Angelina County, Texas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
42 precincts · 34,476 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 24Precinct 24 | 361 | 1,325 | 12 | 1,698 | 21.3% | 78.0% | R+56.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 11Precinct 11 | 135 | 1,555 | 7 | 1,697 | 8.0% | 91.6% | R+83.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 25Precinct 25 | 280 | 1,338 | 11 | 1,629 | 17.2% | 82.1% | R+64.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 34Precinct 34 | 452 | 1,078 | 22 | 1,552 | 29.1% | 69.5% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 17Precinct 17 | 124 | 1,223 | 4 | 1,351 | 9.2% | 90.5% | R+81.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 26Precinct 26 | 152 | 1,133 | 9 | 1,294 | 11.7% | 87.6% | R+75.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 3Precinct 3 | 214 | 1,066 | 6 | 1,286 | 16.6% | 82.9% | R+66.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 14Precinct 14 | 393 | 873 | 17 | 1,283 | 30.6% | 68.0% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 35Precinct 35 | 332 | 934 | 9 | 1,275 | 26.0% | 73.3% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 2Precinct 2 | 817 | 348 | 9 | 1,174 | 69.6% | 29.6% | D+39.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 29Precinct 29 | 137 | 996 | 6 | 1,139 | 12.0% | 87.4% | R+75.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 20Precinct 20 | 825 | 302 | 11 | 1,138 | 72.5% | 26.5% | D+46.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 16Precinct 16 | 426 | 664 | 15 | 1,105 | 38.6% | 60.1% | R+21.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 7Precinct 7 | 116 | 966 | 7 | 1,089 | 10.7% | 88.7% | R+78.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 8Precinct 8 | 109 | 948 | 9 | 1,066 | 10.2% | 88.9% | R+78.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 19Precinct 19 | 341 | 693 | 22 | 1,056 | 32.3% | 65.6% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 33Precinct 33 | 73 | 973 | 8 | 1,054 | 6.9% | 92.3% | R+85.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 5Precinct 5 | 372 | 603 | 11 | 986 | 37.7% | 61.2% | R+23.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 28Precinct 28 | 140 | 773 | 5 | 918 | 15.3% | 84.2% | R+69.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 22Precinct 22 | 80 | 803 | 3 | 886 | 9.0% | 90.6% | R+81.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 4Precinct 4 | 333 | 488 | 11 | 832 | 40.0% | 58.7% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 30Precinct 30 | 54 | 759 | 7 | 820 | 6.6% | 92.6% | R+86.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 11BPrecinct 11B | 97 | 699 | 5 | 801 | 12.1% | 87.3% | R+75.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 21Precinct 21 | 180 | 519 | 9 | 708 | 25.4% | 73.3% | R+47.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 10APrecinct 10A | 299 | 366 | 8 | 673 | 44.4% | 54.4% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 12Precinct 12 | 103 | 498 | 0 | 601 | 17.1% | 82.9% | R+65.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 40Precinct 40 | 180 | 338 | 4 | 522 | 34.5% | 64.8% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 18Precinct 18 | 157 | 343 | 10 | 510 | 30.8% | 67.3% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 15Precinct 15 | 69 | 438 | 1 | 508 | 13.6% | 86.2% | R+72.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 23Precinct 23 | 81 | 414 | 2 | 497 | 16.3% | 83.3% | R+67.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 6Precinct 6 | 60 | 349 | 1 | 410 | 14.6% | 85.1% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 37Precinct 37 | 70 | 323 | 5 | 398 | 17.6% | 81.2% | R+63.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 13Precinct 13 | 151 | 215 | 3 | 369 | 40.9% | 58.3% | R+17.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 39Precinct 39 | 103 | 233 | 4 | 340 | 30.3% | 68.5% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 1Precinct 1 | 112 | 187 | 2 | 301 | 37.2% | 62.1% | R+24.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 17BPrecinct 17B | 19 | 262 | 1 | 282 | 6.7% | 92.9% | R+86.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 38Precinct 38 | 26 | 253 | 3 | 282 | 9.2% | 89.7% | R+80.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 27Precinct 27 | 20 | 259 | 1 | 280 | 7.1% | 92.5% | R+85.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 31Precinct 31 | 45 | 230 | 1 | 276 | 16.3% | 83.3% | R+67.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 9Precinct 9 | 61 | 138 | 0 | 199 | 30.7% | 69.3% | R+38.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 32Precinct 32 | 4 | 92 | 0 | 96 | 4.2% | 95.8% | R+91.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 10BPrecinct 10B | 43 | 52 | 0 | 95 | 45.3% | 54.7% | R+9.5 |
Presidential margin, 1904–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | +58.2% |
| 1908 | +69.0% |
| 1912 | +69.0% |
| 1916 | +72.3% |
| 1920 | +54.5% |
| 1924 | +81.0% |
| 1928 | +31.2% |
| 1932 | +89.0% |
| 1936 | +83.9% |
| 1940 | +82.5% |
| 1944 | +57.4% |
| 1948 | +53.3% |
| 1952 | +13.9% |
| 1956 | −4.9% |
| 1960 | +15.0% |
| 1964 | +21.7% |
| 1968 | +3.3% |
| 1972 | −39.1% |
| 1976 | +14.8% |
| 1980 | +1.2% |
| 1984 | −23.6% |
| 1988 | −7.9% |
| 1992 | +2.3% |
| 1996 | −1.7% |
| 2000 | −24.8% |
| 2004 | −34.0% |
| 2008 | −35.0% |
| 2012 | −43.9% |
| 2016 | −47.2% |
| 2020 | −46.0% |
| 2024 | −52.0% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 51,603 |
| 2018 | 51,641 |
| 2020 | 53,166 |
| 2022 | 54,088 |
| 2024 | 55,965 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+89 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,635 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $56,003 in average income, against $74,197 for residents who stayed — 25% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+30.2 on average — 22 points more Democratic-leaning than Angelina County, TX itself (R+52.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Nacogdoches County, TX203R+38.8
- Harris County, TX178D+5.5
- Polk County, TX78R+58.9
- Cherokee County, TX56R+62.7
- Montgomery County, TX51R+45.5
- Trinity County, TX45R+67.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Nacogdoches County, TX199
- Harris County, TX151
- Polk County, TX64
- Montgomery County, TX60
- Smith County, TX45
- Dallas County, TX35
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −6 |
| 2012 | −186 |
| 2013 | −507 |
| 2014 | −139 |
| 2015 | −94 |
| 2016 | −492 |
| 2017 | −372 |
| 2018 | −889 |
| 2019 | −173 |
| 2021 | +365 |
| 2022 | +482 |
| 2023 | +210 |
| 2024 | +77 |
| 2025 | +89 |
Angelina County, centered on Lufkin in East Texas's Piney Woods, has delivered lopsided Republican margins for over a decade, with the 2024 presidential race finishing R+52. The region's economy historically ties to timber, manufacturing, and healthcare.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 89.0 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 52.0 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 6.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 52.0 points.
A population of 87,275, a 58% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $60,960 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Cherokee County and Gregg County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Angelina County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48005/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.