- Lead
- 2,047
- Total
- 10,502
- vs nation
- R+18.0
- Turnout
- 64.2%
Jackson County, WI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 64.2% of 16,429 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 1,535
- Total
- 10,184
- vs nation
- R+19.5
- Turnout
- 64.7%
- Lead
- 1,088
- Total
- 9,267
- vs nation
- R+13.8
- Turnout
- 59.0%
- Lead
- 1,398
- Total
- 9,313
- vs nation
- D+11.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,020
- Total
- 9,251
- vs nation
- D+14.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 862
- Total
- 9,726
- vs nation
- D+11.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 710
- Total
- 8,417
- vs nation
- D+7.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,443
- Total
- 7,279
- vs nation
- D+11.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+19.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 20,9812024 5-year
- Population density
- 21 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 988 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $68,1102024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 85.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.9%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 3.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+33.0 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+76.3 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Worth County, IA · twin score 88.9
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 64.2%10,554 participants ÷ 16,429 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.0 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -0.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 49.2%–52.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,554 | 16,429 ± 129 | 64.2% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2022Mid | 8,067 | 16,232 ± 135 | 49.7% | Audited | B/A |
| 10,236 | 15,822 ± 113 | 64.7% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2018Mid | 8,083 | 15,744 ± 138 | 51.3% | Audited | B/A |
| 9,341 | 15,836 ± 131 | 59.0% | Audited | B/A | |
| 9,313 | 15,644 | 59.5% | Derived | — | |
| 9,251 | 15,189 | 60.9% | Derived | — | |
| 9,726 | 14,734 extrapolated | 66.0% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 310/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 305/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 300/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 296/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 292/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 32 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
32 precincts · 10,502 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -TOWN OF BROCKWAY WARDS 1-6TOWN OF BROCKWAY WARDS 1-6 | 520 | 416 | 14 | 950 | 54.7% | 43.8% | D+10.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -TOWN OF ADAMS WARDS 1-3TOWN OF ADAMS WARDS 1-3 | 351 | 541 | 7 | 899 | 39.0% | 60.2% | R+21.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ALBION WARDS 1-4TOWN OF ALBION WARDS 1-4 | 251 | 424 | 4 | 679 | 37.0% | 62.4% | R+25.5 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BLACK RIVER FALLS WARD 4CITY OF BLACK RIVER FALLS WARD 4 | 246 | 271 | 13 | 530 | 46.4% | 51.1% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BLACK RIVER FALLS WARD 1CITY OF BLACK RIVER FALLS WARD 1 | 246 | 235 | 5 | 486 | 50.6% | 48.4% | D+2.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MANCHESTER WARD 1TOWN OF MANCHESTER WARD 1 | 130 | 348 | 5 | 483 | 26.9% | 72.0% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BLACK RIVER FALLS WARD 2CITY OF BLACK RIVER FALLS WARD 2 | 245 | 221 | 5 | 471 | 52.0% | 46.9% | D+5.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GARFIELD WARDS 1-2TOWN OF GARFIELD WARDS 1-2 | 107 | 310 | 9 | 426 | 25.1% | 72.8% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF IRVING WARDS 1-3TOWN OF IRVING WARDS 1-3 | 146 | 259 | 7 | 412 | 35.4% | 62.9% | R+27.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF NORTHFIELD WARD 1TOWN OF NORTHFIELD WARD 1 | 114 | 255 | 2 | 371 | 30.7% | 68.7% | R+38.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ALMA WARDS 2-3TOWN OF ALMA WARDS 2-3 | 134 | 227 | 5 | 366 | 36.6% | 62.0% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HIXTON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF HIXTON WARDS 1-2 | 102 | 239 | 3 | 344 | 29.7% | 69.5% | R+39.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CLEVELAND WARD 1TOWN OF CLEVELAND WARD 1 | 88 | 208 | 8 | 304 | 28.9% | 68.4% | R+39.5 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF MELROSE WARD 1VILLAGE OF MELROSE WARD 1 | 119 | 166 | 9 | 294 | 40.5% | 56.5% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF NORTH BEND WARD 1TOWN OF NORTH BEND WARD 1 | 114 | 173 | 3 | 290 | 39.3% | 59.7% | R+20.