | 81.1% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -Darby RidgeDarby Ridge | 519 | 1,736 | 28 | 2,283 | 22.7% | 76.0% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -Simpsonville 5Simpsonville 5 | 1,160 | 1,095 | 27 | 2,282 | 50.8% | 48.0% | D+2.8 |
| Precinct -ThornbladeThornblade | 805 | 1,435 | 42 | 2,282 | 35.3% | 62.9% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -PoinsettPoinsett | 911 | 1,335 | 35 | 2,281 | 39.9% | 58.5% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -Bells CrossingBells Crossing | 779 | 1,458 | 36 | 2,273 | 34.3% | 64.1% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -FurmanFurman | 886 | 1,336 | 37 | 2,259 | 39.2% | 59.1% | R+19.9 |
| Precinct -Tubbs MountainTubbs Mountain | 516 | 1,681 | 25 | 2,222 | 23.2% | 75.7% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -Travelers Rest 1Travelers Rest 1 | 822 | 1,337 | 52 | 2,211 | 37.2% | 60.5% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -Mauldin 4Mauldin 4 | 857 | 1,313 | 32 | 2,202 | 38.9% | 59.6% | R+20.7 |
| Precinct -CanebrakeCanebrake | 770 | 1,362 | 61 | 2,193 | 35.1% | 62.1% | R+27.0 |
| Precinct -WoodmontWoodmont | 1,048 | 1,107 | 36 | 2,191 | 47.8% | 50.5% | R+2.7 |
| Precinct -Greenville 5Greenville 5 | 1,307 | 832 | 46 | 2,185 | 59.8% | 38.1% | D+21.7 |
| Precinct -Simpsonville 3Simpsonville 3 | 740 | 1,398 | 32 | 2,170 | 34.1% | 64.4% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -Sparrows PointSparrows Point | 813 | 1,302 | 39 | 2,154 | 37.7% | 60.4% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -Kilgore FarmsKilgore Farms | 809 | 1,311 | 33 | 2,153 | 37.6% | 60.9% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -Sulphur SpringsSulphur Springs | 728 | 1,389 | 36 | 2,153 | 33.8% | 64.5% | R+30.7 |
| Precinct -PiedmontPiedmont | 773 | 1,346 | 33 | 2,152 | 35.9% | 62.5% | R+26.6 |
| Precinct -Mauldin 5Mauldin 5 | 1,000 | 1,034 | 40 | 2,074 | 48.2% | 49.9% | R+1.6 |
| Precinct -Simpsonville 6Simpsonville 6 | 799 | 1,237 | 31 | 2,067 | 38.7% | 59.8% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -Laurel RidgeLaurel Ridge | 584 | 1,434 | 40 | 2,058 | 28.4% | 69.7% | R+41.3 |
| Precinct -MissionMission | 786 | 1,196 | 34 | 2,016 | 39.0% | 59.3% | R+20.3 |
| Precinct -Greenville 3Greenville 3 | 1,075 | 880 | 54 | 2,009 | 53.5% | 43.8% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -SevierSevier | 653 | 1,303 | 35 | 1,991 | 32.8% | 65.4% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -River WalkRiver Walk | 671 | 1,279 | 35 | 1,985 | 33.8% | 64.4% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -HillcrestHillcrest | 693 | 1,257 | 27 | 1,977 | 35.1% | 63.6% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -RiversideRiverside | 781 | 1,135 | 50 | 1,966 | 39.7% | 57.7% | R+18.0 |
| Precinct -Woodruff LakesWoodruff Lakes | 660 | 1,250 | 36 | 1,946 | 33.9% | 64.2% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -Mountain ViewMountain View | 247 | 1,669 | 22 | 1,938 | 12.7% | 86.1% | R+73.4 |
| Precinct -Long CreekLong Creek | 672 | 1,224 | 38 | 1,934 | 34.7% | 63.3% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -DunklinDunklin | 264 | 1,629 | 20 | 1,913 | 13.8% | 85.2% | R+71.4 |
