- Lead
- 16,563
- Total
- 34,939
- vs nation
- R+45.9
- Turnout
- 56.0%
Putnam County, TN
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 56.0% of 62,988 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 14,574
- Total
- 33,593
- vs nation
- R+47.8
- Turnout
- 56.0%
- Lead
- 12,151
- Total
- 27,212
- vs nation
- R+46.7
- Turnout
- 49.4%
- Lead
- 9,452
- Total
- 25,500
- vs nation
- R+40.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 7,362
- Total
- 27,316
- vs nation
- R+34.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,071
- Total
- 26,442
- vs nation
- R+16.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 463
- Total
- 22,438
- vs nation
- R+2.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 954
- Total
- 20,888
- vs nation
- R+4.0
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+47.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 82,5582024 5-year
- Population density
- 206 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 401 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $58,9122024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 85.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 2.4%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 8.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+38.7 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+47.4 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Coffee County, TN · twin score 85.7
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 56.0%35,245 participants ÷ 62,988 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +23.9 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- -2.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 32.1%–40.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35,245 | 62,988 ± 574 | 56.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 19,863 | 61,818 ± 535 | 32.1% | Audited | A/A |
| 33,800 | 60,345 ± 468 | 56.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 24,596 | 57,691 ± 522 | 42.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 27,500 | 55,637 ± 513 | 49.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 25,500 | 54,310 | 47.0% | Derived | — | |
| 27,316 | 51,916 | 52.6% | Derived | — | |
| 26,442 | 49,522 extrapolated | 53.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 18 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
18 precincts · 34,939 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -09B Double Springs09B Double Springs | 660 | 2,709 | 41 | 3,410 | 19.4% | 79.4% | R+60.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -12A Algood12A Algood | 788 | 2,519 | 28 | 3,335 | 23.6% | 75.5% | R+51.9 |
| Precinct -01A Capshaw01A Capshaw | 1,059 | 1,966 | 45 | 3,070 | 34.5% | 64.0% | R+29.5 |
| Precinct -02A Northeast02A Northeast | 998 | 1,708 | 34 | 2,740 | 36.4% | 62.3% | R+25.9 |
| Precinct -06A Cane Creek06A Cane Creek | 739 | 1,733 | 22 | 2,494 | 29.6% | 69.5% | R+39.9 |
| Precinct -08G Upperman08G Upperman | 432 | 2,027 | 26 | 2,485 | 17.4% | 81.6% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -07A Burgess Falls07A Burgess Falls | 624 | 1,743 | 26 | 2,393 | 26.1% | 72.8% | R+46.8 |
| Precinct -10A Pavilion10A Pavilion | 710 | 1,572 | 34 | 2,316 | 30.7% | 67.9% | R+37.2 |
| Precinct -05C Prescott South05C Prescott South | 459 | 1,674 | 26 | 2,159 | 21.3% | 77.5% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -11A Bangham11A Bangham | 367 | 1,499 | 20 | 1,886 | 19.5% | 79.5% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -04A Burks Middle School04A Burks Middle School | 323 | 1,406 | 15 | 1,744 | 18.5% | 80.6% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -11B Cookeville High School11B Cookeville High School | 416 | 988 | 18 | 1,422 | 29.3% | 69.5% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -05A Cookeville Comm Cntr05A Cookeville Comm Cntr | 351 | 1,020 | 17 | 1,388 | 25.3% | 73.5% | R+48.2 |
| Precinct -07D Twin Oak07D Twin Oak | 197 | 966 | 10 | 1,173 | 16.8% | 82.4% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -03A University03A University | 493 | 592 | 13 | 1,098 | 44.9% | 53.9% | R+9.0 |
| Precinct -04B Monterey City04B Monterey City | 158 | 552 | 7 | 717 | 22.0% | 77.0% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -08E Buffalo Valley08E Buffalo Valley | 107 | 463 | 5 | 575 | 18.6% | 80.5% | R+61.9 |
| Precinct -04C Poplar Grove04C Poplar Grove | 110 | 417 | 7 | 534 | 20.6% | 78.1% | R+57.5 |
presidential history
Party record book
Putnam County, TN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
69.1%
2,911 votes · D+38.7
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 68.3%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
73.1%
25,554 votes · R+47.4
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 70.7%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Bill Clinton1992
10,858votes
50.5% of the vote · D+13.3
Runner-up · Al Gore, 2000 · 10,785 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
25,554votes
73.1% of the vote · R+47.4
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 23,759 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+49.7pts D vs U.S.
Place D+24.5 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · James M. Cox, 1920 · +43.0 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+47.8pts R vs U.S.
Place R+43.4 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +46.7 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Putnam County, TN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 25.3%8,212 | 74.7%24,290 | 32,502 |
| 2020 | R | 26.1%7,943 | 73.9%22,513 | 30,456 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 42,874 |
| 2018 | 42,763 |
| 2020 | 47,984 |
| 2022 | 49,329 |
| 2024 | 52,250 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,473 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +10,765 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $60,175 in average income, against $79,509 for residents who stayed — 24% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+48.1 on average — about the same lean as Putnam County, TN (R+47.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- White County, TN213R+66.6
- Overton County, TN198R+64.2
- Jackson County, TN137R+62.5
- Cumberland County, TN132R+58.9
- Davidson County, TN116D+27.4
- Rutherford County, TN73R+21.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Overton County, TN256
- White County, TN244
- Jackson County, TN145
- Davidson County, TN136
- Cumberland County, TN134
- Wilson County, TN81
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +76 |
| 2012 | +183 |
| 2013 | +133 |
| 2014 | +421 |
| 2015 | −97 |
| 2016 | +714 |
| 2017 | +1,041 |
| 2018 | +1,079 |
| 2019 | +1,305 |
| 2021 | +1,402 |
| 2022 | +1,208 |
| 2023 | +1,148 |
| 2024 | +679 |
| 2025 | +1,473 |
Centered on Cookeville, Putnam County combines a regional university population with a predominantly rural, white working-class electorate that has delivered Republican presidential margins above 40 points in each of the last three cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 38.7 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 47.4 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 47.4 points.
A population of 82,558, a 85% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $58,912 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Coffee County and Weakley County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Putnam County, Tennessee. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/47141/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.