- Lead
- 76
- Total
- 97
- vs nation
- R+76.9
- Turnout
- —
Loving County, TX
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
Vote totals, margins, and source status
- Lead
- 56
- Total
- 66
- vs nation
- R+89.3
- Turnout
- 73.6%
- Lead
- 54
- Total
- 65
- vs nation
- R+85.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 45
- Total
- 64
- vs nation
- R+74.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 55
- Total
- 79
- vs nation
- R+76.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 53
- Total
- 80
- vs nation
- R+63.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 95
- Total
- 156
- vs nation
- R+61.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 34
- Total
- 77
- vs nation
- R+52.7
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+78.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 332024 5-year
- Population density
- 0.05 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 669 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $51,2502024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 93.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 0.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+100.0 in 1908MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+84.8 in 2020MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Prairie County, MT · twin score 84.1
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2018 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2020 turnout
- 73.6%67 participants ÷ 91 CVAP
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67 | 91 ± 40 | 73.6% | Audited | A/D | |
| 2018Mid | 56 | 62 ± 31 | 90.3% | Audited | A/D |
| 64 | 85 | 75.3% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2018, 2020) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Loving County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Loving County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Show all 9 candidates
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 4 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
4 precincts · 97 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 1Precinct 1 | 8 | 23 | 1 | 32 | 25.0% | 71.9% | R+46.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 3Precinct 3 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 31 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 4Precinct 4 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 19 | 5.3% | 94.7% | R+89.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 2Precinct 2 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 15 | 6.7% | 93.3% | R+86.7 |
presidential history
Party record book
Loving County, TX · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1908–2024 · 27 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1908
100.0%
3 votes · D+100.0
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 87.0%
Republican
Donald Trump2020
90.9%
60 votes · R+84.8
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · 89.2%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
187votes
87.0% of the vote · D+74.4
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 118 votes
Republican
George W. Bush2000
124votes
79.5% of the vote · R+60.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 86 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1908
+109.6pts D vs U.S.
Place D+100.0 · U.S. R+9.6
Runner-up · John W. Davis, 1924 · +96.6 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+89.3pts R vs U.S.
Place R+84.8 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +85.2 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Loving County, TX. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 112 |
| 2020 | 111 |
| 2022 | 109 |
| 2024 | 128 |
Who moves in and out
Net domestic migration over time
+7 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +77 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +11 |
| 2012 | −9 |
| 2013 | +20 |
| 2014 | −17 |
| 2015 | +29 |
| 2016 | −4 |
| 2017 | +19 |
| 2018 | +10 |
| 2019 | +20 |
| 2021 | −4 |
| 2022 | −7 |
| 2023 | +1 |
| 2024 | +1 |
| 2025 | +7 |
Loving County's handful of registered voters — oil-patch workers and ranchers in a near-empty Permian Basin stretch — have delivered some of the most lopsided presidential margins in the country for over a decade.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 100.0 points in 1908 and a Republican high of 84.8 points in 2020. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 6.5 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 78.4 points.
A population of 33, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $51,250 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Prairie County and Eureka County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Loving County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48301/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.