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD WARDS 1-2TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD WARDS 1-2 | 106 | 168 | 5 | 279 | 38.0% | 60.2% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MELROSE WARD 1TOWN OF MELROSE WARD 1 | 81 | 187 | 2 | 270 | 30.0% | 69.3% | R+39.3 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF ALMA CENTER WARD 1VILLAGE OF ALMA CENTER WARD 1 | 131 | 129 | 4 | 264 | 49.6% | 48.9% | D+0.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GARDEN VALLEY WARD 1TOWN OF GARDEN VALLEY WARD 1 | 70 | 170 | 6 | 246 | 28.5% | 69.1% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BLACK RIVER FALLS WARD 3CITY OF BLACK RIVER FALLS WARD 3 | 124 | 118 | 3 | 245 | 50.6% | 48.2% | D+2.4 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF HIXTON WARD 1VILLAGE OF HIXTON WARD 1 | 109 | 133 | 3 | 245 | 44.5% | 54.3% | R+9.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF KNAPP WARD 1TOWN OF KNAPP WARD 1 | 56 | 149 | 4 | 209 | 26.8% | 71.3% | R+44.5 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF MERRILLAN WARD 1VILLAGE OF MERRILLAN WARD 1 | 76 | 115 | 5 | 196 | 38.8% | 58.7% | R+19.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF FRANKLIN WARD 1TOWN OF FRANKLIN WARD 1 | 70 | 112 | 3 | 185 | 37.8% | 60.5% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF TAYLOR WARD 1VILLAGE OF TAYLOR WARD 1 | 69 | 112 | 0 | 181 | 38.1% | 61.9% | R+23.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ALMA WARDS 1,4-5TOWN OF ALMA WARDS 1,4-5 | 53 | 121 | 0 | 174 | 30.5% | 69.5% | R+39.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CURRAN WARD 1TOWN OF CURRAN WARD 1 | 58 | 107 | 4 | 169 | 34.3% | 63.3% | R+29.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF KOMENSKY WARD 1TOWN OF KOMENSKY WARD 1 | 130 | 36 | 2 | 168 | 77.4% | 21.4% | D+56.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CITY POINT WARD 1TOWN OF CITY POINT WARD 1 | 50 | 83 | 1 | 134 | 37.3% | 61.9% | R+24.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MILLSTON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF MILLSTON WARDS 1-2 | 36 | 77 | 0 | 113 | 31.9% | 68.1% | R+36.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BEAR BLUFF WARD 1TOWN OF BEAR BLUFF WARD 1 | 11 | 73 | 0 | 84 | 13.1% | 86.9% | R+73.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF MERRILLAN WARD 2VILLAGE OF MERRILLAN WARD 2 | 14 | 21 | 0 | 35 | 40.0% | 60.0% | R+20.0 |
presidential history
Party record book
Jackson County, WI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
65.0%
4,537 votes · D+33.0
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 64.4%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
85.9%
3,652 votes · R+76.3
Runner-up · Theodore Roosevelt, 1904 · 82.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
5,572votes
60.2% of the vote · D+21.8
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 5,298 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
6,204votes
59.1% of the vote · R+19.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 5,791 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
+14.6pts D vs U.S.
Place D+21.8 · U.S. D+7.3
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · +13.1 pts
Republican
William McKinley1900
+51.0pts R vs U.S.
Place R+58.6 · U.S. R+7.5
Runner-up · Warren G. Harding, 1920 · +50.1 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Jackson County, WI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−7 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −200 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $54,989 in average income, against $63,917 for residents who stayed — 14% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+12.6 on average — 6.9 points more Democratic-leaning than Jackson County, WI itself (R+19.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Trempealeau County, WI68R+21.4
- La Crosse County, WI49D+9.4
- Monroe County, WI48R+26.0
- Eau Claire County, WI36D+10.6
- Clark County, WI25R+38.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Eau Claire County, WI51
- La Crosse County, WI48
- Trempealeau County, WI44
- Monroe County, WI42
- Clark County, WI25
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +15 |
| 2012 | −80 |
| 2013 | +43 |
| 2014 | −6 |
| 2015 | −105 |
| 2016 | −105 |
| 2017 | −16 |
| 2018 | −27 |
| 2019 | +109 |
| 2021 | −149 |
| 2022 | −14 |
| 2023 | +33 |
| 2024 | +109 |
| 2025 | −7 |
Jackson County sits at the intersection of rural white working-class voters and the Ho-Chunk Nation's tribal lands, producing a demographic mix that has shifted the presidential margin steadily rightward over the past decade, reaching R+19.5 in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 33.0 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 76.3 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 19.5 points.
A population of 20,981, a 85% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $68,110 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Worth County and Trempealeau County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Jackson County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55053/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.