| Precinct -TimberlakeTimberlake | 784 | 1,069 | 43 | 1,896 | 41.4% | 56.4% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -EbenezerEbenezer | 417 | 1,438 | 38 | 1,893 | 22.0% | 76.0% | R+53.9 |
| Precinct -EastsideEastside | 627 | 1,198 | 41 | 1,866 | 33.6% | 64.2% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -SilverleafSilverleaf | 628 | 1,205 | 28 | 1,861 | 33.7% | 64.8% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -Greenville 10Greenville 10 | 1,066 | 746 | 47 | 1,859 | 57.3% | 40.1% | D+17.2 |
| Precinct -Greenville 22Greenville 22 | 656 | 1,159 | 41 | 1,856 | 35.3% | 62.4% | R+27.1 |
| Precinct -Sugar CreekSugar Creek | 543 | 1,259 | 53 | 1,855 | 29.3% | 67.9% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -Pebble CreekPebble Creek | 541 | 1,267 | 33 | 1,841 | 29.4% | 68.8% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -VerdmontVerdmont | 610 | 1,190 | 29 | 1,829 | 33.4% | 65.1% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -Simpsonville 1Simpsonville 1 | 695 | 1,111 | 21 | 1,827 | 38.0% | 60.8% | R+22.8 |
| Precinct -Mountain CreekMountain Creek | 484 | 1,311 | 29 | 1,824 | 26.5% | 71.9% | R+45.3 |
| Precinct -GreenbriarGreenbriar | 817 | 972 | 24 | 1,813 | 45.1% | 53.6% | R+8.5 |
| Precinct -ConesteeConestee | 862 | 915 | 26 | 1,803 | 47.8% | 50.7% | R+2.9 |
| Precinct -Mauldin 1Mauldin 1 | 865 | 878 | 27 | 1,770 | 48.9% | 49.6% | R+0.7 |
| Precinct -GowensvilleGowensville | 357 | 1,386 | 13 | 1,756 | 20.3% | 78.9% | R+58.6 |
| Precinct -Simpsonville 2Simpsonville 2 | 727 | 1,004 | 25 | 1,756 | 41.4% | 57.2% | R+15.8 |
| Precinct -Greenville 23Greenville 23 | 590 | 1,118 | 22 | 1,730 | 34.1% | 64.6% | R+30.5 |
| Precinct -Fox ChaseFox Chase | 390 | 1,323 | 16 | 1,729 | 22.6% | 76.5% | R+54.0 |
| Precinct -MaridellMaridell | 323 | 1,361 | 31 | 1,715 | 18.8% | 79.4% | R+60.5 |
| Precinct -Ware PlaceWare Place | 345 | 1,300 | 48 | 1,693 | 20.4% | 76.8% | R+56.4 |
| Precinct -Mauldin 6Mauldin 6 | 757 | 883 | 23 | 1,663 | 45.5% | 53.1% | R+7.6 |
| Precinct -Mauldin 3Mauldin 3 | 887 | 727 | 28 | 1,642 | 54.0% | 44.3% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -Edwards ForestEdwards Forest | 509 | 1,087 | 20 | 1,616 | 31.5% | 67.3% | R+35.8 |
| Precinct -StonehavenStonehaven | 543 | 1,044 | 25 | 1,612 | 33.7% | 64.8% | R+31.1 |
| Precinct -Jennings MillJennings Mill | 469 | 1,119 | 22 | 1,610 | 29.1% | 69.5% | R+40.4 |
| Precinct -Greenville 16Greenville 16 | 752 | 823 | 28 | 1,603 | 46.9% | 51.3% | R+4.4 |
| Precinct -TradeTrade | 652 | 918 | 31 | 1,601 | 40.7% | 57.3% | R+16.6 |
| Precinct -Maple CreekMaple Creek | 527 | 1,041 | 24 | 1,592 | 33.1% | 65.4% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct -SouthsideSouthside | 770 | 797 | 25 | 1,592 | 48.4% | 50.1% | R+1.7 |
| Precinct -Fork ShoalsFork Shoals | 264 | 1,303 | 20 | 1,587 | 16.6% | 82.1% | R+65.5 |
| Precinct -Rock HillRock Hill | 667 | 883 | 32 | 1,582 | 42.2% | 55.8% | R+13.7 |
| Precinct -Greenville 4Greenville 4 | 1,039 | 496 | 39 | 1,574 | 66.0% | 31.5% | D+34.5 |
