Shelby County, Tennessee
Precinct data
Results by precinct
142 precincts · 326,497 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -01100110 | 2,638 | 1,748 | 62 | 4,448 | 59.3% | 39.3% | D+20.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -13071307 | 3,466 | 758 | 72 | 4,296 | 80.7% | 17.6% | D+63.0 |
| Precinct -13031303 | 2,147 | 2,032 | 93 | 4,272 | 50.3% | 47.6% | D+2.7 |
| Precinct -02050205 | 1,174 | 2,862 | 59 | 4,095 | 28.7% | 69.9% | R+41.2 |
| Precinct -01060106 | 1,319 | 2,691 | 50 | 4,060 | 32.5% | 66.3% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -04010401 | 1,797 | 2,187 | 63 | 4,047 | 44.4% | 54.0% | R+9.6 |
| Precinct -04120412 | 1,490 | 2,416 | 89 | 3,995 | 37.3% | 60.5% | R+23.2 |
| Precinct -03110311 | 1,429 | 2,472 | 65 | 3,966 | 36.0% | 62.3% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -05030503 | 2,545 | 1,240 | 53 | 3,838 | 66.3% | 32.3% | D+34.0 |
| Precinct -04100410 | 1,379 | 2,359 | 78 | 3,816 | 36.1% | 61.8% | R+25.7 |
| Precinct -01070107 | 1,154 | 2,583 | 37 | 3,774 | 30.6% | 68.4% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct -03010301 | 2,050 | 1,660 | 58 | 3,768 | 54.4% | 44.1% | D+10.4 |
| Precinct -13111311 | 2,138 | 1,541 | 84 | 3,763 | 56.8% | 41.0% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -05090509 | 2,336 | 1,344 | 74 | 3,754 | 62.2% | 35.8% | D+26.4 |
| Precinct -02040204 | 1,050 | 2,593 | 70 | 3,713 | 28.3% | 69.8% | R+41.6 |
| Precinct -02010201 | 1,220 | 2,412 | 68 | 3,700 | 33.0% | 65.2% | R+32.2 |
| Precinct -03100310 | 1,117 | 2,479 | 52 | 3,648 | 30.6% | 68.0% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -04050405 | 1,487 | 2,091 | 65 | 3,643 | 40.8% | 57.4% | R+16.6 |
| Precinct -01050105 | 1,642 | 1,925 | 58 | 3,625 | 45.3% | 53.1% | R+7.8 |
| Precinct -03020302 | 1,740 | 1,830 | 55 | 3,625 | 48.0% | 50.5% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -02070207 | 1,043 | 2,495 | 68 | 3,606 | 28.9% | 69.2% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct -03050305 | 1,229 | 2,298 | 50 | 3,577 | 34.4% | 64.2% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -03030303 | 1,090 | 2,375 | 57 | 3,522 | 30.9% | 67.4% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -04110411 | 1,147 | 2,289 | 78 | 3,514 | 32.6% | 65.1% | R+32.5 |
| Precinct -13081308 | 2,408 | 1,038 | 53 | 3,499 | 68.8% | 29.7% | D+39.2 |
| Precinct -04070407 | 1,679 | 1,706 | 62 | 3,447 | 48.7% | 49.5% | R+0.8 |
| Precinct -01030103 | 842 | 2,566 | 31 | 3,439 | 24.5% | 74.6% | R+50.1 |
| Precinct -03040304 | 1,394 | 1,936 | 53 | 3,383 | 41.2% | 57.2% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -05100510 | 1,976 | 1,219 | 95 | 3,290 | 60.1% | 37.1% | D+23.0 |
| Precinct -12081208 | 2,924 | 300 | 48 | 3,272 | 89.4% | 9.2% | D+80.2 |
