Wyoming — 2008 Democratic presidential caucus
Akashic2008 · Democratic presidential caucusWyoming · Democratic primaryObama+23.6
Who led each county
Wyoming's 2008 Democratic caucus — 23 counties reporting. Each county links to its place page.
2008Democratic caucus leaderObamaClintoncolor = leader · depth = size of the lead
Counties with reported returns are filled by the candidate who led them; the surrounding faint geography is context, not coverage. This is the nominating contest — the November result is on the general-election page.
Statewide result
Wyoming 2008 Democratic presidential caucus — 8,753 votes, county returns aggregated statewide.
- Obama✓5,37861.4%
- Clinton3,31137.8%
- All others640.7%
Caucus figures follow the state party’s reported measure, which can be state-delegate equivalents rather than raw attendees — shares are the honest comparison.
County-by-county leaders — 23 counties
| County | Led by | Margin | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laramie County | Obama | +23.0 | 1,528 |
| Albany County | Obama | +49.0 | 1,308 |
| Teton County | Obama | +59.8 | 1,150 |
| Natrona County | Obama | +0.7 | 943 |
| Sweetwater County | Clinton | +14.8 | 596 |
| Fremont County | Obama | +16.9 | 592 |
| Sheridan County | Obama | +22.0 | 528 |
| Park County | Obama | +25.4 | 334 |
| Carbon County | Clinton | +5.1 | 217 |
| Goshen County | Clinton | +5.9 | 204 |
| Campbell County | Obama | +24.0 | 183 |
| Platte County | Clinton | +2.9 | 173 |
| Uinta County | Obama | +46.4 | 168 |
| Lincoln County | Obama | +20.9 | 134 |
| Converse County | Clinton | +18.9 | 122 |
| Johnson County | Obama | +24.5 | 98 |
| Washakie County | Obama | +18.4 | 98 |
| Big Horn County | Obama | +7.7 | 91 |
| Sublette County | Obama | +26.9 | 78 |
| Weston County | Clinton | +17.6 | 68 |
| Crook County | Obama | +0.0 | 62 |
| Hot Springs County | Obama | +15.5 | 58 |
| Niobrara County | Obama | +0.0 | 20 |
Source. Official statewide canvasses — 2008 Democratic presidential caucus returns · county returns aggregated statewide. Coverage is the nominating contest as reported by the state party; margins are the leader’s edge over the runner-up. Real returns — nothing estimated.