| Precinct -Boiling SpringsBoiling Springs | 574 | 966 | 32 | 1,572 | 36.5% | 61.5% | R+24.9 |
| Precinct -Rolling GreenRolling Green | 482 | 1,011 | 38 | 1,531 | 31.5% | 66.0% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -Del NorteDel Norte | 621 | 871 | 28 | 1,520 | 40.9% | 57.3% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -LakeviewLakeview | 700 | 765 | 45 | 1,510 | 46.4% | 50.7% | R+4.3 |
| Precinct -Graze BranchGraze Branch | 465 | 1,014 | 28 | 1,507 | 30.9% | 67.3% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -LeawoodLeawood | 578 | 878 | 28 | 1,484 | 38.9% | 59.2% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -DevengerDevenger | 468 | 972 | 35 | 1,475 | 31.7% | 65.9% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -DonaldsonDonaldson | 875 | 565 | 18 | 1,458 | 60.0% | 38.8% | D+21.3 |
| Precinct -Mauldin 7Mauldin 7 | 583 | 833 | 38 | 1,454 | 40.1% | 57.3% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -NorthwoodNorthwood | 495 | 917 | 31 | 1,443 | 34.3% | 63.5% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -Spring ForestSpring Forest | 645 | 757 | 32 | 1,434 | 45.0% | 52.8% | R+7.8 |
| Precinct -Greenville 1Greenville 1 | 660 | 726 | 41 | 1,427 | 46.3% | 50.9% | R+4.6 |
| Precinct -Greenville 7Greenville 7 | 986 | 406 | 34 | 1,426 | 69.1% | 28.5% | D+40.7 |
| Precinct -Stone ValleyStone Valley | 476 | 908 | 35 | 1,419 | 33.5% | 64.0% | R+30.4 |
| Precinct -Greenville 29Greenville 29 | 962 | 412 | 33 | 1,407 | 68.4% | 29.3% | D+39.1 |
| Precinct -Wade HamptonWade Hampton | 440 | 932 | 33 | 1,405 | 31.3% | 66.3% | R+35.0 |
| Precinct -Dove TreeDove Tree | 519 | 840 | 29 | 1,388 | 37.4% | 60.5% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -Greenville 17Greenville 17 | 613 | 744 | 31 | 1,388 | 44.2% | 53.6% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct -TanglewoodTanglewood | 673 | 671 | 31 | 1,375 | 48.9% | 48.8% | D+0.1 |
| Precinct -Standing SpringsStanding Springs | 528 | 817 | 27 | 1,372 | 38.5% | 59.5% | R+21.1 |
| Precinct -Clear CreekClear Creek | 269 | 1,083 | 16 | 1,368 | 19.7% | 79.2% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -Travelers Rest 2Travelers Rest 2 | 407 | 922 | 26 | 1,355 | 30.0% | 68.0% | R+38.0 |
| Precinct -TaylorsTaylors | 537 | 777 | 33 | 1,347 | 39.9% | 57.7% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -Rocky CreekRocky Creek | 545 | 756 | 21 | 1,322 | 41.2% | 57.2% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -Bridge ForkBridge Fork | 413 | 885 | 20 | 1,318 | 31.3% | 67.1% | R+35.8 |
| Precinct -Greenville 19Greenville 19 | 934 | 350 | 30 | 1,314 | 71.1% | 26.6% | D+44.4 |
| Precinct -Fountain Inn 2Fountain Inn 2 | 466 | 800 | 16 | 1,282 | 36.3% | 62.4% | R+26.1 |
| Precinct -FrohawkFrohawk | 299 | 953 | 23 | 1,275 | 23.5% | 74.7% | R+51.3 |
| Precinct -Simpsonville 4Simpsonville 4 | 584 | 672 | 18 | 1,274 | 45.8% | 52.7% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -Locust HillLocust Hill | 251 | 992 | 18 | 1,261 | 19.9% | 78.7% | R+58.8 |
| Precinct -WestsideWestside | 492 | 746 | 16 | 1,254 | 39.2% | 59.5% | R+20.3 |
| Precinct -PalmettoPalmetto | 477 | 734 | 37 | 1,248 | 38.2% | 58.8% | R+20.6 |