| Precinct -02080208 | 857 | 2,343 | 44 | 3,244 | 26.4% | 72.2% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct -04090409 | 1,875 | 1,286 | 46 | 3,207 | 58.5% | 40.1% | D+18.4 |
| Precinct -13061306 | 1,573 | 1,520 | 65 | 3,158 | 49.8% | 48.1% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -05070507 | 1,923 | 1,148 | 51 | 3,122 | 61.6% | 36.8% | D+24.8 |
| Precinct -05050505 | 2,340 | 713 | 62 | 3,115 | 75.1% | 22.9% | D+52.2 |
| Precinct -02060206 | 936 | 2,010 | 54 | 3,000 | 31.2% | 67.0% | R+35.8 |
| Precinct -03060306 | 770 | 2,186 | 39 | 2,995 | 25.7% | 73.0% | R+47.3 |
| Precinct -03080308 | 894 | 2,026 | 61 | 2,981 | 30.0% | 68.0% | R+38.0 |
| Precinct -12071207 | 2,553 | 309 | 36 | 2,898 | 88.1% | 10.7% | D+77.4 |
| Precinct -12041204 | 2,506 | 302 | 38 | 2,846 | 88.1% | 10.6% | D+77.4 |
| Precinct -04080408 | 1,611 | 1,172 | 52 | 2,835 | 56.8% | 41.3% | D+15.5 |
| Precinct -02020202 | 1,526 | 1,251 | 57 | 2,834 | 53.8% | 44.1% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -09040904 | 2,618 | 149 | 64 | 2,831 | 92.5% | 5.3% | D+87.2 |
| Precinct -04060406 | 1,014 | 1,694 | 50 | 2,758 | 36.8% | 61.4% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -04030403 | 1,231 | 1,465 | 44 | 2,740 | 44.9% | 53.5% | R+8.5 |
| Precinct -02030203 | 820 | 1,833 | 52 | 2,705 | 30.3% | 67.8% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -02090209 | 593 | 2,047 | 25 | 2,665 | 22.3% | 76.8% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -09070907 | 2,433 | 171 | 52 | 2,656 | 91.6% | 6.4% | D+85.2 |
| Precinct -12061206 | 2,262 | 323 | 39 | 2,624 | 86.2% | 12.3% | D+73.9 |
| Precinct -06060606 | 2,151 | 427 | 42 | 2,620 | 82.1% | 16.3% | D+65.8 |
| Precinct -07080708 | 2,139 | 343 | 53 | 2,535 | 84.4% | 13.5% | D+70.8 |
| Precinct -10031003 | 2,244 | 234 | 49 | 2,527 | 88.8% | 9.3% | D+79.5 |
| Precinct -09050905 | 2,280 | 182 | 35 | 2,497 | 91.3% | 7.3% | D+84.0 |
| Precinct -11061106 | 2,222 | 236 | 39 | 2,497 | 89.0% | 9.5% | D+79.5 |
| Precinct -12051205 | 2,152 | 280 | 35 | 2,467 | 87.2% | 11.3% | D+75.9 |
| Precinct -09090909 | 2,229 | 179 | 43 | 2,451 | 90.9% | 7.3% | D+83.6 |
| Precinct -05060506 | 1,814 | 569 | 42 | 2,425 | 74.8% | 23.5% | D+51.3 |
| Precinct -06040604 | 1,933 | 440 | 51 | 2,424 | 79.7% | 18.2% | D+61.6 |
| Precinct -01010101 | 694 | 1,704 | 24 | 2,422 | 28.7% | 70.4% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -02100210 | 621 | 1,705 | 37 | 2,363 | 26.3% | 72.2% | R+45.9 |
| Precinct -07060706 | 2,087 | 199 | 47 | 2,333 | 89.5% | 8.5% | D+80.9 |
| Precinct -01020102 | 1,003 | 1,279 | 34 | 2,316 | 43.3% | 55.2% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -12101210 | 2,083 | 206 | 27 | 2,316 | 89.9% | 8.9% | D+81.0 |
| Precinct -02110211 | 845 | 1,431 | 27 | 2,303 | 36.7% | 62.1% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -05020502 | 1,417 | 837 | 40 | 2,294 | 61.8% | 36.5% | D+25.3 |
