Wyoming — 2016 Democratic presidential caucus
Akashic2016 · Democratic presidential caucusWyoming · Democratic primarySanders+13.6
Who led each county
Wyoming's 2016 Democratic caucus — 23 counties reporting. Each county links to its place page.
2016Democratic caucus leaderSandersClintoncolor = leader · depth = size of the lead
Counties with reported returns are filled by the candidate who led them; the surrounding faint geography is context, not coverage. This is the nominating contest — the November result is on the general-election page.
Statewide result
Wyoming 2016 Democratic presidential caucus — 7,265 votes, county returns aggregated statewide.
- Sanders✓4,12256.7%
- Clinton3,13143.1%
- All others120.2%
Caucus figures follow the state party’s reported measure, which can be state-delegate equivalents rather than raw attendees — shares are the honest comparison.
County-by-county leaders — 23 counties
| County | Led by | Margin | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laramie County | Clinton | +3.0 | 1,420 |
| Albany County | Sanders | +49.2 | 1,249 |
| Teton County | Sanders | +23.6 | 953 |
| Natrona County | Clinton | +2.6 | 756 |
| Sweetwater County | Sanders | +7.2 | 474 |
| Fremont County | Clinton | +2.2 | 456 |
| Sheridan County | Clinton | +6.6 | 381 |
| Park County | Sanders | +23.0 | 252 |
| Uinta County | Sanders | +19.3 | 181 |
| Campbell County | Sanders | +34.3 | 143 |
| Carbon County | Clinton | +19.1 | 126 |
| Sublette County | Sanders | +34.4 | 125 |
| Goshen County | Clinton | +6.6 | 122 |
| Lincoln County | Sanders | +6.4 | 109 |
| Johnson County | Sanders | +14.3 | 91 |
| Converse County | Sanders | +8.9 | 79 |
| Big Horn County | Sanders | +9.1 | 77 |
| Platte County | Sanders | +21.9 | 64 |
| Crook County | Clinton | +12.1 | 58 |
| Washakie County | Clinton | +22.2 | 54 |
| Hot Springs County | Sanders | +40.9 | 44 |
| Weston County | Sanders | +2.9 | 34 |
| Niobrara County | Sanders | +76.5 | 17 |
Source. Official statewide canvasses — 2016 Democratic presidential caucus returns · county returns aggregated statewide. Coverage is the nominating contest as reported by the state party; margins are the leader’s edge over the runner-up. Real returns — nothing estimated.