| Precinct -AvonAvon | 391 | 823 | 30 | 1,244 | 31.4% | 66.2% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -Greenville 18Greenville 18 | 473 | 755 | 14 | 1,242 | 38.1% | 60.8% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -Greenville 26Greenville 26 | 789 | 400 | 32 | 1,221 | 64.6% | 32.8% | D+31.9 |
| Precinct -WelcomeWelcome | 648 | 535 | 18 | 1,201 | 54.0% | 44.5% | D+9.4 |
| Precinct -Botany WoodsBotany Woods | 389 | 765 | 29 | 1,183 | 32.9% | 64.7% | R+31.8 |
| Precinct -PineviewPineview | 251 | 920 | 11 | 1,182 | 21.2% | 77.8% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -WellingtonWellington | 415 | 742 | 25 | 1,182 | 35.1% | 62.8% | R+27.7 |
| Precinct -Altamont ForestAltamont Forest | 328 | 785 | 31 | 1,144 | 28.7% | 68.6% | R+39.9 |
| Precinct -Paris MountainParis Mountain | 358 | 748 | 29 | 1,135 | 31.5% | 65.9% | R+34.4 |
| Precinct -GroveGrove | 530 | 552 | 15 | 1,097 | 48.3% | 50.3% | R+2.0 |
| Precinct -MonaviewMonaview | 481 | 584 | 21 | 1,086 | 44.3% | 53.8% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -Mt PleasantMt Pleasant | 749 | 305 | 22 | 1,076 | 69.6% | 28.3% | D+41.3 |
| Precinct -Holly TreeHolly Tree | 360 | 697 | 16 | 1,073 | 33.6% | 65.0% | R+31.4 |
| Precinct -Chestnut HillsChestnut Hills | 545 | 497 | 25 | 1,067 | 51.1% | 46.6% | D+4.5 |
| Precinct -SaludaSaluda | 410 | 644 | 11 | 1,065 | 38.5% | 60.5% | R+22.0 |
| Precinct -WestcliffeWestcliffe | 368 | 675 | 20 | 1,063 | 34.6% | 63.5% | R+28.9 |
| Precinct -Baker CreekBaker Creek | 241 | 793 | 12 | 1,046 | 23.0% | 75.8% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -Tyger RiverTyger River | 394 | 595 | 25 | 1,014 | 38.9% | 58.7% | R+19.8 |
| Precinct -Greenville 20Greenville 20 | 424 | 556 | 10 | 990 | 42.8% | 56.2% | R+13.3 |
| Precinct -Greenville 14Greenville 14 | 793 | 168 | 22 | 983 | 80.7% | 17.1% | D+63.6 |
| Precinct -Greenville 21Greenville 21 | 473 | 470 | 24 | 967 | 48.9% | 48.6% | D+0.3 |
| Precinct -FeasterFeaster | 427 | 510 | 21 | 958 | 44.6% | 53.2% | R+8.7 |
| Precinct -Belle MeadeBelle Meade | 794 | 105 | 17 | 916 | 86.7% | 11.5% | D+75.2 |
| Precinct -Greenville 25Greenville 25 | 471 | 424 | 16 | 911 | 51.7% | 46.5% | D+5.2 |
| Precinct -Pelham FallsPelham Falls | 303 | 552 | 26 | 881 | 34.4% | 62.7% | R+28.3 |
| Precinct -BereaBerea | 383 | 461 | 20 | 864 | 44.3% | 53.4% | R+9.0 |
| Precinct -Royal OaksRoyal Oaks | 651 | 198 | 14 | 863 | 75.4% | 22.9% | D+52.5 |
| Precinct -Brook GlennBrook Glenn | 280 | 525 | 9 | 814 | 34.4% | 64.5% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -Greenville 27Greenville 27 | 236 | 511 | 31 | 778 | 30.3% | 65.7% | R+35.3 |
| Precinct -CarolinaCarolina | 541 | 186 | 17 | 744 | 72.7% | 25.0% | D+47.7 |
| Precinct -Greenville 28Greenville 28 | 350 | 299 | 23 | 672 | 52.1% | 44.5% | D+7.6 |
| Precinct -AikenAiken | 361 | 259 | 11 | 631 | 57.2% | 41.0% | D+16.2 |
| Precinct -BelmontBelmont | 345 | 205 | 10 | 560 | 61.6% | 36.6% | D+25.0 |
| Precinct -Greenville 6Greenville 6 | 361 | 183 | 11 | 555 | 65.0% | 33.0% | D+32.1 |
presidential history
Party record book