| Precinct -06010601 | 1,925 | 320 | 43 | 2,288 | 84.1% | 14.0% | D+70.1 |
| Precinct -09080908 | 2,115 | 125 | 43 | 2,283 | 92.6% | 5.5% | D+87.2 |
| Precinct -11051105 | 1,986 | 255 | 38 | 2,279 | 87.1% | 11.2% | D+76.0 |
| Precinct -04020402 | 950 | 1,293 | 32 | 2,275 | 41.8% | 56.8% | R+15.1 |
| Precinct -13091309 | 1,499 | 710 | 64 | 2,273 | 65.9% | 31.2% | D+34.7 |
| Precinct -12091209 | 1,658 | 571 | 38 | 2,267 | 73.1% | 25.2% | D+47.9 |
| Precinct -05040504 | 1,415 | 784 | 40 | 2,239 | 63.2% | 35.0% | D+28.2 |
| Precinct -07100710 | 1,827 | 361 | 42 | 2,230 | 81.9% | 16.2% | D+65.7 |
| Precinct -08050805 | 1,742 | 433 | 40 | 2,215 | 78.6% | 19.5% | D+59.1 |
| Precinct -08030803 | 1,567 | 591 | 33 | 2,191 | 71.5% | 27.0% | D+44.5 |
| Precinct -03090309 | 847 | 1,298 | 45 | 2,190 | 38.7% | 59.3% | R+20.6 |
| Precinct -13051305 | 1,160 | 988 | 33 | 2,181 | 53.2% | 45.3% | D+7.9 |
| Precinct -12021202 | 1,713 | 398 | 53 | 2,164 | 79.2% | 18.4% | D+60.8 |
| Precinct -07010701 | 1,894 | 199 | 32 | 2,125 | 89.1% | 9.4% | D+79.8 |
| Precinct -06050605 | 1,855 | 226 | 34 | 2,115 | 87.7% | 10.7% | D+77.0 |
| Precinct -11031103 | 1,745 | 295 | 42 | 2,082 | 83.8% | 14.2% | D+69.6 |
| Precinct -09060906 | 1,897 | 114 | 35 | 2,046 | 92.7% | 5.6% | D+87.1 |
| Precinct -10081008 | 1,805 | 200 | 35 | 2,040 | 88.5% | 9.8% | D+78.7 |
| Precinct -09030903 | 1,863 | 94 | 42 | 1,999 | 93.2% | 4.7% | D+88.5 |
| Precinct -12031203 | 1,151 | 783 | 57 | 1,991 | 57.8% | 39.3% | D+18.5 |
| Precinct -01110111 | 1,381 | 576 | 32 | 1,989 | 69.4% | 29.0% | D+40.5 |
| Precinct -09110911 | 1,810 | 147 | 26 | 1,983 | 91.3% | 7.4% | D+83.9 |
| Precinct -11071107 | 1,774 | 164 | 39 | 1,977 | 89.7% | 8.3% | D+81.4 |
| Precinct -09100910 | 1,726 | 96 | 49 | 1,871 | 92.3% | 5.1% | D+87.1 |
| Precinct -02130213 | 1,079 | 745 | 37 | 1,861 | 58.0% | 40.0% | D+17.9 |
| Precinct -10041004 | 1,729 | 93 | 35 | 1,857 | 93.1% | 5.0% | D+88.1 |
| Precinct -11081108 | 1,583 | 225 | 33 | 1,841 | 86.0% | 12.2% | D+73.8 |
| Precinct -12011201 | 1,449 | 353 | 32 | 1,834 | 79.0% | 19.2% | D+59.8 |
| Precinct -10091009 | 1,645 | 146 | 36 | 1,827 | 90.0% | 8.0% | D+82.0 |
| Precinct -06080608 | 1,407 | 328 | 38 | 1,773 | 79.4% | 18.5% | D+60.9 |
| Precinct -06090609 | 1,342 | 380 | 44 | 1,766 | 76.0% | 21.5% | D+54.5 |
| Precinct -03070307 | 579 | 1,150 | 24 | 1,753 | 33.0% | 65.6% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -11041104 | 1,540 | 170 | 34 | 1,744 | 88.3% | 9.7% | D+78.6 |
| Precinct -10061006 | 1,521 | 110 | 40 | 1,671 | 91.0% | 6.6% | D+84.4 |
| Precinct -10051005 | 1,228 | 413 | 26 | 1,667 | 73.7% | 24.8% | D+48.9 |
| Precinct -10071007 | 1,503 | 103 | 38 | 1,644 | 91.4% | 6.3% | D+85.2 |
| Precinct -07090709 | 1,329 | 253 | 61 | 1,643 | 80.9% | 15.4% | D+65.5 |
| Precinct -11021102 | 1,433 | 171 | 23 | 1,627 | 88.1% | 10.5% | D+77.6 |
| Precinct -04040404 | 839 | 710 | 26 | 1,575 | 53.3% | 45.1% | D+8.2 |
| Precinct -10021002 | 1,434 | 94 | 43 | 1,571 | 91.3% | 6.0% | D+85.3 |
| Precinct -06020602 | 1,009 | 524 | 28 | 1,561 | 64.6% | 33.6% | D+31.1 |
| Precinct -08080808 | 1,210 | 334 | 17 | 1,561 | 77.5% | 21.4% | D+56.1 |
| Precinct -11011101 | 1,380 | 154 | 26 | 1,560 | 88.5% | 9.9% | D+78.6 |
| Precinct -08090809 | 1,386 | 101 | 38 | 1,525 | 90.9% | 6.6% | D+84.3 |
| Precinct -07040704 | 1,312 | 180 | 24 | 1,516 | 86.5% | 11.9% | D+74.7 |
| Precinct -07030703 | 1,290 | 184 | 33 | 1,507 | 85.6% | 12.2% | D+73.4 |
| Precinct -08010801 | 1,300 | 167 | 31 | 1,498 | 86.8% | 11.1% | D+75.6 |
| Precinct -08100810 | 1,189 | 276 | 26 | 1,491 | 79.7% | 18.5% | D+61.2 |
| Precinct -13041304 | 1,058 | 357 | 26 | 1,441 | 73.4% | 24.8% | D+48.6 |
| Precinct -08110811 | 1,326 | 82 | 25 | 1,433 | 92.5% | 5.7% | D+86.8 |
| Precinct -07070707 | 844 | 528 | 34 | 1,406 | 60.0% | 37.6% | D+22.5 |
| Precinct -08040804 | 1,239 | 111 | 47 | 1,397 | 88.7% | 7.9% | D+80.7 |
| Precinct -05080508 | 1,037 | 304 | 25 | 1,366 | 75.9% | 22.3% | D+53.7 |
| Precinct -10101010 | 1,167 | 159 | 21 | 1,347 | 86.6% | 11.8% | D+74.8 |
| Precinct -02140214 | 829 | 460 | 32 | 1,321 | 62.8% | 34.8% | D+27.9 |
| Precinct -02120212 | 671 | 610 | 28 | 1,309 | 51.3% | 46.6% | D+4.7 |
| Precinct -06070607 | 846 | 413 | 25 | 1,284 | 65.9% | 32.2% | D+33.7 |
| Precinct -09020902 | 1,155 | 84 | 21 | 1,260 | 91.7% | 6.7% | D+85.0 |
| Precinct -07050705 | 1,151 | 71 | 28 | 1,250 | 92.1% | 5.7% | D+86.4 |
| Precinct -07020702 | 1,067 | 152 | 28 | 1,247 | 85.6% | 12.2% | D+73.4 |
| Precinct -08120812 | 1,091 | 68 | 29 | 1,188 | 91.8% | 5.7% | D+86.1 |
| Precinct -08070807 | 971 | 178 | 34 | 1,183 | 82.1% | 15.0% | D+67.0 |
| Precinct -01040104 | 665 | 488 | 14 | 1,167 | 57.0% | 41.8% | D+15.2 |
| Precinct -01090109 | 723 | 417 | 18 | 1,158 | 62.4% | 36.0% | D+26.4 |
| Precinct -01080108 | 559 | 547 | 30 | 1,136 | 49.2% | 48.2% | D+1.1 |
| Precinct -08060806 | 907 | 129 | 15 | 1,051 | 86.3% | 12.3% | D+74.0 |
| Precinct -13021302 | 505 | 493 | 30 | 1,028 | 49.1% | 48.0% | D+1.2 |
| Precinct -13011301 | 452 | 529 | 21 | 1,002 | 45.1% | 52.8% | R+7.7 |
| Precinct -06030603 | 825 | 113 | 18 | 956 | 86.3% | 11.8% | D+74.5 |
| Precinct -10011001 | 800 | 86 | 22 | 908 | 88.1% | 9.5% | D+78.6 |
| Precinct -08020802 | 493 | 163 | 14 | 670 | 73.6% | 24.3% | D+49.3 |
| Precinct -09010901 | 530 | 28 | 8 | 566 | 93.6% | 4.9% | D+88.7 |
| Precinct -05010501 | 224 | 184 | 8 | 416 | 53.8% | 44.2% | D+9.6 |
| Precinct -02150215 | 166 | 61 | 2 | 229 | 72.5% | 26.6% | D+45.9 |
| Precinct -05120512 | 89 | 28 | 1 | 118 | 75.4% | 23.7% | D+51.7 |