Greenville County, SC · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
98.9%
8,310 votes · D+98.9
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 98.4%
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
79.6%
46,360 votes · R+62.2
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 73.1%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
103,030votes
39.9% of the vote · R+18.2
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 100,074 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
158,541votes
60.2% of the vote · R+22.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 150,021 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+121.0pts D vs U.S.
Place D+95.8 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · James M. Cox, 1920 · +119.9 pts
Republican
Barry Goldwater1964
+48.5pts R vs U.S.
Place R+25.9 · U.S. D+22.6
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1972 · +39.0 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Greenville County, SC. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 5 state senate and 5 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 316,917 |
| 2018 | 353,629 |
| 2020 | 385,804 |
| 2022 | 375,025 |
| 2024 | 387,602 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+5,622 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +75,293 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $74,298 in average income, against $94,516 for residents who stayed — 21% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+11.9 on average — 10 points more Democratic-leaning than Greenville County, SC itself (R+22.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Spartanburg County, SC1,919R+33.6
- Anderson County, SC1,153R+47.4
- Pickens County, SC931R+52.7
- Laurens County, SC502R+40.8
- Charleston County, SC347D+5.7
- Richland County, SC328D+34.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Spartanburg County, SC2,809
- Anderson County, SC1,362
- Pickens County, SC1,112
- Laurens County, SC706
- Mecklenburg County, NC341
- Charleston County, SC296
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +3,172 |
| 2012 | +3,990 |
| 2013 | +4,011 |
| 2014 | +5,034 |
| 2015 | +5,759 |
| 2016 | +4,876 |
| 2017 | +4,339 |
| 2018 | +4,297 |
| 2019 | +5,618 |
| 2021 | +6,009 |
| 2022 | +9,916 |
| 2023 | +6,838 |
| 2024 | +5,812 |
| 2025 | +5,622 |
Greenville County anchors South Carolina's Upstate manufacturing and tech corridor, and despite absorbing tens of thousands of new residents over the past decade, its presidential margins have held steady in the low-to-mid twenties for Republicans.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 98.9 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 62.2 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 22.2 points.
A population of 548,166, a 65% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $76,932 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Tulsa County and Escambia County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Greenville County, South Carolina. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/45045/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.