| Precinct -13121312 | 26 | 28 | 1 | 55 | 47.3% | 50.9% | R+3.6 |
| Precinct -13101310 | 23 | 17 | 0 | 40 | 57.5% | 42.5% | D+15.0 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +67.3% |
| 1896 | +6.3% |
| 1900 | +26.5% |
| 1904 | +53.3% |
| 1908 | +40.4% |
| 1912 | +58.5% |
| 1916 | +41.1% |
| 1920 | +29.7% |
| 1924 | +27.4% |
| 1928 | +20.2% |
| 1932 | +70.8% |
| 1936 | +93.2% |
| 1940 | +77.4% |
| 1944 | +63.5% |
| 1948 | +14.3% |
| 1952 | +4.8% |
| 1956 | −2.7% |
| 1960 | −0.5% |
| 1964 | +5.2% |
| 1968 | +3.5% |
| 1972 | −32.6% |
| 1976 | +6.9% |
| 1980 | +6.2% |
| 1984 | −1.1% |
| 1988 | −2.5% |
| 1992 | +10.4% |
| 1996 | +13.3% |
| 2000 | +14.4% |
| 2004 | +15.6% |
| 2008 | +27.4% |
| 2012 | +26.0% |
| 2016 | +27.5% |
| 2020 | +30.4% |
| 2024 | +25.4% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 567,545 |
| 2018 | 579,034 |
| 2020 | 590,726 |
| 2022 | 588,508 |
| 2024 | 604,353 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−11,670 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −107,799 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $59,547 in average income, against $84,751 for residents who stayed — 30% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+5.5 on average — 31 points more Republican-leaning than Shelby County, TN itself (D+25.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- DeSoto County, MS1,915R+24.1
- Tipton County, TN626R+52.8
- Fayette County, TN549R+42.4
- Davidson County, TN367D+27.4
- Crittenden County, AR270D+2.3
- Marshall County, MS204R+7.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- DeSoto County, MS2,544
- Fayette County, TN913
- Tipton County, TN713
- Davidson County, TN595
- Crittenden County, AR313
- Dallas County, TX313
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −2,952 |
| 2012 | −1,596 |
| 2013 | −8,194 |
| 2014 | −8,050 |
| 2015 | −7,623 |
| 2016 | −7,579 |
| 2017 | −7,208 |
| 2018 | −5,164 |
| 2019 | −5,190 |
| 2021 | −8,274 |
| 2022 | −9,716 |
| 2023 | −12,029 |
| 2024 | −12,554 |
| 2025 | −11,670 |
Home to Memphis, Shelby County delivers some of the widest Democratic margins in Tennessee, driven by a majority-Black electorate and a dense urban core that consistently offsets Republican gains statewide.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 93.2 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 32.6 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 25.4 points.
A population of 919,173, a 33% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $63,767 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Richland County and Muscogee County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Shelby County, Tennessee. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/47157/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.